I have a client which uses Okta LDAP Interface facility. We have a LDAP v3 tool which connects with AD, Open LDAP other LDAP v3 supported servers.
We want to integrate Okta LDAP Interface into our tool as it is LDAPv3 Compatible. Our Code is based on .NET framework + C Sharp.
We are facing some issues/challenges while connecting with Okta LDAP Interface.
We use System.DirectoryServices by Microsoft library provided by microsoft currently. But facing issues with LDAP Interface.
For StartTLS/389
I get the error :
Unwilling to perform. LDAP Error Code 53
More: A secure connection cannot be established. To admin: This service requires TLS. LDAP
For SSL/636
Error: The server is not operational.
Links:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.directoryservices?view=netframework-4.8
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.directoryservices.directoryentry?view=netframework-4.8
https://ldapwiki.com/wiki/LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM
var oktaLDAPPath = "LDAP://dev-506668.ldap.oktapreview.com:636/ou=users,dc=dev-506668,dc=oktapreview,dc=com";
var un = "uid=*******,dc=dev-506668,dc=oktapreview,dc=com";
var pass = "*******";
var filter = "((objectClass=*))";
try
{
using (var userDirectoryEntry = new DirectoryEntry(oktaLDAPPath, un, pass,AuthenticationTypes.SecureSocketsLayer))
{
using (var directorySearcher = new DirectorySearcher(userDirectoryEntry, filter) { PageSize = 100 })
{
directorySearcher.FindOne();
}
}
}
catch (DirectoryServicesCOMException dex)
{
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
}
Thanks
Update: So I did some testing for myself. I see what's going on.
If you do a DNS lookup on dev-506668.ldap.oktapreview.com, it gives you a CNAME result to op1-ldapi-fb96b0a1937080bd.elb.us-east-1.amazonaws.com.
A browser will use the IP address of the CNAME, but still make the request with the host name that you originally gave it. However, for some reason, when starting an LDAP connection, Windows is using the CNAME to iniatate the connection.
In other words, Windows is changing the request to LDAP://op1-ldapi-fb96b0a1937080bd.elb.us-east-1.amazonaws.com:636. But then it receives the SSL certificate which has the name *.ldap.oktapreview.com and it panics because that doesn't match the name it used to make the request (op1-ldapi-fb96b0a1937080bd.elb.us-east-1.amazonaws.com).
I verified all of this using Wireshark, monitoring traffic on port 636. The SSL Client Hello is using op1-ldapi-fb96b0a1937080bd.elb.us-east-1.amazonaws.com instead of dev-506668.ldap.oktapreview.com.
I don't know of a way to make it not do that. DirectoryEntry has no way to override how it verifies the SSL certificate either. LdapConnection does, which you can see here, but it might be a little harder to work with. I've never used it. (you probably should do some verification of your own and no just return true like that example does).
This might be something you can share with Okta Support anyway.
Original answer:
It sounds like your computer does not trust the SSL certificate that is used on the server. To verify this, I use Chrome. You have to start Chrome like this:
chrome.exe --explicitly-allowed-ports=636
Then you can put this in the address bar:
https://dev-506668.ldap.oktapreview.com:636
If the certificate is not trusted, you will get a big error saying so. You can click the 'Advanced' button to see the reason Chrome gives for it not being trusted. But Chrome will also let you inspect the certificate by clicking on "Not secure" in the address bar to the left of the address, then click 'Certificate'.
There a couple reasons it might not be trusted:
The fully-qualified domain name you are using (dev-506668.ldap.oktapreview.com) doesn't match what is on the certificate. If that's the case, you might be able to just change the domain name you use to match the certificate.
The certificate is not issued by a trusted authority. It could be a self-signed certificate. If this is the case, then you should see an "Install Certificate" button when you view the certificate, which you can use to explicitly trust the certificate. See here for screenshots, starting on step 3. This will only apply to the current computer.
I recently ran into this issue and was pointed to the following solution:
Add the following registry value then restart the server and see if it fixes the issue.
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LDAP\UseHostnameAsAlias
DWORD, set the value to 1
See https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/an-error-occurs-when-you-try-to-establish-ssl-connections-to-the-nodes-by-using-the-alias-name-from-an-ldaps-client-computer-that-is-running-windows-7-or-windows-server-2008-r2-49b6ee93-2c68-a892-8133-612d208dd1b1 for more details.
Related
I am currently trying to improve an RPC Server I'm responsible for, both server and client run on the same machine locally, however I would like to restrict the server so that it only allows administrator (including built in /LocalSystem account) to connect to the rpc server through a named pipe.
First of all I am using the following library as a wrapper for the RPCserverApi/RPCClientApi:
https://github.com/csharptest/CSharpTest.Net.RpcLibrary
I create the Server like so:
server = new RpcServerApi(IId, MaxCalls, ushort.MaxValue, true);
server.AddProtocol(RpcProtseq.ncacn_np, Id, MaxCalls);
// Set authentication
server.AddAuthentication(RpcAuthentication.RPC_C_AUTHN_WINNT);
However when I check the named pipes security it still shows like it's not restricted at all, and my client can still connect even though I have yet to change that to specify authentication.
In addition I can check the access to that named pipe and I get:
\\.\pipe\myNamedPipe
RW Everyone
RW NT AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON
RW BUILTIN\Administrators
Okay, So for anyone else that ran into this problem There's a few things I needed to do which was not exposed in the library I was using. So instead I created my own wrapper.
When Registering the Rpc Interface with RpcServerRegisterIf2() I had to pass through the flag:
RPC_IF_ALLOW_SECURE_ONLY
Then In addition when setting up the protocols for the RpcServer: RpcServerUseProtseqEp() I also had to pass through an SDDL, to describe the restrictions on the end point. You can find a description of SDDL's here:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/secauthz/security-descriptor-definition-language
To do this I created an Ace String, then used ConvertStringSecurityDescriptorToSecurityDescriptor() to create the correct object. This then locked down the end point like:
\\.\pipe\myNamedPipe
RW BUILTIN\Administrators
But also it enforced on the server that only authenticated accounts could reach it
My issue originally reported was full of misunderstandings about RPC Servers and Named pipes, I thoroughly recommend reading and understanding the following articles, as they were very helpful to me.
https://csandker.io/2021/01/10/Offensive-Windows-IPC-1-NamedPipes.html
https://csandker.io/2021/02/21/Offensive-Windows-IPC-2-RPC.html
I have a black box service I have to call into with simple rest commands that returns xml.
They issued us a certificate that had to be run in IE and installs in to IE's Certificate section. As per their instructions I exported it with the entire chain as a pfx with password.
On the machine that the cert was issued directly to, everything works fine in code
var certHandler = new WebRequestHandler();
certHandler.ClientCertificateOptions = ClientCertificateOption.Manual;
certHandler.UseDefaultCredentials = false;
var certificate = new X509Certificate2(Properties.Resources.SigningCert, "password", X509KeyStorageFlags.DefaultKeySet | X509KeyStorageFlags.MachineKeySet | X509KeyStorageFlags.PersistKeySet); //Must be renewed and replaced every year.
certHandler.ClientCertificates.Add(certificate);
//Execute the command
var client = new HttpClient(certHandler);
string result;
try
{
result = await client.GetStringAsync(url);
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(result);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw ex;
}
(I've stored the cert in the resources, but it loads fine and loading it from a file works fine too in developer machine.) I also imported it into IE on the server just in case. Obviously this is likely under the wrong cert store, but I couldn't figure out how to load this in globally. I can tell you that the same REST GETs work in IE on the server just like they do on the developer machine. It's only in code that it fails.)
In production, this same code throws a 403 forbidden.
Production (really a beta server) is actually behind the same nat as the as the development machine so they're seeing the same IP come through etc.
Any ideas why it would fail on the server and not on the developer box?
Thanks!
You should use X509KeyStorageFlags according to account under which your app is running. If it is
1) An app that runs under regular Windows User Account you should use
X509Certificate2(Properties.Resources.SigningCert, "password", X509KeyStorageFlags.UserKeySet);
2) Windows Service under LocalSystem, IIS under NetworkService or other services under built in Windows Account, you should use
X509Certificate2(Properties.Resources.SigningCert, "password", X509KeyStorageFlags.MachineKeySet);
Basically, you shouldn't use X509KeyStorageFlags.PersistKeySet in your case - you import certificate from pfx format every time.
Certificate's private key is storing in the container according to flags. So you may have no access to it if you use wrong flags.
DefaultKeySet is not just alias for UserKeySet (msdn) - so choose appropriate flags in every case.
These articles also may be helpfull:
Key Storage and Retrieval
Eight tips for working with X.509 certificates in .NET
How Certificates Work
What I've found is that for whatever reason it won't allow you to grant permissions properly to the key. To work around it, I went to:
X:\Users\All Users\Microsoft\Crypto\RSA\MachineKeys
In explorer and found the key in question (I used deduction by Date but the thumbprint is there so you should be able to match it up.) and then right clicked, took over the file permissions and then set the permissions manually.
Then my code just started working.
Interestingly however, on another machine that I needed to deploy this to, the file doesn't exist in the machinekeys directory so I don't know what I'm going to do there but...
I'm currently writing some software in C# which needs to connect to an AD server and get some user details. When I connect using the code below it works against most AD servers that I connect to but there are a couple where it fails with an error of "Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password.". The server name / credentials I'm using are definately correct as I've tested them with an LDAP Browser and the AD server is using standard security (port 389 etc). Can anyone offer any advice?
Cheers
Tim
DirectoryEntry d = new DirectoryEntry("LDAP://" + domain, admin_username, admin_password);
try
{
object x = d.NativeObject;
}
catch
{
throw;
}
I've had similar issues programming .net / AD in the past. One thing I found useful is using an LDAP viewer to see if I can connect to certain servers, etc. In this way, I can at least determine if it is a .NET error (perhaps my code), a credential error, etc.
I use the free/lite version of Softerra's LDAP viewer (http://www.ldapbrowser.com/download.htm) although I'm sure there are many others to choose from out there. If you try the one listed here, make sure to download the 'LDAP browser' and not 'LDAP Administrator'. The browser is the free one.
Try connecting to the same LDAP path you're having trouble with in code, using a LDAP browser/viewer. This will at least as step one determine if it is a .NET/code issue or not. If you can't connect via the browser, it can be helpful to play around with the connection options, such as port, domain (FQDN), etc.
Hope this might help narrow things down.
Active Directory allows at least three different logon name styles:
LDAP - i.e. LDAP DN. For example: cn=JohnS, ou=Users, dc=example, dc=com
NTLM. For example: EXAMPLE\JohnS
Kerberos principal name: For example: johns#example.com
However, you cannot login with just JohnS like you do with Windows box. It's a very common mistake.
Apologies in advance as I haven't had much experience with directories before.
I have an ASP.net application, and I have to validate its users against an Active Directory Application Mode instance running on Server 2k3. I was previously attempting a connection with DirectoryEntry and catching the COMException if the user's credentials (userPrincipalName & password) were wrong, but I had a number of problems when trying to bind as users who weren't a member of any ADAM groups (which is a requirement).
I recently found the System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagement library, which seems a lot more promising, but although it works on my local machine, I'm having some troubles when testing this in our testbed environment. Chances are I'm simply misunderstanding how to use these objects correctly, as I wasn't able to find any great documentation on the matter. Currently I am creating a PrincipalContext with a Windows username and password, then calling the AuthenticateCredentials with the user's userPrincipalName and password. Here's a very short exert of what I'm doing:
using (var serviceContext = new PrincipalContext(
ContextType.ApplicationDirectory,
serverAddress,
rootContainer,
ContextOptions.Negotiate | ContextOptions.SecureSocketLayer,
serviceAccountUsername,
serviceAccountPassword)) {
bool credentialsValid = serviceContext.ValidateCredentials(userID, password, ContextOptions.SecureSocketLayer | ContextOptions.SimpleBind)
}
If the user's credentials are valid, I then go on to perform other operations with that principal context. As I said, this works for both users with and without roles in my own environment, but not in our testbed environment. My old DirectoryEntry way of checking the user's credentials still works with the same configuration.
After a very long morning, I was able to figure out the problem!
The exception message I was receiving when calling ValidateCredentials was extremely vague. After installing Visual Studio 2008 in the test environment (which is on the other side of the country, mind you!), I was able to debug and retrieve the HRESULT of the error. After some very deep searching in to Google, I found some very vague comments about "SSL Warnings" being picked up as other exceptions, and that enabling "SCHANNEL logging" (which I'm very unfamiliar with!) might reveal some more insight. So, after switching that on in the registry and retrying the connection, I was presented with this:
The certificate received from the remote server does not contain the expected name. It is therefore not possible to determine whether we are connecting to the correct server. The server name we were expecting is ADAMServer. The SSL connection request has failed. The attached data contains the server certificate.
I found this rather strange, as the old method of connecting via SSL worked fine. In any case, my co-worker was able to spot the problem - the name on the SSL certificate that had been issued on the server was that of the DNS name ("adam2.net") and not the host name ("adamserver"). Although I'm told that's the norm, it just wasn't resolving the correct name when using PrincipalContext.
Long story short; re-issuing a certificate with the computer name and not the DNS name fixed the problem!
I receive an "Access Deined" COMException when I try to connect to a remote IIS 6 server from my C# application that is running under IIS 5.1.
Any ideas? I am experiencing all the same issues with the original questions.
Update - 4/1/09
I found this solution (http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/Start_Stop_IIS_Website.aspx) that consists of a window application connecting to an IIS server to start and stop web sites. I am able to run it on my workstation and connect to the IIS server.
Ugh....why can I run this stand alone application but not my ASP.NET application?
Original
I receive an "Access Denied" COMException when I try to connect to IIS from a remote machine using the DirectoryEntry.Exist method to check to see if the IIS server is valid.
string path = string.Format("IIS://{0}/W3SVC", server);
if(DirectoryEntry.Exist(path))
{
//do something is valid....
}
I am a member of an active directory group that has been added to the Administrators groups to the IIS server I am trying to connect to.
Has anyone experience this issue and know how to resolve it?
UPDATE:
#Kev - It is an ASP.NET application. Also, I can connect without an username and password to the remote server through IIS6 Manager.
#Chris - I am trying to connect to the remote server to display the number of virtual directorys and determine the .NET framework version of each directory. See this SO question.
#dautzenb - My ASP.NET application is running under IIS 5.1 trying to connect to an IIS 6 server. I can see fault audits in the security log for my local ASPNET account on the remote server. When I try to debug the application, I am running under my domain account and still get the Access is denied.
UPDATE 2:
#Kev - I was able to establish to create a DirectoryEntry object using the following overload:
public DirectoryEntry
(
string path,
string username,
string password
)
But, all of the properties contain a " threw an exception of type 'System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException'" while I debug the app.
Also, the AuthenticationType property is set to Secure.
UPDATE 3:
The following two failure audit entries were in the remote IIS server's security event log every time I tried to establish a connection:
First event:
Event Category: Account Logon
Event ID: 680
Log attempt by: MICROSOFT_AUTHENTICATION_PACKAGE_V1_0
Logon account: ASPNET
Source Workstation:
Error Code: 0xC0000234
Second event:
Event Category: Logon/Logoff
Event ID: 529
Logon Failure:
Reason: Unknown user name or bad password
User Name: ASPNET
Domain: (MyDomain)
Logon Type: 3
Logon Process: NtLmSsp
Authentication Package: NTLM
Workstation Name: (MyWorkstationId)
Caller User Name: -
Caller Domain: -
Caller Logon ID: -
Caller Process ID: -
Transited Services: -
Source Network Address: 10.12.13.35
Source Port: 1708
Impersonation is set to true and the username and password are blank. It is using the ASPNET account on the remote IIS server.
If it is an identity problem, you could try setting your IIS 5.1 application to use Integrated Windows Authentication, and then add the following to you web.config on your IIS5.1 web site under system.web to enable impersonation.
<identity impersonate="true"/>
<authentication mode="Windows" />
Since this is an ASP.NET application, it runs in an Application Pool of IIS. This Application Pool runs using a specific user("Local System", "Network Service" or another user).
Does this user have enough rights to connect to a remote server ?
See MSDN for more info.
This looks like it may be a double-hop issue. If you are impersonating the current user of a website using NTLM, that impersonation is only valid on that server (your IIS 5.1 server in this case). If you try to connect to another server using the web site, you are actually going to have issues as it cannot pass the token to another server that was used during impersonation. The same is true if you are debugging your site through your machine, going to another box. Your local machine is authenticating you, but it cannot impersonate you to another server.
All of the solutions I have used in the past require you to hard code the app pool to use an account that has permissions, set the annony. account to a domain account with permissions on the other machine, or use a windows service running on the IIS 5.1 machine, under a domain account, to connect to the other server.
If you are using Kerberos, this wouldn't apply, but AD uses NTLM by default.
Where exactly are you trying to read too? Is it in under the same path as your application?
When I had this problem, I found that simply authenticating my self on a Windows file share solved the problem. From experience, I think that WMI/ADSI/COM doesn't have great support for not-already-authenticated users. I believe this issue occurs when you're not associated with a Windows domain.
If it is indeed a NTLM doublehop issue you could use the SETSPN utility to create service principal named instances for your target IIS servers.
Then you could go into Active Directory, and then allow the computer object (basically the NETWORK SERVICE or LOCAL SERVICE principals) to delegate its credentials to a correctly registered SPN.
Then you could hop-hop-hop all over the place! But, be warned! People can hurt themselves on sharp pointy things when you enable double-hop!
Good KB articles to read:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/929650
I believe that DirectoryEntry.Exists silently ignores any credentials supplied and uses the creds of the authenticated user. This seems to match the behaviour you've described. For AD work, we never use it for this reason.
I'm sort of stumped at the moment as to why you can't get this working. There is a temporary work around you could try. When instantiating the DirectoryEntry object you could use one of the following constructor overloads:
public DirectoryEntry(
string path,
string username,
string password
)
Documented at: MSDN: DirectoryEntry Constructor (String, String, String)
...or...
public DirectoryEntry(
string path,
string username,
string password,
AuthenticationTypes authenticationType
)
Documented at: MSDN: DirectoryEntry Constructor (String, String, String, AuthenticationTypes)
As it happens I'm building a test AD environment on my virtual server box for a new project to do similar stuff. When I get it up and running I'll have a play around to see if I can reproduce the problem you're encountering. In the meantime let us know what happens if you try these constructor overloads referenced above.
Update (In answer to Michaels comment):
For reasons that evade me just now, we couldn't use DirectoryEntry.Exists() in a particular scenario, there is this snippet of code that gets called now and again in one of our apps:
public static bool MetabasePathExists(string metabasePath)
{
try
{
using(DirectoryEntry site = new DirectoryEntry(metabasePath))
{
if(site.Name != String.Empty)
{
return true;
}
return false;
}
}
catch(COMException ex)
{
if(ex.Message.StartsWith("The system cannot find the path specified"))
{
return false;
}
LogError(ex, String.Format("metabasePath={0}", metabasePath));
throw;
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
LogError(ex, String.Format("metabasePath={0}", metabasePath));
throw;
}
}
You could replace the constructor with one of the ones from above. Admittedly it's a stab in the dark :).