I try to combine a projection and a distinct with the MongoDB driver but don't get anywhere...
I have:
var coll = db.GetCollection<Vat>(CommonConstants.VatCodeCollection);
// I like to combine in one statement:
var result = coll.Distinct<DateTime>("ValidSince", filter).ToList();
var projection = Builders<Vat>.Projection.Expression(x => new VatPeriod { ValidSince = x.ValidSince });
So at the end I like to get a List<VatPeriod> as a result of one statement. Of course I could do something like
var coll = db.GetCollection<Vat>(CommonConstants.VatCodeCollection);
List<VatPeriod> vatPeriods = null;
try
{
var result = coll.Distinct<DateTime>("ValidSince", filter).ToList();
if (result.Count > 0)
{
vatPeriods = new List<VatPeriod>(result.Count);
foreach (var dateTime in result)
{
vatPeriods.Add(new VatPeriod() {ValidSince = dateTime});
}
}
return vatPeriods;
}
catch .....
in my repository class, but I would prefer to do everything on the Mongo server. Any idea if and how this is possible?
Related
IEnumerable<WebsiteWebPage> data = GetWebPages();
foreach (var value in data)
{
if (value.WebPage.Contains(".htm"))
{
WebsiteWebPage pagesinfo = new WebsiteWebPage();
pagesinfo.WebPage = value.WebPage;
pagesinfo.WebsiteId = websiteid;
db.WebsiteWebPages.Add(pagesinfo);
}
}
db.SaveChanges();
I want to add only distinct values to database in above code. Kindly help me how to do it as I am not able to find any solution.
IEnumerable<WebsiteWebPage> data = GetWebPages();
foreach (var value in data)
{
if (value.WebPage.Contains(".htm"))
{
var a = db.WebsiteWebPages.Where(i => i.WebPage == value.WebPage.ToString()).ToList();
if (a.Count == 0)
{
WebsiteWebPage pagesinfo = new WebsiteWebPage();
pagesinfo.WebPage = value.WebPage;
pagesinfo.WebsiteId = websiteid;
db.WebsiteWebPages.Add(pagesinfo);
db.SaveChanges();
}
}
}
This is the code that I used to add distinct data.I hope it helps
In addition to the code sample Furkan Öztürk supplied, Make sure your DB has a constraint so that you cannot enter duplicate values in the column. Belt and braces approach.
I assume that by "distinct values" you mean "distinct value.WebPage values":
// get existing values (if you ever need this)
var existingWebPages = db.WebsiteWebPages.Select(v => v.WebPage);
// get your pages
var webPages = GetWebPages().Where(v => v.WebPage.Contains(".htm"));
// get distinct WebPage values except existing ones
var distinctWebPages = webPages.Select(v => v.WebPage).Distinct().Except(existingWebPages);
// create WebsiteWebPage objects
var websiteWebPages = distinctWebPages.Select(v =>
new WebsiteWebPage { WebPage = v, WebsiteId = websiteid});
// save all at once
db.WebsiteWebPages.AddRange(websiteWebPages);
db.SaveChanges();
Assuming that you need them to be unique by WebPage and WebSiteId
IEnumerable<WebsiteWebPage> data = GetWebPages();
foreach (var value in data)
{
if (value.WebPage.Contains(".htm"))
{
WebsiteWebPage pagesinfo = new WebsiteWebPage();
if (db.WebsiteWebPages.All(c=>c.WebPage != value.WebPage|| c.WebsiteId != websiteid))
{
pagesinfo.WebPage = value.WebPage;
pagesinfo.WebsiteId = websiteid;
db.WebsiteWebPages.Add(pagesinfo);
}
}
}
db.SaveChanges();
UPDATE
To optimize this (given that your table contains much more data than your current list), override your equals in WebsiteWebPage class to define your uniqueness criteria then:
var myWebsiteWebPages = data.select(x=> new WebsiteWebPage { WebPage = x.WebPage, WebsiteId = websiteid}).Distinct();
var duplicates = db.WebsiteWebPages.Where(x=> myWebsiteWebPage.Contains(x));
db.WebsiteWebPages.AddRange(myWebsiteWebPages.Where(x=> !duplicates.Contains(x)));
this is a one database query to retrieve ONLY duplicates and then removing them from the list
You can use the following code,
IEnumerable<WebsiteWebPage> data = GetWebPages();
var templist = new List<WebsiteWebPage>();
foreach (var value in data)
{
if (value.WebPage.Contains(".htm"))
{
WebsiteWebPage pagesinfo = new WebsiteWebPage();
pagesinfo.WebPage = value.WebPage;
pagesinfo.WebsiteId = websiteid;
templist.Add(pagesinfo);
}
}
var distinctList = templist.GroupBy(x => x.WebsiteId).Select(group => group.First()).ToList();
db.WebsiteWebPages.AddRange(distinctList);
db.SaveChanges();
Or you can use MoreLINQ here to filter distinct the list by parameter like,
var res = tempList.Distinct(x=>x.WebsiteId).ToList();
db.WebsiteWebPages.AddRange(res);
db.SaveChanges();
I am having trouble building a conditional query using C# MongoDB driver. Whenever I run the code below, I get an empty list. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Here is my function
public async void searchBook()
{
Book book = new Book();
IMongoDatabase mdb = MongoDBConnectionManager.ConnectToMongoDB();
var query = new BsonDocument();
if (queryString.ContainsKey("Title"))
{
query.Add("Title", queryString["Title"]);
}
if (queryString.ContainsKey("ISBN"))
{
query.Add("Isbn", queryString["ISBN"]);
}
if (queryString.ContainsKey("Author"))
{
query.Add("Author", queryString["Author"]);
}
if (queryString.ContainsKey("Publisher"))
{
query.Add("Publisher", queryString["Publisher"]);
}
var collection = mdb.GetCollection<Book>("Book");
var sort = Builders<Book>.Sort.Ascending("Title");
if(query.ElementCount > 0)
{
var list = await collection.Find(query).Sort(sort).ToListAsync();
dt = ConvertToDataTable(list);
BindGridView(dt);
}
else
{
var list = await collection.Find(Builders<Book>.Filter.Empty).Sort(sort).ToListAsync();
dt = ConvertToDataTable(list);
BindGridView(dt);
}
}
You can use IMongoCollection to get your collection and then use AsQueryable
var query = collection.AsQueryable();
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(entity.Name))
query = query.Where(p => p.Name.Contains(entity.Name));
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(entity.Description))
query = query.Where(p => p.Description.Contains(entity.Description));
var YourList=query.ToList();
I'm querying a SharePoint 2013 Term Store via the SharePoint Client Object Model in order to get a TermCollection.
I'd like to bind the results to a WPF TreeView control. Any idea how I can turn the TermCollection into something that the TreeView will understand?
public static TermCollection GetTaxonomyTerms(string webUrl, string libraryTitle, string fieldTitle)
{
var context = new ClientContext(webUrl);
var web = context.Web;
var list = web.Lists.GetByTitle(libraryTitle);
var fields = list.Fields;
var field = context.CastTo<TaxonomyField>(fields.GetByInternalNameOrTitle(fieldTitle));
context.Load(field);
var termStores = TaxonomySession.GetTaxonomySession(context).TermStores;
context.Load(termStores);
context.ExecuteQuery(); // TODO: Can this ExecuteQuery be avoided by using a LoadQuery statement?
var termStore = termStores.Where(t => t.Id == field.SspId).FirstOrDefault();
var termSet = termStore.GetTermSet(field.TermSetId);
var terms = termSet.GetAllTerms(); //TODO: Do we need a version that returns a paged set of terms? or queries the server again when a node is expanded?
context.Load(terms);
context.ExecuteQuery();
return terms;
}
I ended up writing my own code (please let me know if there's an easier way to do this).
My 'Term' object below is just a simple POCO with Name and Terms.
var terms = SharePointHelper.GetTaxonomyTerms(webUrl, libraryTitle, fieldTitle);
var term = terms.AsRootTreeViewTerm();
....
}
public static Term AsRootTreeViewTerm(this SP.TermCollection spTerms)
{
var root = new Term();
foreach (SP.Term spTerm in spTerms)
{
List<string> names = spTerm.PathOfTerm.Split(';').ToList();
var term = BuildTerm(root.Terms, names);
if (!root.Terms.Contains(term))
root.Terms.Add(term);
}
return root;
}
static Term BuildTerm(IList<Term> terms, List<string> names)
{
Term term = terms.Where(x => x.Name == names.First())
.DefaultIfEmpty(new Term() { Name = names.First() })
.First();
names.Remove(names.First());
if (names.Count > 0)
{
Term child = BuildTerm(term.Terms, names);
if (!term.Terms.Contains(child))
term.Terms.Add(child);
}
return term;
}
I am working on below code, and what I want to do is query by object itself.
For example: I have a search form, that populates objects fields such as below. Then what I want to do is to search Elastic search based on whatever user filled the form with.
ie: below, I want to query the index by searchItem object. How can I do it easily?
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var p = new Program();
var item1 = new Announcement() {Id=1, Title = "john", ContentText = "lorem", Bar = false, Num = 99, Foo = "hellow"};
//p.Index(item1, "add");
var searchItem = new Announcement() {Title="john",Num=99};
ElasticClient.Search<Announcement>();
Console.Read();
}
public void Index(Announcement announcement, String operation)
{
var uriString = "http://localhost:9200";
var searchBoxUri = new Uri(uriString);
var settings = new ConnectionSettings(searchBoxUri);
settings.SetDefaultIndex("test");
var client = new ElasticClient(settings);
if (operation.Equals("delete"))
{
client.DeleteById("test", "announcement", announcement.Id);
}
else
{
client.Index(announcement, "test", "announcement", announcement.Id);
}
}
private static ElasticClient ElasticClient
{
get
{
try
{
var uriString = "http://localhost:9200";
var searchBoxUri = new Uri(uriString);
var settings = new ConnectionSettings(searchBoxUri);
settings.SetDefaultIndex("test");
return new ElasticClient(settings);
}
catch (Exception)
{
throw;
}
}
}
}
You can't :)
NEST cannot infer how to best query only based on a partially filled POCO. Should it OR or AND should it do a nested term query or a term query wrapped in a has_child? You catch my drift.
Nest does have a slick feature called conditionless queries that allow you the write out to entire query like so:
ElasticClient.Search<Announcement>(s=>s
.Query(q=>
q.Term(p=>p.Title, searchItem.Title)
&& q.Term(p=>p.Num, searchItem.Num)
//Many more queries use () to group all you want
)
)
When NEST sees that the argument passed to Term is null or empty it simply wont render that part of the query.
Read more here on how this feature works http://nest.azurewebsites.net/concepts/writing-queries.html
I have an image site where users can tag photos much like you can tag a question on Stackoverflow.
I have the following tables:
Images [ID, URL, etc]
Tags [ID, TagName]
ImageTag [TagID, ImageID]
I want to write a method with the signature:
public void UpdateImageTags(int imageId, IEnumerable<string> currentTags)
This method will do the following:
Create any new Tags in currentTags that don't already exist in the Tags table.
Get the old ImageTag's for an image.
Delete any ImageTag's that no longer exist in the currentTags
Add any ImageTag's that are new between the currentTags and oldTags.
Here is my attempt at that method:
public void UpdateImageTags(int imageId, IEnumerable<string> currentTags)
{
using (var db = new ImagesDataContext())
{
var oldTags = db.ImageTags.Where(it => it.ImageId == imageId).Select(it => it.Tag.TagName);
var added = currentTags.Except(oldTags);
var removed = oldTags.Except(currentTags);
// Add any new tags that need created
foreach (var tag in added)
{
if (!db.Tags.Any(t => t.TagName == tag))
{
db.Tags.InsertOnSubmit(new Tag { TagName = tag });
}
}
db.SubmitChanges();
// Delete any ImageTags that need deleted.
var deletedImageTags = db.ImageTags.Where(it => removed.Contains(it.Tag.TagName));
db.ImageTags.DeleteAllOnSubmit(deletedImageTags);
// Add any ImageTags that need added.
var addedImageTags = db.Tags.Where(t => added.Contains(t.TagName)).Select(t => new ImageTag { ImageId = imageId, TagId = t.TagId });
db.ImageTags.InsertAllOnSubmit(addedImageTags);
db.SubmitChanges();
}
}
However, this fails on the line:
db.ImageTags.DeleteAllOnSubmit(deletedImageTags);
With the error:
Local sequence cannot be used in LINQ to SQL implementations of query
operators except the Contains operator.
Is there an easier way I can handle the operation of adding new tags, deleting old ImageTags, adding new ImageTags in LINQ to SQL?
Seems like this would be easiest
public void UpdateImageTags(int imageId, IEnumerable<string> currentTags)
{
using (var db = new ImagesDataContext())
{
var image = db.Images.Where(it => it.ImageId == imageId).First()
image.Tags.Clear();
foreach(string s in currentTags)
{
image.Tags.Add(new Tag() { TagName = s});
}
db.SubmitChanges();
}
}
This might have to be modified slightly for LinqtoSQL. EF is what i have been using most recently. Also this is dependent on Lazy loading being enabled. If it is not, you will have to force the include of the image tags.
Here is a helper method to deal with many-to-many relationships:
public static void UpdateReferences<FK, FKV>(
this EntitySet<FK> refs,
Expression<Func<FK, FKV>> fkexpr,
IEnumerable<FKV> values)
where FK : class
where FKV : class
{
Func<FK, FKV> fkvalue = fkexpr.Compile();
var fkmaker = MakeMaker(fkexpr);
var fkdelete = MakeDeleter(fkexpr);
var fks = refs.Select(fkvalue).ToList();
var added = values.Except(fks);
var removed = fks.Except(values);
foreach (var add in added)
{
refs.Add(fkmaker(add));
}
foreach (var r in removed)
{
var res = refs.Single(x => fkvalue(x) == r);
refs.Remove(res);
fkdelete(res);
}
}
static Func<FKV, FK> MakeMaker<FKV, FK>(Expression<Func<FK, FKV>> fkexpr)
{
var me = fkexpr.Body as MemberExpression;
var par = Expression.Parameter(typeof(FKV), "fkv");
var maker = Expression.Lambda(
Expression.MemberInit(Expression.New(typeof(FK)),
Expression.Bind(me.Member, par)), par);
var cmaker = maker.Compile() as Func<FKV, FK>;
return cmaker;
}
static Action<FK> MakeDeleter<FK, FKV>(Expression<Func<FK, FKV>> fkexpr)
{
var me = fkexpr.Body as MemberExpression;
var pi = me.Member as PropertyInfo;
var assoc = Attribute.GetCustomAttribute(pi, typeof(AssociationAttribute))
as AssociationAttribute;
if (assoc == null || !assoc.DeleteOnNull)
{
throw new ArgumentException("DeleteOnNull must be set to true");
}
var par = Expression.Parameter(typeof(FK), "fk");
var maker = Expression.Lambda(
Expression.Call(par, pi.GetSetMethod(),
Expression.Convert(Expression.Constant(null), typeof(FKV))), par);
var cmaker = maker.Compile() as Action<FK>;
return cmaker;
}
Usage:
IEnumerable<Tag> values = ...;
Image e = ...;
e.ImageTags.UpdateReferences(x => x.Tag, tags);