We Keep Coding

Linq select where has at least one entry in another table

I have the following structure that I wan't to query using Linq, specifically Linq to Entities (Enitity Framework).
Table1: RouteMeta
Table2: SitePage
Multiple SitePages can link to the same RouteMeta.
I'm querying the Route Meta to select a number of rows. I'm using a generic repository, currently like this:
return r.Find().ToList();
There's nothing special about it - the Find method accepts an optional linq expression, so I could do something like this:
return r.Find(x => x.Status=1).ToList();
However, what I actually want to do is to select rows from RouteMeta where at least one linked row exists in SitePages with a property IsPublished = true.
return r.Find(x => x.SitePages("where y => y.IsPublished = true");
Obviously, the above isn't correct, I'm just trying to explain the scenario better.
Any advice appreciated.

try something like
return r.Find(x=>x.Sitepages.Any(y=>y.Published))?
I'd also suggesting using a profiler if possible to check that this translates properly into SQL. It probably should do but it depends on how your repository works.

Querying across relationships with LINQ to Entity Framework

Here is what my model looks like:
I'm trying to get the count of distinct Assesors by a certain EventId.
Here's the code I'm trying to use:
var x = db.Assessors.Select(a => (a.Assessments.Select(y => y.EventFacility.EventId == 138))).Count();
Unfortunately, I must be coding this wrong because instead of getting the expected result (a count of 9, in this case) I'm getting the wrong result: 35.
I'm wondering if someone can take a look at my LINQ statement and tell me what I'm doing wrong?

You need to use Where and Any like this:
var result = db.Assessors
.Where(a => a.Assessments.Any(y => y.EventFacility.EventId == 138));
What this is saying is that you want all Assessors that are parents of any Assessment that is related to that particular Event.

You're going about this backward, start from what you know (the event since you have it's ID) and navigate to what you want through the navigation properties.
It's impossible to tell from your schema as it includes neither the properties nor the mapping type 1:1? 1:N? Can't know from simple lines
It would probably look Something like this
var x = db.Events
.Where(ev=>ev.Id == 138)
.SelectMany(ev=>ev.EventFacilities) //(i'm assumine possibly multiple and not 1 per event, once again schema doesn't show it, if it's not the case change SelectMany to Select)
.SelectMany(ef=>ef.Assesments) // Same assumption as above
.Select(as=>as.Assessor) // Asuming otherwise here, if wrong change Select to SelectMany
.Distinct(); // Ignore duplicate assessors
Note that your question is impossible to answer as is, this is a best effort but if you want help you should give "all" the information required, not strip out what doesn't immediately seem relevant, it would've been much easier if you took an actual screenshot of your entity diagram instead of what you made up.

Linq Take on Include?

I have a query with a lot of includes, and I'm wondering if I can do Takes on some of the includes.
For example, here's one of my queries, with the (illegal) Take illustrating what I want to do.
var primaryLocation = context.Locations
.Include("PhoneNumbers")
.Include("Invoices").Take(50)
.Include("Invoices.Items")
.Include("Schedules")
.Include("Staffs")
.SingleOrDefault(d => d.Id == locationId);
Currently the only way I can think to do it would be like so:
var primaryLocation = context.Locations
.Include("Invoices")
.Include("Etc")
.SingleOrDefault(d => d.Id == locationId);
primaryLocation.Invoices = primaryLocation.Invoices.Take(50).ToList();
I'd prefer not doing it that way, since means pulling back the entire Invoice list from the database, which I don't need.
Is there a handy way to build the Take into my query?

Seems like have two conflicting criteria for what you're doing. I'm guessing here, but you didn't leave us all that much to go on.
Since your primaryLocation.Invoices = primaryLocation.Invoices.Take(50).ToList(); statement only makes use of 1 of your includes, I'm assuming you're doing more things with your primaryLocation than what you've shown us. This leads me to believe that you want that primaryLocation to include all of the stuff. And then you seem not to want more than those 50, so that's not all of the stuff after all then... To me this is a contradiction. If you require all, you should include it all.
If you want your 50 invoices selection specifically you could get those separately in its own query. I use NHibernate myself, so I'm not sure of the syntax for future's in Entity framework, but if you want to ask for multiple things with only 1 round-trip to the server, in NHibernate you can make a series of queries into futures to allow this. I expect Entity framework has something similar.
In short, what I'm suggesting is that if you want primaryLocation to include all of your data, then that's what you'll get, and if you're after more specific information with filters like Take, then you might want to query more specifically.

Use projection instead of blindly calling Include if you don't want everything:
var primaryLocation = context.Locations
.Select(location => new {
Id = location.Id,
Name = location.Name,
// ... other properties needed on the front end
RecentInvoices = location.Invoices
// really should sort if you're only taking 50
.OrderByDescending(invoice => invoice.CreatedAt)
.Take(50),
AllPhoneNumbers = location.PhoneNumbers,
})
.SingleOrDefault(location => location.Id == locationId);
You could use projection to get just the invoice information you need too, I just didn't want to over-complicate the example.
Using this method you get exactly the data you want without adding confusion. It also allows you to name your properties (such as RecentInvoices above) to add more meaning.

Dynamically adding select fields using LINQ lambda

Lets say we have an expression:
var prices = from p in PriceDB.Prices
where p.TypeID == 12
orderby p.PriceType.Title
select p;
Is it possible to modify the select list?
I imagine it looking something like this:
var newPriceList = prices.Select( p => p.ExchangeRate );
This may be an odd request, but in my code (which is too long and complex to post here) I want to conditionally add fields to be output depending on a CheckBoxList.
I assume, of course, that I'm trying to go about this the wrong way...

I imagine it looking something like this:
Actually it would look exactly like that. First, build a query, selecting the entire record. Then add a select (using the Select() method seem the easiest way) to limit the selection. Linq-to-Sql will sort out the two selects, and use the proper reselt, so theres just one select in the final SQL.
There's no really good way to choose between multiple selects. I would probably use a switch/case.

While you could go down the dynamic route, I would strongly consider not doing so. What is the cost of fetching the extra values if you don't need them, in your particular case? Is the problem that they're being displayed dynamically and you only want them displayed in certain cases? If so, I'd suggest modifying the display code somehow.
It's hard to stay strongly typed (which has various advantages) while being dynamic in terms of what you fetch. Of course, if you always want to fetch the same "shape" of data (e.g. always just a decimal value from each row) then that's reasonably easy - let me know if that's something you'd like to see demonstrated.
If you could tell us more about your problem, we may be able to suggest alternative solutions.

If I understood you correct this is explaining how to build dynamic queries:
http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2008/01/07/dynamic-linq-part-1-using-the-linq-dynamic-query-library.aspx

You might want to look at this Dynamic LINQ and Dynamic Lambda expressions?
Or the Dynamic Expression API (System.Linq.Dynamic).

Linq2Entities, many to many and dynamic where clause

I'm fairly new to Linq and struggling using dynamic where over a many to many relationship.
Database tables are like so:
Products <-> Products_SubCategories <-> SubCategories
with Products_SubCategories being a link table.
My full linq statement is
db.Products.Where("it.SubCategories.SubCategoryID = 2")
.Include("SubCategories")
.OrderBy(searchOrderBy)
.Skip(currentPage * pageSize)
.Take(pageSize)
.ToList()
.ForEach(p => AddResultItem(items, p));
So ignoring everything bar the Where() I'm just trying to pull out all products which are linked to sub category ID 2, this fails with
To extract properties out of collections, you must use a sub-query to iterate over the collection., near multipart identifier, line 8, column 1.
I think using the SQL-esque syntax I can do a subquery as per this link. However I'm not sure how to do that in the lambda / chaining syntax.
This is the start of a search function and I would like to build up the where string dynamically, as I have with the searchOrderBy string to avoid a large SELECT CASE. Products is linked to another table via a link table that I will need to include once I understand how to do this example.
Any help would be much appreciated!
Thanks

This is wrong:
db.Products.Where("it.SubCategories.SubCategoryID = 2")
SubCategories is a list. It does not have a property called SubCategoryID. Rather, it contains a group of entities which each have a property called SubCategoryID. That's a critical distinction.
When you run into a situation where you don't know how to proceed in there are multiple problems, it is good to break the problem down into several, smaller problems.
Let's start by removing the dynamic query. It will be easier to solve the problem with a non-dynamic query. Once you've done that, you can go back and make it dynamic again.
So start by using the non-dynamic syntax. Type something like this in Visual Studio, and see what IntelliSense does for you:
db.Products.Where(p => p.SubCategories.
You will quickly see that there is no SubCategoryID property. Instead, you will see a bunch of LINQ API methods for working with lists. If you know LINQ well, you will recognize that the Any() method is what you want here:
db.Products.Where(p => p.SubCategories.Any(sc => sc.SubCategoryID == 2))
Go ahead and run that query. Does it work? If so, you can move ahead to making it dynamic. I'm no ESQL expert, but I'd start with something along the lines of:
db.Products.Where("EXISTS(SELECT SC FROM it.SubCategories AS SC WHERE SC.SubCategoryID = 2");
As an aside, I use MS Dynamic Query ("Dynamic LINQ") for this sort of thing rather than Query Builder, as it's more testable.

It worked for me.
db.Products.Where("SubCategories.Any(SubCategoryID = 2)")