Allow me to preface this by saying that I did look into other SO questions dealing with this matter, but they were either ASP solutions or not quite exactly what I needed.
My question is as follows, can I make an Http Post request to a method in my controller that returns a partial view if I am using Html.BeginForm? I know, and have used, POST methods using BeginForm multiple times, however, those were to ActionResult methods which were responsible for transferring the data stored over into the server. What I would like to do is something as follows:
Say I have this cshtml:
<div class="test">
#using (Html.BeginForm("MyPartialViewMethod"), FormMethod.POST) {
#Html.LabelFor(x => x.StartTimeLabel, Model.StartTime);
#Html.TextBoxFor(x => x.StartTime);
<input type="button" value="Submit"/>
}
</div>
Such that in my Controller I could say have the following example method.
[HttpPost]
public PartialViewResult MyPartialViewMethod(Model DynamicDataModel) {
//Pass the data in the DynamicDataModel into a new cshtml page and
//have the partial view it returns be rendered on screen
}
So in a nutshell:
Make POST request to server passing into it my data values
Have server process the data and return the partial view accordingly populated with all the required data.
I imagine that I could take the approach I used to do back in college with php which is AJAX call via JS to php, php spits out html, JS adds the html where it is needed. However, this seems to be a bit too rough.
yes you can.
you can also do it in ajax with a custom submit buton who call your ajax an jquery,
with something like that and serialize your model.
or just take the controller part if no ajax and submit
$.ajax({
url: '#Url.Action("actionName", "controllerName")',
data: $('#MyPartialViewMethod').serialize(),
dataType: "json",
type: 'POST',
success: function (data) {
$('html').html(data);
},
error: function (request, error) {
}
});
[HttpPost]
public actionName(Model myModel)
{
do thing with your model
return PartialView(myModel);
}
an loop
Related
I'm trying to figure out using AJAX with Razor Pages.
I've been searching the Web but each example I've found does something different, and most are incomplete or not for Razor Pages.
So far, I've been focusing on variations of something like this:
$.post('/?handler=Delete', 5, function (x) {
alert(x);
});
And then my page model looks like this:
public void OnPostDelete(int id)
{
}
I've tried variations on this but, so far, my C# code is not getting called.
Questions:
Can someone show me what I'm missing?
Can anyone offer some good references for this? (I need to perform other AJAX tasks as well.)
Some examples I found had special handling related to anti-forgery tokens. Do I need to code for that as well?
UPDATE:
So I've been working with this and this is what I have now:
$.ajax({
url: '?handler=Delete',
data: {
id: $(this).data('id')
}
})
.fail(function (e) {
// Error
alert(e.responseText); // Way too much info
})
.done(function () {
// Success
})
.always(function () {
// Always
});
And my handler:
public void OnGetDelete(int id)
{
}
This is in fact calling my handler and I finally got it to pass the id argument.
Since I have a bounty, here's what I'd like to see in an answer:
If I set the AJAX call to use POST and rename my handler to OnPostDelete(), the handler is not called. How would I do a post?
Any other suggestions or criticisms with the code above? I know there are many ways to do this. I'm just looking for the simplest way and trying to refine it.
You could pass F12 to check the request in Network tab , you may see 400 bad request error.
Razor Pages are designed to be automatically protected from cross-site request forgery (CSRF/XSRF) attacks. You don’t have to write any additional code. Antiforgery token generation and validation is automatically included in Razor Pages. Here the request fails, there is no AntiForgeryToken present on the page.
For the question , you could add explicitly using #Html.AntiForgeryToken()
To add AntiForgeryToken, we can use any of the approaches. Both the approaches add an input type hidden with name __RequestVerificationToken. The Ajax request should send the anti-forgery token in request header to the server. So, the modified Ajax request looks like,
#Html.AntiForgeryToken()
#section Scripts
{
<script>
$.ajax({
type: "POST",
url: "/?handler=Delete&id="+5,
beforeSend: function (xhr) {
xhr.setRequestHeader("XSRF-TOKEN",
$('input:hidden[name="__RequestVerificationToken"]').val());
},
success: function (x) {
alert(x);
},
failure: function (response) {
alert(response);
}
});
</script>
}
Since the script sends the token in a header called X-CSRF-TOKEN, configure the antiforgery service to look for the X-CSRF-TOKEN header:
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddRazorPages();
services.AddAntiforgery(o => o.HeaderName = "XSRF-TOKEN");
}
Reference:https://www.talkingdotnet.com/handle-ajax-requests-in-asp-net-core-razor-pages/
This is how I like to do it:
Configure your Javascript
//If you're returning a object, configure it
var yourObject = {
field1: "value1",
field2: "value2"
};
//setup ajax
$.ajax({
data: yourObject,
type: "POST",
url: "urltoyourhandler/delete" //you can add other paramters here as well by doing ?parm=value
success: function(data){
//do success stuff here
//based off my handler code below:
if(data.success){
console.log("Success!");
}
else{
console.log("Failed for some reason!");
}
}
error: function(){
//do error stuff here
//gets called if there is a issue contacting the URL or if there is a server error like 500
}
});
Configuring your handler. For my CRUD operations, I like making a CRUD controller to handle everything
[BindProperty]
public YourClass Name { get; set; }
//set handler to only accept POST and set a URL for it. URL should be to the same folder you're in
//the 'delete' in route doesn't have to match the function name but it's less confusing if it does
[HttpPost, Route("RouteToThisHandler/delete)]
public async Task<IActionResult> Delete()
{
//verify data and the do something with it
//I like returning a JsonResult. Add whatever data you want. I like returning success
//with true or false and some other data if needed
return new JsonResult(new { success: true, importantInfo: "This is important" });
}
Ajax has more configuration options to give you more information about any server errors that occur
As for the anti-forgery token, Microsoft says:
Antiforgery middleware is added to the Dependency injection container
when one of the following APIs is called in Startup.ConfigureServices:
AddMvc
MapRazorPages
MapControllerRoute
MapBlazorHub
Here is a Microsoft link about the anti-forgery token: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/security/anti-request-forgery?view=aspnetcore-3.1
I investigated a few things, what happens when you pass a string from AJAX instead of an integer and how the different routes affect the call (see interesting note below if you've got time) But mostly, all I found is that Razor Pages are pretty forgiving and everything seemed to just work. Like I mentioned, even passing a string where an integer type id still hit the handler method (it just gave me a default(int))
I created this repo just for exploring: https://github.com/EntityAdam/RazorPageHandlers
The major blocker, as #Yan pointed out is the Anti-Forgery token. That is really the only thing that caused a handler not to hit a breakpoint. As was suggested, check your network tab for failed requests or the console for bum JavaScript code.
From your snippet, to change it to a OnPostDelete you would need to use the POST type in the AJAX call AND include the Anti-Forgery Token.
$.ajax({
type: 'POST',
headers: { "RequestVerificationToken": $('input[name="__RequestVerificationToken"]').val() },
url: '?handler=Delete',
data: {
id: $(this).data('id')
}
})
.fail(function (e) {
// Error
alert(e.responseText); // Way too much info
})
.done(function () {
// Success
})
.always(function () {
// Always
});
Another topic that I didn't see discussed is where is this token coming from? It's generated by Razor automagically whenever there is a <form> element. If you do not have a <form> element, you can generate tokens when you need them, check out the #functions {} block in this MSDN Article. There are also scenarios where CSRF is useless or not required and you could also turn anti-forgery off if you don't need it (That's an entirely different discussion).
My criticisms of the approach are opinions so take 'em or leave 'em.
Don't use jQuery if you can avoid it based on the premise that improvements to JavaScript have arguably obsoleted jQuery. Use plain vanilla JS code.
Ajax is showing it's age as well. If you only need to support modern browsers consider the Fetch API
Don't write any JS at all! Blazor is new and shiny. There are still some growing pains, but I'd rather my pain be in C# than in JavaScript =)
An interesting thing I came across..
For this demo, I used the following #page directive
#page "{id?}"
In the HTML part of the forms like:
<form method="post" asp-page-handler="Delete">
<input type="hidden" name="id" value="1" />
<button class="btn btn-danger">Delete</button>
</form>
I'm using the asp-page-handler tag helper to assist in generating the correct URL. For the Create handler, with that #page directive the tag helper comes up with a form target of /?handler=Create
If you swap out that #page directive with #page "{handler?}/{id:int?}", the tag helper figures out the route which is now /Delete. But guess what? The AJAX calls work with either #page directive, even though the URL in the AJAX is hard coded to ?handler=Delete'
Two suggestion:
1- add the page path in front of the url. (I am not sure if it is mentioned in your words).
$.post('/{page_path}/?handler=Delete', 5, function (x) {
alert(x);
});
2- Follow the route map rule. For example, there is the 'id' in your function. The page may have configured like #page "{id:int}". So the url should be something like
$.post('/{page_path}/{id}/?handler=Delete', 5, function (x) {
alert(x);
});
Firstly, thank you for your answers. I have a problem about routing on Asp.Net MVC.
You can see my solution here on the photo where my controllers and views located. I would like to open "UserProfile.cshtml" from "Index.cshtml". Well, my first approach is using Ajax to post "UserProfile Action" in ProfileController.
$.ajax({
url: "/Profile/UserProfile",
type: "POST",
dataType: "json"})
.done(function(response){
window.location = '/Profile/UserProfile'});
this code blocks goes to controller and hits the "UserProfile" Action but returns no error and no view. Even URL doesn't change.
public ActionResult UserProfile()
{
return View ();
}
I would highly appreciate your helpful answers and support. Thank you!
First, you need to have Razor (.cshtml) views, not aspx for mvc to be able to serve these pages out of the box. If you have a controller action named UserProfile in a ProfileController and call return View(), then mvc will be default try to return the view located at Views/Profile/UserProfile.cshtml (it will actually also check a couple other locations such as the Views/Shared/ folder for the view). The following should work for you:
//located in ProfileController
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult UserProfile()
{
return View();
}
//located at Views/Profile/UserProfile.cshtml
`<h4>you've found your user profile page!</h4>`
If you're trying to hit this view by ajax- then you'll need to attack the problem from a slightly different direction. Redirecting on the server side will not work with ajax since it is asynchronous. You can achieve this by using the .done() ajax callback something like the following:
$.ajax({
url: "/Profile/UserProfile",
type: "POST",
dataType: "json"
}).done(function(response){
window.location = '/Profile/UserProfile'
});
I have a View which is the container for a PartialView. Let's say a Customer - Orders relation. The View should received a CustomerViewModel whereas the PartialView a collection of Orders, such as IEnumerable<OrderViewModel>.
I basically have two ways of doing this (not to mention Angular), either Razor or jQuery. With Razor was pretty straightforward by utilizing #Html.Partial("_CustomerOrdersPartial", Model.Orders). But let's assume I cannot use Razor syntax and here it is how I ended up posting this question. I have read many posts on this matter but, most of them (not to mention all), suggest to use $("#container").load('#Url.Action("ActionName", new { parameterX = valueY })). Then here are my questions:
Why to mix Razor and jQuery?
Is this the only way?
Is there any way to call the View and pass the model?
The last question has to do with the fact that the above code requires an action on the server-side to be called, whereas the #Html.Partial("_CustomerOrdersPartial", Model.Orders) mentioned above will just call the View (client-side) and send the given Model in.
Any idea on how to solve this would be really helpful.
Thanks in advance for your time and thoughts.
my solution is:
function ReturnPanel(div, panel) {
$.ajax({
type: "POST",
url: "#Url.Action("GetPanel", "ControllerName")",
data: JSON.stringify({ 'idCurso': idCurso, 'panel': panel }),
contentType: 'application/json; charset=utf-8',
success: function (response) {
$("#" + div).html(response);
},
error: function (xhr, status, errorThrown) {
//Here the status code can be retrieved like;
alert("Error: status = " + xhr.status + " Descripcion =" + xhr.responseText);
}
})
}
in cs.
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult GetPanel(int idCurso, string panel)
{
Contenido contenido = new Contenido();
contenido.IdCurso = idCurso;
return PartialView(panel, contenido);
}
This code should do it. The trick is to acquire the URL and then make sure you get the parameter list right. I used a little Razor to get the URL but you don't have to. Also, If you fail to match the parameter list, your call will not even be acknowledged. You have been warned. I tried to name every thing in a way that helps.
var url = '/controllerName/ActionName';
$('#pnlFillMee').load(url, {NameOfParam: $('#elementID').val() },
function () {CallMeAfterLoadComplete(); });
Here's a real world example I use at work. ReviewInfo is an action in the
controller associated with this page. It returns a partialview result.
$(document).ready(function () {
var url = '/supervisor/reviewinfo';
$('#pnlReviewInfo').load(url, { FCUName: $('#FCU').children(':selected').text(), AccountsFromDate: $('#AccountsFrom').val()}, function () {
InitializeTabs(true);
});
});
This goes somewhere on your form.
<div id="pnlReviewInfo" style="width: 85%"></div>
EDIT:
I would also look up the other jQuery functions like $.get, $.post and $.ajax which are more specialized versions of $.load. and see this link which might answer all your questions about passing models:
Pass Model To Controller using Jquery/Ajax
Hope this helps
wrapping up this question and thanks to #stephen-muecke and #charles-mcintosh for their help:
Using #Html.Partial(partialViewName) the server returns a string resulting from the partial view passed in. Preferred method if you need to manipulate the partial before being displayed. Otherwise, using #Html.RenderPartial(partialViewName) will write into the stream output sent to the browser, the HTML code from the given partial.
As per jQuery API, $(elem).load(url[,data][,complete]) will place the returned HTML into the matching element. Thus, it requires an action method for the given url.
If for whatever reason Razor cannot be used on the UI, chances are you would likely end up either hard-coding the url like in the sample code provided above by #charles-mcintosh or using Angular.
I never use Razor in asp.net MVC so I really don't know how it works.
Every time I want to tag a function in my Controller I use jquery ajax and I write very javascript code and my projects are very messy.
Now I want to make something different.
I have controller named as HomeController where I get data from Sql Server Database, using model entity for that.
public class HomeController : Controller
{
public JsonResult getClasses()
{
IList<Class> classes = (from x in db.Class select x).Distinct().ToList();
return Json(classes, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}
public JsonResult getTypes(string className)
{
IList<String> allTypes = (from type in db.Type
where type.class_name == className
orderby type.type_name
select type.type_name).Distinct().ToList();
return Json(allTypes, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}
}
And I have master.page (named as SiteMaster) where I get this data through jquery ajax.
<body>
<div id="header">
<ul class="classesName"></ul>
</div>
</body>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
$.ajax({
url: "/Home/getClasses",
type: "GET",
data: {},
success: function (result) {
for (n = 0; n < result.length; n++) {
$('.classesName').append('<li><a href="#" onclick="showTypes( \'' + result[n].class_name + '\')" >' + result[n].class_name + '</a></li>');
}
}
});
</script>
I have another ajax for getting the Types when some Class is clicked..but all this I want to change so I can use #Razor.
All I want is to show the data from getClasses() into the masterPage and when some Class is clicked, to send that argument into getTypes(string className) but without using javascript and use #Razor.
So my question is can I do this and how?
The first part (sending the result of getClasses() to your view) can be done with Razor alone, because all of that work can be done on the server.
It is important to understand that the primary strength of Razor is that it allows you to perform (almost, if not) any C# on your views. So doing what you want can be as simple as writing the code as if you were coding in C#:
#{
// I'd suggest you refactor your code to have your `getClasses()` function
// readily available somewhere that's not a controller
var classes = Data.getClasses();
}
<div id="header">
<ul class="classesName">
#foreach (var clazz in classes) {
<li>
#clazz
</li>
}
</ul>
</div>
For the second part (getting the Types when the link is clicked), you're out of luck. The click has to happen on the client, so by then your C# would have been evaluated, the HTML flushed, and the time for your Razor to run would have come and gone. If those types aren't cached on the page somehow, you'll have to make a request against the server again (and AJAX is one way to do that).
You don't need to use ajax to load the initial master page, just return a view containing all the class data you need to display as that saves you the extra trip to the server. As for getting the data when a class is clicked that is an ideal place to use Ajax and to do that in Razor you would use one of the many #Ajax.xxx helpers (#Ajax.RawActionLink, #Ajax.BeginForm, etc.). The following link might be a good place to start looking at how views are used in asp.net MVC views tutorial
I'm in a bit of a bind here, I am trying to submit a form using ajax, all goes well and dandy until after the server has done it's thing, it decides to load to the action onto a new page, which is exactly what I do not want.
Here is my controller
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Submit(int id, string trainingProgramId, FormCollection form, User user)
{
//Do Some action
return null;
}
In a different controller I have it set up to do $return PartialView(model);
this is the JQuery code that I am using.
$(function () {
$("form").submit(function (e) {
if (nextquestion()) { //check if posting can proceed
$.ajax({
type: "POST",
data: $(this).serialize(),
url: $(this).attr("action"),
success: function (response) {
alert(response);
$('#cases:last-child').insertAfter(response);
},
error: function (data) { }
});
}
e.preventDefault();
});
});
In all cases I am being redirected to a different url after performing the operation. Which is not the intention, especially if my intention might be to load more stuff into the page.
I've been tring everything, a bunch of solutions, but once my controller does a return statement the page automatically reloads to $/Submit
I have added $ #Scripts.Render("https://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/mvc/3.0/jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.min.js"); to my scripts
From any other example I am finding this should work as I want it to, by remaining on the same page, however I am finding it difficult to understand who is responsible for changing the page either way. When I return my PartialView, a completely new page loads with the model as I've had it set up for the Partial View to be inserted originally.
Anyone care to explain what is going on or why my code is wrong?
I can't find it after a whole day of trying to debug.