We Keep Coding

C#: Need to split a string into a string[] and keeping the delimiter (also a string) at the beginning of the string

I think I am too dumb to solve this problem...
I have some formulas which need to be "translated" from one syntax to another.
Let's say I have a formula that goes like that (it's a simple one, others have many "Ceilings" in it):
string formulaString = "If([Param1] = 0, 1, Ceiling([Param2] / 0.55) * [Param3])";
I need to replace "Ceiling()" with "Ceiling(; 1)" (basically, insert "; 1" before the ")").
My attempt is to split the fomulaString at "Ceiling(" so I am able to iterate through the string array and insert my string at the correct index (counting every "(" and ")" to get the right index)
What I have so far:
//splits correct, but loses "CEILING("
string[] parts = formulaString.Split(new[] { "CEILING(" }, StringSplitOptions.None);
//splits almost correct, "CEILING(" is in another group
string[] parts = Regex.Split(formulaString, #"(CEILING\()");
//splits almost every letter
string[] parts = Regex.Split(formulaString, #"(?=[(CEILING\()])");
When everything is done, I concat the string so I have my complete formula again.
What do I have to set as Regex pattern to achieve this sample? (Or any other method that will help me)
part1 = "If([Param1] = 0, 1, ";
part2 = "Ceiling([Param2] / 0.55) * [Param3])";
//part3 = next "CEILING(" in a longer formula and so on...

As I mention in a comment, you almost got it: (?=Ceiling). This is incomplete for your use case unfortunately.
I need to replace "Ceiling()" with "Ceiling(; 1)" (basically, insert "; 1" before the ")").
Depending on your regex engine (for example JS) this works:
string[] parts = Regex.Split(formulaString, #"(?<=Ceiling\([^)]*(?=\)))");
string modifiedFormula = String.join("; 1", parts);
The regex
(?<=Ceiling\([^)]*(?=\)))
(?<= ) Positive lookbehind
Ceiling\( Search for literal "Ceiling("
[^)] Match any char which is not ")" ..
* .. 0 or more times
(?=\)) Positive lookahead for ")", effectively making us stop before the ")"
This regex is a zero-assertion, therefore nothing is lost and it will cut your strings before the last ")" in every "Ceiling()".
This solution would break whenever you have nested "Ceiling()". Then your only solution would be writing your own parser for the same reasons why you can't parse markup with regex.

Regex.Replace(formulaString, #"(?<=Ceiling\()(.*?)(?=\))","$1; 1");
Note: This will not work for nested "Ceilings", but it does for Ceiling(), It will also not work fir Ceiling(AnotherFunc(x)). For that you need something like:
Regex.Replace(formulaString, #"(?<=Ceiling\()((.*\((?>[^()]+|(?1))*\))*|[^\)]*)(\))","$1; 1$3");
but I could not get that to work with .NET, only in JavaScript.

This is my solution:
private string ConvertCeiling(string formula)
{
int ceilingsCount = formula.CountOccurences("Ceiling(");
int startIndex = 0;
int bracketCounter;
for (int i = 0; i < ceilingsCount; i++)
{
startIndex = formula.IndexOf("Ceiling(", startIndex);
bracketCounter = 0;
for (int j = 0; j < formula.Length; j++)
{
if (j < startIndex) continue;
var c = formula[j];
if (c == '(')
{
bracketCounter++;
}
if (c == ')')
{
bracketCounter--;
if (bracketCounter == 0)
{
// found end
formula = formula.Insert(j, "; 1");
startIndex++;
break;
}
}
}
}
return formula;
}
And CountOccurence:
public static int CountOccurences(this string value, string parameter)
{
int counter = 0;
int startIndex = 0;
int indexOfCeiling;
do
{
indexOfCeiling = value.IndexOf(parameter, startIndex);
if (indexOfCeiling < 0)
{
break;
}
else
{
startIndex = indexOfCeiling + 1;
counter++;
}
} while (true);
return counter;
}

Check whether two strings contain same words but in different order

I need a way to check two strings to see if they have the same words in them but in different positions. I only need the number of words out of word, not the actual words. For example: string 1 is "this is an out of order test" and string 2 is "this is an order out of test" would return 1 as one word is out of order.
I've started with the following code:
public int OutOfOrder(string string1, string string2)
{
var search1 = string1.Split(' ');
var search2 = string2.Split(' ');
var OutOfOrder = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < search1.Count() - 1; i++)
{
if (search2.Contains(search1[i]))
{
for (int j=0; j < search2.Count()-1; j++)
{
if(search1[i] == search2[j] && i == j)
{
continue;
}
else if (search1[i] == search2[j] && i != j)
{
OutOfOrder++;
break;
}
}
}
}
return OutOfOrder;
}
However everything is out of order after the first one encountered and the number returned is not correct.

This does it
public static int OutOfOrder(string a, string b){
//not out of order issuex`
if (a.Length != b.Length) return -1;
foreach(string str in a.Split(' ')){
//not out of order issue
if (!b.Contains(str)) return -1;
}
//if out of order issue...
int count=0;
string[] awords = a.Split(' ');
string[] bwords = b.Split(' ');
for(int i=0; i<bwords.Length; i++){
if (!awords[i].Equals(bwords[i])) count++;
}
return (int)Math.Ceiling(0.0f + count/2);
//if one is out of order, then it's expected it renders another out of order too.
//so we need to divide it by 2 to get the one disturbing.
//and ceiling is used to help for odd number of words
}
Testing it now
public static void Main(string[] args)
{
string a = "This solves the problem";
string b = "This solves problem the";
Console.WriteLine(OutOfOrder(a, b));
}
It outputs 1

How to create a sequence of strings between "start" and "end" strings [duplicate]

I have a question about iterate through the Alphabet.
I would like to have a loop that begins with "a" and ends with "z". After that, the loop begins "aa" and count to "az". after that begins with "ba" up to "bz" and so on...
Anybody know some solution?
Thanks
EDIT: I forgot that I give a char "a" to the function then the function must return b. if u give "bnc" then the function must return "bnd"

First effort, with just a-z then aa-zz
public static IEnumerable<string> GetExcelColumns()
{
for (char c = 'a'; c <= 'z'; c++)
{
yield return c.ToString();
}
char[] chars = new char[2];
for (char high = 'a'; high <= 'z'; high++)
{
chars[0] = high;
for (char low = 'a'; low <= 'z'; low++)
{
chars[1] = low;
yield return new string(chars);
}
}
}
Note that this will stop at 'zz'. Of course, there's some ugly duplication here in terms of the loops. Fortunately, that's easy to fix - and it can be even more flexible, too:
Second attempt: more flexible alphabet
private const string Alphabet = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";
public static IEnumerable<string> GetExcelColumns()
{
return GetExcelColumns(Alphabet);
}
public static IEnumerable<string> GetExcelColumns(string alphabet)
{
foreach(char c in alphabet)
{
yield return c.ToString();
}
char[] chars = new char[2];
foreach(char high in alphabet)
{
chars[0] = high;
foreach(char low in alphabet)
{
chars[1] = low;
yield return new string(chars);
}
}
}
Now if you want to generate just a, b, c, d, aa, ab, ac, ad, ba, ... you'd call GetExcelColumns("abcd").
Third attempt (revised further) - infinite sequence
public static IEnumerable<string> GetExcelColumns(string alphabet)
{
int length = 0;
char[] chars = null;
int[] indexes = null;
while (true)
{
int position = length-1;
// Try to increment the least significant
// value.
while (position >= 0)
{
indexes[position]++;
if (indexes[position] == alphabet.Length)
{
for (int i=position; i < length; i++)
{
indexes[i] = 0;
chars[i] = alphabet[0];
}
position--;
}
else
{
chars[position] = alphabet[indexes[position]];
break;
}
}
// If we got all the way to the start of the array,
// we need an extra value
if (position == -1)
{
length++;
chars = new char[length];
indexes = new int[length];
for (int i=0; i < length; i++)
{
chars[i] = alphabet[0];
}
}
yield return new string(chars);
}
}
It's possible that it would be cleaner code using recursion, but it wouldn't be as efficient.
Note that if you want to stop at a certain point, you can just use LINQ:
var query = GetExcelColumns().TakeWhile(x => x != "zzz");
"Restarting" the iterator
To restart the iterator from a given point, you could indeed use SkipWhile as suggested by thesoftwarejedi. That's fairly inefficient, of course. If you're able to keep any state between call, you can just keep the iterator (for either solution):
using (IEnumerator<string> iterator = GetExcelColumns())
{
iterator.MoveNext();
string firstAttempt = iterator.Current;
if (someCondition)
{
iterator.MoveNext();
string secondAttempt = iterator.Current;
// etc
}
}
Alternatively, you may well be able to structure your code to use a foreach anyway, just breaking out on the first value you can actually use.

Edit: Made it do exactly as the OP's latest edit wants
This is the simplest solution, and tested:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Console.WriteLine(GetNextBase26("a"));
Console.WriteLine(GetNextBase26("bnc"));
}
private static string GetNextBase26(string a)
{
return Base26Sequence().SkipWhile(x => x != a).Skip(1).First();
}
private static IEnumerable<string> Base26Sequence()
{
long i = 0L;
while (true)
yield return Base26Encode(i++);
}
private static char[] base26Chars = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz".ToCharArray();
private static string Base26Encode(Int64 value)
{
string returnValue = null;
do
{
returnValue = base26Chars[value % 26] + returnValue;
value /= 26;
} while (value-- != 0);
return returnValue;
}

The following populates a list with the required strings:
List<string> result = new List<string>();
for (char ch = 'a'; ch <= 'z'; ch++){
result.Add (ch.ToString());
}
for (char i = 'a'; i <= 'z'; i++)
{
for (char j = 'a'; j <= 'z'; j++)
{
result.Add (i.ToString() + j.ToString());
}
}

I know there are plenty of answers here, and one's been accepted, but IMO they all make it harder than it needs to be. I think the following is simpler and cleaner:
static string NextColumn(string column){
char[] c = column.ToCharArray();
for(int i = c.Length - 1; i >= 0; i--){
if(char.ToUpper(c[i]++) < 'Z')
break;
c[i] -= (char)26;
if(i == 0)
return "A" + new string(c);
}
return new string(c);
}
Note that this doesn't do any input validation. If you don't trust your callers, you should add an IsNullOrEmpty check at the beginning, and a c[i] >= 'A' && c[i] <= 'Z' || c[i] >= 'a' && c[i] <= 'z' check at the top of the loop. Or just leave it be and let it be GIGO.
You may also find use for these companion functions:
static string GetColumnName(int index){
StringBuilder txt = new StringBuilder();
txt.Append((char)('A' + index % 26));
//txt.Append((char)('A' + --index % 26));
while((index /= 26) > 0)
txt.Insert(0, (char)('A' + --index % 26));
return txt.ToString();
}
static int GetColumnIndex(string name){
int rtn = 0;
foreach(char c in name)
rtn = rtn * 26 + (char.ToUpper(c) - '#');
return rtn - 1;
//return rtn;
}
These two functions are zero-based. That is, "A" = 0, "Z" = 25, "AA" = 26, etc. To make them one-based (like Excel's COM interface), remove the line above the commented line in each function, and uncomment those lines.
As with the NextColumn function, these functions don't validate their inputs. Both with give you garbage if that's what they get.

Here’s what I came up with.
/// <summary>
/// Return an incremented alphabtical string
/// </summary>
/// <param name="letter">The string to be incremented</param>
/// <returns>the incremented string</returns>
public static string NextLetter(string letter)
{
const string alphabet = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ";
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(letter))
{
char lastLetterInString = letter[letter.Length - 1];
// if the last letter in the string is the last letter of the alphabet
if (alphabet.IndexOf(lastLetterInString) == alphabet.Length - 1)
{
//replace the last letter in the string with the first leter of the alphbat and get the next letter for the rest of the string
return NextLetter(letter.Substring(0, letter.Length - 1)) + alphabet[0];
}
else
{
// replace the last letter in the string with the proceeding letter of the alphabet
return letter.Remove(letter.Length-1).Insert(letter.Length-1, (alphabet[alphabet.IndexOf(letter[letter.Length-1])+1]).ToString() );
}
}
//return the first letter of the alphabet
return alphabet[0].ToString();
}

just curious , why not just
private string alphRecursive(int c) {
var alphabet = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz".ToCharArray();
if (c >= alphabet.Length) {
return alphRecursive(c/alphabet.Length) + alphabet[c%alphabet.Length];
} else {
return "" + alphabet[c%alphabet.Length];
}
}

This is like displaying an int, only using base 26 in stead of base 10. Try the following algorithm to find the nth entry of the array
q = n div 26;
r = n mod 26;
s = '';
while (q > 0 || r > 0) {
s = alphabet[r] + s;
q = q div 26;
r = q mod 26;
}
Of course, if you want the first n entries, this is not the most efficient solution. In this case, try something like daniel's solution.

I gave this a go and came up with this:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
namespace Alphabetty
{
class Program
{
const string alphabet = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";
static int cursor = 0;
static int prefixCursor;
static string prefix = string.Empty;
static bool done = false;
static void Main(string[] args)
{
string s = string.Empty;
while (s != "Done")
{
s = GetNextString();
Console.WriteLine(s);
}
Console.ReadKey();
}
static string GetNextString()
{
if (done) return "Done";
char? nextLetter = GetNextLetter(ref cursor);
if (nextLetter == null)
{
char? nextPrefixLetter = GetNextLetter(ref prefixCursor);
if(nextPrefixLetter == null)
{
done = true;
return "Done";
}
prefix = nextPrefixLetter.Value.ToString();
nextLetter = GetNextLetter(ref cursor);
}
return prefix + nextLetter;
}
static char? GetNextLetter(ref int letterCursor)
{
if (letterCursor == alphabet.Length)
{
letterCursor = 0;
return null;
}
char c = alphabet[letterCursor];
letterCursor++;
return c;
}
}
}

Here is something I had cooked up that may be similar. I was experimenting with iteration counts in order to design a numbering schema that was as small as possible, yet gave me enough uniqueness.
I knew that each time a added an Alpha character, it would increase the possibilities 26x but I wasn't sure how many letters, numbers, or the pattern I wanted to use.
That lead me to the code below. Basically you pass it an AlphaNumber string, and every position that has a Letter, would eventually increment to "z\Z" and every position that had a Number, would eventually increment to "9".
So you can call it 1 of two ways..
//This would give you the next Itteration... (H3reIsaStup4dExamplf)
string myNextValue = IncrementAlphaNumericValue("H3reIsaStup4dExample")
//Or Loop it resulting eventually as "Z9zzZzzZzzz9zZzzzzzz"
string myNextValue = "H3reIsaStup4dExample"
while (myNextValue != null)
{
myNextValue = IncrementAlphaNumericValue(myNextValue)
//And of course do something with this like write it out
}
(For me, I was doing something like "1AA000")
public string IncrementAlphaNumericValue(string Value)
{
//We only allow Characters a-b, A-Z, 0-9
if (System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.IsMatch(Value, "^[a-zA-Z0-9]+$") == false)
{
throw new Exception("Invalid Character: Must be a-Z or 0-9");
}
//We work with each Character so it's best to convert the string to a char array for incrementing
char[] myCharacterArray = Value.ToCharArray();
//So what we do here is step backwards through the Characters and increment the first one we can.
for (Int32 myCharIndex = myCharacterArray.Length - 1; myCharIndex >= 0; myCharIndex--)
{
//Converts the Character to it's ASCII value
Int32 myCharValue = Convert.ToInt32(myCharacterArray[myCharIndex]);
//We only Increment this Character Position, if it is not already at it's Max value (Z = 90, z = 122, 57 = 9)
if (myCharValue != 57 && myCharValue != 90 && myCharValue != 122)
{
myCharacterArray[myCharIndex]++;
//Now that we have Incremented the Character, we "reset" all the values to the right of it
for (Int32 myResetIndex = myCharIndex + 1; myResetIndex < myCharacterArray.Length; myResetIndex++)
{
myCharValue = Convert.ToInt32(myCharacterArray[myResetIndex]);
if (myCharValue >= 65 && myCharValue <= 90)
{
myCharacterArray[myResetIndex] = 'A';
}
else if (myCharValue >= 97 && myCharValue <= 122)
{
myCharacterArray[myResetIndex] = 'a';
}
else if (myCharValue >= 48 && myCharValue <= 57)
{
myCharacterArray[myResetIndex] = '0';
}
}
//Now we just return an new Value
return new string(myCharacterArray);
}
}
//If we got through the Character Loop and were not able to increment anything, we retun a NULL.
return null;
}

Here's my attempt using recursion:
public static void PrintAlphabet(string alphabet, string prefix)
{
for (int i = 0; i < alphabet.Length; i++) {
Console.WriteLine(prefix + alphabet[i].ToString());
}
if (prefix.Length < alphabet.Length - 1) {
for (int i = 0; i < alphabet.Length; i++) {
PrintAlphabet(alphabet, prefix + alphabet[i]);
}
}
}
Then simply call PrintAlphabet("abcd", "");

Parsing strings recursively

I am trying to extract information out of a string - a fortran formatting string to be specific. The string is formatted like:
F8.3, I5, 3(5X, 2(A20,F10.3)), 'XXX'
with formatting fields delimited by "," and formatting groups inside brackets, with the number in front of the brackets indicating how many consecutive times the formatting pattern is repeated. So, the string above expands to:
F8.3, I5, 5X, A20,F10.3, A20,F10.3, 5X, A20,F10.3, A20,F10.3, 5X, A20,F10.3, A20,F10.3, 'XXX'
I am trying to make something in C# that will expand a string that conforms to that pattern. I have started going about it with lots of switch and if statements, but am wondering if I am not going about it the wrong way?
I was basically wondering if some Regex wizzard thinks that Regular expressions can do this in one neat-fell swoop? I know nothing about regular expressions, but if this could solve my problem I am considering putting in some time to learn how to use them... on the other hand if regular expressions can't sort this out then I'd rather spend my time looking at another method.

This has to be doable with Regex :)
I've expanded my previous example and it test nicely with your example.
// regex to match the inner most patterns of n(X) and capture the values of n and X.
private static readonly Regex matcher = new Regex(#"(\d+)\(([^(]*?)\)", RegexOptions.None);
// create new string by repeating X n times, separated with ','
private static string Join(Match m)
{
var n = Convert.ToInt32(m.Groups[1].Value); // get value of n
var x = m.Groups[2].Value; // get value of X
return String.Join(",", Enumerable.Repeat(x, n));
}
// expand the string by recursively replacing the innermost values of n(X).
private static string Expand(string text)
{
var s = matcher.Replace(text, Join);
return (matcher.IsMatch(s)) ? Expand(s) : s;
}
// parse a string for occurenses of n(X) pattern and expand then.
// return the string as a tokenized array.
public static string[] Parse(string text)
{
// Check that the number of parantheses is even.
if (text.Sum(c => (c == '(' || c == ')') ? 1 : 0) % 2 == 1)
throw new ArgumentException("The string contains an odd number of parantheses.");
return Expand(text).Split(new[] { ',', ' ' }, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries);
}

I would suggest using a recusive method like the example below( not tested ):
ResultData Parse(String value, ref Int32 index)
{
ResultData result = new ResultData();
Index startIndex = index; // Used to get substrings
while (index < value.Length)
{
Char current = value[index];
if (current == '(')
{
index++;
result.Add(Parse(value, ref index));
startIndex = index;
continue;
}
if (current == ')')
{
// Push last result
index++;
return result;
}
// Process all other chars here
}
// We can't find the closing bracket
throw new Exception("String is not valid");
}
You maybe need to modify some parts of the code, but this method have i used when writing a simple compiler. Although it's not completed, just a example.

Personally, I would suggest using a recursive function instead. Every time you hit an opening parenthesis, call the function again to parse that part. I'm not sure if you can use a regex to match a recursive data structure.
(Edit: Removed incorrect regex)

Ended up rewriting this today. It turns out that this can be done in one single method:
private static string ExpandBrackets(string Format)
{
int maxLevel = CountNesting(Format);
for (int currentLevel = maxLevel; currentLevel > 0; currentLevel--)
{
int level = 0;
int start = 0;
int end = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < Format.Length; i++)
{
char thisChar = Format[i];
switch (Format[i])
{
case '(':
level++;
if (level == currentLevel)
{
string group = string.Empty;
int repeat = 0;
/// Isolate the number of repeats if any
/// If there are 0 repeats the set to 1 so group will be replaced by itself with the brackets removed
for (int j = i - 1; j >= 0; j--)
{
char c = Format[j];
if (c == ',')
{
start = j + 1;
break;
}
if (char.IsDigit(c))
repeat = int.Parse(c + (repeat != 0 ? repeat.ToString() : string.Empty));
else
throw new Exception("Non-numeric character " + c + " found in front of the brackets");
}
if (repeat == 0)
repeat = 1;
/// Isolate the format group
/// Parse until the first closing bracket. Level is decremented as this effectively takes us down one level
for (int j = i + 1; j < Format.Length; j++)
{
char c = Format[j];
if (c == ')')
{
level--;
end = j;
break;
}
group += c;
}
/// Substitute the expanded group for the original group in the format string
/// If the group is empty then just remove it from the string
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(group))
{
Format = Format.Remove(start - 1, end - start + 2);
i = start;
}
else
{
string repeatedGroup = RepeatString(group, repeat);
Format = Format.Remove(start, end - start + 1).Insert(start, repeatedGroup);
i = start + repeatedGroup.Length - 1;
}
}
break;
case ')':
level--;
break;
}
}
}
return Format;
}
CountNesting() returns the highest level of bracket nesting in the format statement, but could be passed in as a parameter to the method. RepeatString() just repeats a string the specified number of times and substitutes it for the bracketed group in the format string.

Iterating through string?

Not entirely sure this is possible, but say I have two strings like so:
"IAmAString-00001"
"IAmAString-00023"
What would be a quick'n'easy way to iterate from IAmAString-0001 to IAmAString-00023 by moving up the index of just the numbers on the end?
The problem is a bit more general than that, for example the string I could be dealing could be of any format but the last bunch of chars will always be numbers, so something like Super_Confusing-String#w00t0003 and in that case the last 0003 would be what I'd use to iterate through.
Any ideas?

You can use char.IsDigit:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var s = "IAmAString-00001";
int index = -1;
for (int i = 0; i < s.Length; i++)
{
if (char.IsDigit(s[i]))
{
index = i;
break;
}
}
if (index == -1)
Console.WriteLine("digits not found");
else
Console.WriteLine("digits: {0}", s.Substring(index));
}
which produces this output:
digits: 00001

string.Format and a for loop should do what you want.
for(int i = 0; i <=23; i++)
{
string.Format("IAmAString-{0:D4}",i);
}
or something close to that (not sitting in front of a compiler).

string start = "IAmAString-00001";
string end = "IAmAString-00023";
// match constant part and ending digits
var matchstart = Regex.Match(start,#"^(.*?)(\d+)$");
int numberstart = int.Parse(matchstart.Groups[2].Value);
var matchend = Regex.Match(end,#"^(.*?)(\d+)$");
int numberend = int.Parse(matchend.Groups[2].Value);
// constant parts must be the same
if (matchstart.Groups[1].Value != matchend.Groups[1].Value)
throw new ArgumentException("");
// create a format string with same number of digits as original
string format = new string('0', matchstart.Groups[2].Length);
for (int ii = numberstart; ii <= numberend; ++ii)
Console.WriteLine(matchstart.Groups[1].Value + ii.ToString(format));

You could use a Regex:
var match=Regex.Match("Super_Confusing-String#w00t0003",#"(?<=(^.*\D)|^)\d+$");
if(match.Success)
{
var val=int.Parse(match.Value);
Console.WriteLine(val);
}
To answer more specifically, you could use named groups to extract what you need:
var match=Regex.Match(
"Super_Confusing-String#w00t0003",
#"(?<prefix>(^.*\D)|^)(?<digits>\d+)$");
if(match.Success)
{
var prefix=match.Groups["prefix"].Value;
Console.WriteLine(prefix);
var val=int.Parse(match.Groups["digits"].Value);
Console.WriteLine(val);
}

If you can assume that the last 5 characters are the number then:
string prefix = "myprefix-";
for (int i=1; i <=23; i++)
{
Console.WriteLine(myPrefix+i.ToString("D5"));
}

This function will find the trailing number.
private int FindTrailingNumber(string str)
{
string numString = "";
int numTest;
for (int i = str.Length - 1; i > 0; i--)
{
char c = str[i];
if (int.TryParse(c.ToString(), out numTest))
{
numString = c + numString;
}
}
return int.Parse(numString);
}
Assuming all your base strings are the same, this would iterate between strings.
string s1 = "asdf123";
string s2 = "asdf127";
int num1 = FindTrailingNumber(s1);
int num2 = FindTrailingNumber(s2);
string strBase = s1.Replace(num1.ToString(), "");
for (int i = num1; i <= num2; i++)
{
Console.WriteLine(strBase + i.ToString());
}

I think it would be better if you do the search from the last (Rick already upvoted you since it was ur logic :-))
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var s = "IAmAString-00001";
int index = -1;
for (int i = s.Length - 1; i >=0; i--)
{
if (!char.IsDigit(s[i]))
{
index = i;
break;
}
}
if (index == -1)
Console.WriteLine("digits not found");
else
Console.WriteLine("digits: {0}", s.Substring(index));
Console.ReadKey();
}
HTH

If the last X numbers are always digits, then:
int x = 5;
string s = "IAmAString-00001";
int num = int.Parse(s.Substring(s.Length - x, x));
Console.WriteLine("Your Number is: {0}", num);
If the last digits can be 3, 4, or 5 in length, then you will need a little more logic:
int x = 0;
string s = "IAmAString-00001";
foreach (char c in s.Reverse())//Use Reverse() so you start with digits only.
{
if(char.IsDigit(c) == false)
break;//If we start hitting non-digit characters, then exit the loop.
++x;
}
int num = int.Parse(s.Substring(s.Length - x, x));
Console.WriteLine("Your Number is: {0}", num);
I'm not good with complicated RegEx. Because of this, I always shy away from it when maximum optimization is unnecessary. The reason for this is RegEx doesn't always parse strings the way you expect it to. If there is and alternate solution that will still run fast then I'd rather go that route as it's easier for me to understand and know that it will work with any combination of strings.
For Example: if you use some of the other solutions presented here with a string like "I2AmAString-000001", then you will get "2000001" as your number instead of "1".