Now I have a completed program, that needs to be deployed with some files. I would like to ask, if it is possible to deploy the program without the use of ClickOnce or other external tools, with the minimum amount of required files?
The program will run on a server, and will be updated locally, but since the program is installed per user, does that mean if I log in to the server with my user, a person that uses the direct path to the program will not find it? It also makes maintaining the program slightly more annoying, because when changes come, the current maintainer will have to always navigate to the xyz folder to edit one config file. How do I publish the program without ClickOnce or other tools?
Your options include:
Click once (which you don't want)
Visual Studio installer Projects
WiX Toolset
Other installers ...
Write an installer on your own (wouldn't recommend)
Just put the exe (and other needed files) in some directory and launch the program
Put the exe on a shared location and launch from there
You can redistribute as a set of files. However I would not recommend this approach. You force the person who deploys your program :
Choose location for the files
Remember this location when time to uninstall comes.
Handle updates and version management
Restore program functionality if any of the required files will get damaged.
You can use VS Setup project template, here's tutorial
Alternatively you can use free Wix installer, it has a bit of a learning curve but provides much more power to the developer.
You can do perMachine install both with VS setup project and with wix.
Related
I created a program that uses images from the Blizzard API service.
I created an installer for the program, and I place the images in the "User's Application Data Folder".
Installation is excellent, the images are unpacked into the folder "AppData / Roaming / MyApp".
There is a need for the images to be deleted, and the program will download them from the Blizzard service itself.
But when you delete the installed files, the installer starts restoring the files, and the program cannot download fresh data from the Blizzard service.
Is it possible to disable recovery for the folder "AppData / Roaming / MyApp"?
Or you have any idea how to resolve it?
For creating installer I using "Microsoft Visual Studio Installer Projects" https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=VisualStudioClient.MicrosoftVisualStudio2017InstallerProjects
Help me please.
Download Files: Can you install your service and then download the files from the server and not install them via MSI at all? This
will de-couple them from any MSI self-repair interference. MSI does not know anything about the files in this scenario.
Self-Repair: Windows Installer (MSI) self-repair is a very intricate thing to deal with: Why does the MSI installer reconfigure if I delete a file?. And here is a more elaborate piece: How do I avoid triggering MSI self-repair with my WiX / MSI package? I wouldn't really recommend studying it too much: the concept is simple (keep installed files in correct version), but the problems that result are intricate and difficult to fix.
Blank GUIDs: There is a method where you can install the files via components that has a blank GUID. Then they are simply installed and never checked again. This should eliminate self-repair problems.
Read-Only Templates: Finally you can install a bunch of template files to a per-machine path (for example under program files) and then copy them in place for each user. Can be very effective. You can then overwrite them and delete at will.
Recommendation: I would install my service and download the files from the server on demand. That should give you full control of the whole process from code that is easier to debug than setup code (custom actions).
I wrote a fairly simple application with C#/.NET and can't figure out a good way to publish it. It's a sort of a "tool" that users would only run once, or run every few months. Because of this, I'm hoping that there is a way I could deploy it where it wouldn't need installing to run (it could just be run by double-clicking an EXE file straight after downloading).
However, it still needs (somehow) to include the correct version of .NET, libraries, etc. so it will run correctly. I know this is included when using ClickOnce, but that still installs the application onto the user's computer.
Is there a way this can be done?
EDIT - \bin\Debug
myAppName.application
myAppName.exe
myAppName.exe.config
myAppName.exe.manifest
myAppName.pdb
myAppName.vshost.application
myAppName.vshost.exe
myAppName.vshost.exe.config
myAppName.vshost.exe.manifest
extraLibrary.dll
as well as two folders
app.publish
Resources
It is possible and is deceptively easy:
"Publish" the application (to, say, some folder on drive C), either from menu Build or from the project's properties → Publish. This will create an installer for a ClickOnce application.
But instead of using the produced installer, find the produced files (the EXE file and the .config, .manifest, and .application files, along with any DLL files, etc.) - they are all in the same folder and typically in the bin\Debug folder below the project file (.csproj).
Zip that folder (leave out any *.vhost.* files and the app.publish folder (they are not needed), and the .pdb files unless you foresee debugging directly on your user's system (for example, by remote control)), and provide it to the users.
An added advantage is that, as a ClickOnce application, it does not require administrative privileges to run (if your application follows the normal guidelines for which folders to use for application data, etc.).
As for .NET, you can check for the minimum required version of .NET being installed (or at all) in the application (most users will already have it installed) and present a dialog with a link to the download page on the Microsoft website (or point to one of your pages that could redirect to the Microsoft page - this makes it more robust if the Microsoft URL change). As it is a small utility, you could target .NET 2.0 to reduce a user's probability to install .NET.
It works. We use this method during development and test to avoid constantly uninstalling and installing the application and still being quite close to how the final application will run.
First, you need to publish the file by:
BUILD -> PUBLISH or by right clicking project on Solution Explorer -> properties -> publish or select project in Solution Explorer and press Alt + Enter
NOTE: if you are using Visual Studio 2013 then in properties you have to go to BUILD and then you have to disable define DEBUG constant and define TRACE constant and you are ready to go.
Save your file to a particular folder.
Find the produced files (the EXE file and the .config, .manifest, and .application files, along with any DLL files, etc.) - they are all in the same folder and type in the bin\Debug folder below the project file (.csproj).
In Visual Studio they are in the Application Files folder and inside that, you just need the .exe and dll files.
(You have to delete ClickOnce and other files and then make this folder a zip file and distribute it.)
NOTE: The ClickOnce application does install the project to the system, but it has one advantage. You DO NOT require administrative privileges here to run (if your application follows the normal guidelines for which folders to use for application data, etc.).
I have developed a windows application on C# in Visual Studio Express 2010. Now I want to deploy it.
I used publish to deploy but when I run the project it get error on the form where I have used some external files which I am using for I/O operation, read and write files.
How do I resolve this error? I am also using one folder for files.
I'm a big fan of using WiX for installers - even if you've got Visual Studio Pro with the built in MSI creation tools
http://wix.sourceforge.net/
the benefit of WiX is that you can do most anything, from the super simple to very complicated. The tool is great b/c you can get started quickly and then move up (adding dialogs, etc) as your app gets more popular.
One trick for installers - consider using VMWare/HyperV, install a test OS then take a snapshot of the OS before you install your app. IF everything works, great - you're done. However if something isnt right, roll the OS back to the pre-install snapshot, fix the bug, and try it again.
Add those external files to the project
Right Click the external files in your VS Set the Build Action as Content
Copy to Output directory to CopyAlways
Then try deploying
That may be due Windows 7 UAC permissions. Despite the fact that current books, msdn and even the snippets in Visual Studio teach methods of file IO, most are not correct when taking UAC into consideration.
All of your file operations should take place in UAC safe zones such as
Environment.GetFolderPath(Environment.SpecialFolder.ApplicationData)
You cannot read or write to files in the C:\Program Files (x86) directories unless you have elevated your app to run with higher privileges.
If you install your application and right click the executable and select Run As Administrator and everything works the problem is UAC.
If you haven't coded around UAC limitations I highly recommend reading up on it. It will save many headaches down the road.
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/17968/Making-Your-Application-UAC-Aware
VS 2008 SP1
I have created a application that I have installed on the user computer. However, I want the application to be self-updating. But I am not sure if this would really update the application.
The application will download all the files from the web server, and replace the files in the directory where the program as been installed to. The user will restart the application.
I am just want to be sure, because I can't replace the installed files with the updated ones. As the application will be running. So really the application cannot delete/replace itself.
So, I was thinking that I could download into another directory, if the program is installed in this directory 'program files/application/1.0.0' then I could download the files to 'program files/application/1.0.1'.
However, when the program restarts, how can it know that it has to execute from the 1.0.1 directory?
I can't use clickonce or the updater block for this.
Many thanks for any advice,
A good option is to make an independant Updater application.
The updater will download the newest version and kill/replace the old.
I think this is the best option, because you can execute the updater within the main appication (so you can say that it´s self-updating), or directly by the user with a shortcut.
The updater can check if the application is running and ask the user to exit the application or kill it by itself.
Forgive my english...
Good luck
All of that is already done for you if you use ClickOnce deployment (Project properties, Publish).
You can wrap the application with a small loader program which will do a version check. If it's out of date, download the newer binaries and overwrite the old ones. If you want to maintain all version you might end up with:
c:\program files\mycompany\myapp\loader (the newer version will point to the latest directory)
c:\program files\mycompany\myapp\v1.0
c:\program files\mycompany\myapp\v1.1
If it's on a LAN, you might be able afford the bandwidth of just re-downloading the binaries on start up instead.
Use Windows Installer for the installation and updating. If you sign your installation packages the user can update your application without needing any administrator privileges.
I've made a website and an application that demonstrates the functionality of what you want on my website.
Wix Clickthrough might meet your needs: http://wix.sourceforge.net/clickthrough.html
I would look into ClickOnce. It can be configured multiple ways, to check for updates before the application runs, to download from the server each time it's run, or check for updates after the application has started.
I have done ClickOnce Deployment and an independent updating application, they both work well. You obviously will have more flexibility over an updating application that you create yourself, however tho, ClickOnce can also be configured to install prerequisites such as the .NET Framework, Windows Installer, etc... for your application to run.
How can I deploy a C# Visual Studio 2005 project so that I can run the application in another system? My project has a few dependencies and files that have to be integrated while deploying the project.
What is the best way to handle this?
You need to know what dependencies you have.
you need to have .Net framework installed
you have to explicitly install all dependencies that you used from the GAC on your target machine (some 3rd party components)
and then you just need to copy files from your \bin\Release folder
install all services, etc. if you have any
In the simplest cases only copying files should be enough.
Have you looked into ClickOnce deployment?
It's far from perfect, but for projects without a huge amount of overhead, it's generally good enough.
What kind of project?
Assuming it's a regular winforms application, just copy everything from either the obj\debug or obj\release directory to the new computer. Then run your executable
You can right click on the project file in visual studio and publish to a different location. This will build the site and copy it to the specified directory.
Also, if you need to do anything extra during the build, you can specify custom build actions on the build tab of the project's properties.
EDIT: now that I see you added that it's a windows application my answer doesn't matter. I'd try adding a setup and deployment project in visual studio to handle installing/deploying your windows application.
You more or less have three options (maybe 4?) as I see it.
Windows Installer
ClickOnce
Just distribute
the exe itself
In your particular case I would suggest ClickOnce as long as the project is not massive with too many dependencies.
For other alternatives.
The right answer depends on many criteria.
The simplest way to deploy is by copying files. Just put your .exe, the dependent .dll's, and the .config file in a directory and copy it onto the target machine. It's simple, but there are many restrictions to this approach:
It assumes that the target machine has the right version of the .NET framework installed
It assumes a certain technical competence on the part of the person installing the software.
The installation won't do basic things like create start menu items.
Publishing the program for ClickOnce deployment addresses a lot of these issues, but it's got its own set of limitations. I haven't used it much, so there are probably more than these, though these alone are pretty significant:
Programs are installed into the ClickOnce cache, not the Program Files directory.
If your program does anything outside of the ClickOnce sandbox, you have to deal with security elevation and code signing.
You can create a VS Setup and Deployment project and build an .msi file to install the program. The most obvious drawback to this is that it's complicated: .msi files can do many, many things, and the Setup and Deployment object model is complex, with documentation that is, let us say, fanciful. But there are things you can do with .msi installation that you can't readily do with other approaches, including (and certainly not limited to):
Cleanly uninstall the program through Add/Remove Programs.
Provide an actual UI for installation that lets the user decide where to put the program.
Support scripted installation via MSIEXEC.
Install components besides the program, e.g. databases, COM objects, etc.
Put components in the target machine's GAC.