We Keep Coding

WPF/MVVM: switching between views

I'm trying to learn WPF/MVVM, and I'm currently working on how to switch between views. I've started by finding some example to study in the interntet. The one I'm using is quite simple: two views (named "Home and "Account") that only display a label, to keep the xaml and VM simple, and a main window with two buttons to switch between the views.
The DataTemplates are declared in the App.xaml file (together with the namespaces), so they should be global to the whole project:
<Application.Resources>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type viewmodels:HomeViewModel}">
<views:HomeView/>
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type viewmodels:AccountViewModel}">
<views:AccountView/>
</DataTemplate>
</Application.Resources>
The way I've understood it, the trick is done by a third VM (called MainViewModel.cs) that implements a SelectedViewModel attribute that keeps track of the VM that must be displayed, plus and ICommand bound to the buttons:
private BaseViewModel _selectedViewModel;
public BaseViewModel SelectedViewModel
{
get { return _selectedViewModel; }
set
{
_selectedViewModel = value;
OnPropertyChanged(nameof(SelectedViewModel));
}
}
public ICommand UpdateViewCommand { get; set; }
MainWindow.xaml looks like this:
<ContentControl Grid.Row="0" Content="{Binding SelectedViewModel}"/>
<StackPanel Grid.Row="1" Orientation="Horizontal" HorizontalAlignment="Center">
<Button Margin="10" Width="200" Content="Home" Command="{Binding UpdateViewCommand}" CommandParameter="Home"/>
<Button Margin="10" Width="200" Content="Account" Command="{Binding UpdateViewCommand}" CommandParameter="Account"/>
</StackPanel>
In a separate class file (UpdateViewModel.cs) the UpdateViewModel class implements the Execute method as follows:
public void Execute (object parameter)
{
if (parameter.ToString() == "Home")
{
viewModel.SelectedViewModel = new HomeViewModel();
}
else if (parameter.ToString() == "Account")
{
viewModel.SelectedViewModel = new AccountViewModel();
}
}
I hope I've given the idea without boring you. It all works and lets me understand the basics. Now I wanted to try a variant, i.e. take one view (the "Account" one) and implement a button that would switch directly to the other view. I thought all I had to do was to bind the button to the UpdateViewModel class, and initially I modified the Account.xaml code as follows:
<Button Content="Button" Command="{Binding Path=UpdateViewCommand}" CommandParameter="Home"/>
The program runs, but when I click on the button in the Account view, nothing happens. So I changed this to something more complex:
<UserControl.DataContext>
<src:MainViewModel/>
</UserControl.DataContext>
...
<Button Content="Button" Command="{Binding Path=UpdateViewCommand}" CommandParameter="Home"/>
But the result is the same. I suspect it has to do with the binding, but can't see how to change it. Anybody can help?

Welcome to SO!
Your button bindings are done relative to the current DataContext, so binding to UpdateViewCommand in your AccountView (say) will try to bind to the UpdateViewCommand in your AccountViewModel, rather than your MainViewModel.
There are two ways to solve this. The first is to change your button bindings to bind to the parent's view model instead:
<Button Content="Button" Command="{Binding Path=DataContext.UpdateViewCommand, RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType={x:Type local:MainWindow}}}" CommandParameter="Home"/>
A major disadvantage here, of course, is that the visual hierarchy your child views reside in may not always be as predictable as this.
The second (better) way is to add UpdateViewCommand handlers to each of your child view models, and then have them pass control on to whatever you actually want to handle it. In practice you would typically create a base class for all your children, to reduce code duplication, and you would create a service (e.g. INavigationService) for them to call. Your MainViewModel (say) would then implement this interface, and you would use dependency injection to inject that reference into the child view models at their moment of creation (or just have the parent pass itself directly into their constructors, if you don't want to use a full DI framework).

OnPropertyChanged at class level

Im working on a WPF project in which my view model has more than 90 properties. I have a "save" button on clicking of which I save the properties to DB. Im required to disable the Save button until at lease one of the properties has been modified. I cannot go and put OnPropertyChanged event handling for each property(simply because it is too cumbersome for 90+ properties). Is there that I can do such that even if one property is changed I should get notified so that I can enable the Save button?
<StackPanel>
<StackPanel>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" HorizontalAlignment="Right">
<Button Content="{x:Static res:Resources.SaveToDB}" Command="{Binding Save}" IsEnabled="{Binding CanSaveToDB}" Margin="0,0,4,0" HorizontalAlignment="Center" Style="{StaticResource OverlayDialogButtonCentered}" FontSize="14"/>
<Button Content="{x:Static res:Resources.DiscardDBSave}" Command="{Binding DiscardSave}" Margin="0,0,4,0" HorizontalAlignment="Center" Style="{StaticResource OverlayDialogButtonCentered}" FontSize="14"/>
</StackPanel>
<StackPanel>
<views:MySampleAppView1 DataContextChanged="MySampleApp_DataContextChanged" DataContext="{Binding MySampleApp.View1}"/>
</StackPanel>
<StackPanel>
<views:MySampleAppView2 DataContextChanged="MySampleApp_DataContextChanged" DataContext="{Binding MySampleApp.View2}"/>
</StackPanel>
<StackPanel>
<views:MySampleAppView3 DataContextChanged="MySampleApp_DataContextChanged" DataContext="{Binding MySampleApp.View3}"/>
</StackPanel>
<StackPanel>
<views:MySampleAppView4 DataContextChanged="MySampleApp_DataContextChanged" DataContext="{Binding MySampleApp.View4}"/>
</StackPanel>
<StackPanel>
<views:MySampleAppView5 DataContextChanged="MySampleApp_DataContextChanged" DataContext="{Binding MySampleApp.View5}"/>
</StackPanel>
<StackPanel>
<views:MySampleAppView6 DataContextChanged="MySampleApp_DataContextChanged" DataContext="{Binding MySampleApp.View6}"/>
</StackPanel>
<StackPanel>
<views:MySampleAppView7 DataContextChanged="MySampleApp_DataContextChanged" DataContext="{Binding MySampleApp.View7}"/>
</StackPanel>
</StackPanel>
Then each of the above View has WPF controls.I have viewmodels for each of the above View. Then there is a main view model which represents above mentioned code.

A typical solution is to implement it just once (usually on a base class) and call it from the setter on each property passing the name of the property that has changed. This is still relatively cumbersome. Another approach is to use a tool such as Fody to automatically add this logic.
If all your properties are calling a single OnPropertyChanged implementation then the logic to set the dirty flag (and so enable the Save button) can be implemented there.

As per the Documentation,
The PropertyChanged event can indicate all properties on the object
have changed by using either null or String.Empty as the property name
in the PropertyChangedEventArgs.

Two ways come to mind.
First, you don't really need to trigger a unique property change notice in each property setter because your buttons' IsEnabled properties are not gonna be binding to any one of those 90-some odd properties in your view model. What you really want I think is to have some kind of IsDirty property that gets set whenever one of the other properties change, bind that to the IsEnabled property of the buttons, and execute the OnPropertyChanged notifier when IsDirty is changed.
If you still don't want to have to do ANYTHING special in your 90 property setters, however, the other option is to handle the change event in your view controls themselves. In all TextBoxes, for example, subscribe to TextChanged. And in your event handlers, set the IsDirty property on your view model. (You can subscribe to those handlers in the controls' styles so you don't have to set the event handler 90 times.)
Barring those two ideas, I don't think there's any way to do what you want. There's no built in mechanism in C# to get notified when a class property has changed. You're gonna have to intercept the change yourself, if not in the properties' setters, then using event handlers on the controls they're bound to.

React on user clicking already selected ListViewItem, MVVM

I have a ListView that looks like this, that controls which tab in my application that is opened.
<ListView Grid.ColumnSpan="2" Grid.Row="1" SelectedItem="{Binding Path=SelectedSubstanceName}" Name="listView" ItemsSource="{Binding Path=Substances}" HorizontalAlignment="Stretch" Margin="2" VerticalAlignment="Stretch">
<ListView.ContextMenu>
<ContextMenu>
<MenuItem Header="Lägg till" Command="{Binding AddSubstanceCommand}"/>
<MenuItem Header="Ta bort" Command="{Binding RemoveSubstanceCommand}"/>
</ContextMenu>
</ListView.ContextMenu>
<ListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<WrapPanel>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Name}" FontWeight="Bold" />
</WrapPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</ListView.ItemTemplate>
</ListView>
I use the SelectedSubstanceName property to detect which tab to open, or switch to, if it's already open.
The property looks like this:
private SubstanceName selectedSubstanceName;
public SubstanceName SelectedSubstanceName
{
get
{
return selectedSubstanceName;
}
set
{
selectedSubstanceName = value;
OnPropertyChanged("SelectedSubstanceName");
if (selectedSubstanceName != null)
{
if (!Tabs.Any(t => t.Identify(selectedSubstanceName.SubstanceNameID, typeof(SubstanceTabsViewModel))))
AddTab(selectedSubstanceName);
else
SelectedTab = Tabs.First(t => t.Identify(selectedSubstanceName.SubstanceNameID, typeof(SubstanceTabsViewModel)));
}
}
}
The case I'm not able to cover is when the user clicks "someSubstance", the corresponding tab is opened, the user closes it, and "someSubstance" is still selected. If the user wants to open it again, he has to select some other substance (which will then be opened), and then click "someSubstance" again. Is it possible to trigger the property even when clicking the same ListViewItem?
I know I could add an event on double-click, but ideally, I want to avoid both events and double-clicks.

I think the problem is that after clicking an item the first time the list's SelectedItem gets set. After clicking the same item the second time SelectedItem won't change because it is already set to that item. What you should do is set the SelectedItem to null after handling the click.

Try to unselect all Items in your ListView after the tab is closed.
YOURLISTVIEW.UnselectAll();
So the next time someone selects an Item there will be a change.

You don't actually want to use the ListView class, but instead simply use the ItemsControl, since it is the most basic way of representing a sequence of elements, but without the extras such as SelectedItem, SelectedValue, etc. that any class deriving from Selector has.
From there, it's merely a matter of how to represent each item in the ItemsControl. The behavior you want is to know when a specific item has been clicked on, which would make the Button class a good candidate, since it handles click behavior through an ICommand interface. Obviously, since you know about DataTemplates and styling in general, you should already know that you can customize how the button looks (visually) without sacrificing the actual behavior (click-handling).
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding Path=Substances}">
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Button Style="{StaticResource SomeStyleToChangeItsLook}"
Command="{Binding Path=SelectSubstanceCommand}"
CommandParameter="{Binding}"
Content="{Binding Path=Name}" />
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
public ICommand SelectSubstanceCommand { get; private set; }
private void SelectSubstance(object parameter)
{
// Add the substance that was "clicked" on here however you want to do it.
}
Keep in mind I don't know what framework you are using, so I just gave a general example of how the Command code might look in your view-model. The key to MVVM and using WPFs awesome UI is to always think of what behavior you want and which controls offer that behavior. Ignore how they actually look because that can be changed without losing that behavior.

Caliburn.Micro: Grid not getting binded/linked to x:Name

So I'm developing a Windows Phone 8 app with the Caliburn.Micro framework. I'm trying to create a grid where I, at runtime add/remove elements such as TextBlock's at runtime. I've tried a few things to bind my code to the x:Name but nothing has worked so far.
So one of the things i tried was having a placeholder grid in my xaml aka View:
<Grid x:Name="ContentPanel" Margin="0,97,0,0" Grid.RowSpan="2">
</Grid>
And then i my ViewModel i use the following to bind my ContentPanel Grid:
private Grid contentPanel;
public Grid ContentPanel
{
get
{
return contentPanel;
}
set
{
contentPanel = value;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => ContentPanel);
}
}
I then created a TextBlock to add to the grid:
TextBlock txt1 = new TextBlock();
txt1.Text = "2005 Products Shipped";
txt1.FontSize = 20;
txt1.FontWeight = FontWeights.Bold;
Grid.SetRow(txt1, 1);
And finally i added the TextBlock to my Grid:
ContentPanel.Children.Add(txt1);
When i run this code ContentPanel turn out to be equals null, why is that? Shouldn't Caliburn auto bind ContentPanel x:Name="ContentPanel" with the property ContentPanel?
I would appreciate your help in this matter.
My core problem, that i need solved is this:
I got a login page in my app where i show some pictures and text loaded from a server. As you can see below this is done with Image and a TextBlock When that server is offline or the wi-fi simply aren't enabled i want to replace this picture+text with a static image. Aka i want to remove the TextBlock from the StackPanel.
The part where i load and show the stuff form my server works great and looks like this in my xaml:
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" Background="White" DataContext="{Binding FeedItemsAnnounce,Mode=TwoWay}" >
<Image delay:LowProfileImageLoader.UriSource="{Binding ImagePath,Mode=TwoWay}" Margin="5" Width="170" Height="138">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger
EventName="Tap">
<cm:ActionMessage
MethodName="LoadAnnouncement">
<cm:Parameter Value="{Binding Link}"></cm:Parameter>
</cm:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</Image>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Title}" TextWrapping="Wrap" Width="160" Foreground="Black" FontSize="24" VerticalAlignment="Center" Margin="25,0,0,0"></TextBlock>
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger
EventName="Tap">
<cm:ActionMessage
MethodName="LoadAnnouncement">
<cm:Parameter Value="{Binding Link}"></cm:Parameter>
</cm:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
So when the server is offline/wifi disabled i want to replace that with. so that the TextBlock is no longer there:
<Image delay:LowProfileImageLoader.UriSource="{Binding ImagePath,Mode=TwoWay}" DataContext="{Binding FeedItemsAdvertisement,Mode=TwoWay}" Margin="0,20,0,39" Width="380" Height="128">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger
EventName="Tap">
<cm:ActionMessage
MethodName="LoadAdvertisement" >
<cm:Parameter Value="{Binding Link}"></cm:Parameter>
</cm:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
Is this even possible? If not what would the best semi-solution be?
EDIT 1: I've managed to setup the flow following the instructions from the accepted answer. But my BooleanToVisibilityConverter is not called, though my NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => IsConnectionAvailable); is getting called.
My Property:
private bool _isConnectionAvailable;
public bool IsConnectionAvailable
{
get { return _isConnectionAvailable; }
set
{
if (_isConnectionAvailable != value)
{
_isConnectionAvailable = value;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => IsConnectionAvailable);
}
}
}
How i change the bool: This code is called in my constructor for my ViewModel(just as a test to see if it was working):
IsConnectionAvailable = false;
TextBlock (without trigger code cause its the same as previous):
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Title}" Visibility="{Binding IsConnectionAvailable, Converter={StaticResource BoolToVisibility}}" TextWrapping="Wrap" Width="160" Foreground="Black" FontSize="24" VerticalAlignment="Center" Margin="25,0,0,0"></TextBlock>
It's like the Binding IsConnectionAvailable isn't working because i can change the name IsConnectionAvailable in my Xaml to anything and my NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => IsConnectionAvailable); will still be called.
Any ideas?
I can't even do a normal bind Visibility="{Binding Path=IsVisibil,Mode=TwoWay} to a public Visibility IsVisibil property. I've done this in other classes, but even this won't work??
EDIT 2: The problem that course the binding not to work, seems to lie somewhere in this code:
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" Background="White" DataContext="{Binding FeedItemsAnnounce,Mode=TwoWay}" >
<Image delay:LowProfileImageLoader.UriSource="{Binding ImagePath,Mode=TwoWay}" Margin="5" Width="170" Height="138">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger
EventName="Tap">
<cm:ActionMessage
MethodName="LoadAnnouncement">
<cm:Parameter Value="{Binding Link}"></cm:Parameter>
</cm:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</Image>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Title}" Visibility="{Binding Path=IsVisibil,Mode=TwoWay}" TextWrapping="Wrap" Width="160" Foreground="Black" FontSize="24" VerticalAlignment="Center" Margin="25,0,0,0"></TextBlock>
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger
EventName="Tap">
<cm:ActionMessage
MethodName="LoadAnnouncement">
<cm:Parameter Value="{Binding Link}"></cm:Parameter>
</cm:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</StackPanel>
Solution to EDIT 1 and 2: I created an x:Name"Root" at the top of my xaml structure. Then changed the binding to:
ElementName=Root, Path=DataContext.IsVisibil
This is needed because the binding to visibility that I'm trying to set is inside another DataContxt.

This isn't the correct way to use CM, there are a number of areas where you are confusing the model and viewmodel and the binding functionality in CM.
What you are doing currently
You are attempting to have the CM framework look for a property called ContentPanel on your ViewModel and automatically figure out what properties on Grid to bind it to...
This won't work because of a few reasons:
I don't think there is a convention for Grid in CM - it's not really bindable in an obvious way (it's a layout container)
Grid is not a data enabled control - it doesn't know how to consume a collection and display dynamic rows out the box (it's a layout container)
What you are doing doesn't really make any sense (you have an instance of a grid in your UserControl and you have also instantiated a grid in your ViewModel - these are two separate instances of a control - you can't 'bind' them together - that's not how it all works)
CM and Bindings
When you using element name bindings e.g. x:Name with CM, it attempts to find a property on the ViewModel which matches the element name. At this point, depending on the conventions setup for the source control in question, CM will attempt to automagically wire up all the bits and pieces.
There are default conventions contained in ConventionManager which determine which properties to bind when you use element name bindings - e.g. for TextBlock, the Text property on the TextBlock is bound to the target property on the ViewModel.
http://caliburnmicro.codeplex.com/SourceControl/latest#src/Caliburn.Micro.Platform/ConventionManager.cs - look at the class constructor on ConventionManager to see the out of the box conventions - there isn't one for Grid
Once a target property is found, CM will bind it up.
(As an aside: it's worth noting that if the control type is a ContentControl CM will do some composition magic so you can have viewmodels that contain other viewmodels and have a composition all bound up at runtime - great for screens which have multiple sub-windows etc)
The problem you have is that there is no convention setup for Grid out of the box - this is most likely because a Grid in SL/WPF is primarily used for layout, and is not really a 'data container' or data aware in any way (apart from the few dependency properties you can bind to) - i.e. I don't think it's possible to bind to a grid and get a dynamic number of columns/rows without some customisation to the control, hence the omission of any conventions
(think about it - if you are binding a grid to a collection, what should the grid do... add rows or columns? It can't really be supported in a sensible way)
Now bringing it back to SL/WPF for a sec:
Usually if you want a variable list of items you will need to bind to the ItemsSource property of a control which inherits from ItemsControl (or ItemsControl itself).
Many controls do this: if they need to display a dynamic number of items they will usually inherit from ItemsControl.
How does this tie in with CM?
Caliburn Micro knows how to bind up ItemsControl out of the box. This means you can have a property on your ViewModel containing a collection of items and after binding you get a dynamic view of these at runtime
For example - a CM bound ItemsControl might look like this:
<ItemsControl x:Name="TextItems">
<!-- host the items generated by this ItemsControl in a grid -->
<ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<Grid/>
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<!-- render each bound item using a TextBlock-->
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding SomeTextualProperty}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
Now you just need a collection of objects to bind this to - each item in the collection becomes a new item in the control with its DataContext pointing to the bound item. I've made the assumption that you would want each item to be a ViewModel which contained the property SomeTextualProperty - I've defined that here...
// Provides a viewmodel for a textual item
public class TextItemViewModel
{
public string SomeTextualProperty { get; set;}
}
The VM that should contain the list of items would need to have a collection to bind against.
(Note: Since you are adding items to it at runtime you need to tell the UI when the collection changes - ObservableCollection gives you this for free as it implements collection changed notification events)
// This is the viewmodel that contains the list of text items
public class ScreenViewModel
{
public ObservableCollection<TextItemViewModel> TextItems { get; set; }
}
What else I would consider the incorrect approach
Your ViewModels shouldn't know about your View implementation i.e. they shouldn't reference any type of controls unless absolutely necessary (I can't think of a time when I had to put a control in a VM). ViewModels should model the view - but they shouldn't really need to know any specifics about what that view contains - this way they are more easily testable and they are easily reused
If you follow the above approach, you can get away with providing an application which re-uses the set of viewmodels, but provides different views for each. You can try this by replacing ItemsControl with another type of control in the view (as long as it's data aware such as a datagrid) and the VM will still work - the VM is view agnostic.
Your use of Grid in your VM is not ideal because Grid is a visual control, it is not data. Remember that the visuals are your View and the ViewModel should just contain data and events which notify the view of things happening
If I was doing this - the code would look more like the code I posted above.
To sum up
Model the information you wanted to show in a ViewModel (TextItemViewModel)
Add a collection of these objects to the main ViewModel (ScreenViewModel) using a change aware collection such as ObservableCollection
Add/remove items from the collection using the standard add/remove
Bind the ItemsControl in the view using x:Name bindings to the collection on your ScreenViewModel
Adding/removing items in the VM will fire property changed notifications. ItemsControl will watch for these events and update itself accordingly
Addendum
You could get away with just using an ObservableCollection<string> instead of a TextBlockViewModel but it's not clear if you want to add more properties to the items you are binding to the grid (such as IsHeading property for headings which you could then make bold/italic in the view)
If you want to just use strings just modify the DataTemplate to bind directly to the DataContext rather than a property on the DataContext
<ItemsControl x:Name="TextItems">
<!-- host the items generated by this ItemsControl in a grid -->
<ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<Grid/>
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<!-- render each bound item using a TextBlock-->
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
**<TextBlock Text="{Binding}"/> <!-- Bind direct -->**
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
Edit:
Ok in your case it's quite simple - your ViewModel should simply model the state of the server:
public class LoginPageViewModel
{
public bool IsConnectionAvailable { get; set; } // or whatever your variable should be called
}
Then bind the visibility of the textblock to this using a converter:
<TextBlock Visibility="{Binding IsConnectionAvailable, Converter={StaticResource BooleanToVisibilityConverter}}">
You will need to declare the static resource for the converter somewhere (in the control itself or your main resources dictionary for example)
It looks like there is a converter already defined in System.Windows.Controls somewhere, but in case you can't find it the implementation is pretty simple (you could probably do this a bit better to guard against invalid input but for brevity I've kept it tiny):
public class BooleanToVisibilityConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
return (bool) value ? Visibility.Visible : Visibility.Collapsed;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter,CultureInfo culture)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
You may also want to change the state from available/unavailable during the views lifecycle, so in that case you probably want to use the property changed events built in to PropertyChangedBase (which Screen also inherits) to let the view know when the property changes
private bool _isConnectionAvailable;
public bool IsConnectionAvailable
{
get { return _isConnectionAvailable; }
set
{
if (_isConnectionAvailable != value)
{
_isConnectionAvailable = value;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => IsConnectionAvailable);
}
}
}
Addendum 2
I prefer the terse CM syntax instead of being explicit when binding action messages - so your XAML would change from:
<Image delay:LowProfileImageLoader.UriSource="{Binding ImagePath,Mode=TwoWay}" DataContext="{Binding FeedItemsAdvertisement,Mode=TwoWay}" Margin="0,20,0,39" Width="380" Height="128">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger
EventName="Tap">
<cm:ActionMessage
MethodName="LoadAdvertisement" >
<cm:Parameter Value="{Binding Link}"></cm:Parameter>
</cm:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</Image>
To
<Image delay:LowProfileImageLoader.UriSource="{Binding ImagePath,Mode=TwoWay}" DataContext="{Binding FeedItemsAdvertisement,Mode=TwoWay}" Margin="0,20,0,39" Width="380" Height="128" cal:Message.Attach="[Tap] = [LoadAdvertisement($dataContext.Link)]"></Image>
(actually that might not be right with the $dataContext.Link part ... but then again it might be... see here: http://caliburnmicro.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=All%20About%20Actions&referringTitle=Documentation)

Using Icons in WPF Database Driven Application Results

I am attempting to make a WPF application. The application needs to use a "list view" to show results of queries to the database. I have been able to successfully create the application (GUI, database, LINQ, etc.), however, the display of my query results appear more "gridlike".
The specifications for the project below show that each record that appears in the results needs to have a green circle icon next to it. I have removed the actual results from the images below to keep the contents of the database private.
I don't have enough Reputation Points to post images, so I posted pictures so a sample/testing domain that I use. You can see screenshots here of the WPF app and code here:
http://digitalworkzone.com/WPF.html
What am I doing incorrectly? Is there something I need to add or modify to my code to be able to get the green circles and more of a "list" style to display my query results?

Understand the WPF content model. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb613548.aspx
Anything that has a 'Content' property basically behaves in two ways. If the 'Content' is set to something that derives from UIElement, then the class will manage it's own presentation. Anything else, however, will just get .ToString() called, and it's text displayed instead.
What this means in the long run is that everything in WPF can display anything. If you want to show a button in a button, you can. For example:
<Button>
<Button.Content>
<Button Content="This will show as text" />
</Button.Content>
</Button>
The inner button will have text, but the outer button will show a Button because Button derives from UIElement and therefore will handle its own presentation.
In your picture examples above, you have ListBoxes/DataGrids that you want to fill in with graphical information. Try this out:
<ListBox HorizontalContentAlignment="Stretch">
<ListBox.Items>
<Button Content="One"/>
<Button Content="Two"/>
<Button Content="Three"/>
<Button Content="Four"/>
</ListBox.Items>
</ListBox>
Now you have a ListBox that shows Buttons instead of Text. You can take this a step further and contain the items in a stackpanel, for example:
<ListBox HorizontalContentAlignment="Stretch">
<ListBox.Items>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<Button Content="A button"/>
<Label Content="Some text" />
</StackPanel>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<Button Content="A button"/>
<Label Content="Some text" />
</StackPanel>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<Button Content="A button"/>
<Label Content="Some text" />
</StackPanel>
</ListBox.Items>
</ListBox>
Now we have items that contain a layout container (StackPanels, which then contains other elements).
However, if you set the ItemsSource elsewhere, you can actually use a DataTemplate to display the contents. A DataTemplate in effect targets a particular class and lays out it's contents as defined in XAML. Consider:
Code Behind:
public partial class MyWindow : UserControl {
public MyWindow() {
InitializeComponent();
MyListBox.ItemsSource = new List<Person> {
new Person("Sam", "Smith"),
new Person("Jim", "Henson"),
new Person("Betty", "White"),
};
}
XAML:
<ListBox HorizontalContentAlignment="Stretch" x:Name="MyListBox" >
<ListBox.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" >
<Label Content="{Binding FirstName}"/>
<Label Content="{Binding LastName}"/>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemTemplate>
</ListBox>
Now when the Listbox displays, it will cycle through each of the items in the ItemsSource property, and then lay them out using the DataTemplate. It's possible to have the DataTemplate target specific classes by using the DataType property if you're using polymorphism (as in different types of people such as 'Cusomters' or 'Employees' which all derive from 'Person).
The problem with this approach is that you are setting the value of the items directly, which is bad form. It's better to define a class that handles all of the data for your view separately. Consider:
public class ViewModel {
// WPF will automatically read these properties using reflection.
public List<Person> People {
get {
return new List<Person> {
new Person("Sam", "Smith"),
new Person("Jim", "Henson"),
new Person("Betty", "White")
};
}
}
}
That will hold all the data for the view, now let's add it to the actual window. First we need to reference the namespace ('xmlns' means xml namespace):
<Window x:Class="Sharp.MyWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
xmlns:d="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
xmlns:lol="clr-namespace:Sharp">
The namespace is Sharp (the namespace where my stuff lives), and the alias we'll give it is lol. Now we attach our ViewModel class to the window by setting it to the DataContext property, as in:
<Window>
<Window.DataContext>
<lol:ViewModel />
</Window.DataContext>
</Window>
This makes all of the public properties on the ViewModel class available to the Window. This way, if we want to read the Persons information into our ListBox, we simply say:
<ListBox HorizontalContentAlignment="Stretch" ItemsSource="{Binding People}" >
...
</ListBox>
Notice that we say ItemsSource={Binding People}, which means 'scan the ViewModel for any public properties called 'People' and then retrieve those results. This is essentially the fundamentals behind the MVVM approach. You might have all of your business logic in one or many classes which handle the main application operation in a Model, but then you have a ViewModel which interacts with the Model and exposes the results as public properties. WPF automatically binds to those properties and presents them for your. The information just flows, rather than setting the values by force.
To really understand how WPF is supposed to work, you should take some time to understand the basics of MVVM. WPF was really designed with MVVM in mind, and so to really get how WPF is supposed to work, you really should take the time to get your head around it. Take a look at:
http://agilewarrior.wordpress.com/2011/01/11/simple-mvvm-walkthrough-part-i/ .

<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding QueryResults}">
<ListBox.ItemsTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<Image Source="{Binding ImageSource}"/>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding TextSource}"/>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemsTemplate>
</ListBox>
Will work if you have a list of objects named QueryResults in your code behind. Each object needs to have an string property named ImageSource and a string property named TextSource.
However, since you only need to display a green circle icon for each of the items, you can hardcode the image source. The above will work if you want to have a different icon for each, though.
Also note that in order for this to work, you need to set the DataContext of the window to DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}}"