We Keep Coding

Using attachedbehaviors with an HierarchicalDatatemplate

Currently I am trying to display a ObservableCollection of an custom class in a TreeView, when the user double clicks on a 'item' it will fire an method in the ViewModel passing the selected custom class as parameter. I am using the MVVM structure for my WPF Application.
The problem I am facing with this is that the Observable Collection is displayed with an HierarchicalDataTemplate. See underneath the whole XAML code for the TreeView
<TreeView Name="DeviceTreeView" ItemsSource="{Binding ViewableTIADeviceTree}" Grid.Column="3" Margin="5">
<TreeView.Resources>
<HierarchicalDataTemplate DataType="{x:Type treeviewable:ViewableTIADevice}" ItemsSource="{Binding DeviceItems}">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=DeviceName}"/>
<HierarchicalDataTemplate.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type treeviewable:ViewableTIADevice}">
<Setter Property="commandBehaviors:MouseDoubleClick.Command"
Value="{Binding TIADeviceTreeItemDoubleClick}"/>
<Setter Property="commandBehaviors:MouseDoubleClick.CommandParameter"
Value="{Binding}"/>
</Style>
</HierarchicalDataTemplate.ItemContainerStyle>
</HierarchicalDataTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type treeviewable:ViewableDeviceItem}">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Path=Name}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</TreeView.Resources>
</TreeView>
And the MouseDoubleClick attached behavior class:
public class MouseDoubleClick
{
public static DependencyProperty CommandProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("Command",
typeof(ICommand),
typeof(MouseDoubleClick),
new UIPropertyMetadata(CommandChanged));
public static DependencyProperty CommandParameterProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("CommandParameter",
typeof(object),
typeof(MouseDoubleClick),
new UIPropertyMetadata(null));
public static void SetCommand(DependencyObject target, ICommand value)
{
target.SetValue(CommandProperty, value);
}
public static void SetCommandParameter(DependencyObject target, object value)
{
target.SetValue(CommandParameterProperty, value);
}
public static object GetCommandParameter(DependencyObject target)
{
return target.GetValue(CommandParameterProperty);
}
public static void CommandChanged(DependencyObject target, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs args)
{
Control control = target as Control;
if(control != null)
{
if((args.NewValue != null) && (args.OldValue == null))
{
control.MouseDoubleClick += OnMouseDoubleClick;
}
else if((args.NewValue == null) && (args.OldValue != null))
{
control.MouseDoubleClick -= OnMouseDoubleClick;
}
}
}
private static void OnMouseDoubleClick(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
Control control = sender as Control;
ICommand command = (ICommand)control.GetValue(CommandProperty);
object commandParameter = control.GetValue(CommandParameterProperty);
command.Execute(commandParameter);
}
}
The problem I am facing with this is that it says that the 'ViewableTIADevice' is not an FrameWorkElement and thus I cannot even run it.
I've also tried using the
<Style TargetType"{x:Type TreeViewItem}">
That does run but I get no response when trying to double click an item in the TreeView.
I've searched a lot for the solution and I would like to refer to this thread: WPF/MVVM - how to handle double-click on TreeViewItems in the ViewModel?
I've been using the above thread as solution but how can I combine that solution with an HierarchicalDatatemplate?
EDIT
The ICommand that I am trying to call by double clicking an item
public RelayCommand TIADeviceTreeItemDoubleClick { get; set; }
Where I am here assigning it to the function
TIADeviceTreeItemDoubleClick = new RelayCommand(c => tiaDeviceTreeItemDoubleClick(c));
And the function it refers to:
private void tiaDeviceTreeItemDoubleClick(object value)
{
//code
}
This is the ViewableTIADevice class:
public class ViewableTIADevice
{
public ViewableTIADevice()
{
DeviceItems = new List<ViewableDeviceItem>();
}
public string DeviceName { get; set; }
public IList<ViewableDeviceItem> DeviceItems { get; set; }
}

i believe you have a missunderstanding of what your datacontext is, consider this example:
<TreeView ItemsSource="{Binding Items}">
<TreeView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding ItemProperty1}"></TextBlock>
</DataTemplate>
</TreeView.ItemTemplate>
<TreeView.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="TreeViewItem">
<Setter Property="Local:MouseDoubleClick.Command"
Value="{Binding ElementName=DeviceTreeView, Path=DataContext.TIADeviceTreeItemDoubleClick}"/>
<Setter Property="Local:MouseDoubleClick.CommandParameter"
Value="{Binding}"/>
</Style>
</TreeView.ItemContainerStyle>
</TreeView>
the datacontext of my TreeView, is my viewmodel, so when i say ItemsSource="{Binding Items}", i am binding to the observable collection called Items inside my ViewModel.
the datacontext inside TreeView.ItemTemplate, is one single item inside the collection Items. meaning that when i say {Binding ItemProperty1}, i am binding, NOT to ViewModel.ItemProprty1, but to a single item inside the collection ViewModel.Items. this means that you have to have a ViewModel, and inside a collection called Items, and inside this collection you need to have objects of type X, and the class X must have a property called ItemProperty1.
the datacontext inside the TreeView.ItemContainerStyle, is also one single item inside the collection Items, meaning that when you say {Binding TIADeviceTreeItemDoubleClick}, you are trying to bind to an ICommand property that is inside of the class that is inside your collection Items. your datacontext here, is not, as you assumed, your ViewModel, but rather one single item inside ViewModel.Items
so when you use this:
Value="{Binding ElementName=DeviceTreeView, Path=DataContext.TIADeviceTreeItemDoubleClick}"
you are binding to the datacontext of the TreeView, which is ViewModel, which contains an ICommand property called TIADeviceTreeItemDoubleClick.
when you write this:
{Binding TIADeviceTreeItemDoubleClick}
you are trying to bind to the datacontext of the current TreeViewItem, which is one single object inside your collection Items. so this will only work if you add the ICommand to your class that is inside your collection Items.
you also use this:
<Setter Property="Local:MouseDoubleClick.CommandParameter"
Value="{Binding}"
here, obviosly, you are sending one single item inside your collection Items, and not the ViewModel.
make sense?

wpf MVVM Focus cursor on textbox

In a WPF window, I'm trying to put the cursor by default on one of the textboxes.
After reading some questions and answers, I tried the following:
xaml:
<StackPanel Grid.Row="1"
<StackPanel.Style>
<Style>
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding UserShouldEditValueNow}" Value="true">
<Setter Property="FocusManager.FocusedElement" Value="{Binding ElementName=FID}"/>
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</StackPanel.Style>
<TextBox Name ="FID" Text="{Binding FixID, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}"
FocusManager.FocusedElement="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}}"/>
</StackPanel>
cs: (Viewmodel)
this.UserShouldEditValueNow = true;
I expected to see a blinking cursor on the textbox FID when opening the window.
However, there's no cursor at all on this textbox.
Debugging showed me that I'm going through the cs code, setting the value to true.
any ideas why?

Solution involves:
1. Adding a FocusExtension class.
2. Focus and Keyboard.Focus are inside Dispatcher.BeginInvoke
cs.
public static class FocusExtension
{
public static bool GetIsFocused(DependencyObject obj)
{
return (bool)obj.GetValue(IsFocusedProperty);
}
public static void SetIsFocused(DependencyObject obj, bool value)
{
obj.SetValue(IsFocusedProperty, value);
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty IsFocusedProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached(
"IsFocused", typeof(bool), typeof(FocusExtension),
new UIPropertyMetadata(false, OnIsFocusedPropertyChanged));
private static void OnIsFocusedPropertyChanged(
DependencyObject d,
DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
var uie = (UIElement)d;
if ((bool)e.NewValue)
{
uie.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(
new Action(
delegate{
uie.Focus();
Keyboard.Focus(uie);
}
)
);
}
}
}
.xaml
<TextBox Text="{Binding FixID, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}" viewModels:FocusExtension.IsFocused="{Binding UserShouldEditValueNow}" />

WPF: Parent which would display a specific child depending on input value

As far as I understand, usual Visibility={Binding SomeValue, Converter={…}} still keeps node in visual and logical tree even if it’s invisible. But what if I want to remove it completely and at the same time keep syntax light?
Right now, I’ve made a class called Switch allowing me to do stuff like that:
<Switch Value="{Binding Status}">
<TextBlock Switch.When="{x:Static Status.NotFound}" Text="Not found" />
<Button Switch.When="{x:Static Status.ConnectionError}" Text="Connection error. Try again?" />
<Grid Switch.When="{x:Static Status.Loaded}">…</Grid>
</Switch>
Here is a source code of that Switch thing.
I like how it looks and works, but sometimes some errors occur. For instance, while removing visual child from its previous location, rarely, but System.InvalidOperationException: Cannot modify the logical children for this node at this time because a tree walk is in progress. might happen. Cases like this are solvable, but the whole thing with them makes me think I’m doing something very wrong. What could it be? Maybe the whole idea is just not compatible with WPF at all? Or maybe I’m just missing something (like that thing that I have to override IEnumerator LogicalChildren { get; } to make it work properly)?

I think the answer is probably that you're trying to reparent the child controls the right way. Bad idea! They're just arbitrary content; don't treat them as controls. The actual reparenting in my code is done by hidden ContentPresenter magic in the template. All our control class code does is just sling them around like potatoes.
Here's a working version of the control that shouldn't give you any backtalk. But note that I had trouble comparing boxed enum values to each other. I'm interested in how you solved that problem.
Switch.cs
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
using System.Windows.Markup;
namespace SwitchTestProject
{
[ContentProperty("Items")]
public class Switch : Control
{
public Switch()
{
Items = new List<DependencyObject>();
}
static Switch()
{
DefaultStyleKeyProperty.OverrideMetadata(typeof(Switch), new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(typeof(Switch)));
}
public override void OnApplyTemplate()
{
base.OnApplyTemplate();
OnValueChanged(null);
}
#region Switch.When Attached Property
public static Object GetWhen(DependencyObject obj)
{
return (Object)obj.GetValue(WhenProperty);
}
public static void SetWhen(DependencyObject obj, Object value)
{
obj.SetValue(WhenProperty, value);
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty WhenProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("When", typeof(Object), typeof(Switch),
new PropertyMetadata(null));
#endregion Switch.When Attached Property
#region Content Property
public Object Content
{
get { return (Object)GetValue(ContentProperty); }
protected set { SetValue(ContentPropertyKey, value); }
}
internal static readonly DependencyPropertyKey ContentPropertyKey =
DependencyProperty.RegisterReadOnly(nameof(Content), typeof(Object), typeof(Switch),
new PropertyMetadata(null));
public static readonly DependencyProperty ContentProperty = ContentPropertyKey.DependencyProperty;
#endregion Content Property
#region Value Property
public Object Value
{
get { return (Object)GetValue(ValueProperty); }
set { SetValue(ValueProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty ValueProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register(nameof(Value), typeof(Object), typeof(Switch),
new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(null, Value_PropertyChanged));
protected static void Value_PropertyChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
(d as Switch).OnValueChanged(e.OldValue);
}
private void OnValueChanged(object oldValue)
{
if (Value is IComparable)
{
// Boxed value types have to be a special case.
// Unless I jumped to an unwarranted conclusion about == not working.
var icompval = Value as IComparable;
foreach (var item in Items)
{
var icompwhen = GetWhen(item) as IComparable;
if (icompwhen != null && icompval.CompareTo(icompwhen) == 0)
{
Content = item;
return;
}
}
}
else
{
Content = Items.FirstOrDefault(item => GetWhen(item) == Value);
}
}
#endregion Value Property
#region Items Property
public List<DependencyObject> Items
{
get { return (List<DependencyObject>)GetValue(ItemsProperty); }
protected set { SetValue(ItemsPropertyKey, value); }
}
internal static readonly DependencyPropertyKey ItemsPropertyKey =
DependencyProperty.RegisterReadOnly(nameof(Items), typeof(List<DependencyObject>), typeof(Switch),
new PropertyMetadata(null));
public static readonly DependencyProperty ItemsProperty = ItemsPropertyKey.DependencyProperty;
#endregion Items Property
}
}
App.xaml or Themes\Generic.xaml
You could do a lot more with styling the parent here.
<Style TargetType="local:Switch">
<Setter Property="Template">
<Setter.Value>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="local:Switch">
<ContentPresenter
/>
</ControlTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</Style>
Usage:
<local:Switch
Value="{Binding Status}"
>
<TextBlock
local:Switch.When="{x:Static local:Status.NotFound}"
>This is a test</TextBlock>
<TextBlock
local:Switch.When="{x:Static local:Status.ConnectionError}"
>There was an error in the connection</TextBlock>
</local:Switch>
Pure XAML alternative
The bug in your Switch control is probably fixable, but this will work reliably without any nonsense (other than all the verbosity).
<ContentControl>
<ContentControl.Style>
<Style TargetType="ContentControl">
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding Status}" Value="NotFound">
<Setter Property="ContentTemplate">
<Setter.Value>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBlock Text="Not found" />
</DataTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</DataTrigger>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding Status}" Value="ConnectionError">
<Setter Property="ContentTemplate">
<Setter.Value>
<DataTemplate>
<Button Content="Connection error. Try again?" />
</DataTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</DataTrigger>
<DataTrigger Binding="{Binding Status}" Value="Loaded">
<Setter Property="ContentTemplate">
<Setter.Value>
<DataTemplate>
<Ellipse
Height="32"
Width="32"
Fill="DeepSkyBlue"
/>
</DataTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</ContentControl.Style>
</ContentControl>
We set the content using DataTemplates rather than setting the Content property directly because if we use the latter method, only one instance of each child control will ever exist, so we wouldn't be able to factor the style out as a resource and reuse it.
And because templating is the canonical way to create new controls in XAML.

How to set a Binding from ItemTemplate to the hosting Container in an ItemsControl? (UWP)

Given an arbitrary ItemsControl, like a ListView, I want to set a Binding from inside the ItemsTemplate to the hosting Container. How can I do that easily? For example, in WPF we can do it using this inside the ItemTemplate
<ListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<SomeControl Property="{Binding Path=TargetProperty, RelativeSouce={RelativeSource FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type MyContainer}}}" />
</DataTemplate>
<ListView.ItemTemplate>
In this example (for WPF) the Binding will be set between Property in SomeControl and TargetProperty of the ListViewItem (implicit, because it will be generated dynamically by the ListView to host the each of its items).
How can we do achieve the same in UWP?
I want something that is MVVM-friendly. Maybe with attached properties or an Interaction Behavior.

When the selection changes, search the visual tree for the radio button with the DataContext corresponding to selected/deselected items. Once it's found, you can check/uncheck at your leisure.
I have a toy model object looking like this:
public class Data
{
public string Name { get; set; }
}
My Page is named self and contains this collection property:
public Data[] Data { get; set; } =
{
new Data { Name = "One" },
new Data { Name = "Two" },
new Data { Name = "Three" },
};
The list view, binding to the above collection:
<ListView
ItemsSource="{Binding Data, ElementName=self}"
SelectionChanged="OnSelectionChanged">
<ListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<RadioButton Content="{Binding Name}" />
</DataTemplate>
</ListView.ItemTemplate>
</ListView>
The SelectionChanged event handler:
private void OnSelectionChanged(object sender, SelectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
ListView lv = sender as ListView;
var removed = FindRadioButtonWithDataContext(lv, e.RemovedItems.FirstOrDefault());
if (removed != null)
{
removed.IsChecked = false;
}
var added = FindRadioButtonWithDataContext(lv, e.AddedItems.FirstOrDefault());
if (added != null)
{
added.IsChecked = true;
}
}
Finding the radio button with a DataContext matching our Data instance:
public static RadioButton FindRadioButtonWithDataContext(
DependencyObject parent,
object data)
{
if (parent != null)
{
int childrenCount = VisualTreeHelper.GetChildrenCount(parent);
for (int i = 0; i < childrenCount; i++)
{
DependencyObject child = VisualTreeHelper.GetChild(parent, i);
ListViewItem lv = child as ListViewItem;
if (lv != null)
{
RadioButton rb = FindVisualChild<RadioButton>(child);
if (rb?.DataContext == data)
{
return rb;
}
}
RadioButton childOfChild = FindRadioButtonWithDataContext(child, data);
if (childOfChild != null)
{
return childOfChild;
}
}
}
return null;
}
And finally, a helper method to find a child of a specific type:
public static T FindVisualChild<T>(
DependencyObject parent)
where T : DependencyObject
{
if (parent != null)
{
int childrenCount = VisualTreeHelper.GetChildrenCount(parent);
for (int i = 0; i < childrenCount; i++)
{
DependencyObject child = VisualTreeHelper.GetChild(parent, i);
T candidate = child as T;
if (candidate != null)
{
return candidate;
}
T childOfChild = FindVisualChild<T>(child);
if (childOfChild != null)
{
return childOfChild;
}
}
}
return default(T);
}
The result:
This will break if a given model instance shows up more than once in the list.

Note: this answer is based on WPF, there might be some changes necessary for UWP.
There are basically two cases to consider:
You have a data driven aspect that needs to be bound to the item container
You have a view-only property
Lets assume a customized listview for both cases:
public class MyListView : ListView
{
protected override DependencyObject GetContainerForItemOverride()
{
return new DesignerItem();
}
protected override bool IsItemItsOwnContainerOverride(object item)
{
return item is DesignerItem;
}
}
public class DesignerItem : ListViewItem
{
public bool IsEditing
{
get { return (bool)GetValue(IsEditingProperty); }
set { SetValue(IsEditingProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty IsEditingProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("IsEditing", typeof(bool), typeof(DesignerItem));
}
In case 1, you can use the ItemContainerStyle to link your viewmodel property with a binding and then bind the same property inside the datatemplate
class MyData
{
public bool IsEditing { get; set; } // also need to implement INotifyPropertyChanged here!
}
XAML:
<local:MyListView ItemsSource="{Binding Source={StaticResource items}}">
<local:MyListView.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type local:DesignerItem}">
<Setter Property="IsEditing" Value="{Binding IsEditing,Mode=TwoWay}"/>
<Setter Property="HorizontalContentAlignment" Value="Stretch"/>
</Style>
</local:MyListView.ItemContainerStyle>
<local:MyListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Border Background="Red" Margin="5" Padding="5">
<CheckBox IsChecked="{Binding IsEditing}"/>
</Border>
</DataTemplate>
</local:MyListView.ItemTemplate>
</local:MyListView>
In case 2, it appears that you don't really have a data driven property and consequently, the effects of your property should be reflected within the control (ControlTemplate).
In the following example a toolbar is made visible based on the IsEditing property. A togglebutton can be used to control the property, the ItemTemplate is used as an inner element next to the toolbar and button, it knows nothing of the IsEditing state:
<local:MyListView ItemsSource="{Binding Source={StaticResource items}}">
<local:MyListView.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type local:DesignerItem}">
<Setter Property="IsEditing" Value="{Binding IsEditing,Mode=TwoWay}"/>
<Setter Property="Template">
<Setter.Value>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type local:DesignerItem}">
<DockPanel>
<ToggleButton DockPanel.Dock="Right" Margin="5" VerticalAlignment="Top" IsChecked="{Binding IsEditing,RelativeSource={RelativeSource TemplatedParent},Mode=TwoWay}" Content="Edit"/>
<!--Toolbar is something control related, rather than data related-->
<ToolBar x:Name="MyToolBar" DockPanel.Dock="Top" Visibility="Collapsed">
<Button Content="Tool"/>
</ToolBar>
<ContentPresenter ContentSource="Content"/>
</DockPanel>
<ControlTemplate.Triggers>
<Trigger Property="IsEditing" Value="True">
<Setter TargetName="MyToolBar" Property="Visibility" Value="Visible"/>
</Trigger>
</ControlTemplate.Triggers>
</ControlTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</Style>
</local:MyListView.ItemContainerStyle>
<local:MyListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Border Background="Red" Margin="5" Padding="5">
<TextBlock Text="Hello World"/>
</Border>
</DataTemplate>
</local:MyListView.ItemTemplate>
</local:MyListView>
For a better control template, you may chose to use Blend and create the control template starting at the full ListViewItem template and just editing your changes into it.
If your DesignerItem generally has a specific enhanced appearance, consider designing it in the Themes/Generic.xaml with the appropriate default style.
As commented, you could provide a separate data template for the editing mode. To do this, add a property to MyListView and to DesignerItem and use MyListView.PrepareContainerForItemOverride(...) to transfer the template.
In order to apply the template without the need for Setter.Value bindings, you can use value coercion on DesignerItem.ContentTemplate based on IsEditing.
public class MyListView : ListView
{
protected override DependencyObject GetContainerForItemOverride()
{
return new DesignerItem();
}
protected override bool IsItemItsOwnContainerOverride(object item)
{
return item is DesignerItem;
}
protected override void PrepareContainerForItemOverride(DependencyObject element, object item)
{
base.PrepareContainerForItemOverride(element, item);
var elem = element as DesignerItem;
elem.ContentEditTemplate = ItemEditTemplate;
}
public DataTemplate ItemEditTemplate
{
get { return (DataTemplate)GetValue(ItemEditTemplateProperty); }
set { SetValue(ItemEditTemplateProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty ItemEditTemplateProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("ItemEditTemplate", typeof(DataTemplate), typeof(MyListView));
}
public class DesignerItem : ListViewItem
{
static DesignerItem()
{
ContentTemplateProperty.OverrideMetadata(typeof(DesignerItem), new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(
null, new CoerceValueCallback(CoerceContentTemplate)));
}
private static object CoerceContentTemplate(DependencyObject d, object baseValue)
{
var self = d as DesignerItem;
if (self != null && self.IsEditing)
{
return self.ContentEditTemplate;
}
return baseValue;
}
private static void OnIsEditingChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
d.CoerceValue(ContentTemplateProperty);
}
public bool IsEditing
{
get { return (bool)GetValue(IsEditingProperty); }
set { SetValue(IsEditingProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty IsEditingProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("IsEditing", typeof(bool), typeof(DesignerItem), new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(new PropertyChangedCallback(OnIsEditingChanged)));
public DataTemplate ContentEditTemplate
{
get { return (DataTemplate)GetValue(ContentEditTemplateProperty); }
set { SetValue(ContentEditTemplateProperty, value); }
}
// Using a DependencyProperty as the backing store for ContentEditTemplate. This enables animation, styling, binding, etc...
public static readonly DependencyProperty ContentEditTemplateProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("ContentEditTemplate", typeof(DataTemplate), typeof(DesignerItem));
}
Note, for an easier example I will activate the "edit" mode by ListViewItem.IsSelected with some trigger:
<local:MyListView ItemsSource="{Binding Source={StaticResource items}}">
<local:MyListView.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type local:DesignerItem}">
<Style.Triggers>
<Trigger Property="IsSelected" Value="True">
<Setter Property="IsEditing" Value="True"/>
</Trigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</local:MyListView.ItemContainerStyle>
<local:MyListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Border Background="Red" Margin="5" Padding="5">
<TextBlock Text="Hello World"/>
</Border>
</DataTemplate>
</local:MyListView.ItemTemplate>
<local:MyListView.ItemEditTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Border Background="Green" Margin="5" Padding="5">
<TextBlock Text="Hello World"/>
</Border>
</DataTemplate>
</local:MyListView.ItemEditTemplate>
</local:MyListView>
Intended behavior: the selected item becomes edit-enabled, getting the local:MyListView.ItemEditTemplate (green) instead of the default template (red)

Just in case you might want to have an IsSelected property in your view model item class, you may create a derived ListView that establishes a Binding of its ListViewItems to the view model property:
public class MyListView : ListView
{
public string ItemIsSelectedPropertyName { get; set; } = "IsSelected";
protected override void PrepareContainerForItemOverride(
DependencyObject element, object item)
{
base.PrepareContainerForItemOverride(element, item);
BindingOperations.SetBinding(element,
ListViewItem.IsSelectedProperty,
new Binding
{
Path = new PropertyPath(ItemIsSelectedPropertyName),
Source = item,
Mode = BindingMode.TwoWay
});
}
}
You might now simply bind the RadioButton's IsChecked property in the ListView's ItemTemplate to the same view model property:
<local:MyListView ItemsSource="{Binding DataItems}">
<ListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<RadioButton Content="{Binding Content}"
IsChecked="{Binding IsSelected, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</ListView.ItemTemplate>
</local:MyListView>
In the above example the data item class also has Content property. Obviously, the IsSelected property of the data item class must fire a PropertyChanged event.

Command Binding not working on a context sensitive menu?

I have an user control (ex: UserCtrlClass)with a tree view inside it
I have View model (ex: OBJViewModel) class for represent the actual items/data display on the tree view
Next I have a Tree View Model (ex: TreeViewModel), which has a list of OBJViewModel objects
Now in the code behind file of the user control, I have instantiated the tree view model class and set as the data context of the user control class
I need a context sensitive menu, which i need to display only when I right click on a specific item in the tree, so I have handled the right click event of the user control class and did the work there
But the commands are not working, The commands are derived from I command and instantiated in TreeViewModel class. i tried to debug my Command.execute was never hit! Any help would be appreciated as I am being a newbie to .net and wpf
TreeViewModel class
<UserControl Name="PFDBUserCtrl" x:Class="BFSimMaster.BFSMTreeview"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:local="clr-namespace:BFSimMaster.ViewModel"
xmlns:cmd="clr-namespace:BFSimMaster.Commands"
mc:Ignorable="d"
d:DesignHeight="66" d:DesignWidth="300">
<UserControl.Resources>
<!--cmd:ActivateProjectCmd x:Key="CMDActivateProject"/-->
<!--cmd:DeActivateProjectCmd x:Key="CMDDeActivateProject"/-->
</UserControl.Resources>
<DockPanel>
<!-- PF Object Browser TREE -->
<TreeView Name="PFDataBrowser" ItemsSource="{Binding LevelOnePFObjects}" >
<TreeView.Resources>
<ContextMenu x:Key ="ProjectMenu" StaysOpen="true" >
<!-- Text="{Binding Source={StaticResource myDataSource}, Path=PersonName}-->
<!--MenuItem Header="Activate" Command="{Binding Source={StaticResource CMDActivateProject}}" CommandParameter="{Binding Path=PlacementTarget,RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=ContextMenu}}"/-->
<MenuItem Header="Activate" Command="{Binding DataContext.CMDActivateProject, RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType={x:Type UserControl}}}" CommandParameter="{Binding Path=PlacementTarget,RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=ContextMenu}}"/>
<MenuItem Header="Deactivate" Command="{Binding Source=TVViewModel, Path=CMDDeActivateProject}" CommandParameter="{Binding Path=PlacementTarget,RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=ContextMenu}}"/>
</ContextMenu>
</TreeView.Resources>
<TreeView.ItemContainerStyle>
<!-- This Style binds a TreeViewItem to a PFObject View Model.-->
<Style TargetType="{x:Type TreeViewItem}">
<EventSetter Event="MouseRightButtonDown" Handler="OnRightButtonDown"/>
<Setter Property="IsExpanded" Value="{Binding IsExpanded, Mode=TwoWay}" />
<Setter Property="IsSelected" Value="{Binding IsSelected, Mode=TwoWay}" />
<Setter Property="FontWeight" Value="Normal" />
<Style.Triggers>
<Trigger Property="IsSelected" Value="True">
<Setter Property="FontWeight" Value="Bold" />
</Trigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</TreeView.ItemContainerStyle>
<TreeView.ItemTemplate>
<HierarchicalDataTemplate ItemsSource="{Binding Children}">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Name}" />
</HierarchicalDataTemplate>
</TreeView.ItemTemplate>
</TreeView>
</DockPanel>
Code behind class
using System;
namespace BFSimMaster
{
public partial class BFSMTreeview : UserControl
{
readonly TreeViewItemViewModel mViewModelPFObjBrowserTree;
public BFSMTreeview()
{
InitializeComponent();
WApplication appPF = PFAPIUtils.APIInstance.GetApplication();
WDataObject User = appPF.GetCurrentUser();
// Get raw objects - tree data from a PF database.
//BFPFDataObject userdb = new BFPFDataObject(User,false,"*.IntPrj");
BFPFDataObject userdb = new BFPFDataObject(User, true);
// Create UI-friendly wrappers around the
// raw data objects (i.e. the view-model).
mViewModelPFObjBrowserTree = new TreeViewItemViewModel(userdb);
// Let the UI bind to the view-model.
base.DataContext = mViewModelPFObjBrowserTree;
}
public TreeViewItemViewModel TVViewModel
{
get { return mViewModelPFObjBrowserTree; }
}
private void OnRightButtonDown(object sender, MouseButtonEventArgs e)
{
//MessageBox.Show("Right Clicked on tree view");
if (sender is TreeViewItem)
{
e.Handled = true;
(sender as TreeViewItem).IsSelected = true;
string strObjectType = ((sender as TreeViewItem).Header as PFObjectViewModel).PFDataObject.mThisPFObject.GetClassName().GetString();
switch (strObjectType)
{
case "IntPrj":
(sender as TreeViewItem).ContextMenu = PFDataBrowser.Resources["ProjectMenu"] as System.Windows.Controls.ContextMenu;
(sender as TreeViewItem).ContextMenu.PlacementTarget = (sender as TreeViewItem);
break;
case "Folder":
(sender as TreeViewItem).ContextMenu = PFDataBrowser.Resources["ProjectMenu"] as System.Windows.Controls.ContextMenu;
break;
}
}
}
}
}
the TreeViewModel Class
using System;
namespace BFSimMaster.ViewModel
{
public class TreeViewItemViewModel
{
#region Data
readonly ReadOnlyCollection<PFObjectViewModel> mLevelOnePFObjects;
readonly PFObjectViewModel mRootOfPFObjects;
#endregion // Data
#region Constructor
public TreeViewItemViewModel(BFPFDataObject rootOfPFObjectsA)
{
this.CMDActivateProject = new ActivateProjectCmd();
this.CMDDeActivateProject = new DeActivateProjectCmd();
mRootOfPFObjects = new PFObjectViewModel(rootOfPFObjectsA);
mLevelOnePFObjects = new ReadOnlyCollection<PFObjectViewModel>(
new PFObjectViewModel[]
{
mRootOfPFObjects
});
}
#endregion // Constructor
public ICommand CMDActivateProject { get; set; }
public ICommand CMDDeActivateProject { get; set; }
public ReadOnlyCollection<PFObjectViewModel> LevelOnePFObjects
{
get { return mLevelOnePFObjects; }
}
}
}

A ContextMenu isn't part of the logical tree, so this binding "{Binding DataContext.CMDActivateProject, RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType={x:Type UserControl}}}" wont work, because it simply has no ancestor of type UserControl. If you dont set the DataContext of the PlacementTarget manuelly, you could try
"{Binding PlacementTarget.DataContext.CMDActivateProject, RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType={x:Type ContextMenu}}}"
I not 100% sure about the following, but I think this will just work, if youre using the ContextMenu property:
<Treeview>
<Treeview.ContextMenu>
<ContextMenu>
...
<ContextMenu>
<Treeview.ContextMenu>
...
The adventage here is, that you dont have to handle the rightbuttondown event in code-behind, it automatically opens if you right click on your treeview.

I've solved this problem by introducing VM class for MenuItem and setting context menu with ExtendedContextMenu.Items={Binding ContextMenu} attached property. MenuResourcesDictionary is ResourceDictionary.xaml with back-side .cs file (shown below).
To use it for your code you need to add IEnumerable<MenuItemVM> ContextMenu property on your tree model and put commands there (e.g. pass them to MenuItemVM constructor). And in the item style add <Setter Property="ExtendedContextMenu.Items" Value="{Binding DataContext.ContextMenu}" />
public static class ExtendedContextMenu
{
private static readonly StyleSelector _styleSelector = new ContextMenuItemStyleSelector();
public static readonly DependencyProperty ItemsProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("Items",
typeof(IEnumerable<MenuItemVM>),
typeof(ExtendedContextMenu),
new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(default(IEnumerable<MenuItemVM>), ItemsChanged));
public static void SetItems(DependencyObject element, IEnumerable<MenuItemVM> value)
{
element.SetValue(ItemsProperty, value);
}
public static IEnumerable<MenuItemVM> GetItems(DependencyObject element)
{
return (IEnumerable<MenuItemVM>)element.GetValue(ItemsProperty);
}
private static void ItemsChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
var target = (FrameworkElement)d;
var items = (IEnumerable<MenuItemVM>)e.NewValue;
var contextMenu = new ContextMenu();
contextMenu.ItemContainerStyleSelector = _styleSelector;
contextMenu.ItemsSource = items;
return contextMenu;
}
private static void AdjustContextMenuVisibility(ContextMenu menu)
{
menu.Visibility = menu.HasItems ? Visibility.Visible : Visibility.Hidden;
}
}
public class ContextMenuItemStyleSelector : StyleSelector
{
private static readonly MenuResourcesDictionary _resources = new MenuResourcesDictionary();
private static readonly Style _menuItemStyle = (Style)_resources[MenuResourcesDictionary.MenuItemStyleResourceKey];
private static readonly Style _separatorStyle = (Style)_resources[MenuResourcesDictionary.SeparatorStyleResourceKey];
public override Style SelectStyle(object item, DependencyObject container)
{
if (item == MenuItemVM.Separator)
return _separatorStyle;
return _menuItemStyle;
}
}
public sealed partial class MenuResourcesDictionary
{
public const string MenuItemStyleResourceKey = "MenuItemStyleResourceKey";
public const string DynamicMenuItemStyleResourceKey = "DynamicMenuItemStyleResourceKey";
public const string SeparatorStyleResourceKey = "SeparatorStyleResourceKey";
public const string LoadingStyleResourceKey = "LoadingMenuItemStyleResourceKey";
public MenuResourcesDictionary()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
}
Here is XAML styles:
<Style x:Key="{x:Static local:MenuResourcesDictionary.MenuItemStyleResourceKey}">
<Setter Property="MenuItem.Header" Value="{Binding Path=(menuVMs:MenuItemVM.Text)}" />
<Setter Property="MenuItem.Command" Value="{Binding Path=(menuVMs:MenuItemVM.Command)}" />
</Style>
<Style x:Key="{x:Static local:MenuResourcesDictionary.SeparatorStyleResourceKey}" TargetType="{x:Type MenuItem}">
<Setter Property="Template">
<Setter.Value>
<ControlTemplate>
<Separator />
</ControlTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</Style>
MenuItemVM class is more-or-less straighforward, so I don't write it here.

I Found the Answer for TreeView Context menu with and with out DataTemplate here:
TreeView ContextMenu MVVM Binding
MVVM binding command to contextmenu item