How to check if Linq Expression value is null - c#

I have a lambda expression x => x.person.parent.Id == someId and I want to check if someId is null or not. The issue I am facing is that Id property is a nullable integer (i.e. int?). This is my attempt but it does not work if property is nullable. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
private static bool IsNullExpression(Expression exp)
{
if (exp is ConstantExpression constantExpression)
{
return constantExpression.Value == null;
}
return false;
}
public void AddIfNotNull(Expression<Func<T, bool>> exp)
{
// convert expression to binary expression
if (exp.Body is BinaryExpression binaryExpression && (IsNullExpression(binaryExpression.Left) || IsNullExpression(binaryExpression.Right)))
{
// there is a null in expression, we just found it
return;
}
_list.Add(exp);
}

There are several cases you don't handle.
Firstly, if the property and the value are of different types, the constant will be warped in a Convert LINQ node, (which is of type UnaryExpression) which you need to unwrap.
Secondly if we are dealing with captured variables, the compiler will generate an extra object and the variables will be transformed into fields on this object, and the expression that accesses the variable will be a member access to the constant that contains the capture object.
private static bool IsNullExpression(Expression exp)
{
// If types are different for example int and int? there will be an extra conversion expression, we need to unwrap this
if (exp is UnaryExpression uExp) exp = uExp.Operand;
// If we are dealing with a captured variable, then teh constant will be the capture object and the value is stored as a member on this object
if (exp is MemberExpression mExp && mExp.Expression is ConstantExpression cExp)
{
object value = mExp.Member is PropertyInfo pInfo ? pInfo.GetValue(cExp.Value) :
mExp.Member is FieldInfo fInfo ? fInfo.GetValue(cExp.Value) :
throw new NotSupportedException();
return value == null;
}
// If we use a simple constant, this is what will be called
if (exp is ConstantExpression constantExpression)
{
return constantExpression.Value == null;
}
return false;
}
// Tested with the following
// Simple constant expressions
TestMethod(p => p.Id == 0);
TestMethod(p => p.Id == null);
// Capture a non null value
int value = 0;
TestMethod(p => p.Id == value);
// Capture a null value
int? nullValue = null;
TestMethod(p => p.Parent.Id == nullValue);
// Testing infrastructure
public static bool TestMethod(Expression<Func<Person, bool>> exp)
{
// If we have a binary expression
if (exp.Body is BinaryExpression binaryExpression && (IsNullExpression(binaryExpression.Left) || IsNullExpression(binaryExpression.Right)))
{
return true;
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
public class Person
{
public int? Id { get; set; }
}

Related

Define a generic lambda in C# and assign it to a variable to be used with MakeGenericMethod

I know I can define a generic function and then call it with Type parameters by help of reflection. Something like that:
private static void SomeFunc<Tf>()
{
// Something type safe against Tf
}
public void CallingFunc()
{
var someType = typeof(whatever); // This may be retrieved using reflection as well instead
var someMethod = this.GetType().GetMethod(nameof(SomeFunc)), BindingFlags.Static | BindingFlags.NonPublic);
var typedMethod = someMethod.MakeGenericMethod(someType);
typedMethod.Invoke(null, null);
}
Now, is there a way to declare this SomeMethod<Tf>() inline as a lambda, to avoid declaring it as a separate method in the class, but still being able to use it with MakeGenericMethod? Something like:
public void CallingFunc()
{
var someType = typeof(whatever); // This may be retrieved using reflection as well instead
// This obviously doesn't work as it requires Tf to be known at this stage, and we can have Tf only as a Type variable here => what should I do instead?
var someMethod = new Action<Tf>(() => /* Something type safe against Tf */).Method;
var typedMethod = someMethod.MakeGenericMethod(someType);
typedMethod.Invoke(null, null);
}
Making CallingFunc generic as well is not an option - the someType variable is retrieved with reflection so is not known on compile time.
Based on: https://gist.github.com/afreeland/6733381 thanks !
With a little improve:
public class ExpressionBuilder
{
// Define some of our default filtering options
private static MethodInfo containsMethod = typeof(string).GetMethod("Contains", new[] { typeof(string) });
private static MethodInfo startsWithMethod = typeof(string).GetMethod("StartsWith", new[] { typeof(string) });
private static MethodInfo endsWithMethod = typeof(string).GetMethod("EndsWith", new[] { typeof(string) });
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> GetExpression(List<GridHelper.Filter> filters)
{
// No filters passed in #KickIT
if (filters.Count == 0)
return null;
// Create the parameter for the ObjectType (typically the 'x' in your expression (x => 'x')
// The "parm" string is used strictly for debugging purposes
ParameterExpression param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "parm");
// Store the result of a calculated Expression
Expression exp = null;
if (filters.Count == 1)
exp = GetExpression<T>(param, filters[0]); // Create expression from a single instance
else if (filters.Count == 2)
exp = GetExpression<T>(param, filters[0], filters[1]); // Create expression that utilizes AndAlso mentality
else
{
// Loop through filters until we have created an expression for each
while (filters.Count > 0)
{
// Grab initial filters remaining in our List
var f1 = filters[0];
var f2 = filters[1];
// Check if we have already set our Expression
if (exp == null)
exp = GetExpression<T>(param, filters[0], filters[1]); // First iteration through our filters
else
exp = Expression.AndAlso(exp, GetExpression<T>(param, filters[0], filters[1])); // Add to our existing expression
filters.Remove(f1);
filters.Remove(f2);
// Odd number, handle this seperately
if (filters.Count == 1)
{
// Pass in our existing expression and our newly created expression from our last remaining filter
exp = Expression.AndAlso(exp, GetExpression<T>(param, filters[0]));
// Remove filter to break out of while loop
filters.RemoveAt(0);
}
}
}
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(exp, param);
}
private static Expression GetExpression<T>(ParameterExpression param, GridHelper.Filter filter)
{
// The member you want to evaluate (x => x.FirstName)
MemberExpression member = Expression.Property(param, filter.PropertyName);
var typeOfValue = filter.Value.GetType();
// The value you want to evaluate
ConstantExpression constant = Expression.Constant(filter.Value, typeOfValue);
// Determine how we want to apply the expression
switch (filter.Operator)
{
case GridHelper.Operator.Equals:
return Expression.Equal(member, constant);
case GridHelper.Operator.NotEqual:
return Expression.Equal(member, constant);
case GridHelper.Operator.Contains:
return Expression.Call(member, containsMethod, constant);
case GridHelper.Operator.GreaterThan:
return Expression.GreaterThan(member, constant);
case GridHelper.Operator.GreaterThanOrEqual:
return Expression.GreaterThanOrEqual(member, constant);
case GridHelper.Operator.LessThan:
return Expression.LessThan(member, constant);
case GridHelper.Operator.LessThanOrEqualTo:
return Expression.LessThanOrEqual(member, constant);
case GridHelper.Operator.StartsWith:
return Expression.Call(member, startsWithMethod, constant);
case GridHelper.Operator.EndsWith:
return Expression.Call(member, endsWithMethod, constant);
}
return null;
}
private static BinaryExpression GetExpression<T>(ParameterExpression param, GridHelper.Filter filter1, GridHelper.Filter filter2)
{
Expression result1 = GetExpression<T>(param, filter1);
Expression result2 = GetExpression<T>(param, filter2);
return Expression.AndAlso(result1, result2);
}
}
// Filter class
public class GridHelper
{
public enum Operator
{
Contains,
GreaterThan,
GreaterThanOrEqual,
LessThan,
LessThanOrEqualTo,
StartsWith,
EndsWith,
Equals,
NotEqual,
Or
}
public class Filter
{
public string PropertyName { get; set; }
public object? Value { get; set; }
public Operator Operator { get; set; }
}
}

Transform ExpressionVisitor to DbExpressionVisitor, read parameter as constant

I currently have some ExpressionVisitors I manually use on some IQueryable calls
But I would like to use an interceptor to hook them into all queries, but then I need to transform them to DbExpressionVistors
I think I have them all sorted, except one, which takes a parameter value and outputs it as a constant, to create unique query plans based on a tenant id
The problem I have is that I cant seem to find a way to extract the parameter value from the DbParameterReferenceExpression into a constant value like in the previous code for the ExpressionVisitor:
public class DeParameterizeTenantIdVisitor : ExpressionVisitor
{
protected override Expression VisitMember(MemberExpression node)
{
if (IsTenantType(node))
{
var expression = Visit(node.Expression);
var constantExpression = expression as ConstantExpression;
var val = GetValue(constantExpression, node.Member);
if(val != null)
return Expression.Constant(val);
}
return base.VisitMember(node);
}
private static bool IsTenantType(Expression node)
{
return node.Type == typeof(OrganizationId);
}
private static object GetValue(ConstantExpression constantExpression, MemberInfo member)
{
if (constantExpression != null)
{
var container = constantExpression.Value;
var info = member as FieldInfo;
if (info != null)
{
var value = info.GetValue(container);
return value;
}
var propertyInfo = member as PropertyInfo;
if (propertyInfo != null)
{
var value = propertyInfo.GetValue(container, null);
return value;
}
}
return null;
}
}
Anyone have any input or feedback about it?
I have been trying to search around for it but it seems to be very experimental ground I'm onto!
Edit:
Or is it possible to use my existing ExpressionVisitior in relation with a interceptor or DbExpressionVisitor?

An expression tree lambda may not contain a null propagating operator

The line price = co?.price ?? 0, in the following code gives me the above error, but if I remove ? from co.? it works fine.
I was trying to follow this MSDN example where they are using ? on line select new { person.FirstName, PetName = subpet?.Name ?? String.Empty }; So, it seems I need to understand when to use ? with ?? and when not to.
Error:
an expression tree lambda may not contain a null propagating operator
public class CustomerOrdersModelView
{
public string CustomerID { get; set; }
public int FY { get; set; }
public float? price { get; set; }
....
....
}
public async Task<IActionResult> ProductAnnualReport(string rpt)
{
var qry = from c in _context.Customers
join ord in _context.Orders
on c.CustomerID equals ord.CustomerID into co
from m in co.DefaultIfEmpty()
select new CustomerOrdersModelView
{
CustomerID = c.CustomerID,
FY = c.FY,
price = co?.price ?? 0,
....
....
};
....
....
}
The example you were quoting from uses LINQ to Objects, where the implicit lambda expressions in the query are converted into delegates... whereas you're using EF or similar, with IQueryable<T> queryies, where the lambda expressions are converted into expression trees. Expression trees don't support the null conditional operator (or tuples).
Just do it the old way:
price = co == null ? 0 : (co.price ?? 0)
(I believe the null-coalescing operator is fine in an expression tree.)
The code you link to uses List<T>. List<T> implements IEnumerable<T> but not IQueryable<T>. In that case, the projection is executed in memory and ?. works.
You're using some IQueryable<T>, which works very differently. For IQueryable<T>, a representation of the projection is created, and your LINQ provider decides what to do with it at runtime. For backwards compatibility reasons, ?. cannot be used here.
Depending on your LINQ provider, you may be able to use plain . and still not get any NullReferenceException.
Jon Skeet's answer was right, in my case I was using DateTime for my Entity class.
When I tried to use like
(a.DateProperty == null ? default : a.DateProperty.Date)
I had the error
Property 'System.DateTime Date' is not defined for type 'System.Nullable`1[System.DateTime]' (Parameter 'property')
So I needed to change DateTime? for my entity class and
(a.DateProperty == null ? default : a.DateProperty.Value.Date)
While expression tree does not support the C# 6.0 null propagating, what we can do is create a visitor that modify expression tree for safe null propagation, just like the operator does!
Here is mine:
public class NullPropagationVisitor : ExpressionVisitor
{
private readonly bool _recursive;
public NullPropagationVisitor(bool recursive)
{
_recursive = recursive;
}
protected override Expression VisitUnary(UnaryExpression propertyAccess)
{
if (propertyAccess.Operand is MemberExpression mem)
return VisitMember(mem);
if (propertyAccess.Operand is MethodCallExpression met)
return VisitMethodCall(met);
if (propertyAccess.Operand is ConditionalExpression cond)
return Expression.Condition(
test: cond.Test,
ifTrue: MakeNullable(Visit(cond.IfTrue)),
ifFalse: MakeNullable(Visit(cond.IfFalse)));
return base.VisitUnary(propertyAccess);
}
protected override Expression VisitMember(MemberExpression propertyAccess)
{
return Common(propertyAccess.Expression, propertyAccess);
}
protected override Expression VisitMethodCall(MethodCallExpression propertyAccess)
{
if (propertyAccess.Object == null)
return base.VisitMethodCall(propertyAccess);
return Common(propertyAccess.Object, propertyAccess);
}
private BlockExpression Common(Expression instance, Expression propertyAccess)
{
var safe = _recursive ? base.Visit(instance) : instance;
var caller = Expression.Variable(safe.Type, "caller");
var assign = Expression.Assign(caller, safe);
var acess = MakeNullable(new ExpressionReplacer(instance,
IsNullableStruct(instance) ? caller : RemoveNullable(caller)).Visit(propertyAccess));
var ternary = Expression.Condition(
test: Expression.Equal(caller, Expression.Constant(null)),
ifTrue: Expression.Constant(null, acess.Type),
ifFalse: acess);
return Expression.Block(
type: acess.Type,
variables: new[]
{
caller,
},
expressions: new Expression[]
{
assign,
ternary,
});
}
private static Expression MakeNullable(Expression ex)
{
if (IsNullable(ex))
return ex;
return Expression.Convert(ex, typeof(Nullable<>).MakeGenericType(ex.Type));
}
private static bool IsNullable(Expression ex)
{
return !ex.Type.IsValueType || (Nullable.GetUnderlyingType(ex.Type) != null);
}
private static bool IsNullableStruct(Expression ex)
{
return ex.Type.IsValueType && (Nullable.GetUnderlyingType(ex.Type) != null);
}
private static Expression RemoveNullable(Expression ex)
{
if (IsNullableStruct(ex))
return Expression.Convert(ex, ex.Type.GenericTypeArguments[0]);
return ex;
}
private class ExpressionReplacer : ExpressionVisitor
{
private readonly Expression _oldEx;
private readonly Expression _newEx;
internal ExpressionReplacer(Expression oldEx, Expression newEx)
{
_oldEx = oldEx;
_newEx = newEx;
}
public override Expression Visit(Expression node)
{
if (node == _oldEx)
return _newEx;
return base.Visit(node);
}
}
}
It passes on the following tests:
private static string Foo(string s) => s;
static void Main(string[] _)
{
var visitor = new NullPropagationVisitor(recursive: true);
Test1();
Test2();
Test3();
void Test1()
{
Expression<Func<string, char?>> f = s => s == "foo" ? 'X' : Foo(s).Length.ToString()[0];
var fBody = (Expression<Func<string, char?>>)visitor.Visit(f);
var fFunc = fBody.Compile();
Debug.Assert(fFunc(null) == null);
Debug.Assert(fFunc("bar") == '3');
Debug.Assert(fFunc("foo") == 'X');
}
void Test2()
{
Expression<Func<string, int>> y = s => s.Length;
var yBody = visitor.Visit(y.Body);
var yFunc = Expression.Lambda<Func<string, int?>>(
body: yBody,
parameters: y.Parameters)
.Compile();
Debug.Assert(yFunc(null) == null);
Debug.Assert(yFunc("bar") == 3);
}
void Test3()
{
Expression<Func<char?, string>> y = s => s.Value.ToString()[0].ToString();
var yBody = visitor.Visit(y.Body);
var yFunc = Expression.Lambda<Func<char?, string>>(
body: yBody,
parameters: y.Parameters)
.Compile();
Debug.Assert(yFunc(null) == null);
Debug.Assert(yFunc('A') == "A");
}
}

Get Non-Static MethodInfo for IEnumerable<T>.First() (Or make the static method work with EF)

I have a method, GetSearchExpression, defined as:
private Expression<Func<T, bool>> GetSearchExpression(
string targetField, ExpressionType comparison, object value, IEnumerable<EnumerableResultQualifier> qualifiers = null);
At a high level, the method takes in a Field or Property (such as Order.Customer.Name), a comparison type (like Expression.Equals), and a value (like "Billy"), then returns a lambda expression suitable for input to a Where statement o => o.Customer.Name == "Billy"}.
Recently, I discovered an issue. Sometimes, the field I need is actually the field of an item in a collection (like Order.StatusLogs.First().CreatedDate).
I feel like that should be easy. The code that creates the left side of the expression (above, o => o.Customer.Name) is as follows:
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "t");
Expression left = null;
//turn "Order.Customer.Name" into List<string> { "Customer", "Name" }
var deQualifiedFieldName = DeQualifyFieldName(targetField, typeof(T));
//loop through each part and grab the specified field or property
foreach (var part in deQualifiedFieldName)
left = Expression.PropertyOrField(left == null ? param : left, part);
It seems like I should be able to revise this to check if the field/property exists, and if not, try to call a method by that name instead. It would look like this:
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "t");
Expression left = null;
var deQualifiedFieldName = DeQualifyFieldName(targetField, typeof(T));
var currentType = typeof(T);
foreach (var part in deQualifiedFieldName)
{
//this gets the Type of the current "level" we're at in the hierarchy passed via TargetField
currentType = SingleLevelFieldType(currentType, part);
if (currentType != null) //if the field/property was found
{
left = Expression.PropertyOrField(left == null ? param : left, part);
}
else
{ //if the field or property WASN'T found, it might be a method
var method = currentType.GetMethod(part, Type.EmptyTypes); //doesn't accept parameters
left = Expression.Call(left, method);
currentType = method.ReturnType;
}
}
The problem is that statement near the end (var method currentType.GetMethod(part, Type.EmptyTypes);). Turns out "First" and "Last" don't exist for IEnumerable objects, so I get a null exception when I try to use my Method object. In fact, the only way I can EVER them to show up in a GetMethod() call is by calling typeof(Enumerable).GetMethod(). That's useless of course, because then I get a static method in return rather than the instance method I need.
As a side-note: I tried using the static method, but Entity Framework throws a fit and won't accept it as part of the lambda.
I need help getting the instance MethodInfo of IEnumerable.First() & Last(). Please help!
My first attempt would be to identify if the instance is Enumerable<T> and treat the member name as method instead of a property/field like this
public static class ExpressionUtils
{
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> MakePredicate<T>(
string memberPath, ExpressionType comparison, object value)
{
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "t");
var right = Expression.Constant(value);
var left = memberPath.Split('.').Aggregate((Expression)param, (target, memberName) =>
{
if (typeof(IEnumerable).IsAssignableFrom(target.Type))
{
var enumerableType = target.Type.GetInterfaces()
.Single(i => i.IsGenericType && i.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(IEnumerable<>));
return Expression.Call(typeof(Enumerable), memberName, enumerableType.GetGenericArguments(), target);
}
return Expression.PropertyOrField(target, memberName);
});
var body = Expression.MakeBinary(comparison, left, right);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(body, param);
}
}
and try use it as follows
var predicate = ExpressionUtils.MakePredicate<Order>(
"StatusLogs.First.CreatedDate", ExpressionType.GreaterThanOrEqual, new DateTime(2016, 1, 1));
The possible methods are First, FirstOrDefault, Last, LastOrDefault, Singe and SingleOrDefault.
But then you'll find that from the above methods only FirstOrDefault is supported in EF predicates.
Hence we can hardcode that call for collection types and do not include it in the accessors like this
public static class ExpressionUtils
{
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> MakePredicate2<T>(
string memberPath, ExpressionType comparison, object value)
{
var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "t");
var right = Expression.Constant(value);
var left = memberPath.Split('.').Aggregate((Expression)param, (target, memberName) =>
{
if (typeof(IEnumerable).IsAssignableFrom(target.Type))
{
var enumerableType = target.Type.GetInterfaces()
.Single(i => i.IsGenericType && i.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(IEnumerable<>));
target = Expression.Call(typeof(Enumerable), "FirstOrDefault", enumerableType.GetGenericArguments(), target);
}
return Expression.PropertyOrField(target, memberName);
});
var body = Expression.MakeBinary(comparison, left, right);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(body, param);
}
}
and use it as follows
var predicate = ExpressionUtils.MakePredicate<Order>(
"StatusLogs.CreatedDate", ExpressionType.GreaterThanOrEqual, new DateTime(2016, 1, 1));
P.S. While this will work, it might not produce the intended result. IEnumerable<T> navigation property means one-to-many relationship and assuming that the condition should apply only for the first (whatever that means in database, it's rather random) element does not make much sense. I would rather imply Any and try to build expression like this in the above case
t => t.StatusLogs.Any(s => s.CreatedDate >= new DateTime(2016, 1, 1))
or support FirstOrDefault, Any, All, (eventually Count, Sum, Min, Max) and handle them differently inside the builder.
Still IMO for collections Any is the most logical equivalent of the single entity criteria.
But all that will be another story (question).
UPDATE: Initially I was thinking to stop here, but for the sake of completeness, here is a sample implementation of the Any concept:
public static class ExpressionUtils
{
public static Expression<Func<T, bool>> MakePredicate<T>(string memberPath, ExpressionType comparison, object value)
{
return (Expression<Func<T, bool>>)MakePredicate(
typeof(T), memberPath.Split('.'), 0, comparison, value);
}
static LambdaExpression MakePredicate(Type targetType, string[] memberNames, int index, ExpressionType comparison, object value)
{
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(targetType, targetType.Name.ToCamel());
Expression target = parameter;
for (int i = index; i < memberNames.Length; i++)
{
if (typeof(IEnumerable).IsAssignableFrom(target.Type))
{
var itemType = target.Type.GetInterfaces()
.Single(t => t.IsGenericType && t.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(IEnumerable<>))
.GetGenericArguments()[0];
var itemPredicate = MakePredicate(itemType, memberNames, i, comparison, value);
return Expression.Lambda(
Expression.Call(typeof(Enumerable), "Any", new[] { itemType }, target, itemPredicate),
parameter);
}
target = Expression.PropertyOrField(target, memberNames[i]);
}
if (value != null && value.GetType() != target.Type)
value = Convert.ChangeType(value, target.Type);
return Expression.Lambda(
Expression.MakeBinary(comparison, target, Expression.Constant(value)),
parameter);
}
static string ToCamel(this string s)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(s) || char.IsLower(s[0])) return s;
if (s.Length < 2) return s.ToLower();
var chars = s.ToCharArray();
chars[0] = char.ToLower(chars[0]);
return new string(chars);
}
}
so for this sample model
public class Foo
{
public ICollection<Bar> Bars { get; set; }
}
public class Bar
{
public ICollection<Baz> Bazs { get; set; }
}
public class Baz
{
public ICollection<Detail> Details { get; set; }
}
public class Detail
{
public int Amount { get; set; }
}
the sample expression
var predicate = ExpressionUtils.MakePredicate<Foo>(
"Bars.Bazs.Details.Amount", ExpressionType.GreaterThan, 1234);
produces
foo => foo.Bars.Any(bar => bar.Bazs.Any(baz => baz.Details.Any(detail => detail.Amount > 1234)))
What you are possibly looking for is System.Linq.Enumerable.First<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source) etc, so: start at typeof(System.Linq.Enumerable) and work from there. Note: you mention IEnumerable<T>, but it is possible that you actually mean IQueryable<T>, in which case you want Queryable.First<T>(this IQueryable<T> source) etc. Maybe this difference (between Enumerable and Queryable) is why EF "throws a fit".
Thank you to Marc and Ivan for their input. They deserve credit as without their help I would have spent much longer finding a solution. However, as neither answer solved the issue I was having, I'm posting the solution that worked for me (successfully applying criteria as well as successfully querying against an EF data source):
private Expression<Func<T, bool>> GetSearchExpression(string targetField, ExpressionType comparison, object value, string enumMethod)
{
return (Expression<Func<T, bool>>)MakePredicate(DeQualifyFieldName(targetField, typeof(T)), comparison, value, enumMethod);
}
private LambdaExpression MakePredicate(string[] memberNames, ExpressionType comparison, object value, string enumMethod = "Any")
{
//create parameter for inner lambda expression
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "t");
Expression left = parameter;
//Get the value against which the property/field will be compared
var right = Expression.Constant(value);
var currentType = typeof(T);
for (int x = 0; x < memberNames.Count(); x++)
{
string memberName = memberNames[x];
if (FieldExists(currentType, memberName))
{
//assign the current type member type
currentType = SingleLevelFieldType(currentType, memberName);
left = Expression.PropertyOrField(left == null ? parameter : left, memberName);
//mini-loop for non collection objects
if (!currentType.IsGenericType || (!(currentType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(IEnumerable<>) ||
currentType.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(ICollection<>))))
continue;
///Begin loop for collection objects -- this section can only run once
//get enum method
if (enumMethod.Length < 2) throw new Exception("Invalid enum method target.");
bool negateEnumMethod = enumMethod[0] == '!';
string methodName = negateEnumMethod ? enumMethod.Substring(1) : enumMethod;
//get the interface sub-type
var itemType = currentType.GetInterfaces()
.Single(t => t.IsGenericType && t.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(IEnumerable<>))
.GetGenericArguments()[0];
//generate lambda for single item
var itemPredicate = MakeSimplePredicate(itemType, memberNames[++x], comparison, value);
//get method call
var staticMethod = typeof(Enumerable).GetMember(methodName).OfType<MethodInfo>()
.Where(m => m.GetParameters().Length == 2)
.First()
.MakeGenericMethod(itemType);
//generate method call, then break loop for return
left = Expression.Call(null, staticMethod, left, itemPredicate);
right = Expression.Constant(!negateEnumMethod);
comparison = ExpressionType.Equal;
break;
}
}
//build the final expression
var binaryExpression = Expression.MakeBinary(comparison, left, right);
return Expression.Lambda<Func<T, bool>>(binaryExpression, parameter);
}
static LambdaExpression MakeSimplePredicate(Type inputType, string memberName, ExpressionType comparison, object value)
{
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(inputType, "t");
Expression left = Expression.PropertyOrField(parameter, memberName);
return Expression.Lambda(Expression.MakeBinary(comparison, left, Expression.Constant(value)), parameter);
}
private static Type SingleLevelFieldType(Type baseType, string fieldName)
{
Type currentType = baseType;
MemberInfo match = (MemberInfo)currentType.GetField(fieldName) ?? currentType.GetProperty(fieldName);
if (match == null) return null;
return GetFieldOrPropertyType(match);
}
public static Type GetFieldOrPropertyType(MemberInfo field)
{
return field.MemberType == MemberTypes.Property ? ((PropertyInfo)field).PropertyType : ((FieldInfo)field).FieldType;
}
/// <summary>
/// Remove qualifying names from a target field. For example, if targetField is "Order.Customer.Name" and
/// targetType is Order, the de-qualified expression will be "Customer.Name" split into constituent parts
/// </summary>
/// <param name="targetField"></param>
/// <param name="targetType"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static string[] DeQualifyFieldName(string targetField, Type targetType)
{
return DeQualifyFieldName(targetField.Split('.'), targetType);
}
public static string[] DeQualifyFieldName(string[] targetFields, Type targetType)
{
var r = targetFields.ToList();
foreach (var p in targetType.Name.Split('.'))
if (r.First() == p) r.RemoveAt(0);
return r.ToArray();
}
I included related methods in case someone actually needs to sort through this at some point. :)
Thanks again!

Unable to cast object of type 'System.Linq.Expressions.UnaryExpression' to type 'System.Linq.Expressions.MemberExpression'

I created a method in C# to get methodname
public string GetCorrectPropertyName<T>(Expression<Func<T, string>> expression)
{
return ((MemberExpression)expression.Body).Member.Name; // Failure Point
}
and calling it as
string lcl_name = false;
public string Name
{
get { return lcl_name ; }
set
{
lcl_name = value;
OnPropertyChanged(GetCorrectPropertyName<ThisClassName>(x => x.Name));
}
}
This works fine if property is string and for all other types gives this exception:
Unable to cast object of type 'System.Linq.Expressions.UnaryExpression' to type 'System.Linq.Expressions.MemberExpression'.
I changed string to object in method signature, but then it fails again.
I changed calling from x => x.PropertyName to x => Convert.ToString(x.PropertyName) and it still fails
Where am I wrong?
You need a separate line to extract the Member where the input expression is a Unary Expression.
Just converted this from VB.Net, so might be slightly off - let me know if I need to make any minor tweaks:
public string GetCorrectPropertyName<T>(Expression<Func<T, Object>> expression)
{
if (expression.Body is MemberExpression) {
return ((MemberExpression)expression.Body).Member.Name;
}
else {
var op = ((UnaryExpression)expression.Body).Operand;
return ((MemberExpression)op).Member.Name;
}
}
The VB version is:
Public Shared Function GetCorrectPropertyName(Of T) _
(ByVal expression As Expression(Of Func(Of T, Object))) As String
If TypeOf expression.Body Is MemberExpression Then
Return DirectCast(expression.Body, MemberExpression).Member.Name
Else
Dim op = (CType(expression.Body, UnaryExpression).Operand)
Return DirectCast(op, MemberExpression).Member.Name
End If
End Function
Note that the input expression does not return string necessarily - that constrains you to only reading properties that return strings.
This is apparently related to boxing/unboxing. Lambda expressions returning value types that require boxing will be represented as UnaryExpressions whereas those that return reference types will be represented as MemberExpressions.
After asking this question(yes I am OP) i received comments on question from Jon
and I came up with this
public string ResolvePropertyName<TEntity>(Expression<Func<TEntity>> expression)
{
try {
if (expression == null) {
Throw New ArgumentNullException("propertyExpression")
}
object memberExpression = expression.Body as MemberExpression;
if (memberExpression == null) {
Throw New ArgumentException("The expression is not a member access expression.", "propertyExpression")
}
object property = memberExpression.Member as PropertyInfo;
if (property == null) {
Throw New ArgumentException("The member access expression does not access a property.", "propertyExpression")
}
object getMethod = property.GetGetMethod(true);
if (getMethod.IsStatic) {
Throw New ArgumentException("The referenced property is a static property.", "propertyExpression")
}
return memberExpression.Member.Name;
} catch (Exception ex) {
return string.Empty;
}
}
A modern version of the answer above.
private static string GetPropertyName<T>(Expression<Func<T, object>> expression)
=> expression.Body switch
{
MemberExpression expr => expr.Member.Name,
UnaryExpression expr => ((MemberExpression)expr.Operand).Member.Name,
_ => throw new ArgumentException($"Argument {nameof(expression)} is not a property expression.", nameof(expression)),
};
In case you have to handle conditional expressions add this:
else if (expression.Body is ConditionalExpression expr)
{
return ((MemberExpression)((bool)(System.Linq.Expressions.Expression.Lambda(expr.Test).Compile().DynamicInvoke())
? expr.IfTrue
: expr.IfFalse)).Member.Name;
}

Categories