The documentation states that "When a build is completed, if nothing else in the build number has changed, the Rev integer value is incremented by one".
However, you can see below that even though something did change, it still incremented.
Does anyone know what the actual behavior is when using $(Rev:r) in the build number?
You have your build number format specified like this:
1.$(Rev:r).$(Year:yy)$(DayOfYear)
You do consequent builds. Everything on the left side from $(Rev:r) stays constant as you hard coded the prefix 1.. The right side of $(Rev:r) doesn't matter here. Hence, your $(Rev:r) keeps incrementing on 1, like this:
1.1.2010 // first build on tenth day of 2020
1.2.2010 // second build, same day
1.3.2115 // third build on fifteenth day of 2021
Now if you change your format to
1.$(Year:yy)$(DayOfYear).$(Rev:r)
you will end up with this behavior
1.2010.1 // first build on tenth day of 2020
1.2010.2 // second build, same day
1.2115.1 // third build on fifteenth day of 2021
With using the standard FastForestRegressor like this:
pipeline.Add(new FastForestRegressor());
My expected result is more of an 'average' than a 'this must be it' prediction.
The following image contains time (HH:mm:ss) slots, with a number:
The higher the number, the more likely my prediction should give me that hour from the number. Now, in bold at the bottom you can see the predictions, which are indeed some kind of average of all the given values. it predicts a time that does not even has an entry. What I expect:
Column1: 9:00:00 has 140 values, so it should return a prediction close around this one
Column2: 14:00:00 has 152 vales, the other 2 below are also high, so something in that range between 14:00:00-16:00:00.
I tried to tweak the parameters of the FastForestRegressor but that doesn't seem to change anything at all.
My data is stored as:
time,day
480,1
480,1
..etc.
Now, for the upper left one in the image (8:00:00 110), 110 lines are of values (480,1) are stored in a file. Maybe I should make an extra column with the amount?
To me it seems like I have to adjust some grouping, or smoothing, so it takes the highest possible candidate, and not an average, but I can't seem to find it.
Using C# I have to:
Take an user entered number and decide if 5 out of 6 of these numbers are within 5% of each other. Also identify when it's impossible reach success before going to all 6 numbers. An example of this would be in the first 3 numbers... if 2 were not within 5% of each other, no use continuing.
I've tried taking in the first 2 numbers, into an array, and setting a Min and Max assuming they are within 5%. By the time I get to the 3rd and 4th numbers, which also can reset my Min and Max, it's turned into a bowl of spaghetti :)
Please help!
I don't know if the title makes sense, but I am trying to time two different methods and see how many times they execute per second, or say per 10 seconds.
For instance:
DividePolygons1(Polygon[] polys)
DividePolygons2(Polygon[] polys)
DividePolygons1 ran:
1642 times per 1 second
DividePolygons2 ran:
1890 times per 1 second
The System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch class will help you here, but be careful to use the results somehow so that the optimizer doesn't eliminate the logic you're trying to measure.
Beyond that, just run the code you're profiling several million times in a loop (adjust the iteration count to make it take between 1 and 30 seconds), then divide the number of iterations by the time taken to get the throughput in executions per second.
What I would do:
Start a Stopwatch.
In those functions, I increment a simple variable (long, float, or double, depending on how often you think they'll get called) so it's incremented on each call.
Call the first function.
Stop the Stopwatch and check the TotalSeconds against the variable I've been incrementing.
Repeat for the second function.
Visual Studio 2010 has a profiler which could determine the exact number of methods calls per time unit.
I am trying to develop a scheduler- and calendar-dependent event application in C#, for which a crucial requirement is to represent recurring events in the database.
What is the best way to represent recurring events in a database?
More Details:
While creating the event I am also sending invites to the certain users and the invitees should be allowed to login to the meeting only during the specified window(meeting duration) or may be decline the login when the invitee attempts to login say, 5 minutes before the scheduled start of the meeting.
The sysjobs, sysjobsschedule and sysschedules tables in SQL Server does a pretty good job of this. I wouldn't reinvent the wheel, I'd just copy their design.
Here are some of the important fields from sysschedules
freq_type
How frequently a job runs for this schedule.
1 = One time only
4 = Daily
8 = Weekly
16 = Monthly
32 = Monthly, relative to freq_interval
64 = Runs when the SQL Server Agent service starts
128 = Runs when the computer is idle
freq_interval
Days that the job is executed. Depends on the value of freq_type. The default value is 0, which indicates that freq_interval is unused.
Value of freq_type Effect on freq_interval
1 (once) freq_interval is unused (0)
4 (daily) Every freq_interval days
8 (weekly) freq_interval is one or more of the following: 1 = Sunday 2 = Monday 4 = Tuesday 8 = Wednesday 16 = Thursday 32 = Friday 64 = Saturday
16 (monthly) On the freq_interval day of the month
32 (monthly, relative) freq_interval is one of the following: 1 = Sunday 2 = Monday 3 = Tuesday 4 = Wednesday 5 = Thursday 6 = Friday 7 = Saturday 8 = Day 9 = Weekday 10 = Weekend day
64 (starts when SQL Server Agent service starts) freq_interval is unused (0)
128 (runs when computer is idle) freq_interval is unused (0)
freq_subday_type
Units for the freq_subday_interval. Can be one of the following values:
Value Description (unit)
1 At the specified time
2 Seconds
4 Minutes
8 Hours
freq_subday_interval
Number of freq_subday_type periods to occur between each execution of the job.
freq_relative_interval
When freq_interval occurs in each month, if freq_interval is 32 (monthly relative). Can be one of the following values:
0 = freq_relative_interval is unused
1 = First
2 = Second
4 = Third
8 = Fourth
16 = Last
freq_recurrence_factor
Number of weeks or months between the scheduled execution of a job. freq_recurrence_factor is used only if freq_type is 8, 16, or 32. If this column contains 0, freq_recurrence_factor is unused.
Well, to store the recurrence rule itself, you could use a cut down version of RFC 5545 (and I really suggest you cut it down heavily). Aside from anything else, that will make it easy to export into other applications should you wish to.
After you've made that decision, for the database side you need to work out whether you want to store each occurrence of the event, or just one record for the repeated event, expanding it as and when you need to. Obviously it's considerably easier to query the database when you've already got everything expanded - but it makes it trickier to maintain.
Unless you fancy writing some pretty complex SQL which may be hard to test (and you'll want a lot of unit tests for all kinds of corner cases) I would suggest that you make the database itself relatively "dumb" and write most of the business logic in a language like Java or C# - either of which may be embeddable within stored procedures depending on your database, of course.
Another thing you need to ask yourself is whether you need to cope with exceptions to events - one event in a series changing time/location etc.
I have some experience with calendaring (I've spent most of the last year working on the calendar bit of Google Sync via ActiveSync) and I should warn you that things get complicated really quickly. Anything you can deem "out of scope" is a blessing. In particular, do you need to work in multiple time zones?
Oh, and finally - be very, very careful when you're doing actual arithmetic with calendar operations. If you're going to use Java, please use Joda Time rather than the built-in Calendar/Date classes. They'll help you a lot.
The accepted answer here is too convoluted. For example, if an event occurs every 5 days, the 5 is stored in freq_interval, but if it occurs every 5 weeks, the 5 is stored in freq_recurrence. The biggest problem is that freq_interval means three different things depending on the value of freq_type (number of days between occurrences for daily recurrence, day of the month for monthly recurrence, or days of the week for weekly or monthly-relative). Also, the 1,2,4,8... type sequence is used when it is unnecessary and less than helpful. For example, freq_relative_interval can only be "one of" the possible values. This lines up with a drop-down box or radio button type input, not a checkbox type input where multiple choices can be selected. For coding, and for human readability, this sequence gets in the way and just using 1,2,3,4... is simpler, more efficient, more appropriate. Finally, most calendar applications don't need subday intervals (events occurring multiple times in a day - every so many seconds, minutes, or hours).
But, having said this, that answer did help me refine my thoughts on how I am doing this. After mix and matching it with other articles and going from what I see in the Outlook calendar interface and a few other sources, I come up with this:
recurs
0=no recurrence
1=daily
2=weekly
3=monthly
recurs_interval
this is how many of the periods between recurrences. If the event recurs every 5 days, this will have a 5 and recurs will have 1. If the event recurs every 2 weeks, this will have a 2 and recurs will have a 2.
recurs_day
If the user selected monthly type recurrence, on a given day of the month (ex: 10th or the 14th). This has that date. The value is 0 if the user did not select monthly or specific day of month recurrence. The value is 1 to 31 otherwise.
recurs_ordinal
if the user selected a monthly type recurrence, but an ordinal type of day (ex: first monday, second thursday, last friday). This will have that ordinal number. The value is 0 if the user did not select this type of recurrence.
1=first
2=second
3=third
4=fourth
5=last
recurs_weekdays
for weekly and monthly-ordinal recurrence this stores the weekdays where the recurrence happens.
1=Sunday
2=Monday
4=Tuesday
8=Wednesday
16=Thursday
32=Friday
64=Saturday
So, examples:
So, every 4 weeks on Saturday and Sunday would be
recurs = 2 ==> weekly recurrence
recurs_interval = 4 ==> every 4 weeks
recurs_weekdays = 65 ==> (Saturday=64 + Sunday=1)
recurs_day and recurs_ordinal = 0 ==> not used
Similarly, Every 6 months on the first Friday of the month would be
recurs = 3 ==> monthly recurrence
recurs_interval = 6 ==> every 6 months
recurs_ordinal = 1 ==> on the first occurrence
recurs_weekdays = 32 ==> of Friday
None of this business of having a field that means three entirely different things depending on the value of another field.
On the user interface side of things, I let the user specify a date, start time, end time. They can then specify if they want a type of recurrence other than none. If so, the app expands the relevant section of the web-page to give the user the options required for the stuff above, looking a lot like the Outlook options, except there is no "every weekday" under daily recurrence (that is redundant with weekly recurrence on every mon-fri), and there is no yearly recurrence. If there is recurrence then I also require the user to specify an end-date that is within one year of today (the users want it that way, and it simplifies my code) - I don't do unending recurrence or "end after ## occurrences."
I store these fields with the user selections in my event table, and expand that out in a schedule table which has all occurrences. This facilitates collision detection (I am actually doing a facility reservation application) and editing of individual occurrences or refactoring of future occurrences.
My users are all in CST, and I thank the good Lord for that. It is a helpful simplification for now, and if in the future the user base is going to expand beyond that, then I can figure out how to deal with it then, as a well separated task.
UPDATE
Since I first wrote this, I did add daily occurrence with "Every weekday". Our users had a bit of a hard time with thinking that you could use Weekly recurrence for events happening from Thursday one week to Tuesday the next week and only on weekdays. It was more intuitive for them to have this, even if there was already another way that they could do it.
I have been thinking about this too, although have not implemented it but these are my thoughts for a simple solution.
When setting up an event thats recurring, have the user specify the "end date" and create individual events for each one (based on the recurring options). Because its a recurring event, set a unique "recurring ID" for each of these. This ID will then be used to mark an event as recurring and if you change a future event, you can prompt the user to apply this to the rest of the future events by deleting and recreating the recurring events with a new "recurring ID" which will also differentiate this recurring event from the previously ones that have changed.
Hope this makes sense and would like any comments.
I would record recurring events as two separate things in the database. First of all, in an events table, record each and every occurence of the event. Secondly, have recurrences table in which you record the details that you ask for to set up the recurring event. Start date, periodicity, number of occurences, etc.
Then you might think of tying it all together by putting the PK of recurrences into each of the event records as an FK. But a better design would be to normalise the event table into two tables, one which is just the barebones of an event, and one which has the details, which could now be referring to multiple events. That way every event record, recurring or not, has an FK to the PK of the eventdetails table. Then in eventdetails, record the PK of recurrences somewhere along with agenda, invitees, etc. The recurrence record does not drive anything. For instance, if you want a list of all recurring events, you look through eventdetails for all events with a non-null FK to recurrences.
You'll need to be careful to synchronise all of these things, so that you insert or delete events when the recurrence data changes.
"Aside from anything else"
does this include "the very requirements" ?
"that will make it easy to export into other applications should you wish to."
Do the stated requirements include "it must be easy to export the calendars to other applications" ? My impression was that the problem consisted solely of building the FIRST application.
that said, my own response :
You need to limit yourself/your user on the types of "recurrency" your sytem will be able to support. And "All of the above" or "No Limitations" will not be a valid answer if you/your user want(s) to end up with a usable application.