We Keep Coding

How user event can be triggered in class?

I am trying to use my own events in several classes.
I've seen similar questions. But i need a clear, correct example, like in ABC-book.
class Class2
{
public bool Do_Some_thing()
{
bool there_is_no_errors=false;
if (there_is_no_errors)
trigger_User_event();
return true;
}
}
How this should be realized? Creating a new class or just in main code i can create obj-event and give it my class2?
public delegate void TriggerMyEvent(string message);
public event TriggerMyEvent MyEvent;

Events are declared and generated in a class and are associated with the event handler by using a delegate in the same class or in another class.
The class containing the event is used to publish the event. This is called the publisher class. Other classes that accept this event are called subscriber classes.
To declare an event inside a class, you must first declare the its delegate type. Then, declare the event using keyword event.
Here is a simple demo about how to subscribe to an event.
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
EventTest e = new EventTest(); /* Instantiate the object, without triggering event */
subscribEvent v = new subscribEvent(); /* Instantiate object */
e.ChangeNum += new EventTest.NumManipulationHandler(v.printf); /* subscribe the event */
e.SetValue(7);
e.SetValue(11);
}
}
public class EventTest
{
private int value;
public delegate void NumManipulationHandler();
public event NumManipulationHandler ChangeNum;
protected virtual void OnNumChanged()
{
if (ChangeNum != null)
{
ChangeNum(); /* Trigger the event */
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("event not fire");
Console.ReadKey(); /* Press enter to continue */
}
}
public EventTest()
{
int n = 5;
SetValue(n);
}
public void SetValue(int n)
{
if (value != n)
{
value = n;
OnNumChanged();
}
}
}
// Subscriber class
public class subscribEvent
{
public void printf()
{
Console.WriteLine("event fire");
Console.ReadKey(); /* Press enter to continue */
}
}

raising events using event Action<T>

I'm used to using delegate EventHandler for event callbacks but now I'm attempting to use event Action for invoking events. I couldn't find much info on how this can be used properly anywhere so I'm hoping someone can point me in the right direction.
I have an Action event handler that handles string objects. In my subscriber class I have public event Action<string> UploadProgress;. The event handler is invoked like this:
UploadProgress.Invoke(string.Format("sending file data {0:0.000}%", (bytesSoFar * 100.0f) / totalToUpload));
The listener class is subscribed to this event as below:
uploadFile.UploadProgress += uploadFile_UploadProgress;
void uploadFile_UploadProgress(string obj)
{
var prog = obj;
}
When the event is invoked, I get System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. I'm not sure what I need to change in the subscriber class to avoid this error. Can someone tell me the proper way to use event Action or provide me the link to where I can read up on it? I know how to use the normal Action but confused about declaring it as an event. Any help is appreciated.

This way is much better, send bytesToUpload and totalToUpload through event, instead of the whole Action (right sample):
internal class Program
{
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
SomeClass someClass = new SomeClass();
someClass.UploadProgress += SomeClass_UploadProgress;
someClass.DoSomeUpload();
}
private static void SomeClass_UploadProgress(object sender, UploadEventArgs e)
{
string s = string.Format("sending file data {0:0.000}%", (e.BytesSoFar * 100.0f) / e.TotalToUpload);
Console.WriteLine(s);
}
}
public class UploadEventArgs : EventArgs
{
public float BytesSoFar { get; set; }
public float TotalToUpload { get; set; }
}
public class SomeClass
{
public event EventHandler<UploadEventArgs> UploadProgress;
public void DoSomeUpload()
{
if (UploadProgress != null)
{
UploadEventArgs e = new UploadEventArgs();
e.BytesSoFar = 123f;
e.TotalToUpload = 100000f;
UploadProgress.Invoke(this, e);
}
}
}

Why is a "forwarded" event not raised when assigning a method group but is when assigning a delegate?

Given the following code:
public delegate void Signal();
public static class SignalExtensions
{
public static void SafeInvoke(this Signal signal)
{
Signal copy = signal;
if (copy != null)
{
copy();
}
}
}
public class RootEventSource
{
public event Signal RootEvent;
public void Raise()
{
this.RootEvent.SafeInvoke();
}
}
public class EventForwarder
{
private readonly RootEventSource rootEventSource;
public EventForwarder(RootEventSource rootEventSource)
{
this.rootEventSource = rootEventSource;
// this is the critical part
this.rootEventSource.RootEvent
+= () => this.AnotherEvent.SafeInvoke();
}
public event Signal AnotherEvent;
// just an example of another method which is using the root event source
public override string ToString()
{
return this.rootEventSource.ToString();
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var rootEventSource = new RootEventSource();
var eventForwarder = new EventForwarder(rootEventSource);
eventForwarder.AnotherEvent += HandleAnotherEvent;
rootEventSource.Raise();
Console.WriteLine("done");
Console.ReadKey();
}
private static void HandleAnotherEvent()
{
Console.WriteLine("received AnotherEvent");
}
}
This results in the output:
received AnotherEvent
done
Now I make a slight change to the implementation of EventForwarder to use a method group for forwarding the event:
public EventForwarder(RootEventSource rootEventSource)
{
this.rootEventSource = rootEventSource;
this.rootEventSource.RootEvent += this.AnotherEvent.SafeInvoke;
}
The output becomes:
done
So AnotherEvent is not raised.
Until now i would have considered the two lines:
this.rootEventSource.RootEvent += this.AnotherEvent.SafeInvoke;
this.rootEventSource.RootEvent += () => this.AnotherEvent.SafeInvoke();
as being equivalent. It seems they're not.
So what is the difference? Plus why is the event not being raised?
PS: while usually R# suggests to replace () => this.AnotherEvent.SafeInvoke(); by this.AnotherEvent.SafeInvoke it doesn't do so here. So apparently it knows that it should not do it here.

When you assign a method group to event like this:
this.rootEventSource.RootEvent += this.AnotherEvent.SafeInvoke;
you in fact create a delegate from method SignalExtensions.SafeInvoke which as a parameter takes your this.AnotherEventdelegate object. Since it is initially null, you create a delegate with null parameter. This null value will of course never change, since delegates are immutable.
If you want to forward an event you should maybe do it like this:
public class EventForwarder
{
private readonly RootEventSource rootEventSource;
public EventForwarder(RootEventSource rootEventSource)
{
this.rootEventSource = rootEventSource;
}
public event Signal AnotherEvent
{
add { this.rootEventSource.RootEvent += value; }
remove { this.rootEventSource.RootEvent -= value; }
}
}

C# delegate v.s. EventHandler

I want to send an alert message to any subscribers when a trap occurred.
The code I created works fine using a delegate method myDelegate del.
My questions are:
I want to know whether it's better to use EventHandler instead of a delegate?
I'm not sure what the differences are between a delegate and an EventHandler in my case.
notify(trapinfo t), that's what I've done here to get trap information. But it seems not to be a good idea. I read some online tutorial lesson introducing passing delegate object; I'm wondering if it's appropriate in my case? And how should I do it? Any suggestions?
Thanks a lot :)
My code:
public class trapinfo
{
public string info;
public string ip;
public string cause;
}
public class trap
{
public delegate void myDelegate(trapinfo t);
public myDelegate del;
trapinfo info = new trapinfo();
public void run()
{
//While(true)
// If a trap occurred, notify the subscriber
for (; ; )
{
Thread.Sleep(500);
foreach (myDelegate d in del.GetInvocationList())
{
info.cause = "Shut Down";
info.ip = "192.168.0.1";
info.info = "Test";
d.Invoke(info);
}
}
}
}
public class machine
{
private int _occuredtime=0;
public trapinfo info = new trapinfo();
public void notify(trapinfo t)
{
++_occuredtime;
info.cause = t.cause;
info.info = t.info;
info.ip = t.ip;
getInfo();
}
public void subscribe(trap t)
{
t.del += new trap.myDelegate(notify);
}
public void getInfo()
{
Console.WriteLine("<Alert>: cauese/{0}, info/ {1}, ip/{2}, time/{3}",
info.cause, info.info, info.ip,_occuredtime);
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
trap t = new trap();
machine machineA = new machine();
machineA.subscribe(t);
t.run();
}
}
Update 2013-08-12
How about the observer/observable design pattern, that looks great in my case (EventHandler).
In my case, a machine subscribes to a trap messenger. (Add a machine to an invocation list)
Once a trap occurred, I send a message to all machines which are subscribed. (Call HandleEvent to handle it)
Advantages:
don't care about GetInvocationList() anymore, just use (+=) and (-=) to decide whom to send the trap.
It's easier to understand the logic of my program.
I know there are several ways to do it, but I wish I could analyze its pros and cons.
And thanks for your comments and suggestions, that would be very helpful!
I read the MSDN EventArgs article which Matthew Watson suggested.
Here's my Event Version:
public class TrapInfoEventArgs : EventArgs
{
public int info { get; set; }
public string ip { get; set; }
public string cause { get; set; }
}
public class trap
{
public event EventHandler<TrapInfoEventArgs> TrapOccurred;
protected virtual void OnTrapOccurred(TrapInfoEventArgs e)
{
EventHandler<TrapInfoEventArgs> handler = TrapOccurred;
if (handler != null)
{
handler(this, e);
}
}
public void run()
{
//While(true)
// If a trap occurred, notify the subscriber
for (; ; )
{
Thread.Sleep(500);
TrapInfoEventArgs args = new TrapInfoEventArgs();
args.cause = "Shut Down";
OnTrapOccurred(args);
}
}
}
public class machine
{
public void c_TrapOccurred(object sender, TrapInfoEventArgs e)
{
Console.WriteLine("<Alert>: cauese/{0}, info/ {1}, ip/{2}, time/{3}",
e.cause, e.info, e.ip, DateTime.Now.ToString());
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
trap t = new trap();
machine machineA = new machine();
t.TrapOccurred += machineA.c_TrapOccurred; //notify machine A
t.run();
}
}

The difference between event and delegate is that:
event declaration adds a layer of protection on the delegate instance.
This protection prevents clients of the delegate from resetting the
delegate and its invocation list, and only allows adding or removing
targets from the invocation list
See What are the differences between delegates and events?
2) As I see it, your subscriber should not change delegates freely. One subscriber can assign = to it instead of adding +=. This will assign a new delegate, therefore, the previous delegate with its invocation list will be lost and previous subscribers will not be called anymore. So you should use Event for sure. Or you can change your code to make your delegate private and write additional functions for manipulating it to define your own event behavior.
//preventing direct assignment
private myDelegate del ;
public void AddCallback(myDelegate m){
del += m;
}
public void RemoveCallback(myDelegate m){
del -= m;
}
//or
public static trap operator +(trap x,myDelegate m){
x.AddCallback(m);
return x;
}
public static trap operator -(trap x, myDelegate m)
{
x.RemoveCallback(m);
return x;
}
//usage
//t.AddCallback(new trap.myDelegate(notify));
t+=new trap.myDelegate(notify);

It is much better to use an event for your example.
An event is understood by the Visual Studio Form and WPF designers, so you can use the IDE to subscribe to events.
When raising events, there is no need for you to write your own foreach handling to iterate through them.
events are the way that most programmers will expect this functionality to be accessed.
If you use a delegate, the consuming code can mess around with it in ways that you will want to prevent (such as resetting its invocation list). events do not allow that to happen.
As for your second question: Using an event you would create a class derived from EventArgs to hold the data, and pass that to the event when you raise it. The consumer will then have access to it.
See here for details: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.eventargs.aspx

How can I bubble events from the Repository through the Service up to the UI?

I have a repository that uses components that report events.
I want to show the reported events in the front end.
This is the repository:
public interface IXmlRepository
{
//irrelevant stuff removed
event EventHandler TraceEventHandler;
}
public class XmlPanelRepository : IXmlRepository
{
public XmlPanelRepository()
{
public event EventHandler TraceEventHandler;
var panelCom = new PanelCom(); // this is a COM object that connects to a device
// when something happens in the COM object it reports it.
panelCom.Trace += panelCom_Trace;
// I want to bubble the trace events up to my UI.
TraceEventHandler += TraceEventHandler_Tracing;
}
private void TraceEventHandler_Tracing(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// what do I do here?
}
void panelCom_Trace(string message)
{
if (TraceEventHandler!= null) TraceEventHandler.Invoke(this, new EventArgs());
}
}
My UI uses a Service to interface with the repository. The service is defined as:
public interface IXmlConfigurationService
{
//irrelevant stuff removed
event EventHandler TraceEventHandler;
}
public class XmlConfigurationService : IXmlConfigurationService
{
public event EventHandler TraceEventHandler;
public XmlConfigurationService(IXmlRepository configurationRepository)
{
_configurationRepository.TraceEventHandler += ConfigurationRepository_TraceEventHandler;
}
void ConfigurationRepository_TraceEventHandler(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// this never gets hit.
if (TraceEventHandler != null) TraceEventHandler.Invoke(sender, e);
}
}
If I can get this working, I presume I can follow the same steps to get the UI displaying event reports.
How can I get the Service to report the events that are occurring in the repository?

If I understand correctly, you would need to fulfil your event. This is akin to the Observable fulfilling all listening observers in the Observer Pattern. But for events written like this:
public XmlPanelRepository()
{
public event EventHandler TraceEventHandler;
var panelCom = new PanelCom(); // this is a COM object that connects to a device
// when something happens in the COM object it reports it.
panelCom.Trace += panelCom_Trace;
// I want to bubble the trace events up to my UI.
TraceEventHandler += TraceEventHandler_Tracing;
}
private void TraceEventHandler_Tracing(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (TraceEventHandler != null)
{
TraceEventHandler(this, e);
}
}
However, perhaps you should name the event something other than TraceEventHandler because you are now exposing an event (which usually is expressed in the past tense).
It is also worth noting that you can potentially change the event args as you bubble up (if you want to). EventHandler(TEventArgs) can help with this.

You're forgetting to use delegates...
Try something like this:
public interface IXmlRepository
{
//irrelevant stuff removed
event EventHandler TraceEventHandler;
}
public class XmlPanelRepository : IXmlRepository
{
public delegate void EventHandler(string parameter1, string parameter2);
public event EventHandler TraceEventHandler;
public XmlPanelRepository()
{
var panelCom = new PanelCom(); // this is a COM object that connects to a device
// when something happens in the COM object it reports it.
panelCom.Trace += panelCom_Trace;
}
void panelCom_Trace(string message)
{
if (EventHandler != null)
EventHandler("Event was hit, here's the message:", message);
}
}
public interface IXmlConfigurationService
{
//irrelevant stuff removed
}
public class XmlConfigurationService : IXmlConfigurationService
{
public XmlConfigurationService(IXmlRepository configurationRepository)
{
_configurationRepository.TraceEventHandler += ConfigurationRepository_EventHandler;
}
void ConfigurationRepository_EventHandler(string parameter1, string parameter2);)
{
// Do something with your parameters.
Response.Write(parameter1 + parameter2);
}
}