I've got some component objects in a CollectionViewSource i need to sort, these objects all have a custom type. The grouping is done on the type and the components are sorted by their name. What I now need to do is sort the grouping on the component type But i need to sort these component types depending on an external source, So the objects looks a bit like this:
public class ComponentType
{
public Guid Identification
{
get;
}
}
public class Component
{
public string Name
{
get;
}
public ComponentType Type
{
get;
}
}
The collection view is created like so:
this.ComponentCollection = new CollectionViewSource();
this.ComponentCollection.Source = this.Components;
this.ComponentCollection.GroupDescriptions.Clear();
this.ComponentCollection.GroupDescriptions.Add(new PropertyGroupDescription("ComponentType"));
this.ComponentCollection.SortDescriptions.Clear();
this.ComponentCollection.SortDescriptions.Add(new SortDescription("Name", ListSortDirection.Ascending));
this.ComponentCollection.Filter += this.FilterComponent;
this.ComponentCollection.View.Refresh();
RaisePropertyChanged(() => this.ComponentCollection);
I also have the following dictionary in the same calss i'm creating the CollectionViewSource which looks like this:
public Dictionary<Guid, int> ComponentTypePositions
Where the key is the identificaiton of the component type and int is the position of which type should come first.
It is not possible to put the position as a property in the ComponentType or Component class, it needs to be a separate list.
How do i sort the grouping according to the corresponding number in the ComponentTypePositions dictionary?
You need to create a new type based on Component class which includes your position numbers and use this for the elements of your source list. This can be done inline with an anonymous type:
ComponentCollection = new CollectionViewSource();
ComponentCollection.Source = (from c in Components
select new
{
Name = c.Name,
Type = c.Type,
Pos = ComponentTypePositions[c.Type.Identification]
}).ToList();
ComponentCollection.GroupDescriptions.Clear();
ComponentCollection.GroupDescriptions.Add(new PropertyGroupDescription("Type"));
ComponentCollection.SortDescriptions.Clear();
ComponentCollection.SortDescriptions.Add(new SortDescription("Pos", ListSortDirection.Ascending));
ComponentCollection.SortDescriptions.Add(new SortDescription("Name", ListSortDirection.Ascending));
ComponentCollection.Filter += FilterComponent;
ComponentCollection.View.Refresh();
If your source list need to be editable, you can use your own custom list type for it:
public class ComponentListElement
{
private Component comp;
public ComponentListElement(Component comp, Dictionary<Guid, int> positionMap)
{
this.comp = comp;
this.Pos = positionMap[comp.Type.Identification];
}
public string Name { get { return comp.Name; } }
public ComponentType Type { get { return comp.Type; } }
public int Pos { get; private set; }
}
public class ComponentList : Collection<ComponentListElement>
{
private Dictionary<Guid, int> positionMap;
public ComponentList(Dictionary<Guid, int> positionMap)
{
this.positionMap = positionMap;
}
public void Add(Component item)
{
base.Add(new ComponentListElement(item, positionMap));
}
}
And use it like this:
ComponentList componentList = new ComponentList(ComponentTypePositions);
foreach (var item in Components)
{
componentList.Add(item);
}
ComponentCollection.Source = componentList;
Related
I'm trying to implement a class with a property which can be accessed only with parameter. To clear my question see how I intend to use it
Note that this is different than Indexer. Please don't flag for duplicate.
My incomplete class
public class Inventory{
public object Options..... // I don't know how to define this property
}
How I'm going to use it
Inventory inv = new Inventory();
string invLabel = (string)inv.Options["Label"];
int size = inv.Options["Size"];
inv.Options["Weight"] = 24;
Internally, Options reads data from a private Dictionary. Please help me on how I can define the Options property.
Note: This is different than Indexer. With Indexer, I can use below code:
int size = inv["Size"];
But my usage is different.
I found a way to implement it.
public class Options
{
public Dictionary<string, object> _options;
public Options()
{
_options = new Dictionary<string, object>();
}
public object this[string key] {
get { return _options.Single(r => r.Key == key).Value; }
set { _options[key] = value; }
}
}
public class Inventory
{
public Inventory()
{
Options = new Options();
}
public Options Options { get; set; }
}
Usage:
var x = new Inventory();
x.Options["Size"] = 120;
x.Options["Box"] = "4 x 4 x 8";
Console.WriteLine(x.Options["Size"]);
Console.WriteLine(x.Options["Box"]);
I want to create "list of list of list". It should be:
Group (has a list of Members)
Member (has a Name and list of Properties)
Property (has Name and Value)
What I want is to have a possibility to add Property into Member (specified by its name) inside defined Group. Someting like this:
membersgroup.AddNewMember(memberXYZ);
...
membersgroup.memberXYZ.AddProperty(nameXYZ, valueXYZ).
I have trouble achieving this using list... I found class Hashable, but I am not sure if this is usable... and cannot make it works too...
Thank for any suggestion :)
Well, I suggest you create a custom class instead of your approach. But otherwise you can use a Dictionary.
var properties = new Dictionary<string, string>();
properties.Add("Prop1", "Value");
var members = new Dictionary<string, Dictionary<string, string>>();
members.Add("Member1", properties);
var group = new Dictionary<string, Dictionary<string, Dictionary<string, string>>>();
group.Add("GroupName", members);
public class Group
{
public Group()
{
Members = new List<Member>();
}
public IEnumerable<Member> Members { get; set; }
}
public class Member
{
public Member()
{
Properties = new Dictionary<string, string>();
}
public string Name { get; set; }
IDictionary<string, string> Properties { get; set; }
}
The dictionary can take a key and a value, and the key should be unique.
You can also create a class property if you want to add another thing beside the name and the value
I would use indexers.
Here's a partial implementation:
class Group
{
private List<Member> _members;
public string this
{
get
{
return _members.Find(m => m.Name == value);
}
// You can also implement set here if you want...
}
}
class Member
{
private List<Property> _properties;
public string Name {get;set;}
public string this
{
get
{
return _properties.Find(m => m.Name == value);
}
}
}
class Property
{
public string Name {get;set;}
public string Value {get;set;}
}
And the usage:
var g = new Group();
g[memberName][propertyName].Value = someValue;
Note: This implementation is partial! it still needs constructor logic and any other logic you might need.
Likely the best solution is to use the C# class Dictionary - as suggested by zetawars, or a custom class - as suggested by Zohar Peled, or some mix of the two - as suggested by gandalf.
However, in order to use syntax similar to what is requested in the question...
membersgroup.AddNewMember(memberXYZ);
...
membersgroup.memberXYZ.AddProperty(nameXYZ, valueXYZ).
You can abuse ExpandoObject and Action, and do something awesome like this:
dynamic membersgroup = new ExpandoObject();
var getNewMemberObject = new Func<dynamic>(() =>
{
dynamic memberObject = new ExpandoObject();
var addPropertyAction = new Action<string, string>((propertyName, propertyValue) =>
{
((IDictionary<string, object>)memberObject).Add(propertyName, propertyValue);
});
memberObject.AddProperty = addPropertyAction;
return memberObject;
});
var addNewMemberAction = new Action<string>((memberName) =>
{
((IDictionary<string, object>)membersgroup).Add(memberName, getNewMemberObject());
});
membersgroup.AddNewMember = addNewMemberAction;
string memberXYZ = nameof(memberXYZ);
string nameXYZ = nameof(nameXYZ);
string valueXYZ = nameof(valueXYZ);
// look we did it!
membersgroup.AddNewMember(memberXYZ);
membersgroup.memberXYZ.AddProperty(nameXYZ, valueXYZ);
// and it actually works
var actualValue = membersgroup.memberXYZ.nameXYZ;
Console.WriteLine(actualValue); // "valueXYZ"
(for science of course)
I need to serialize/deserialize some XML code and part of it looks like next example:
<CoordGeom>
<Curve rot="cw" chord="830.754618036885" crvType="arc" delta="72.796763873948" dirEnd="283.177582669379" dirStart="355.974346543327" external="169.661846548051" length="889.38025007632" midOrd="136.562611151675" radius="699.999999998612" tangent="516.053996536113">
<Start>4897794.2800513292 6491234.9390137056</Start>
<Center>4897096.0071489429 6491185.7968343571</Center>
<End>4897255.5861026254 6491867.3645547926</End>
<PI>4897758.0514541129 6491749.7197593488</PI>
</Curve>
<Spiral length="109.418078418008" radiusEnd="INF" radiusStart="699.999999999025" rot="cw" spiType="clothoid" theta="4.477995782709" totalY="2.849307921907" totalX="109.351261203955" tanLong="72.968738862921" tanShort="36.493923980983">
<Start>4897255.5861026254 6491867.3645547936</Start>
<PI>4897220.0531303799 6491875.6840722272</PI>
<End>4897147.9238984985 6491886.7208634559</End>
</Spiral>
<Spiral length="153.185309785019" radiusEnd="499.99999999993" radiusStart="INF" rot="ccw" spiType="clothoid" theta="8.776871734087" totalY="7.808812331497" totalX="152.826239431476" tanLong="102.249348442205" tanShort="51.176160975293">
<Start>4897147.9238985004 6491886.7208634559</Start>
<PI>4897046.8509311257 6491902.186455016</PI>
<End>4896998.0370401107 6491917.5553683294</End>
</Spiral>
<Curve rot="ccw" chord="936.510896488672" crvType="arc" delta="138.94725576785" dirEnd="66.423714388543" dirStart="287.476458620693" external="925.970149937768" length="1212.543549877849" midOrd="324.680762068264" radius="499.999999999181" tangent="1335.436583485725">
<Start>4896998.0370401107 6491917.5553683294</Start>
<Center>4897148.1939981515 6492394.4755796343</Center>
<End>4896948.2091376046 6492852.7397562303</End>
<PI>4895724.243644949 6492318.6055583945</PI>
</Curve>
</CoordGeom>
I've generated automatically classes using xsd.exe. Part of generated code looks like this:
public partial class CoordGeom
{
private List<object> _items;
private List<Feature> _feature;
private string _desc;
private string _name;
private stateType _state;
private string _oID;
public CoordGeom()
{
_feature = new List<Feature>();
_items = new List<object>();
}
[XmlElementAttribute("Chain", typeof(Chain))]
[XmlElementAttribute("Curve", typeof(Curve))]
[XmlElementAttribute("IrregularLine", typeof(IrregularLine))]
[XmlElementAttribute("Line", typeof(Line))]
[XmlElementAttribute("Spiral", typeof(Spiral))]
public List<object> Items
{
get { return this._items; }
set { this._items = value; }
}
[XmlElement("Feature")]
public List<Feature> Feature { get; set; }
[XmlAttribute()]
public string desc { get; set; }
[XmlAttribute()]
public string name { get; set; }
[XmlAttribute()]
public stateType state { get; set; }
[System.Xml.Serialization.XmlAttributeAttribute()]
public string oID
{
get{ return this._oID; }
set{ this._oID = value; }
}
}
And my code for deserialization look like this:
XmlSerializer mySerializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(LandXML), new XmlRootAttribute(""));
TextReader myFileStream = new StreamReader("myFile.xml");
LandXML myObject = (LandXML)mySerializer.Deserialize(myFileStream);
var coordGeomItems = myObject.Alignments.Alignment[0].CoordGeom;
My problem is that, when I deserialize file, it is deserialized as list of items of type {LandXML.Curve}, {LandXML.Spiral} etc. and I don't know how to access their properties. It would be great if I can do this directly. Here is a screenshot:
EDIT 1
Here is inital screen
then I have items:
When I unfold this
And this is at the top layer of object - it has some InnerXml, InnerText... If I want to achieve CoordGeom, there is a lot object.Item(i).ChildNodes.Item(j).ChildNodes...
And all of that is because in some lines, lists of objects are made like List as for CoordGeom
Because there are multiple allowed types, the Items collection is typed as object. The simplest approach is to enumerate and cast each item:
foreach(var item in coordGeomItems.Items)
{
var curve = item as Curve;
if (curve != null)
{
// access curve properties here
}
var spiral = item as Spiral
if (spiral != null)
{
// access spiral properties here
}
// ...
}
You could build up a list of Curves and Spirals and access them using properties with custom getters:
class CoordGeom
{
public List<object> Items;
List<Curve> _curves;
public List<Curve> Curves
{
get
{
return _curves ?? (_curves = Items
.Where(item => item is Curve).Select(curve => (Curve)curve).ToList());
}
}
}
The null coalescing operator (??) will cause the Curves property to set and return the value of _curves as a list of curves if _curves is null. This basically causes it to initialize the list on the first get and on all subsequent gets it will return the already initialized list.
As you cannot change the generated class nor the XML.The best possible approach would be to write an extension method.
public static List<Curve> GetCurves(this CoordGeom cg)
{
return cg.Items.OfType<Curve>().ToList();
}
public static List<Spiral> GetSpirals(this CoordGeom cg)
{
return cg.Items.OfType<Spiral>().ToList();
}
Once you do this, you can get items like this
var coordGeomItems = myObject.Alignments.Alignment[0].CoordGeom;
var curves = coordGeomItems.GetCurves();
var spirals = coordGeomItems.GetSpirals();
Say I have the following (simplified):
public class Item
{
public String Name { get; set; }
public String Type { get; set; }
}
public class Armor : Item
{
public int AC { get; set; }
public Armor () { Type = "Armor"; }
}
public class Weapon : Item
{
public int Damage { get; set; }
public Armor () { Type = "Weapon"; }
}
public class Actor
{
...
}
public class HasItem : Relationship<ItemProps>, IRelationshipAllowingSourceNode<Actor>, IRelationshipAllowingTargetNode<Item>
{
public readonly string TypeKey = "HasItem";
public HasItem ( NodeReference targetItem, int count = 1 )
: base(targetItem, new ItemProps { Count = count })
{
}
public override string RelationshipTypeKey
{
get { return TypeKey; }
}
}
With this setup I can easily create a heterogeneous list of Weapons, Armor, etc related to the Actor. But I can't seem to figure out how to get them out. I have this method (again simplified) to get a list of all the related items, but it gets them all out as Items. I can't figure out how to get them as their actual type. I can use the Type field to determine the type, but there doesn't seem to be anyway of dynamically building the return:
public IEnumerable<Item> Items
{
get
{
return
GameNode
.GraphClient
.Cypher
.Start(new { a = Node.ByIndexLookup("node_auto_index", "Name", Name) })
.Match("(a)-[r:HasItem]-(i)")
.Return<Item>("i") // Need something here to return Armor, Weapon, etc as needed based on the Type property
.Results;
}
}
I found a bad workaround where I return the Type and NodeID and run the list through a switch statement that does a .Get with the NodeID and casts it to the right type. but this is inflexible and inefficient. I could run one query for each derived class and concatenate them together, but the thought of that makes my skin crawl.
This seems like it would be a common problem, but I couldn't find anything online. Any ideas?
The problem is how the data is stored in Neo4J, and serialized back via Json.net.
Let's say I have a sword:
var sword = new Weapon{
Name = "Sword 12.32.rc1",
Type = "Sword"
Damage = 12
};
If I serialize this to neo4j: graphClient.Create(sword); all is fine, internally we now have a Json representation which will look something like this:
{ "Name" : "Sword 12.32.rc1", "Type": "Sword", "Damage": "12"}
There is no information here that the computer can use to derive that this is in fact of type 'Sword', so if you bring back a collection of type Item it can only bring back the two properties Name and Type.
So, there are two solutions that I can think of, neither one of which is great, but both do get you with a one query solution. The first (most sucky) is to create a 'SuperItem' which has all the properties from the derived classes together, so:
public class SuperItem { Name, Type, Damage, AC } //ETC
But that is horrible, and kind of makes having a hierarchy pointless. The 2nd option, which whilst not great is better - is to use a Dictionary to get the data:
var query = GraphClient
.Cypher
.Start(new {n = actorRef})
.Match("n-[:HasItem]->item")
.Return(
item => new
{
Item = item.CollectAs<Dictionary<string,string>>()
});
var results = query.Results.ToList();
Which if you run:
foreach (var data in results2.SelectMany(item => item.Item, (item, node) => new {item, node}).SelectMany(#t => #t.node.Data))
Console.WriteLine("Key: {0}, Value: {1}", data.Key, data.Value);
Would print out:
Key: Type, Value: Sword
Key: Damage, Value: 12
Key: Name, Value: 12.32.rc1
So, now we have a dictionary of the properties, we can create an extension class to parse it:
public static class DictionaryExtensions
{
public static Item GetItem(this Dictionary<string, string> dictionary)
{
var type = dictionary.GetTypeOfItem().ToLowerInvariant();
var json = dictionary.ToJson();
switch (type)
{
case "sword":
return GetItem<Weapon>(json);
case "armor":
return GetItem<Armor>(json);
default:
throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("dictionary", type, string.Format("Unknown type: {0}", type));
}
}
private static string GetTypeOfItem(this Dictionary<string, string> dictionary)
{
if(!dictionary.ContainsKey("Type"))
throw new ArgumentException("Not valid type!");
return dictionary["Type"];
}
private static string ToJson(this Dictionary<string, string> dictionary)
{
var output = new StringBuilder("{");
foreach (var property in dictionary.OrderBy(k => k.Key))
output.AppendFormat("\"{0}\":\"{1}\",", property.Key, property.Value);
output.Append("}");
return output.ToString();
}
private static Item GetItem<TItem>(string json) where TItem: Item
{
return JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<TItem>(json);
}
}
and use something like:
var items = new List<Item>();
foreach (var data in results)
foreach (Node<Dictionary<string, string>> item in data.Item)
items.Add(item.Data.GetItem());
Where items will be the types you're after.
I know this isn't great, but it does get you to one query.
I have a (string, object) dictionary, object (class) has some values including data type which is defined by enum. I need a GetItemValue method that should return dictionary item's value. So return type must be the type which is defined in item object.
Class Item
{
String Name;
DataValueType DataType;
Object DataValue;
}
private Dictionary<string, Item> ItemList = new Dictionary<string, Item>();
void Main()
{
int value;
ItemList.Add("IntItem", new Item("IntItem", DataValueType.TInt, 123));
value = GetItemValue("IntItem"); // value = 123
}
What kind of solution can overcome this problem?
Best Regards,
You can use Generic Classes
Class Item<T>
{
String Name;
T DataTypeObject;
Object DataValue;
public T GetItemValue()
{
//Your code
return DataTypeObject;
}
}
A better solution would be to introduce an interface that you make all the classes implement. Note that the interface doesn't necessarily have to specify any behavior:
public interface ICanBePutInTheSpecialDictionary {
}
public class ItemTypeA : ICanBePutInTheSpecialDictionary {
// code for the first type
}
public class ItemTypeB : ICanBePutInTheSpecialDictionary {
// code for the second type
}
// etc for all the types you want to put in the dictionary
To put stuff in the dictionary:
var dict = new Dictionary<string, ICanBePutInTheSpecialDictionary>();
dict.add("typeA", new ItemTypeA());
dict.add("typeB", new ItemTypeB());
When you need to cast the objects to their specific types, you can either use an if-elseif-block, something like
var obj = dict["typeA"];
if (obj is ItemTypeA) {
var a = obj as ItemTypeA;
// Do stuff with an ItemTypeA.
// You probably want to call a separate method for this.
} elseif (obj is ItemTypeB) {
// do stuff with an ItemTypeB
}
or use reflection. Depending on how many choices you have, either might be preferrable.
If you have a 'mixed bag' you could do something like this...
class Item<T>
{
public String Name { get; set; }
public DataValueType DataType { get; set; }
public T DataValue { get; set; }
}
class ItemRepository
{
private Dictionary<string, object> ItemList = new Dictionary<string, object>();
public void Add<T>(Item<T> item) { ItemList[item.Name] = item; }
public T GetItemValue<T>(string key)
{
var item = ItemList[key] as Item<T>;
return item != null ? item.DataValue : default(T);
}
}
and use it like...
var repository = new ItemRepository();
int value;
repository.Add(new Item<int> { Name = "IntItem", DataType = DataValueType.TInt, DataValue = 123 });
value = repository.GetItemValue<int>("IntItem");
If you have just a couple types - you're better off with Repository<T>.
I found a solution exactly what I want. Thanks to uncle Google.
Thanks all of you for your kind interest.
public dynamic GetValue(string name)
{
if (OpcDataList[name].IsChanged)
{
OpcReflectItem tmpItem = OpcDataList[name];
tmpItem.IsChanged = false;
OpcDataList[name] = tmpItem;
}
return Convert.ChangeType(OpcDataList[name].ItemValue.Value, OpcDataList[name].DataType);
}