We are in the process of setting up our release definitions to finally finish the last piece of our CD/CI setup in VSTS and are running into an issue where we are unable to transform our configs.
Currently we are following Scott Hanselman's approach of keeping connection strings and secrets out of our web.config via a secrets.config because we don't want any of that information committed to source control. If there is a better practice for this scenario we are open to switching but currently unsure of how this would integrate with VSTS CD/CI.
We've tried using the XDT Transform Extension to transform our web.base.config to web.config to remove the file and the configsource references but it doesn't seem to be transforming.
We've also used the IIS Web App Deploy task with the XML transformation and XML variable substitution but the transformation isn't working because the web.base.config doesn't exist in the artifacts. I'm not sure why that is not being pulled in on build.
We'd like to know what best practice is for any or all of these different steps and how we can accomplish an on premise deployment successfully without committing config settings to source control. We'd also like to know how to execute this methodology for console apps as well.
Since the web.base.config file isn’t uploaded to source control and no in build agent machine, so you can’t use XDT Transform or XML transformation task/feature.
You can store the data in secret variable or Azure Key Vault and link it to release definition.
For example:
Add a new variable (click lock icon) or link Azure key Vault in release definition (e.g. connectionStrings)
Way 1: Check XML variable substitution option (Variables defined in the Build or Release Definition will be matched against the 'key' or 'name' entries in the appSettings, applicationSettings, and connectionStrings sections of any config file and parameters.xml. Variable Substitution is run after config transforms.), then the variable value will be replaced to the config files
Way 2: If the web app published as the web deployment package: override web deploy parameters (SetParameters.xml )by specifying value in Override Parameters input in release task. (You can add parameters.xml file to the project, then the related parameters will be added to SetParameters.xml file when generate web deployment package) Configuring Parameters for Web Package Deployment
Way 3: Using Replace Token task to replace the token in a file (e.g. #{mypassword}#) to the variable value (mypassword)
Related
I am trying to help port a .Net service to a more modern .Net version (possibly Core) and use the MSIX installer. The application has several configuration files generated by the compiler (in source they are app.config but compiled they become *.exe.xml), they are installed into Program File right next to the binaries and a GUI helper app as well and the application itself can modify them to change service behavior (port, ip, tls cert, etc).
Writes under C:\Program Files\WindowsApps\package_name are not allowed.Writes under C:\Program Files\WindowsApps\package_name are not allowed.
The problem I am facing is that the MSIX installer makes it so that files in it's sandboxed version of Program Files cannot be written to (see above). That means that this application cannot be configured, so I am trying to figure out not only how to make the app configurable again, but also how windows wants to handle app configuration.
Right now it seems like there is two general approaches to do this:
write the configuration data to the service account's AppData/local folder
try to mimic a /etc/Myservice behavior in another folder. (meaning a local system-wide directory that houses configuration data for the service)
If you suggest #1 please answer the following additional questions:
How would I move Application configuration files to a user configuration file directory
how can an admin with a normal account modify the config file in the Service Account's AppData folder with the mentioned GUI helper application? (do they need to enable desktop access to the service account, login and run the GUI)?
If you suggest #2:
Where would you suggest this directory exist (specifically where will MSIX allow it)?
How do I tell the .Net application that the files are not right next to it? Can I just use AppData.CurrentDomain.SetData?
Well, a service running on the system account is the same for all users, so I would say that CommonApplicationData is a better folder for storing its settings, instead of appdata. This folder is easily accessible to both your service and to any admin that needs to deploy a custom config file.
In AppData you should store only actual user files (like files or settings generated by the actions taken inside your app by a specific user - thus different files for different users).
Now, the second part is where you need to configure you code to load the config file from a custom path instead of looking for it next to the EXE. I am no .NET expert but after a quick search I found this:
Relocating app.config file to a custom path
The modern approach to deploying app customizations
What is not clear to me is how your customers use the GUI helper tool to customize the config file. Is this just a tool that is used by someone from the IT department to generate the config file, and then they would copy that file and deploy it to the end-user machines using an MSI/MST file (or through some other custom deployment method)?
If your application is only deployed by IT folks, then you can try another simpler (and much elegant) solution for providing it with a custom config file, which actually doesn't require any code changes.
You can still leave the config file next to the EXE, in ProgramFiles and instruct the IT teams that deploy the app to use an MSIX Modification Package to deploy the custom config file generated by your GUI helper. (check the link included above for an example - with a video version at the end of the article).
Note: IT teams can use multiple free or paid tools to generate MSIX Modifications Packages.
Of course, your GUI helper tool still needs to generate that customized config file in a folder where it is allowed, as it can no longer write under ProgramFiles. So actually, you do need to modify a little bit your code in this scenario too.
I want to know if there is a better way to use connection strings in external files in my solution, since my solution has 8 separate projects, all using the same connection strings. According to this:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/framework/data/adonet/connection-strings-and-configuration-files#using-external-configuration-files
using an external file (for connection strings) is trivial, and can be easily done (using something like configSource="connections.config). However, in order to make this work, We have to follow these guidelines:
The external file has to exist within the project folder
The external file has to have the property "CopyToOutputFolder" set to true
In my case, this can be done, but it's problematic to manage this throughout all 8 projects, especially if I need to add a new connection string, change one of the settings (target database, username, password), or when I need to add a new project.
--FYI: each of these projects are web jobs that are deployed to an Azure server. Adding a new web job for a new feature, new utility, etc., or removing an old web job for any number of reasons is not uncommon. This solution is constantly changing, which adds to the difficulty of managing these settings within each project separately. Also, connection string management on the production server is not problematic, since each web job inherits these connection strings from the parent app service.
I would like to know if any of the following is possible;
Can I use a separate file that is NOT within the project folder for the connection strings?
Can I load connection strings dynamically (at run-time) into the configuration manager? (one note on this - I know this is possible, but I need to be able to do it without affecting the underlying app.config file)
Is there another type of ConfigurationManager that is commonly used to load these connection strings into the solution, that will meet my requirements?
Although this question is over a year old, I thought an up-to-date answer would be useful for any Windows desktop coders wanting to reference connection strings outside the project folder's app.config etc. This would be useful for sharing 1 config file for multiple projects, having to only change connection string in 1 centralised file.
The basics of telling App.Config to use a different file for connection strings, is straightforward; however, .NET appears NOT to be able to parse this external file, if it is either NOT in the project's root folder, or a subfolder(s) within that project. Let's see this by looking at the most basic example:
in the project's App.config, within the <configuration> tag, use the code below ('configSource' points to another file to read the connection strings):
<configuration>
<connectionStrings configSource="ExternalConnectionStrings.config"/>
</configuration>
Create ExternalConnectionStrings.config, with the following code:
<connectionStrings>
<clear/>
<add name = "ConnString1"
connectionString = "Server=myServer;Trusted_Connection=True;Database=myDB;Persist Security Info=false"/>
<add name = "ConnString2"
connectionString = "Server=tcp:azureserver.database.windows.net,1433;Database=AzureDB;User ID=**;Password=**;Encrypt=True;TrustServerCertificate=False;Connection Timeout=30;Persist Security Info=false"/>
</connectionStrings>
Save this config file in the same folder as your project's App.config and mark this file's property to 'Copy to Output Directory' or 'Copy if newer'.
This is the 'textbook' way of referring to connection strings from another file other than App.config. However, this may not be that useful: how to have this external file in a completely different folder from the project folder?
To do this, copy that same ExternalConnectionStrings.config to a folder OUTSIDE the project or solution folder, eg. C:\ConnectionStringsFolder\. REMOVE this config file from the project folder where we previously copied/created it (otherwise the following instructions will not work).
Keep App.config the same (making sure the ExternalConnectionStrings.config is not present in the project folder). Use the Windows mklink command to associate ExternalConnectionStrings.config to an external folder, with the following command prompt command:
mklink ExternalConnectionStrings.config C:\ConnectionStringsFolder\ExternalConnectionStrings.config
Windows should return with a 'symbolic link created for....'; make sure you did NOT have that particular config file present in the project folder where app.config sits.
You should see the ExternalConnectionStrings.config listed within eg. Visual Studio; make sure you mark this to COPY to the output folder (I use 'Copy if newer', which will pick up any changes to the external config file ONLY after a rebuild of the project).
This answers Matt Spinks' question 1; for question 2, the following method will return all connection strings found within the external file (as pointed to by App.config):
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Configuration;
static void GetConnectionStrings()
{
ConnectionStringSettingsCollection cStringsSettings = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings;
if (cStringsSettings != null)
{
foreach (ConnectionStringSettings cstrings in cStringsSettings)
{
Debug.WriteLine(cstrings.Name);
Debug.WriteLine(cstrings.ConnectionString);
}
}
}
This is currently working in Visual Studio 2019, with .NET Core 3.1, a WPF application, on Windows 10.
You don't mention which version of dotnet you are using, however if you are using dotnet core the application configuration can be sourced from environment variables.
I think this could solve your problem because you don't need to track any additional files between your projects and in my opinion makes a lot of sense because any secure data would not be visible to any developer or be stored in any repository. Only devops would know about it when they set it initially. Also this gets your closer to the 12 factor app https://12factor.net/.
To use this make sure that your Startup.cs file includes a section to load the environment variables such as
var config = new ConfigurationBuilder()
.AddJsonFile("appsettings.json", true, true)
.AddJsonFile($"appsettings.{env.EnvironmentName}.json", true)
.AddEnvironmentVariables()
.Build();
dotnet core Environment Variable cnfiguration provider
You can probably create a bat file to set everything initially
setx connection_string="Server=xxxxxxxxx" /M
This will create your environment variables and set the values you specity.
Hope you find this useful.
I'm trying to use application settings with a C#.NET project I am working on. But I can't seem to get it to return anything other then the default values. Through the project properties I've added a single setting, DBConnectionString, and set its value to a connection string I want to use. Its scope is set to "application".
Doing this created a number of files including Settings.settings, Settings.Designer.CS, and app.config. The Settings class then has custom, type safe, properties that can be used to set and retrieve each setting. The app.config file is a XML file that stores the actual settings values.
When I build my project it looks like the app.config file is copied to the target directory as DataAccessLayer.dll.config. My program runs fine and is able to use the default connection string.
Next I tried to edit the DataAccessLayer.dll.config file to change the connection string. I ran my program again, but it continued to use the default value.
This project is a class library that use to a Web project and sometimes the connection string can changes.
Builds will output config files named after the dll however those aren't actually what's read on app start up. You could put the setting in the web apps config (example here Equivalent to 'app.config' for a library (DLL)), those are the settings you'll actually be running with in this case.
If you want your library to be portable you'll have to either; 1) make your own config class/file 2) Read your dll's app config manually (example in the answer I linked to above) or 3) Put your setting in the importing projects app.config
In this case I would just put your connection string data in the web apps config. If DataAccessLayer.dll is only for internal use, this is in my experience the most common pattern, and doesn't really have many cons. Ultimately I would have these values set during my build or by a deploy utility like Salt or Chef. If you're manually editing the web apps config on or after deploy then you're doing it wrong.
I have a Visual Studio web service application with the following solution structure (using VS2013 Community):
- [Solution] S
- [Project] S_Service
- S.amsx
- [Project] S_Lib
- File1.cs
- File2.cs
- app.config
The S_Service project is a simple web service project, with just a single asmx file with one WebService method. The project contains a reference to the S_Lib project, a class library to do all the work in terms of the business logic (the request processing).
In S_Lib I have an app.config file in which I store things like directories and file names for stuff which is used by the various components in S_Lib. When I am developing, changes to that file are picked up by the code ok.
Here's the problem: When I publish the S_Service project, the publish directory doesn't contain my app.config - only S_Service.dll and S_Lib.dll. After reading some other posts on StackOverflow (can't seem to find them now), I tried setting the build action on app.config to Content and to Copy Always. Great, this gets the file across to the publish directory, so it looks ok. But, once I deploy the whole lot onto IIS, any changes to the app.config file do not get reflected when the service is run. In fact I can delete the file completely from the IIS directory and it runs just fine. It's as though S_Lib.dll contains a compiled version of the configuration settings. This is no use, as I want to modify the config depending on the machine it's deployed on.
What do I need to do so that app.config is actually used at runtime and that changes are read on the fly?
Just as you wrote, S_Lib.dll contains compiles settings from the time when you set them in VS settings designer. Therefore it is still working (more or less).
You have a web service so you need a web.config. Add one to S_Service project. Then merge app.config content to web.config. Every time you change some setting in S_Lib project you will have to merge changes to web.config as well.
Or you could add app.config to S_Service project as a link by name web.config (not sure if it is possible to create a link with different name). Then when you change settings in S_Lib project they will be referenced in S_Service project automatically.
After failing to find a simple Visual Studio-based solution to do what I want, I implemented a more customised solution. In the library project, I replaced the config lookup method:
internal static string GetConfig(string key) {
return ConfigurationManager.AppSettings[key] as string;
}
with a new method that reads my own settings file (custom format), stored in the solution. It's not perfectly ideal as it means that each project in the solution has to have its own settings file, but it's simpler overall. If anyone is interested please leave a comment and I will elaborate on this solution.
I created a Windows service used to execute automated procedures (.Net code) for multiple periodic operations, like backups, sanity checks, reports generation, etc. After building the project, I installed the service with installutil. Everything worked great.
I decided to move various "static" parameters for these automated procedures in the App.config file. I uninstalled the previous version of the service with installutil /u and built the new version of the project. In my build output folder, there's a AppName.exe file and a AppName.exe.config file, as I would expect. I installed the new version of the service, again with installutil from the VS 2012 Developer Command Prompt as an administrator.
The problem is that the service doesn't seem to be able to read the configuration file from the ConfigurationManager. The call for ConfigurationManager.AppSettings("paramname") doesn't fail, but the resulting parameter value is an empty string. As far as I know, the problem occurs for all parameters and not only for specific ones. The parameters are located in the <appSettings> section, under <configuration>, like I've done multiple times before in various projects.
I don't know if it can help, but my service runs on the LocalSystem account and starts automatically after installation and with Windows.
What did I do wrong?
Edit: I already tried uninstalling/re-installing the service (multiple times), like some stackoverflow answers suggests. Also, I'm not looking to update/refresh the file at runtime.
I solved this by setting the location of the config file in runtime. This enables me to place and name the config file where ever I want. I fetch the executing assembly path and then checks if the config file is there. Check the answer on this thread how to dynamically set the config file
This is how I fetch the executing assembly:
var path = Path.GetDirectoryName(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().Location);
var configFilePath = Path.Combine(path, "service.config");
Hope this helps!
Turns out I was getting the configuration value in a variable declared with the same name as the property I was using to store the value. For an unknown reason, I had no warning from the compiler. Since a Windows service cannot be debugged, the solution was to review the code/rewrite this part from scratch, and that's when I saw the error.