PssCreateSnapshot - access denied odd situation - c#

I've created some code for performing clones of processes using PssCaptureSnapshot and then perform a mini dump of the clone.
However, on some processes I'm getting access denied when running PssCaptureSnapshot (running as elevated). That's not a problem at all, in fact the processes that I cannot perform a clone of, can also not be cloned using ProcDump (tool from SysInternals).
However, what is odd is that if I open a PowerShell PSSession to the localhost and run my application from there... it has no problems creating the clone!
Now what immediately popped to my head was... privileges. So I checked the privileges inside the PSSession against those outside and... Bingo! PSSession has literally all privileges known to man whereas outside the PSSession I have just a handful of privileges.
No biggie, I thought... I'll just start assigning myself privileges, one at a time, calling PssCaptureSnapshot in between. When I stop getting access denied, I know which privilege I need!
The plan was foolproof. That is... until I ran out of privileges to assign and I was still getting access denied...
So now I'm really clutching at straws: why does it work inside a PSSession but not outside, when all of the privileges are (theoretically) the same? How do I troubleshoot this further?
Any help would be appreciated.
PS: I will gladly post code if you think it will help. But bearing in mind I get an access denied, the fact that it works inside a PSSession but not outside and the fact that ProcDump can also not create clones for these processes... I don't think the code is relevant.
EDIT
Results from whoami /all
local session:
USER INFORMATION
----------------
User Name SID
================== ===========================================
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx S-1-5-21-1509752874-53682476-648048294-1107
GROUP INFORMATION
-----------------
(listing only groups that appear in this session, but don't appear in the other)
NT AUTHORITY\REMOTE INTERACTIVE LOGON Well-known group S-1-5-14 Mandatory group, Enabled by default, Enabled group
NT AUTHORITY\INTERACTIVE Well-known group S-1-5-4 Mandatory group, Enabled by default, Enabled group
LOCAL Well-known group S-1-2-0
PRIVILEGES INFORMATION
----------------------
Privilege Name Description State
=============================== ========================================= ========
SeIncreaseQuotaPrivilege Adjust memory quotas for a process Disabled
SeSecurityPrivilege Manage auditing and security log Disabled
SeTakeOwnershipPrivilege Take ownership of files or other objects Disabled
SeLoadDriverPrivilege Load and unload device drivers Disabled
SeSystemProfilePrivilege Profile system performance Disabled
SeSystemtimePrivilege Change the system time Disabled
SeProfileSingleProcessPrivilege Profile single process Disabled
SeIncreaseBasePriorityPrivilege Increase scheduling priority Disabled
SeCreatePagefilePrivilege Create a pagefile Disabled
SeBackupPrivilege Back up files and directories Disabled
SeRestorePrivilege Restore files and directories Disabled
SeShutdownPrivilege Shut down the system Disabled
SeDebugPrivilege Debug programs Enabled
SeSystemEnvironmentPrivilege Modify firmware environment values Disabled
SeChangeNotifyPrivilege Bypass traverse checking Enabled
SeRemoteShutdownPrivilege Force shutdown from a remote system Disabled
SeUndockPrivilege Remove computer from docking station Disabled
SeManageVolumePrivilege Perform volume maintenance tasks Disabled
SeImpersonatePrivilege Impersonate a client after authentication Enabled
SeCreateGlobalPrivilege Create global objects Enabled
SeIncreaseWorkingSetPrivilege Increase a process working set Disabled
SeTimeZonePrivilege Change the time zone Disabled
SeCreateSymbolicLinkPrivilege Create symbolic links Disabled
USER CLAIMS INFORMATION
-----------------------
User claims unknown.
Kerberos support for Dynamic Access Control on this device has been disabled.
inside PSSession:
USER INFORMATION
----------------
User Name SID
================== ===========================================
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx S-1-5-21-1509752874-53682476-648048294-1107
GROUP INFORMATION
-----------------
(listing only groups that appear in this session, but don't appear in the other)
NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK Well-known group S-1-5-2
PRIVILEGES INFORMATION
----------------------
Privilege Name Description State
=============================== ========================================= =======
SeIncreaseQuotaPrivilege Adjust memory quotas for a process Enabled
SeSecurityPrivilege Manage auditing and security log Enabled
SeTakeOwnershipPrivilege Take ownership of files or other objects Enabled
SeLoadDriverPrivilege Load and unload device drivers Enabled
SeSystemProfilePrivilege Profile system performance Enabled
SeSystemtimePrivilege Change the system time Enabled
SeProfileSingleProcessPrivilege Profile single process Enabled
SeIncreaseBasePriorityPrivilege Increase scheduling priority Enabled
SeCreatePagefilePrivilege Create a pagefile Enabled
SeBackupPrivilege Back up files and directories Enabled
SeRestorePrivilege Restore files and directories Enabled
SeShutdownPrivilege Shut down the system Enabled
SeDebugPrivilege Debug programs Enabled
SeSystemEnvironmentPrivilege Modify firmware environment values Enabled
SeChangeNotifyPrivilege Bypass traverse checking Enabled
SeRemoteShutdownPrivilege Force shutdown from a remote system Enabled
SeUndockPrivilege Remove computer from docking station Enabled
SeManageVolumePrivilege Perform volume maintenance tasks Enabled
SeImpersonatePrivilege Impersonate a client after authentication Enabled
SeCreateGlobalPrivilege Create global objects Enabled
SeIncreaseWorkingSetPrivilege Increase a process working set Enabled
SeTimeZonePrivilege Change the time zone Enabled
SeCreateSymbolicLinkPrivilege Create symbolic links Enabled
USER CLAIMS INFORMATION
-----------------------
User claims unknown.
Kerberos support for Dynamic Access Control on this device has been disabled.

after relative long research with cogumel0 we found exactly root of the problem.
first of all we found that PssCaptureSnapshot can failed when and only when it called with PSS_CAPTURE_VA_CLONE flag - so for capture a snapshot of all cloneable pages in the process.
despite we have process handle with all required access to process (say PROCESS_ALL_ACCESS) - for some processes PssCaptureSnapshot return error. why ?
i note that error was only if process is running in the some job. (for determinate this we can use IsProcessInJob) and PssCaptureSnapshot can return in this case 2 different errors:
ERROR_NOT_ENOUGH_QUOTA - i view this in win8.1 and win10 - it
returned say for some chrome.exe processes (not all)
ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED - this error happens only when process which we
want snap - run in another session (compare our process) and this
is only in win8.1 - no this error in win10, even if process in
job and in another session.
for understand why this happens - need look how PssCaptureSnapshot internal implement PSS_CAPTURE_VA_CLONE semantic. it do it by fork target process (yes, fork under windows). for this task used undocumented ZwCreateProcessEx api. when SectionHandle == 0 (win32 CreateProcess always pass here section created on exe file (if say full true now CreateProcess use another api, this was early)) ZwCreateProcessEx clone (fork) process (ParentProcess) instead create new one based on SectionHandle (which based on some exe file)
but if ParentProcess in job - the child (our forked) process also will be placed in this job. and here can be problems.
at first job can have limit for process count in job. if say job have this limit - no more than 1 process in job - ZwCreateProcessEx and fail with error STATUS_QUOTA_EXCEEDED - and as result PssCaptureSnapshot return to us ERROR_NOT_ENOUGH_QUOTA. this is chrome.exe case - for security reasons some chrome processes run in job (with limit in 1 process) (this processes also have Untrusted Mandatory Level but this not related to issue)
but even if job have no limit for active process count (or we not exceed this limit) in win8.1 - in job belong to another session - call fail with STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. why this ? this already internal implementation details and now (in windows 10) it changed - no more this error - we can fork process even if it in job and another session. some hint why this we can got in AssignProcessToJobObject page:
All processes within a job must run within the same session as the
job.
so here some windows restriction related to job object and cross session.
how reproduce/test this error on windows 8.1 if interesting ? for my look most easy way - take some windows service running in session 0 - this service must be not critical for system (easy can start/stop it) and have own exe. for my look "msdtc.exe" perfect victim here. so open it, try snapshot first, than place in in job and after this - again try snapshot. and view different:
NTSTATUS status;
BOOLEAN b;
if (0 <= (status = RtlAdjustPrivilege(SE_DEBUG_PRIVILEGE, TRUE, FALSE, &b)))
{
// GetProcessIdByName custom function not shown here
if (ULONG dwProcessId = GetProcessIdByName(L"msdtc.exe"))
{
DbgPrint("found dwProcessId=%x\n", dwProcessId);
if (HANDLE hProcess = OpenProcess(PROCESS_CREATE_PROCESS|PROCESS_QUERY_LIMITED_INFORMATION |
PROCESS_SET_QUOTA|PROCESS_TERMINATE , FALSE, dwProcessId))
{
BOOL bInJob;
if (IsProcessInJob(hProcess, 0, &bInJob))
{
if (!bInJob)
{
HPSS SnapshotHandle;
ULONG err;
if (!(err = PssCaptureSnapshot(hProcess, PSS_CAPTURE_VA_CLONE, 0,&SnapshotHandle)))
{
PssFreeSnapshot(NtCurrentProcess(), SnapshotHandle);
}
DbgPrint("PssCaptureSnapshot=%u\n", err);
if (HANDLE hJob = CreateJobObject(0, 0))
{
bInJob = AssignProcessToJobObject(hJob, hProcess);
CloseHandle(hJob);
if (bInJob)
{
if (IsProcessInJob(hProcess, 0, &bInJob) && bInJob)
{
DbgPrint("process in job now!\n");
if (!(err = PssCaptureSnapshot(hProcess, PSS_CAPTURE_VA_CLONE, 0,&SnapshotHandle)))
{
PssFreeSnapshot(NtCurrentProcess(), SnapshotHandle);
}
DbgPrint("PssCaptureSnapshot=%u\n", err);
}
else
{
DbgPrint("process not in job !?\n");
}
}
else
{
DbgPrint("AssignProcessToJobObject error=%u\n", GetLastError());
}
}
else
{
DbgPrint("CreateJobObject error=%u\n", GetLastError());
}
}
else
{
DbgPrint("process already in job\n");
}
}
else
{
DbgPrint("IsProcessInJob error=%u\n", GetLastError());
}
CloseHandle(hProcess);
}
else
{
DbgPrint("OpenProcess error=%u\n", GetLastError());
}
}
}
else
{
DbgPrint("RtlAdjustPrivilege(SE_DEBUG_PRIVILEGE)=%x\n", status);
}
in windows 8.1 i got next dbgprint:
found dwProcessId=950
PssCaptureSnapshot=0
process in job now!
PssCaptureSnapshot=5
but in windows 10 another picture:
found dwProcessId=4d0
PssCaptureSnapshot=0
process in job now!
PssCaptureSnapshot=0
are this is windows bug or feature - hard to say

Related

C#: Programmatically Detect Windows Server Has Booted

I'm working on an automation process in C# that is going to remotely reboot a Windows (2008/2012/2016) server and I need to wait until that server is back online before proceeding.
I know 'back online' can be ambiguous, so for my requirements, I need the server to be back at the Ctrl-Alt-Del screen.
The reason for this is to have the server in a consistent state before proceeding. In my experience, there are several factors that could prevent the server from reaching this screen, such as installing windows updates that gets stuck in a reboot cycle or getting stuck at 'Waiting for Local Session Manager' etc.
I've spent a few days looking in to this to no avail:
The server obviously starts responding to ping requests before it is available
System Boot Time occurs before the Server reaches the desired state
Any events indicating the system has booted are logged before the desired state
I can't simply poll for an essential service - when Windows is applying computer updates prior to logon these services can be already started. Additionally, sometimes a server will reboot itself whilst installing updates at this stage which could result in false positives.
Polling CPU activity could also produce false positives or introduce delays
Is there anyway to detect a Windows server has finished booting and is available for an interactive logon?
It sounds like you've covered most of the possible ways I know of. Which makes me revert to brute force ideas. I am curious what you're doing where you can't install a windows service on the box (or is that just not very viable because of the number)
First would just be trying to remote login or whatever, and having some way to test if it fails or not, wait 1 minute, try again. But seems like that might cause side-issues for you somehow?
My idea of a brute force method that wouldn't affect state:
Ping every 1-5seconds
Once it starts responding
wait 5 or 10 or even 15 minutes, whilst still pinging it
If pings fail reset that timer (windows updates restart case)
Then be pretty confident you're at the right state.
With potentially thousands of servers, I can't imagine 15 minutes each would be a big deal, especially if it is consistent enough to be able to run in larger batches
So I've been able to accomplish this by using a hacky method put seems to work in my test environment.
Note that the el.Current.Name property will equate to the Ctrl-Alt-Del text, so on 2008R2 this is 'Press CTRL-ALT-DEL to log on' and 'Press CTRL-ALT-DEL to sign in.' on 2012R2
I've built a C# console application that uses UI Automation:
using System;
using System.Windows.Automation;
namespace WorkstationLocked
{
class Program
{
static void Main()
{
AutomationElement el = AutomationUI.FindElementFromAutomationID("LockedMessage");
if (el !=null)
{
Console.WriteLine(el.Current.Name);
}
}
}
class AutomationUI
{
public static AutomationElement FindElementFromAutomationID(string automationID)
{
string className = "AUTHUI.DLL: LogonUI Logon Window";
PropertyCondition condition = new PropertyCondition(AutomationElement.ClassNameProperty, className);
AutomationElement logonui = AutomationElement.RootElement.FindFirst(TreeScope.Children, condition);
if (logonui != null)
{
condition = new PropertyCondition(AutomationElement.AutomationIdProperty, automationID);
return logonui.FindFirst(TreeScope.Descendants, condition);
}
else
{
return null;
}
}
}
}
I can then execute this console application via PsExec, however, because this needs to be launched in the winlogon desktop, which can only be done by running under the local system, PsExec is invoked twice. For example:
psexec.exe \\ServerA -s -d C:\PsTools\PsExec.exe -accepteula -d -x C:\Utils\WorkstationLocked.exe
This is very much a work in progress right now as I can't get the output of the command to pass through to the calling process so I may just look to populate a registry value or write to a file that can be subsequently interrogated.

Process.Start won't work

I am trying to launch a process from a web page's back-end code/app pool. This process will launch an App that i built myself.
For some reason, the process only works / runs when i start it from VS2013... it never works when i launch it from IIS(7.5) itself.
I am on a Windows 7 machine (both IIS host, and App location), and I've setup my web site to only be accessible via internal network.
Here's the code, followed by the config / attempts to fix the issue:
protected void btn_DoIt_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
string file_text = this.txt_Urls.Text;
if (!String.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(file_text))
File.WriteAllText(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["filePath"], file_text);
ProcessStartInfo inf = new ProcessStartInfo();
SecureString ss = GetSecureString("SomePassword");
inf.FileName = #"........\bin\Release\SomeExecutable.exe";
inf.Arguments = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["filePath"];
inf.UserName = "SomeUserName";
inf.Password = ss;
inf.UseShellExecute = false;
//launch desktop app, but don't close it in case we want to see the results!
try
{
Process.Start(inf);
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
this.txt_Urls.Text = ex.Message;
}
this.txt_Urls.Enabled = false;
this.btn_DoIt.Enabled = false;
this.txt_Urls.Text = "Entries received and process started. Check local machine for status update, or use refresh below.";
}
Here are the things I've tried to resolve the issue:
Made sure the executing assembly was built with AnyCPU instead of
x86
Ensured that the AppPool that runs the app, also runs under the same account (SomeUsername) as the ProcessStartInfo specified.
Ensured that the specific user account has full access to the executable's folder.
Ensured that IIS_USR has full access to the executable's folder.
Restarted both the app pool and IIS itself many times over implementing these fixes
I am now at a loss as to why this simply will not launch the app... when i first looked into the event log, i saw that the app would die immediately with code 1000:KERNELBASE.dll, which got me on the AnyCPU config instead of X86 fix... that fixed the event log entries but the app still doesn't start (nothing comes up in task manager), and i get no errors in the event log...
if someone could help me fix this problem i would really appreciate it. This would allow me to perform specific tasks on my main computer from any device on my network (phone, tablet, laptop, etc etc) without having to be in front of my main PC...
UPDATE
The comment to my OP, and ultimate answer from #Bradley Uffner actually nailed the problem on the head: My "app" is actually a desktop application with a UI, and in order to run that application, IIS would need to be able to get access to the desktop and the UI, just like if it were a person sitting down in front of the PC. This of course is not the case since IIS is running only as a service account and it makes sense that it shouldn't be launching UI programs in the background. Also see his answer for one way of getting around this.
Your best bet might be to try writing this as 2 parts. A web site that posts commands to a text file (or database, or some other persistent storage), and a desktop application that periodically polls that file (database, etc) for changes and executes those commands. You could write out the entire command line, including exe path command arguments, and switches.
This is the only way I can really think of to allow a service application like IIS to execute applications that require a desktop context with a logged in user.
You should assign a technical user with enough high priviliges to the running application pool. By default the application pool is running with ApplicationPoolIdentity identy which has a very low priviliges.

Reliable method for detecting if Webex Client is running

What is the best method for determining if the Cisco Webex client is running on a user's computer? Currently, I'm checking for a running process like this:
public static bool IsWebExClientRunning()
{
// webex process name started from internet browser (could change). Just use Process Explorer to find the sub process name.
// alternate name - CiscoWebexWebService
Process[] pname = Process.GetProcessesByName("atmgr");
return pname.Length > 0;
}
While this method works, there could be an instance where Cisco pushes out updates to their client that changes the process name which would break this code if we're looking for a specific process name.
The Webex client starts as a child process from an Internet browser since it is technically a browser plugin and it doesn't show up on its own in Windows Task Manager. I have seen both atmgr and CiscoWebexWebService using Process Explorer to find the process. Sometimes, depending on the host operating system, Windows XP/Windows 7, it will just display atmgr and not the child process CiscoWebexWebService belonging to atmgr. It also varies slightly based on the browser that is used. It runs as a browser plugin for all supported browsers and for unsupported browsers, it will give the option to run as a standalone application.
The process tree can vary (i.e. other browsers/operating systems), but it looks something like this:
iexplore.exe
-> atmgr.exe
-> CiscoWebexWebService.exe
Obviously, all checks must be done client side and not server side, but is there a better method for approaching this?
I spoke with a Cisco specialist and they said that my current approach should be safe for detecting if the Webex client is running a user's machine. They were able to confirm that the process name is atmgr.exe and should not change in the near future.

Deny Access to Kiosk program process

I have a kiosk app and have to disable task manager always to prevent closing the program by users .
But some users need the TaskManager to close hanging programs.
Any help would be appropriated.
However, I am sure there is a function in windows to prevent closing a program's process , as when one attempt to kill rundll.exe process. I want to know that function if I can call it with DllImport
Can anyone help with a trick?
A hack?
A function?
Any other solution?
EDIT:
At least if there is not a way to prevent the process from being closed, I need a way to hide it from processes list appeared in the task manager.
EDIT 2:
I can't find the solution so far
One approach, if you could access the process ID in an administrative context, is to deny the PROCESS_TERMINATE permission on the process to end users. Terminating the process (through task manager or other contexts) is by default granted to the owner, but can be explicitly denied. When it is denied, terminating the process would require the owner to manually change the ACL, and then terminate the process. If the user is neither an administrator nor the owner of the process, he will not be able to forcibly terminate the process (e.g., through Task Manager), although the process will be allowed to exit normally.
The following code puts an explicit deny ACE on the process with the PID processid for members of the Everyone group.
#include "Aclapi.h"
#include "Sddl.h"
DWORD RestrictTerminateOnProcessId(DWORD processid)
{
PACL dacl = NULL, newdacl = NULL;
HANDLE ph = NULL;
PSECURITY_DESCRIPTOR* desc = NULL;
PSID everyonesid = NULL;
ph = OpenProcess(WRITE_DAC | READ_CONTROL, false, processid);
if (!ph) goto cleanup;
if (ERROR_SUCCESS != GetSecurityInfo(ph,
SE_KERNEL_OBJECT,
DACL_SECURITY_INFORMATION,
NULL,
NULL,
&dacl,
NULL,
desc)) goto cleanup;
SID_IDENTIFIER_AUTHORITY WorldAuth = SECURITY_WORLD_SID_AUTHORITY;
if (!AllocateAndInitializeSid(
&WorldAuth,1,SECURITY_WORLD_RID,
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,&everyonesid)) goto cleanup;
// begin copy dacl
_ACL_SIZE_INFORMATION si;
GetAclInformation(dacl,
&si,
sizeof(si),
AclSizeInformation);
DWORD dwNewAclSize = si.AclBytesInUse +
(2*sizeof(ACCESS_DENIED_ACE)) + (2*GetLengthSid(everyonesid)) -
(2*sizeof(DWORD));
newdacl = (PACL)HeapAlloc(
GetProcessHeap(),
HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY,
dwNewAclSize);
if (newdacl == NULL) goto cleanup;
if (!InitializeAcl(newdacl, dwNewAclSize, ACL_REVISION_DS))
goto cleanup;
if (!AddAccessDeniedAce(newdacl,
ACL_REVISION_DS,
PROCESS_TERMINATE,
everyonesid)) goto cleanup;
for (int i = 0; i < si.AceCount; i++)
{
LPVOID pace = NULL;
if (!GetAce(dacl, i, &pace)) goto cleanup;
if (!AddAce(newdacl, ACL_REVISION_DS,
MAXDWORD, pace, ((PACE_HEADER)pace)->AceSize))
goto cleanup;
}
// end copy dacl
if (!SetSecurityInfo(ph,
SE_KERNEL_OBJECT,
DACL_SECURITY_INFORMATION,
NULL,
NULL,
newdacl,
NULL)) goto cleanup;
SetLastError(0);
cleanup:
DWORD ret = GetLastError();
if (desc) LocalFree(desc);
if (newdacl) HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, (LPVOID)newdacl);
if (ph) CloseHandle(ph);
if (everyonesid) FreeSid(everyonesid);
return !ret;
}
You could create a service that runs on boot. It then monitors when the user logs in and starts your program. From there you have two choices:
Have it wait on the program and revive it for as long as the user's session persists.
Run it under an administrator account and make sure the users are always running on limited accounts. Windows' privilege enforcement should take care of your program not dying.
If you must allow the users administrative privileges (and they can thus kill your service), make sure to register your service so that the SCM restarts it automatically.
Anything beyond that would require some kernel hacking, as mdm said, or diving into rootkit territory. Which I would suggest you avoid.
If by any chance you're still running Windows XP, instead of a system service, you can register a Winlogon notification package. They're basically unkillable, as they run in the context of winlogon.exe, which is the reason they were removed from Vista and above.
The proper way of doing this is:
Create a user for the Kiosk application. Lets say KioskUser
Create other users that do stuff in the computer. Lets say User1
NONE of them should be administrator. They do not need to be admins right? They can have privileges of course.
You are going to use User1 account as usual.
Then, you run the Kiosk application as the KioskUser. (use runas command)
- add the application to the session and make it visible (see the arguments for more info on this)
While the User1 is loged in and the Kiosk application runs from the KioskUser, the User1 cannot kill the process.
I wouldn't recommend "hacking" the system, nor changing something on the registry.
Also, you can make the Kiosk application a service, and run it under the Kiosk user.
It sounds like you can't prevent a process from being killed - see this question and specifically the link posted to an explanation.
You can however prevent the user from opening the task manager from the taskbar (right click -> open task manager), from pressing Ctrl-Shift-Esc, or from typing taskman at the command prompt using the following registry key:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System\DisableTaskMgr
Setting it to 1 disables the task manager, 0 enables it again.
From the command prompt, disable it like so:
reg add HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System /v DisableTaskMgr /t REG_DWORD /d 1 /f
And you can renable with this command:
reg add HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System /v DisableTaskMgr /t REG_DWORD /d 0 /f
You'll also need to find a way of preventing the user from writing to this key in the registry - although on my Windows 7 64-bit machine I had to open an admin command prompt before I could change the key.
Edit
As suggested in the comments, you could intercept a low level system call to alter the list of processes reported. This answer eludes to it, you will basically have to write a kernel-mode rootkit - probably implemented as a device driver. This will likely only work in Windows XP and below due to kernel changes made in Vista and onwards. It can be done however, a friend of mine created a prototype of this for his BSc final year dissertation.
You'll also have to consider other methods of querying for processes - IIRC NtQuerySystemInformation isn't the only way that processes can be enumerated.
Short of protecting your Kiosk app with some rootkit/driver you can't... although the methods you would need to use in this context are "malware-like" so beware...
Here http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2004/02/16/73780.aspx you can see on one side why this is a task not really possible and on the other side the several possibilities you would have to defend against... which would be:
deny PROCESS_TERMINATE
deny PROCESS_CREATE_THREAD
deny PROCESS_VM_WRITE
deny PROCESS_SUSPEND_RESUME
Plus any defense you can get your hands on against debuggers - another very tricky business.
Sorry for not posting this as a comment (not enough reputation).
I'm using drfs solution, but it seems to induce a memory leak with the way GetSecurityInfo is used. I changed the code and got rid of the memory leak like this:
Declaration:
PSECURITY_DESCRIPTOR desc = NULL;
Initialisation:
desc = (PSECURITY_DESCRIPTOR)GlobalAlloc(GMEM_FIXED, sizeof(PSECURITY_DESCRIPTOR));
Cleanup:
if (desc) GlobalFree(desc);
Call:
GetSecurityInfo(ph, SE_KERNEL_OBJECT, DACL_SECURITY_INFORMATION, NULL, NULL, &dacl, NULL, &desc)
I also found this article on the issue: http://i1.blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2012/12/12/10376639.aspx
While you can't prevent an authorized user from killing your process, you can prevent users from having the necessary permissions to kill your process. That said, a local administrator will always have permission to kill any process. Is your hope to prevent closing of your application by any user or just non-admins? If the former, simply running the process under a dedicated user account may be enough to do the trick.

Disabling Task manager using c# in OS Hardened machine

I am using the below code to disable the task manager for a kiosk application which works perfectly
public void DisableTaskManager()
{
RegistryKey regkey;
string keyValueInt = "1";
string subKey = "Software\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\Policies\\System";
try
{
regkey = Registry.CurrentUser.CreateSubKey(subKey);
regkey.SetValue("DisableTaskMgr", keyValueInt);
regkey.Close();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
MessageBox.Show("DisableTaskManager" + ex.ToString());
}
}
But when i run this in OS hardened machine i get the following error,
DisableTaskManagerSystem.UnauthorizedAccessException:
Access to the registry key 'HKey_Current_User\Software\Mictrosoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System' is denied.
at Microsoft.win32.RegistryKey.win32Error(int32 errorcode, String str)
How can i overcome this ? I need to do this for a Kiosk application.
take a look at this, im not yet a good enough C# Developer to comment but i know that during my work with other developers they came accross the UAC In windows 7, If thats what were talking about here.
http://www.aneef.net/2009/06/29/request-uac-elevation-for-net-application-managed-code/
Well the guy that set up that machine basically asked the reverse... "How do I prevent a non-administrator from messing with group policy". So rather engaging in a group policy arms race, you can either do it at install time when running as an admin, or just skip that part of the code when not running as a user that has permission to do so.
Don't have your application disable task manager but instead use a windows service or scheduled task. Your application is going to run in the context of the current user and won't have rights to the registry key. Instead you can create either a windows service or a scheduled task which can run as a user with higher privileges and can write to the registry.
With a windows service you can communicate it through any IPC mechanism such as custom service messages, Sockets, .NET Remoting, WCF, or whatever, to tell it to turn task manager on/off.
the code requires an elevated privilege to access registry. However there is just a fragment of code that requires these extra permission. To handle such scenarios impersonation is used i.e. you will execute this application as normal user only but that particular piece of code will be executed as if you were an Administrator.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.security.principal.windowsimpersonationcontext.aspx

Categories