WPF MVVM Pagination - c#

I have a user control for pagination view, it has its own viewmodel. I added the pagination in a page with a datagrid that also has a separate viewmodel.
My question is how can I update the ObservableCollection I have in my page viewmodel every time a command is done in my pagination viewmodel?
Here's my PagingControl.xaml
<StackPanel Width="Auto"
Orientation="Horizontal">
<Button
Margin="4,0"
Content="<<"
Command="{Binding FirstCommand}"/>
<Button
Margin="4,0"
Content="<"
Command="{Binding PreviousCommand}"/>
<StackPanel
VerticalAlignment="Center"
Orientation="Horizontal">
<TextBlock
Text="{Binding Start}"/>
<TextBlock
Text=" to "/>
<TextBlock
Text="{Binding End}"/>
<TextBlock
Text=" of "/>
<TextBlock
Text="{Binding TotalItems}"/>
</StackPanel>
<Button
Margin="4,0"
Content=">"
Command="{Binding NextCommand}"/>
<Button
Margin="4,0"
Content=">>"
Command="{Binding LastCommand}"/>
<ComboBox Width="100" ItemsSource="{Binding ItemsPerPage}" SelectedValue="{Binding ItemCount}">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger EventName="SelectionChanged">
<i:InvokeCommandAction Command="{Binding CountChangedCommand}"/>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</ComboBox>
</StackPanel>
PagingViewModel.cs
public class PagingViewModel : ViewModelBase
{
private ObservableCollection<DataModel> _data;
private int start = 0;
private int itemCount = 10;
private int totalItems = 0;
private readonly List<int> count;
private ICommand _firstCommand;
private ICommand _previousCommand;
private ICommand _nextCommand;
private ICommand _lastCommand;
private ICommand _countchangedCommand;
public ObservableCollection<DataModel> Data
{
get { return _data; }
set
{
if (_data!= value)
{
_data= value;
OnPropertyChanged("Data");
}
}
}
public PagingViewModel()
{
count = new List<int> { 10, 20, 30};
RefreshData();
}
public int Start { get { return start + 1; } }
public int End { get { return start + itemCount < totalItems ? start + itemCount : totalItems; } }
public int TotalItems { get { return totalItems; } }
public List<int> Count { get { return count; } }
public int ItemCount { get { return itemCount; } set { itemCount = value; OnPropertyChanged("ItemCount"); } }
public ICommand FirstCommand
{
get
{
if (_firstCommand == null)
{
_firstCommand = new RelayCommand
(
param =>
{
start = 0;
RefreshData();
},
param =>
{
return start - itemCount >= 0 ? true : false;
}
);
}
return _firstCommand;
}
}
public ICommand PreviousCommand
{
get
{
if (_previousCommand == null)
{
_previousCommand = new RelayCommand
(
param =>
{
start -= itemCount;
RefreshData();
},
param =>
{
return start - itemCount >= 0 ? true : false;
}
);
}
return _previousCommand;
}
}
public ICommand NextCommand
{
get
{
if (_nextCommand == null)
{
_nextCommand = new RelayCommand
(
param =>
{
start += itemCount;
RefreshData();
},
param =>
{
return start + itemCount < totalItems ? true : false;
}
);
}
return _nextCommand;
}
}
public ICommand LastCommand
{
get
{
if (_lastCommand == null)
{
_lastCommand = new RelayCommand
(
param =>
{
start = (totalItems / itemCount - 1) * itemCount;
start += totalItems % itemCount == 0 ? 0 : itemCount;
RefreshData();
},
param =>
{
return start + itemCount < totalItems ? true : false;
}
);
}
return _lastCommand;
}
}
public ICommand CountChangedCommand
{
get
{
if (_countchangedCommand == null)
{
_countchangedCommand = new RelayCommand
(
param =>
{
start = 0;
RefreshData();
},
param =>
{
return ((totalItems - itemCount) > -10) ? true : false;
}
);
}
return _countchangedCommand;
}
}
public void RefreshData()
{
_data= GetData(start, itemCount, out totalItems);
DataViewModel vm = new DataViewModel(this);
OnPropertyChanged("Start");
OnPropertyChanged("End");
OnPropertyChanged("TotalItems");
}
}
And here's the viewmodel for my Page: DataViewModel.cs
public class DataViewModel: ViewModelBase
{
private ObservableCollection<DataModel> _data;
public ObservableCollection<DataModel> Data
{
get { return _data; }
set
{
if (_data!= value)
{
_data= value;
OnPropertyChanged("Data");
}
}
}
public DataViewModel(PagingViewModel pagevm)
{
_data = new ObservableCollection<DataModel>();
_data= pagevm.Data;
}
}
My Data property is bound to an ItemSource of a DataGrid in DataView.xaml with DataContext set to DataViewModel.

That's a nicely detailled question !
For your refresh problems i see a few options :
When setting your Data in RefreshData you should use the public setter of the property and not _data. If you don't you will never use the OnPropertyChanged to notify the view that your whole collection changed.
So you need to replace :
_data= GetData(start, itemCount, out totalItems);
With :
Data= GetData(start, itemCount, out totalItems);
By the way your DataViewModel makes no sense to me. Your _audits field is nowhere to be seen and the ObservableCollection Data is never set in this ViewModel. I belive your problem must come from this.
PS :
On the other hand i have some advices not directly related to your question:
First of all, when you want to to check if some RelayCommand or else is null before setting it you may want to use the ?? operator : https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/en-en/library/ms173224.aspx.
Secondly i highly recommand you to put your RelayCommands behaviours in methods. When you end up with dozen of commands it's a real mess to maintain RelayCommand where everything happens in lambdas.
This way you will replace this:
public ICommand NextCommand
{
get
{
if (_nextCommand == null)
{
_nextCommand = new RelayCommand
(
param =>
{
start += itemCount;
RefreshData();
},
param =>
{
return start + itemCount < totalItems ? true : false;
}
);
}
return _nextCommand;
}
}
With this :
public ICommand NextCommand
{
get
{
return _nextCommand = _nextCommand ?? new RelayCommand(Next, CanExecuteNext);
}
}
private void Next()
{
start += itemCount;
RefreshData();
}
private bool CanExecuteNext()
{
return start + itemCount < totalItems ? true : false;
}

It sounds like your commands need to be able to access your page view model. For them to do this your paging viewModel would need to hold a reference to the page viewModel (so that your paging viewModel could pass this to the relevant command).
I suggest using property injection. In your PagingViewModel add a property like this;
public AuditTrailViewModel AuditTrailViewModel { get; set; }
(Give the property change notification if you need to).
In your commands you would now be able to access the properties of the AuditTrailViewModel
public ICommand LastCommand
{
get
{
if (_lastCommand == null)
{
_lastCommand = new RelayCommand
(
param =>
{
start = (totalItems / itemCount - 1) * itemCount;
start += totalItems % itemCount == 0 ? 0 : itemCount;
AuditTrailViewModel.Data = //Now you can update your viewModel
RefreshData();
},
param =>
{
return start + itemCount < totalItems ? true : false;
}
);
}
return _lastCommand;
}
}

Related

Binding Radio Button IsChecked to object's current array of element's state

I am developing a small utility using C#/WPF/MVVM which would allow to set the input state of a controller we are using for testing. The communication between the app I am developing and the hardware/our web service communication to the hardware is only one way, meaning that the app will only be able to set the state of the inputs, but not get the states.
Another point to mention is that some types are already defined for this in some other parts of our solution, which are all in F#. To do my app, I am currently using C#. So I did a Unit class to wrap around the LocalControllerTypes.LocalController type defined in F#, containing a lot of needed information.
In order to do that, I have an enum enumerating the InputState possible (currently there is Active or Normal, but that list could potentially grow with time). Also, the number of inputs present on each unit type is different (some have 2, some have 4, some have more), so I have an ItemControl binded on the selected unit's array of Inputs, which unfortunately only contains the Name of the input which I have to display. The unit has 2 other properties related to the inputs it has, InputWriters, which is an array of a type which is used to send the command to the hardware/web service communicating with that hardware, and InputStates, which is an array of InputState for each input it has, as last set in the app (since we can't get the state from the hardware).
Now I would like to bind the IsChecked property of the radio buttons (which is what I define as ItemTemplate of the ItemsControl) to the InputState of the currently SelectedUnit (in my ViewModel). The problem I am having, is that I would somehow need to know the radio button is for which index of the SelectedUnit's Inputs array, in order to get the item at the same index for the SelectedUnit's InputStates property.
Is there any way to achieve this?
MainWindow.xaml:
...
<ItemsControl Grid.Row="1" ItemsSource="{Binding SelectedUnit.LocalControllerInfo.Inputs}">
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<TextBlock Margin="10" FontSize="15" Style="{StaticResource TextBlockNormalBase}" Text="{Binding InputName}"/>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<RadioButton Margin="10" Foreground="White" Content="Normal"
IsChecked="{Binding Path=?,
Converter={StaticResource inputToBoolConverter},
ConverterParameter=?}"/>
<RadioButton Margin="10" Foreground="White" Content="Active"
IsChecked="{Binding Path=?,
Converter={StaticResource inputToBoolConverter},
ConverterParameter=?}"/>
</StackPanel>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
...
Unit.cs:
public class Unit : BindableObject
{
public enum InputState
{
Normal,
Active
}
private LocalControllerTypes.LocalController _localControllerInfo;
private LocalControllerTypes.ArduinoInjector[] _arduinoInjector;
private WebWriter.WebWriter[] _inputWriters;
private SNMPNetworkSwitchConnection.SNMPNetworkSwitchConnection _networkSwitchConnection;
private InputState[] _inputStates;
private bool _isUnitConnected;
public Unit(LocalControllerTypes.LocalController localControllerInfo,
LocalControllerTypes.ArduinoInjector[] arduinoInjector,
WebWriter.WebWriter[] inputWriters,
SNMPNetworkSwitchConnection.SNMPNetworkSwitchConnection networkSwitchConnection)
{
_localControllerInfo = localControllerInfo;
_arduinoInjector = arduinoInjector;
_inputWriters = inputWriters;
_networkSwitchConnection = networkSwitchConnection;
// This assumption might not always be true, but there is no way for now to get the input state
_inputStates = Enumerable.Repeat(InputState.Normal, _inputWriters.Length).ToArray();
// This assumption might not always be true, but there is no way for now to get the connection state
_isUnitConnected = true;
}
public LocalControllerTypes.LocalController LocalControllerInfo
{
get
{
return _localControllerInfo;
}
set
{
if (_localControllerInfo != value)
{
_localControllerInfo = value;
RaisePropertyChanged();
}
}
}
public LocalControllerTypes.ArduinoInjector[] ArduinoInjectors
{
get
{
return _arduinoInjector;
}
set
{
if (_arduinoInjector != value)
{
_arduinoInjector = value;
RaisePropertyChanged();
}
}
}
public WebWriter.WebWriter[] InputWriters
{
get
{
return _inputWriters;
}
set
{
if (_inputWriters != value)
{
_inputWriters = value;
RaisePropertyChanged();
}
}
}
public SNMPNetworkSwitchConnection.SNMPNetworkSwitchConnection NetworkSwitchConnection
{
get
{
return _networkSwitchConnection;
}
set
{
if (_networkSwitchConnection != value)
{
_networkSwitchConnection = value;
RaisePropertyChanged();
}
}
}
public InputState[] InputStates
{
get
{
return _inputStates;
}
set
{
if (_inputStates != value)
{
_inputStates = value;
RaisePropertyChanged();
}
}
}
public bool IsUnitConnected
{
get
{
return _isUnitConnected;
}
set
{
if (_isUnitConnected != value)
{
_isUnitConnected = value;
RaisePropertyChanged();
}
}
}
}
MainViewModel.cs:
public class MainViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private Unit _selectedUnit;
private ObservableCollection<Unit> _units;
private string _reader1RawCardData;
private string _reader2RawCardData;
private int _reader1BitsCount;
private int _reader2BitsCount;
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
public MainViewModel(IUnitStore unitStore)
{
UnitStore = unitStore;
// We could use directly the unitstore instead of creating another container and binding on that, but
// not doing so will allow us to add unit filtering further down the road
_units = new ObservableCollection<Unit>(unitStore.Units);
_selectedUnit = _units.First();
_reader1RawCardData = "";
_reader2RawCardData = "";
_reader1BitsCount = 0;
_reader2BitsCount = 0;
}
protected void RaisePropertyChanged([CallerMemberName]string propertName = "")
{
var temp = PropertyChanged;
if (temp != null)
{
temp(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertName));
}
}
protected void RefreshUnitStore(object obj)
{
UnitStore.UpdateStore();
Units = new ObservableCollection<Unit>(UnitStore.Units);
SelectedUnit = Units.First();
}
protected void SendReaderCardSwipe(object obj)
{
int unitReaderNumber = (int)obj;
IPAddress arduinoIp = SelectedUnit.LocalControllerInfo.Readers[unitReaderNumber - 1].InjectorIp;
int injectorNumber = SelectedUnit.LocalControllerInfo.Readers[unitReaderNumber - 1].InjectorNumber;
string serviceUrl = SelectedUnit.ArduinoInjectors.Where(injector => injector.Ip.Equals(arduinoIp)).First().Url;
InjectorInterface.CardSwipe<IPAddress>(serviceUrl, arduinoIp, injectorNumber, Reader1BitsCount, Reader1RawCardData);
}
protected void UpdateSelectedUnitConnectionState(object obj)
{
((INetworkConnection.INetworkConnection)SelectedUnit.NetworkSwitchConnection).SetConnection(SelectedUnit.IsUnitConnected);
}
public IUnitStore UnitStore
{
get;
private set;
}
public Unit SelectedUnit
{
get
{
return _selectedUnit;
}
set
{
if (_selectedUnit != value)
{
_selectedUnit = value;
RaisePropertyChanged();
}
}
}
public ObservableCollection<Unit> Units
{
get
{
return _units;
}
set
{
if (_units != value)
{
_units = value;
RaisePropertyChanged();
}
}
}
public string Reader1RawCardData
{
get
{
return _reader1RawCardData;
}
set
{
if (_reader1RawCardData != value)
{
_reader1RawCardData = value;
RaisePropertyChanged();
}
}
}
public string Reader2RawCardData
{
get
{
return _reader2RawCardData;
}
set
{
if (_reader2RawCardData != value)
{
_reader2RawCardData = value;
RaisePropertyChanged();
}
}
}
public int Reader1BitsCount
{
get
{
return _reader1BitsCount;
}
set
{
if (_reader1BitsCount != value)
{
_reader1BitsCount = value;
RaisePropertyChanged();
}
}
}
public int Reader2BitsCount
{
get
{
return _reader2BitsCount;
}
set
{
if (_reader2BitsCount != value)
{
_reader2BitsCount = value;
RaisePropertyChanged();
}
}
}
public ICommand RefreshSourceCommand
{
get
{
return new RelayCommand(RefreshUnitStore);
}
}
public ICommand SendReaderCardSwipeCommand
{
get
{
return new RelayCommand(SendReaderCardSwipe);
}
}
public ICommand UpdateSelectedUnitConnectionStateCommand
{
get
{
return new RelayCommand(UpdateSelectedUnitConnectionState);
}
}
}
Your ItemsControl is bound to SelectedUnit.LocalControllerInfo.Inputs. What is the type of .Inputs?
As written your bindings will not have access to InputState or InputName. That's not really in the scope of "how to identify what array item goes with what enum"
To address your original issue, one possibility would be to nest some tuples and bind to that, a la
List<Tuple<int,State>> States = new List<Tuple<int,State>>();
States.Add(new Tuple<int, State>(1,State.Bar));
States.Add(new Tuple<int, State>(2, State.Foo));
States.Add(new Tuple<int, State>(3, State.Bar));

combobox selection triggers another combobox selection etc. in WPF

I know this has been asked before, but for some reason it seems like its only working for me to an extent. I set up my XAML like this:
<Grid>
<ComboBox x:Name="cbCategories" ItemsSource="{Binding Categories}" DisplayMemberPath="Name" SelectedIndex="{Binding SelectedCategoryIndex}"/>
<ComboBox x:Name="cbSourceParam" ItemsSource="{Binding SourceParameters}" DisplayMemberPath="Name" SelectedIndex="{Binding SelectedSourceParameterIndex}"/>
<ComboBox x:Name="cbTargetParam" ItemsSource="{Binding TargetParameters}" DisplayMemberPath="Name" SelectedIndex="{Binding SelectedTargetParameterIndex}"/>
</Grid>
Then my ViewModel like this:
public class pmCopyParamToParamViewModel : ViewModelBase
{
public pmModel model;
public ObservableCollection<CategoryWrapper> Categories { get; private set; }
public pmCopyParamToParamViewModel(Document doc)
{
this.model = new pmModel(doc);
this.Categories = model.CollectCategories();
SelectedCategoryIndex = 0;
}
private ObservableCollection<ParameterWrapper> _sourceParameters;
public ObservableCollection<ParameterWrapper> SourceParameters
{
get { return _sourceParameters; }
set
{
if (_sourceParameters == value) return;
_sourceParameters = value;
RaisePropertyChanged(() => SourceParameters);
SelectedSourceParameterIndex = 0;
}
}
private ObservableCollection<ParameterWrapper> _targetParameters;
public ObservableCollection<ParameterWrapper> TargetParameters
{
get { return _targetParameters; }
set
{
if (_targetParameters == value) return;
_targetParameters = value;
RaisePropertyChanged(() => TargetParameters);
SelectedTargetParameterIndex = 0;
}
}
// logic for selected category index
private int _selectedCategoryIndex;
public int SelectedCategoryIndex
{
get { return _selectedCategoryIndex; }
set
{
if (_selectedCategoryIndex == value) return;
_selectedCategoryIndex = value;
RaisePropertyChanged(() => SelectedCategoryIndex);
SourceParameters = model.CollectParameters(Categories[SelectedCategoryIndex].ID, new string[] { "String", "Double", "Integer" });
}
}
private int _selectedSourceParameterIndex;
public int SelectedSourceParameterIndex
{
get { return _selectedSourceParameterIndex; }
set
{
if (_selectedSourceParameterIndex == value) return;
_selectedSourceParameterIndex = value;
RaisePropertyChanged(() => SelectedSourceParameterIndex);
TargetParameters = model.CollectParameters(Categories[SelectedCategoryIndex].ID, new string[] { SourceParameters[SelectedSourceParameterIndex].StorageType });
}
}
private int _selectedTargetParameterIndex;
public int SelectedTargetParameterIndex
{
get { return _selectedTargetParameterIndex; }
set
{
if (_selectedTargetParameterIndex == value) return;
_selectedTargetParameterIndex = value;
RaisePropertyChanged(() => SelectedTargetParameterIndex);
}
}
}
What I was expecting to happen is that on ViewModel initilization, it would collect all Categories. I then call SelectedCategoryIndex and set it to 0. That in turn should trigger SourceParameters to update and set the selected item initially to 0. That in turn would trigger TargetParameters to trigger and set the initial SelectedParameterIndex to 0.
So far, I am only seeing the Categories and Source Parameters getting set, but the Target Paramters combobox doesn't get set until i manually touch/change selection for the source parameters combobox.
Did I miss something here? Thanks!
Could this be the issue?
private int _selectedSourceParameterIndex; // Starts off as 0
public int SelectedSourceParameterIndex
{
set
{
// Setting to zero would not change the value, and this will return
if (_selectedSourceParameterIndex == value) return;
//... nothing here gets executed ...
_selectedSourceParameterIndex = value;
RaisePropertyChanged(() => SelectedSourceParameterIndex);
TargetParameters = model.CollectParameters(Categories[SelectedCategoryIndex].ID, new string[] { SourceParameters[SelectedSourceParameterIndex].StorageType });
}
}
I personally prefer binding SelectedItem instead of SelectedIndex. It'll give you the actual object (or null if none is selected) so you don't have to deal with the intricacies of a combobox/list indexing.

Create a ListView With 3 Columns Xamarin Forms

I want to create a customListView in Xamarin Forms that shows 3 columns and N rows (I will get the source from a web service). Each cell has an icon and a description. I have found several examples but no one uses columns.
Depending on what you want, you can create a ListView then have a Grid for each Item, where you define the 3 columns. This will allow you to keep the extra features of the ListView like PullToRefresh.
If you want an automatic GridView type control, I did build one off ChaseFlorell's example as shown in this forum post: https://forums.xamarin.com/discussion/61925/how-to-make-the-dynamic-grid-view-and-make-it-clickable
This way it makes it data bindable, rather than having to explicitly define each one.
First is the Grid Control
<Grid xmlns="http://xamarin.com/schemas/2014/forms"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2009/xaml"
x:Class="Mobile.Controls.GridView">
</Grid>
public partial class GridView : Grid
{
public GridView()
{
InitializeComponent();
for (var i = 0; i < MaxColumns; i++)
ColumnDefinitions.Add(new ColumnDefinition());
}
public static readonly BindableProperty CommandParameterProperty = BindableProperty.Create<GridView, object>(p => p.CommandParameter, null);
public static readonly BindableProperty CommandProperty = BindableProperty.Create<GridView, ICommand>(p => p.Command, null);
public static readonly BindableProperty ItemsSourceProperty = BindableProperty.Create<GridView, IEnumerable<object>>(p => p.ItemsSource, null, BindingMode.OneWay, null, (bindable, oldValue, newValue) => { ((GridView)bindable).BuildTiles(newValue); });
private int _maxColumns = 2;
private float _tileHeight = 0;
public Type ItemTemplate { get; set; } = typeof(DocumentTypeTemplate);
public int MaxColumns
{
get { return _maxColumns; }
set { _maxColumns = value; }
}
public float TileHeight
{
get { return _tileHeight; }
set { _tileHeight = value; }
}
public object CommandParameter
{
get { return GetValue(CommandParameterProperty); }
set { SetValue(CommandParameterProperty, value); }
}
public ICommand Command
{
get { return (ICommand)GetValue(CommandProperty); }
set { SetValue(CommandProperty, value); }
}
public IEnumerable<object> ItemsSource
{
get { return (IEnumerable<object>)GetValue(ItemsSourceProperty); }
set { SetValue(ItemsSourceProperty, value); }
}
public void BuildTiles(IEnumerable<object> tiles)
{
try
{
if (tiles == null || tiles.Count() == 0)
Children?.Clear();
// Wipe out the previous row definitions if they're there.
RowDefinitions?.Clear();
var enumerable = tiles as IList ?? tiles.ToList();
var numberOfRows = Math.Ceiling(enumerable.Count / (float)MaxColumns);
for (var i = 0; i < numberOfRows; i++)
RowDefinitions?.Add(new RowDefinition { Height = TileHeight });
for (var index = 0; index < enumerable.Count; index++)
{
var column = index % MaxColumns;
var row = (int)Math.Floor(index / (float)MaxColumns);
var tile = BuildTile(enumerable[index]);
Children?.Add(tile, column, row);
}
}
catch { // can throw exceptions if binding upon disposal
}
}
private Layout BuildTile(object item1)
{
var buildTile = (Layout)Activator.CreateInstance(ItemTemplate, item1);
buildTile.InputTransparent = false;
var tapGestureRecognizer = new TapGestureRecognizer
{
Command = Command,
CommandParameter = item1,
NumberOfTapsRequired = 1
};
buildTile?.GestureRecognizers.Add(tapGestureRecognizer);
return buildTile;
}
}
Then define a template
<Grid xmlns="http://xamarin.com/schemas/2014/forms"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2009/xaml"
x:Class="Mobile.TypeTemplate">
<Label Text="{Binding Name}" />
</Grid>
public partial class TypeTemplate : Grid
{
public TypeTemplate()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
public TypeTemplate(object item)
{
InitializeComponent();
BindingContext = item;
}
}
Then use the control
<control:GridView HorizontalOptions="FillAndExpand"
Grid.Row="1"
VerticalOptions="FillAndExpand"
RowSpacing="20"
ColumnSpacing="20"
MaxColumns="2"
ItemsSource="{Binding ListOfData}"
CommandParameter="{Binding}"
Command="{Binding ClickCommand}"
IsClippedToBounds="False">
<control:GridView.TileHeight>
<OnPlatform x:TypeArguments="x:Single"
iOS="60"
Android="60"
WinPhone="90" />
</control:GridView.TileHeight>
</control:GridView>
A much easier solution than the proposed is to use the DevExpress Grid control. It has support for headers, row virtualization, pull-to-refresh, load on demand and a bunch of other useful features.

creating class structure in mvvm issues

I have the following Classes:
Item
public class Item : INotifyPropertyChanged, IDataErrorInfo
{
private int? id;
public int? ID
{
get
{ return id; }
set
{ id = value; }
}
private string name;
public string Name
{
get
{ return name; }
set
{
if (value != name)
{
ClearError("Name");
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(value) || value.Trim() == "")
SetError("Name", "Required Value");
name = value;
}
}
}
private List<MedicineComposition> medicineCompositions;
public List<MedicineComposition> MedicineCompositions
{
set { medicineCompositions = value; }
get { return medicineCompositions; }
}
}
MedicineComposition
public class MedicineComposition : INotifyPropertyChanged, IDataErrorInfo
{
private int? id;
public int? ID
{
get
{ return id; }
set
{ id = value; }
}
private Item item;
public Item Item
{
get
{ return item; }
set
{
if (item != value)
{
ClearError("Item");
if (value == null)
SetError("Item", "Required Value");
item = value;
}
}
}
private Component component;
public Component Component
{
get
{ return component; }
set
{
if (component != value)
{
ClearError("Component");
if (value == null)
SetError("Component", "Required Value");
component = value;
}
}
}
}
Component which has only id and Name
and the following functions that bring data from database and make the list of my objects:
GetItems in Item Class
public static List<Item> GetAllItems
{
get
{
List<Item> MyItems = new List<Item>();
SqlConnection con = new SqlConnection(BaseDataBase.ConnectionString);
SqlCommand com = new SqlCommand("sp_Get_All_Item", con);
com.CommandType = System.Data.CommandType.StoredProcedure;
try
{
con.Open();
SqlDataReader rd = com.ExecuteReader();
while (rd.Read())
{
Item i = new Item();
if (!(rd["ID"] is DBNull))
i.ID = System.Int32.Parse(rd["ID"].ToString());
i.Name = rd["Name"].ToString();
i.MedicineCompositions = MedicineComposition.GetAllByItem(i);
MyItems.Add(i);
}
rd.Close();
}
catch
{
MyItems = null;
}
finally
{
con.Close();
}
return MyItems;
}
GetAllByItem in MedicalCompositions
public static List<MedicineComposition> GetAllByItem(Item i)
{
List<MedicineComposition> MyMedicineCompositions = new List<MedicineComposition>();
SqlConnection con = new SqlConnection(BaseDataBase.ConnectionString);
SqlCommand com = new SqlCommand("sp_Get_ByItemID_MedicineComposition", con);
com.CommandType = System.Data.CommandType.StoredProcedure;
SqlParameter pr = new SqlParameter("#ID", i.ID);
com.Parameters.Add(pr);
try
{
con.Open();
SqlDataReader rd = com.ExecuteReader();
while (rd.Read())
{
MedicineComposition m = new MedicineComposition() { };
if (!(rd["ID"] is DBNull))
m.ID = Int32.Parse(rd["ID"].ToString());
if (!(rd["ComponentID"] is DBNull))
m.Component = Component.GetByID(Int32.Parse(rd["ComponentID"].ToString()));
m.Item = i;
MyMedicineCompositions.Add(m);
}
rd.Close();
}
catch
{
MyMedicineCompositions = null;
}
finally
{
con.Close();
}
return MyMedicineCompositions;
}
it's like to use mvvm because it let you deal with objects instead of datatable, but when i use the previous shape of class structure i have the following problems:
i have at least 1000 records in Item Table in database so when i call GetAllItems i have slow performance especially when the database in not on local computer.
i tried to load Items when splash screen on, it takes times but take medium performance
on each update on Item table i should recall GetAllItems so slow back
my questions is where is the problem that i have in creating class, and is this the best way to structure the class in mvvm
I dont think your user need to see all the 1000 items at a glance, not even the many thousand of composition and components related.
I situations like this I would:
Filter the data. Ask the user for the Item name, category or what else.
Delay load. At first load only the (filtered) Items. When the user select an Item switch to an "Item details" View and load the related data (composition and components).
A few things you could improve here, for example:
Given we are talking about MedicalComposition it might not be best of ideas to have nullable unique identifier
If you have multiple classes consisting only of id and name you could use KeyValuePair<> or Tuple<> instead
Implement a base class, say ModelBase that implements INotifyPropertyChanged
Implement repository pattern for database related action, cache/page results if possible
If not yet done, move data- and/or time intensive operations into separate thread(s)
It's a little confusing that on Item you have IEnumerable of MedicineCompositions but also, in MedicineComposition you have the Item, too? Maybe you don't need it at all or related Item.Id would be enough?
You could add a method to your repository to only return items that have been added/modified/removed since <timestamp> and only update what is necessary in your Items collection
You could make some of the properties Lazy<>
Utilize TAP (Task-based Asynchronous Pattern)
Below is "one go" for your problem w/o blocking the UI thread. It's far from complete but still. Thread.Sleeps in repositories are mimicking your database query delays
View\MainWindow.xaml
Codebehind contains just InitializeComponents.
<Window x:Class="WpfApplication1.View.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:viewModel="clr-namespace:WpfApplication1.ViewModel"
Title="MainWindow"
Height="300"
Width="250">
<Window.DataContext>
<viewModel:MainViewModel />
</Window.DataContext>
<!-- Layout root -->
<Grid x:Name="ContentPanel" Margin="12,0,12,0">
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="*" />
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="Auto" />
<RowDefinition Height="*" />
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<!-- Status label -->
<Label Grid.Row="0"
HorizontalAlignment="Stretch"
VerticalAlignment="Top"
Background="Bisque"
Margin="0,3,0,3"
Content="{Binding Status}" />
<!-- Controls -->
<StackPanel Grid.Row="1">
<Label Content="Items" />
<!-- Items combo -->
<ComboBox HorizontalAlignment="Stretch"
MaxDropDownHeight="120"
VerticalAlignment="Top"
Width="Auto"
Margin="0,0,0,5"
ItemsSource="{Binding Items}"
SelectedItem="{Binding SelectedItem}"
DisplayMemberPath="Name" />
<!-- Medicine components -->
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding SelectedItem.MedicineCompositions}">
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Name}" />
<!-- Components -->
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding Components}">
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBlock>
<Run Text=" * " />
<Run Text="{Binding Name}" />
</TextBlock>
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
</Window>
ViewModel\MainViewModel
public class MainViewModel : ViewModelBase
{
private string _status;
private Item _selectedItem;
private ObservableCollection<Item> _items;
public MainViewModel()
:this(new ItemRepository(), new MedicineCompositionRepository())
{}
public MainViewModel(IRepository<Item> itemRepository, IRepository<MedicineComposition> medicineCompositionRepository)
{
ItemRepository = itemRepository;
MedicineCompositionRepository = medicineCompositionRepository;
Task.Run(() => LoadItemsData());
}
public IRepository<Item> ItemRepository { get; set; }
public IRepository<MedicineComposition> MedicineCompositionRepository { get; set; }
public Item SelectedItem
{
get { return _selectedItem; }
set
{
_selectedItem = value;
OnPropertyChanged();
Task.Run(() => LoadMedicineCompositionsData(_selectedItem));
}
}
public ObservableCollection<Item> Items
{
get { return _items; }
set { _items = value; OnPropertyChanged(); }
}
public string Status
{
get { return _status; }
set { _status = value; OnPropertyChanged(); }
}
private async Task LoadItemsData()
{
Status = "Loading items...";
var result = await ItemRepository.GetAll();
Items = new ObservableCollection<Item>(result);
Status = "Idle";
}
private async Task LoadMedicineCompositionsData(Item item)
{
if (item.MedicineCompositions != null)
return;
Status = string.Format("Loading compositions for {0}...", item.Name);
var result = await MedicineCompositionRepository.GetById(item.Id);
SelectedItem.MedicineCompositions = result;
Status = "Idle";
}
}
Model
public class Component : ModelBase
{}
public class MedicineComposition : ModelBase
{
private IEnumerable<Component> _component;
public IEnumerable<Component> Components
{
get { return _component; }
set { _component = value; OnPropertyChanged(); }
}
}
public class Item : ModelBase
{
private IEnumerable<MedicineComposition> _medicineCompositions;
public IEnumerable<MedicineComposition> MedicineCompositions
{
get { return _medicineCompositions; }
set { _medicineCompositions = value; OnPropertyChanged(); }
}
}
public abstract class ModelBase : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
private int _id;
private string _name;
public int Id
{
get { return _id; }
set { _id = value; OnPropertyChanged(); }
}
public string Name
{
get { return _name; }
set { _name = value; OnPropertyChanged(); }
}
[NotifyPropertyChangedInvocator]
protected virtual void OnPropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null)
{
var handler = PropertyChanged;
if (handler != null)
handler(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
Repository
public interface IRepository<T> where T : class
{
Task<IEnumerable<T>> GetAll();
Task<IEnumerable<T>> GetById(int id);
}
public class ItemRepository : IRepository<Item>
{
private readonly IList<Item> _mockItems;
public ItemRepository()
{
_mockItems = new List<Item>();
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)
_mockItems.Add(new Item { Id = i, Name = string.Format("Item #{0}", i), MedicineCompositions = null });
}
public Task<IEnumerable<Item>> GetAll()
{
Thread.Sleep(1500);
return Task.FromResult((IEnumerable<Item>) _mockItems);
}
public Task<IEnumerable<Item>> GetById(int id)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
public class MedicineCompositionRepository : IRepository<MedicineComposition>
{
private readonly Random _random;
public MedicineCompositionRepository()
{
_random = new Random();
}
public Task<IEnumerable<MedicineComposition>> GetAll()
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
public Task<IEnumerable<MedicineComposition>> GetById(int id)
{
// since we are mocking, id is actually ignored
var compositions = new List<MedicineComposition>();
int compositionsCount = _random.Next(1, 3);
for (int i = 0; i <= compositionsCount; i++)
{
var components = new List<Component>();
int componentsCount = _random.Next(1, 3);
for (int j = 0; j <= componentsCount; j++)
components.Add(new Component {Id = j, Name = string.Format("Component #1{0}", j)});
compositions.Add(new MedicineComposition { Id = i, Name = string.Format("MedicalComposition #{0}", i), Components = components });
}
Thread.Sleep(500);
return Task.FromResult((IEnumerable<MedicineComposition>) compositions);
}
}
Instead of returning List, return IEnumerable and yield results as they are needed. Obviously it would only improve performance, when you are not reading all the results, which is actually true in most cases. To do that you would have to remove catch, because you cannot have yield and catch together. The catch could go around con.Open and ExecuteReader and in catch you can yield break:
public static IEnumerable<MedicineComposition> GetAllByItem(Item i)
{
SqlConnection con = new SqlConnection(BaseDataBase.ConnectionString);
SqlCommand com = new SqlCommand("sp_Get_ByItemID_MedicineComposition", con);
com.CommandType = System.Data.CommandType.StoredProcedure;
SqlParameter pr = new SqlParameter("#ID", i.ID);
com.Parameters.Add(pr);
try
{
SqlDataReader rd;
try
{
con.Open();
rd = com.ExecuteReader();
}
catch { yield break;}
while (rd.Read())
{
MedicineComposition m = new MedicineComposition() { };
if (!(rd["ID"] is DBNull))
m.ID = Int32.Parse(rd["ID"].ToString());
if (!(rd["ComponentID"] is DBNull))
m.Component = Component.GetByID(Int32.Parse(rd["ComponentID"].ToString()));
m.Item = i;
yield return m;
}
rd.Close();
}
finally
{
con.Close();
}
}
Now in case of an exception this is no longer returning null, but can return few items or even empty enumeration. I would rather move the catch to caller of this getter.
If you need for some reason count of returned items, call GetAllByItem(item).ToArray(). This will enumerate all the items once and gets the length for you. Definitely don't call the enumeration twice to get the length and then enumerate the items:
var length = GetAllByItem(item).Count();// this will get all the items from the db
foreach(var i in GetAllByItem(item)) // this will get all the items from the db again
Rather do this:
var list = GetAllByItem(item); // this will get all the items and now you have the length and the items.
Obviously if you need the length for some reason, there is no point in changing to IEnumerable, only for better abstraction.
Other improvement could be, to create the connection only once instead of every time on calling the getter. That is possible only, if you know it won't cause any harm.
Assign the dataset into the constructor of your ObservableCollection property. Else your view will update via a PropertyChanged notification for each item that your ObservableCollection performs an Add operation.
Try this:
var items = services.LoadItems();
myObservableCollection = new ObservableCollection<somedatatype>(items);
This type of assignment will notify your view once instead of the current way your implementation does which is 1000 times.

MVVMLight: RelayCommand seems not working in Windows 8 App

I have the following ViewModel:
public class TransportationUnit : ViewModelBase {
private string _TypeOfFuel;
private string _Model;
private string _Manufacturer;
private string _LicencePlate;
private Guid _Key = Guid.Empty;
public ICommand CmdAddTransportationUnit { get; set; }
public TransportationUnit() {
CmdAddTransportationUnit = new GalaSoft.MvvmLight.Command.RelayCommand( () => AddTransportationUnitDo(), () => AddTransportationUnitCan() );
}
/// <summary>manufacturer</summary>
public string Manufacturer {
get { return _Manufacturer; }
set {
if (_Manufacturer == value )
return;
RaisePropertyChanging( "Manufacturer" );
_Manufacturer = value;
RaisePropertyChanged( "Manufacturer" );
}
}
/* ommitted some equal properties */
public bool AddTransportationUnitCan() {
return !string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace( Model ) && !string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace( Manufacturer ) & !string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace( LicencePlate );
}
public async void AddTransportationUnitDo() {
await LogbookRepository.Instance.Add<TransportationUnit>( this );
}
}
My textboxes are bound that way:
<TextBox x:Name="CarManufacturerNameText" Width="400" HorizontalAlignment="Left" VerticalAlignment="Center" Grid.Row="0" Grid.Column="1" Text="{Binding Manufacturer,Mode=TwoWay}" />
My button in the AppBar (bottom) is bound that way:
<Button Style="{StaticResource SaveAppBarButtonStyle}" AutomationProperties.Name="" x:Name="save" x:Uid="StandardSave" Command="{Binding CmdAddTransportationUnit}" />
I would have expected that the button is disabled when the method AddTransportationUnitCan evaluates to false and vice versa. When all textboxes are filled, it keeps being disabled, and even a breakpoint set in the method only fires once when the RelayCommand is created. I've tested for a rather long time, but haven't found a solution. Anyone else had this problem?
Edit: When I just return true in AddTransportationUnitCan the button is enabled
Try adding a RaiseCanExecuteChanged to your property setters. This will tell your RelayCommand to reevaluate the CanExecute.
public string Manufacturer {
get { return _Manufacturer; }
set {
_Manufacturer = value;
RaisePropertyChanged( "Manufacturer" );
CmdAddTransportationUnit.RaiseCanExecuteChanged();
}
}

Categories