We Keep Coding

UWP application is getting slow after usage of some time?

I have developed one UWP application.In that nearly 20 windows are there.
Every window contains lot of Xaml controls. For some time it's working fine.
But after usage of some time application is getting very slow.
After doing some R&D I came to know that it's called Memory Leakage.
As per my knowledge in .Net Garbage Collector has to take care of this if I am not wrong.It seems like In UWP Application it is not happening. So I thought I should use GC.Collect() in Page Unload Event.
Is that correct approach or anything else I need to do to release memory which are used by the window controls?

The performance optimization is a vast subject and may not be possible to answer on an open ended question (without knowledge of your environment and architecture etc).
However you can use the Visual Studio profiler to measure and track performance and to find out the area where you need to take action, these can be;
Data binding
UI Virtualization
Image rendering
Visual Tree Size
Further reading these urls may also help you.
ms docs and this blog

The GC takes care of orphaned objects or objects that are no longer referenced by any other classes. when the GC finds objects like these it removes them from memory. memory leaks happen when an object is referenced by another class even after it is done with it. this means you need to look at your code and find where this is happening. you need to help GC in doing its job by making sure you no longer reference objects you don't need.
I also wouldn't recommend using GC.Collect in page unload event since GC has to freeze threads in order to collect. this might impact performance.

OutOfMemory Exception when debugging

I'm running a very small program that throws "System.OutOfMemoryException" when there's clearly a lot of memory available:
Under the task manager, I got plenty of memory left, and the process is taking around 45MB.
Is there a way to increase this process memory limit?
EDIT1:
I moved some code around, and this made the error get triggered in many different spots. The latest, after loading a form and filling it with data from the database, I just change from one tab to another in a TabControl and that triggers the exception.
I'm using Entity Framework 6 and a Postgres database, if that helps. Maybe the framework is creating too many instances of objects and I'm running out of memory indexes.
That's why I think the code itself is not relevant to the question.
EDIT2:
I took another screenshot of the memory analyser before and after the exception occurs:
So the problem is that I'm getting over 100K objects in memory, and I'm not having enough memory pages to create new ones? I'm still quite lost on how to handle this.
EDIT3:
Well, I found the culprit of the memory leak: Entify Framework. The memory consumption increase happens after I first load data from the database. Now I'll have to properly debug if the problem is in the Postgre driver or on Entity Framework itself. Will have to test with a different database to check.
Here's two screenshots showing the difference before and after I use EF. The code loads some items in two comboboxes, both using the same List as a datasource. On the first example. I have EF, on the second I loaded the same types of objects, but creating them myself, no connection to the database. The difference is astonishing!
EDIT 4:
Well, this is embarassing. I moved to a different solution. Now I'm working with Simple.Migration to manage changes in the database, and Dapper (with Dapper.Contrib) to handle CRUD. Hope they see this and maybe see what's going wrong...

Memory usage can be different from memory reserved. The system can reserve memory (it says "I have dibs on that megabyte") but not actually utilize it. I'm not certain whether Visual Studio shows the memory usage or reserved, but you can check it through Task Manager, going to the Performance tab, and clicking the Resource Monitor button near the bottom of the window. The Memory tab in the Resource Monitor window will show how much memmory is commited.
If you have this problem, and I bet you do, then you are repeatedly declaring something and not instantiating or deleting it, or you are adding endless objects to a list. It's most likely happening inside a loop. It is very unlikely that Visual Studio is hitting a memory limit, unless your computer is a potato.

What could cause this memory issue?

I'm working on an app for windows phone 8, and I'm having a memory leak problem. But first some background. The app works (unfortunately) using WebBrowsers as pages. The pages are pretty complex with a lot of javascript involved.
The native part of the app, written in c#, is responsible for doing some simple communication with the javascript(e.g. native is a delegate for the javascript to communicate with a server), make animation for page transition, tracking, persistance, etc. All is done in a unique PhoneApplicationPage.
After I had some crashes for out of memory exceptions, I started profiling the app. I can see that the WebBrowsers, which are the big part of the the app, are being disposed correctly.
But the problem I'm seeing is that memory continues to increase. What's worse, I have little feedback from the profiler. From what I understand, the profiler graph says there is a big problem, while the profiler numbers say there's no problem at all...
Note: the step represents a navigation from a WebBrowser to another WebBrowser. The spike is created (I suppose) by the animation between the two controls. In the span I've selected in the image, I was doing a navigation forward and one backward having a maxium of 5 WebBrowsers (2 for menus that are always there, 1 for the index page, 1 for the page I navigate from and 1 for the page I navigate to). At every navigation the profiler shows the correct number of WebBrowsers: 5 after navigating forward, 4 after navigating backward.
Note 2: I have added the red line to make clearer that the memory is going up in that span of time
As you can see from the image
the memory usage is pretty big but the numbers say it's low and in that span of time, retained allocation is lower than when it started...
I hope I've included enough information. I want some ideas on what could cause this problem. My ideas so far are:
-the javascript in the WebBrowser is doing something wrong (e.g. not cleaning some event handler). Even if this is the case, shouldn't the WebBrowser release the memory when it is destroyed?
-using a unique PhoneApplicationPage is something evil that is not supposed to be done, and changing its structure may cause this.
-other?
Another question: why does the graph show the correct amount of memory use while the number doesn't?
If you need more info about the profiler, ask and I will post them tomorrow.

Ok after a lot of investigation I finally was able to find the leak.
the leak is created by the WebBrowser control itself which seems to have some event handler that are not removed when you remove it from a Panel. In fact the leak is reproducible by following these steps:
Create a new WebBrowser
Add it to a Panel or whatever
Navigate to a page, with an image which is big and heavy
Tap somewhere in the blank space of the browser(tapping on the image seems to not create the leak)
remove and collect the browser
repeat from 1
at every iteration the memory of the image is never collected and the memory continue to grow.
A ticket to Microsoft was already sent.
The problem was resolved using a pool of WebBrowsers

I don't think There is enough information to find the cause to your leak, and without posting your entire solution I am not sure there can be, since the question is about locating the root cause of it...
What I Can offer is the approach I have used when I had my own memory leak.
The technique was to:
Open a memory profiler. From your screenshot I see you are using one. I used perfmon. This article has some material about setting perfmon and #fmunkert also explains it rather well.
Locate an area in the code that you suspect that it is likely that the leak is in that area. This part is mostly depending on you having good guesses about the part of the code that is responsible for the issue.
Push the Leak to the extreme: Use labels and "goto" for isolating an area / function and repeat the suspicious code many times (a loop will work to. I find goto more convenient for this matter).
In the loop I have used a breakpoint that halted every 50 hits for examining the delta in the memory usage. Of course you can change the value to feet a noticeable leak change in your application.
If you have located the area that causes the leak, the memory usage should rapidly spike. If the Memory usage does not spike, repeat stages 1-4 with another area of code that you suspect being the root cause. If it does, continue to 6.
In the area you have found to be the cause, use same technique (goto + labels) to zoom in and isolate smaller parts of the area until you find the source of the leak.
Note that the down sides of this method are:
If you are allocating an object in the loop, it's disposal should be also contained in the loop.
If you have more than one source of leak, It makes it harder to spot (yet still possible)

Did you clean up your event handlers? You may inadvertently still have some references if the controls are rooted.

C# .NET memory leak: sawtooth memory usage when GC stage#1 and stage#2 run

I have an event driven app that I was tasked with maintaining.
About 100 events run every 30 seconds, on separate timers. Over time the events alias into a constant stream of about 1-3 events per second.
Memory usage does not appear dependent on the number of events firing in any given second.
Each event polls data from a Webservice, checks the data using a LINQ2SQL DataContext against the previously polled data (I do not dispose or null out the DataContext when done), and if the data is different, updates the database and pushes the new data as an XML message to receiver service via TCP.
This app appears to have a memory leak which
only manifests after 30m+ of running (either debug or release)
won't manifest when profiling [I'm using .NET Memory Profiler 4.5]
Characteristics:
On startup the program uses ~30MB. As time progresses this Memory usage in Task Manager will begin pogoing, first only slightly, between 50 and 150MB, and eventually gets worse, oscillating between 200MB and 1GB+. When this happens, it happens a few times within a second or two, then settles down at ~150MB for the next 10-20 or so seconds.
I've been trying to catch this behavior in action using memory profiling. So far I've been unsuccessful, I can't get the app to pogo or oscillate in memory usage anywhere near like I can when the profiler isn't watching.
However, I've been noticing a square-wave sort of pattern on the memory usage as the Garbage Collector stages 1 and 2 run that looks very similar to what I see in Task Manager, except the memory usage oscillations in the square-wave are 10MB wide, instead of 800MB+ (200MB to 1GB+). Now, according to Google Images, Garbage collection in a properly functioning app looks more like a sawtooth wave than square.
I frankly don't see any way that my app could be pogoing between 200MB and 1GB+ of memory usage within a second and NOT be spiking the CPU to 100%.
I have read about some problems that can manifest between garbage collection + event handling, but I have several paths I could go investigate and am trying to narrow down which one to spend time on. I'm still pretty slow at .NET and haven't developed the "intuition" I have for embedded devices running C that generally helps me filter what I should investigate first.
What if FEELS like is perhaps some event handlers are losing and re-gaining references to [massive amounts of data] (I don't know how this could even happen?) seeing as memory usage appears to spike back up to 1GB soon after the garbage collector runs and drops memory usage back to 200MB.
Previous versions of this app did not have these problems. Two changes I have made since then include
utilizing LINQ2SQL instead of our own data manager (which had an ADORecordSetHelper object we utilized to execute hardcoded SQL statements)
changing the piece of software we use to send the TCP XML messages to a receiver.
Due to the simplicity of the what we're doing in #2, it COULD be the source of the problem but this memory usage behavior makes me think otherwise.
I guess my main questions at this point are
Should I be calling dispose on my LINQ2SQL DataContexts before I return from the method I create them in?
Should I null them out instead?
if an exception were occuring somewhere in a method after creation of a DataContext, could it cause the DataContext to be kept in memory indefinitely?
if I store a result from a LINQ query to a value-type (ie int not var), is it lazy-loaded then, or lazy'd when the variable is used?
how possible is it for event-driven frameworks to hypothetically lose and regain references?
edit: the events have instance-based subscriptions like discussed here and are never unsubscribed for the life of the app.
edit2: finally managed to catch it in the profiler, appears to be a 200MB system.string that's being created somehow. Thanks everyone for ruling out GC behavior.

Most of the times, memory leaks are caused by weird references between objects (events and delegates are also included here).
What I think you could try is the following:
Run the application and reproduce the issue. When the private working set of memory hits a very high value, right click the process on task manager and select "Create Dump File". This will be a lot less intrusive than profiling the application live.
Download WinDBG and run it.
Open the memory dump by going to the File menu and selecting Open dump file (I cannot remember exactly what the name of the menu options is... should be easy to spot though).
Run the following commands:
.symfix
.loadby sos clr
!dumpheap -type [YourAssemblyNameSpacePrefix] -stat
The last command will give you all the instances in memory which are not CLR types, only your types. Look at the types which have a very high number of instances and try to see if anything doesn't look right.
If you see a very high number of objects of the same type run the following command which will show you all instances' addresses:
!dumheap -type [TheFullObjectTypeName]
You will need to select one single instance address. Now run the following command to see the references to that instance:
!gcroot [InstanceAddress]
Repeat step 6 a few times for different instances so that you can confirm the leak is coming from the same place or to help you identify what is causing those instances to not be collected (still being referenced by other objects).
If you don't see anything weird with your own types, change the !dumpheap command in step 4 to: !dumpheap -stat. This way you are not filtering by type and you will also see CLR types and third party libraries types.
This is a little bit complex but hopefully I was able to give you a method to help you figure out how to find memory leaks.

How to manually release resources from images downloaded via the web in WP7?

Hi I'm bringing back some items from a web service that contains three strings. One of those is the path to an image. Now when I start loading the images into a listbox the memory as expected starts to go up which isn't bad. But when I hit the back button the memory is still very high.
I'm thinking it has to do with the fact that I'm not releasing the resources taken up by the images. The idea comes from this answer => Question.
Does anyone know how to manually release these resources?

There's no Dispose() method for Image or BitmapImage classes, so the best you can do is dispose the stream you're getting the data to. But I'd personally look for the problem somewhere else since Images should be GC'd automatically (in fact, they do).
There might be event handlers that bind to your page from outside making GC unable to collect it, e.g. you have a reference to the page in your application settings or something. Or the GC just doesn't at once collect the dumped objects but waits for the specific time - try moving back/forward several times and see if the memory raises up and up and up.
Anyway, there's no need/ability to free resources taken by Image/BitmapImage manually (only the corresponding Stream, which usually doesn't give the result since it's cached in the image).