I am building an app for the HoloLens gen 1 device using Unity 2018.3.13f and MRTK V2 RC1. I got a simple AR design with 2 text objects and 1 rawimage object. After building the project and deploying it to the HoloLens the AR objects ends up behind the spatial mesh (you know all those spatial triangles), but I want all the objects to be in front of the wall.
How do I accomplish this?
The canvas is set to be on the main camera
I have the original settings for the DefaultMixedRealityconfiguraitonProfile if there is something there that needs to be changed.
This is how it looks through the hololens with the app when it does not show the mesh of the wall (sorry for the bad quality)
and this is how it looks when it falls behind the mesh
Do I need to add some mesh renderer or something on the MainCamera to make this possible?
Any help is appreciated, thanks!
I don't believe that the MRTKv2 as of 2019/5/9 has code that will auto-ensure that a specific object is positioned in between the camera and other arbitrary meshes and colliders (i.e. the spatial awareness is one such mesh, though you could imagine just having an arbitrary box or plane in the scene that would occlude that object, in which case, maybe you'd want your "in between" object to stay in between both those two types of potentially occluding things).
There used to be a script in the HTK called Tagalong.cs that would do something like this by doing raycasts from the camera to collidable object:
https://github.com/microsoft/MixedRealityToolkit-Unity/blob/htk_release/Assets/HoloToolkit/Utilities/Scripts/Tagalong.cs
This single large script I think got broken up into smaller scripts (i.e. specific behaviors in the solvers here:)
https://github.com/microsoft/MixedRealityToolkit-Unity/tree/mrtk_release/Assets/MixedRealityToolkit.SDK/Features/Utilities/Solvers
However, from what I can tell, the specific interaction of "keep things automatically between the camera and whatever collidable object" wasn't preserved. Someone else can correct me here if I'm wrong, it looks like this wasn't a behavior that got preserved in V2.
Going forward, there are a couple of possibilities:
1) Probably file an issue on Github here (https://github.com/microsoft/MixedRealityToolkit-Unity/issues) to request this feature be ported over.
2) Use the code in Tagalong.cs to add your own solver that would accomplish this (i.e. the code looks to be all there, there's just some work needed to get done to reorder it to handle what you want)
If you use a sprite renderer, set order in layer (into 0 or -1).
If you use a mesh renderer, try to deactivate dynamic occluded.
Try to change the hierarchy of the sorting layers under Edit-> Project Settings -> Sorting Layers
Related
I am currently using the NVIDIA FleX package in Unity3D to create soft-bodied, jelly objects. I'm using Unity for animation only, not game dev.
What I am aiming to make is a transparent, jello sphere that retains its spherical shape with elasticity.
The first way I've tried to achieve this is using Flex Array + fluid setting. I've been playing with the settings but I can't get it to remain a sphere, it just becomes a more/less viscous fluid blob.
The second way is using the Flex Soft + fluid setting. It is much better in terms of physics but even with "draw particles" off, but the water droplets are each separated and not one jelly sphere.
This is what it looks like before hitting play, where the left is with Flex Array and the right is Flex Soft. The particles for Array are visible but not for Soft.
This is after hitting play, where the Array becomes one viscous fluid, but not a sphere, and the Soft is very jello-like but the water droplets are all separated.
A solution for either of the two ways would be much appreciated!
the standard approach is to create an Nvidia Flex Controller first...
Then you should also create a Flex Soft Asset...
Then you should create or select a game object and through the Add Component tab in the game object's inspector, find the Flex Soft Actor component [see it loaded up in the image below]...
Ensure your Soft Actor Asset mentioned previously has your required mesh type selected in the inspector option [I chose sphere in the image here] and check to see it looks something like the image below to be sure...
So after that, hopefully, you can just press play and see it in action as it drops and contorts for you.
If not, I have created a quick example for you to download as a unitypackage.
It may still require further resolution with the package manager as the Flex plugin is already inside the package I'm providing here[Using Unity 2020.3.5f1]
Flex in unity package
Anyway, hope this gets you started and somewhere towards your goal with Flex.
As a bonus, I've added a small script to move the flex object as this is outside of the usual approach as we have to call to the NVidia Flex component class of choice and invoke the ApplyImpulse method.
Cheers :)
Edit: There are a small 3 set of tutorials from NV Gameworks on integrating the plugin with Unity and exampling some stuff - this "stuff" is included in my downloadable package provided above.
Here is the youtube link to the 3 set:
Nvidia Gameworks FleX tutorials on Youtube
Edit 2: rereading your question made me think I hadnt really given you the definitive answer as to using a cloth actor and having the mesh renderer deform via the flex cloth deform component.
I am providing another link to another unity package here that will show this in action also allowing you to see the game object and how the cloth component from NVIDIA Flex works with the standard mesh filter and mesh renderer. Hope this more accurately answers your question :)
Example also using Cloth Actors as well as Soft Actors in NVIDIA FleX
I'm newbie at unity animations and stuff and I want to create a game scene in which at run time I would be able to move a humanoid 3D model and save the movement as an animation (.anim) file.
I may move the parts of the model by mouse or by mapping scrolling bars to animation property values, somehow.
To do all this I decided to go for the animators (properties) of a model. Kindly look at the picture in the link below to know exactly what I am talking about. (Wasn't able to post image since I'm new to stack overflow too)
I searched the unity Scriptable API for this but wasn't able to find the documentation on how to use the above mentioned property directly in your scripts so that animation curves can be generated from them.
Is it possible to do this?
Is there a better way to record animations of humanoid models at runtime (in-game mode) or a better property for humanoid models to use?
Note: The whole animation process is to be handled through code.
I would like to create a shared AR game on Android phones, where I would like to:
spawn a cube for each player on an ImageTarget
allow them to control the position of their cube
allow them to see the movements of all players' cubes
I'm using Vuforia as my AR library and PUN 2 as my networking library. I have no issue synchronizing the positions and rotations of all cubes. However, the cubes do not stay on the ImageTarget properly and "jump" around. On the other hand, if I place my two phones very close together and point them at the ImageTarget at roughly the same angle, the cubes do not jump as much.
This leads me to think that the 2 instances of ARCamera fail to realize that they are pointing at the same ImageTarget from 2 different angles, and instead think that the ImageTarget exists in 2 different orientations at the same time.
Is there any way for me to tell Vuforia that I'm using multiple instances of ARCamera pointing at the same ImageTarget? (Or if my hypothesis is completely wrong, how do I actually make a multiplayer AR game?)
Thanks so much in advance!
p.s. I know the Vuforia forums are a better place to ask this question but unfortunately that forum is not particularly active, so I'm trying my luck here.
I've solved the issue by going to the ARCamera gameobject, then in the Vuforia Behavior component, I changed the World Center Mode from DEVICE to FIRST_TARGET. This allows multiple instances of ARCameras to be in different positions.
More info on World Center Mode can be found here.
Forgive me if there is already another post addressing something like this, but I haven't found it yet. I'm trying to get my object to ignore the default gravity field and move between the walls of the pipe in the image below:
The effect I'm trying to achieve is to allow my player (cube) to exit with a different rotation/spin when leaving the pipe as it falls back toward the ground.
I've seen an attractor script for planetary bodies elsewhere, but I'm not sure those apply to this scenario or not. Obviously, I'm planning on using a mesh collidor for my pipeline in the image (I created this in Blender) and the faces are inverted.
If I need to create a script for this, where would I start? Which object would I apply this script to and in which way?
I currently have a WinForms C# application. I have a .txt file with GPS coordinates of some points (borders of buildings, roads etc.), and using Graphics.FillPolygon method in System.Drawing I am drawing these on a Panel. However, I got an idea that for what I am trying to do (it basically is a 2D game), a Unity 2D project would be more suitable and easy to use (mainly because of easier view handling using the cameras). However, I don't know how to do this drawing in it. I just need to somehow get these coordinates drawn in Unity, but I don't know how to do it.
Note: I already have some minor expirience with 3D in Unity, but I am a total newbie to 2D.
Thanks
There is no GDI/canvas implementation built into Unity. Drawing these in rastered 2D would be quite hard in Unity (basically putpixel level, or finding some third party library).
You have an alternative, though - you can draw these shapes in 3D, ignoring the third dimension. You have a few methods for this:
Line renderers - this one will be the easiest, but forget about anything else than just drawing the outline, no fill etc.
Make your own mesh - This will let you use the geometry with your scene. It's an retained mode API (you init your geometry once)
Use the GL namespace - This will be only rendered on the screen, no interaction with the scene. It's an immidiate mode API (draw everything on every frame)