I am creating a WPF-based plugin (for Revit, an architectural 3D modelling software, but this shouldn't matter) which is quite complex and I'm getting kind of lost.
The WPF Window is composed by 2 tabs and each Tab is a custom UserControl that I'm inserting in the TabItem through a Frame. The Main Window has a ViewModel where the data is bound.
One of the tabs helps with the creation of floors in a 3D model
part of MainWindow.xaml
<TabItem Name="LevelsTab" Header="Levels" HorizontalContentAlignment="Left">
<ScrollViewer >
<Frame Name="LevelsContent" Source="LevelsTab.xaml"/>
</ScrollViewer>
</TabItem>
The LevelsTab.xaml UserControl is really barebone and just contains buttons to create or remove a custom UserControl I created to represent graphically a floor in the UI (screenshot below). This very simple as well:
LevelDefinition.xaml
<UserControl x:Class="RevitPrototype.Setup.LevelDefinition" ....
<Label Grid.Column="0" Content="Level:"/>
<TextBox Name="LevelName" Text={Binding <!--yet to be bound-->}/>
<TextBox Name="LevelElevation" Text={Binding <!--yet to be bound-->}/>
<TextBox Name="ToFloorAbove" Text={Binding <!--yet to be bound-->}/>
</UserControl>
When the user clicks the buttons to add or remove floors in LevelsTab.xaml, a new LevelDefinition is added or removed to the gird.
Each LevelDefinition will be able to create a Level object from the information contained in the different TextBox elements, using MVVM. Eventually, in the ViewModel, I should have a List<Level> I guess.
Level.cs
class Level
{
public double Elevation { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Number { get; set; }
}
Each LevelDefinition should be sort of bound to the previous one though, as the floor below contains the information of the height to the Level above. The right-most TextBox in LevelDefinition.xaml indicated the distance between the current floor and the floor above, hence the Height `TextBox should just be the sum of its height PLUS the distance to the level above:
Of course the extra level of difficulty here is that if I change distance to the level above in one floor, all the floors above will have to update the height. For example: I change LEVEL 01 (from the pic) to have 4 meters to the level above, LEVEL 02's height will have to update to become 7m (instead of 6) and LEVEL 03's will have to become 10m.
But at this point I'm very lost:
How do I get this logic of getting the floor height bound to the info in the floor below?
How do I implement MVVM correctly in this case?
I hope I managed to explain the situation correctly even though it's quite complex and thanks for the help!
If you intend to make your Level items editable, you have to implement INotifyPropertyChanged. I created a level view model for demonstration purposes and added a property OverallElevation that represents the current elevation including that of previous levels.
public class LevelViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private string _name;
private int _number;
private double _elevation;
private double _overallElevation;
public LevelViewModel(string name, int number, double elevation, double overallElevation)
{
Number = number;
Name = name;
Elevation = elevation;
OverallElevation = overallElevation;
}
public string Name
{
get => _name;
set
{
if (_name == value)
return;
_name = value;
OnPropertyChanged();
}
}
public int Number
{
get => _number;
set
{
if (_number == value)
return;
_number = value;
OnPropertyChanged();
}
}
public double Elevation
{
get => _elevation;
set
{
if (_elevation.CompareTo(value) == 0)
return;
_elevation = value;
OnPropertyChanged();
}
}
public double OverallElevation
{
get => _overallElevation;
set
{
if (_overallElevation.CompareTo(value) == 0)
return;
_overallElevation = value;
OnPropertyChanged();
}
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
protected virtual void OnPropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null)
{
PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
You can bind these properties to your LevelDefinition user control. I adapted your sample, because it is incomplete. Since the overall elevation is calculated, I set the corresponding TextBox to be read-only, but you should really use a TextBlock or a similar read-only control instead.
<UserControl x:Class="RevitPrototype.Setup.LevelDefinition"
...>
<UserControl.Resources>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type TextBox}" BasedOn="{StaticResource {x:Type TextBox}}">
<Setter Property="Margin" Value="5"/>
</Style>
</UserControl.Resources>
<Grid>
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition/>
<ColumnDefinition/>
<ColumnDefinition/>
<ColumnDefinition/>
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<Label Grid.Column="0" Content="Level:"/>
<TextBox Grid.Column="1" Name="LevelName" Text="{Binding Name}"/>
<TextBox Grid.Column="2" Name="LevelElevation" Text="{Binding OverallElevation}" IsReadOnly="True"/>
<TextBox Grid.Column="3" Name="ToFloorAbove" Text="{Binding Elevation}"/>
</Grid>
</UserControl>
Since you did not provide your tab view model, I created one for reference. This view model exposes an ObservableCollection of levels, a GroundFloor property and commands to add and remove levels. I use a DelegateCommand type, but you may use a different one.
On each add of a level, you subscribe to the PropertyChanged event of the new level and on removal you unsubscribe to prevent memory leaks. Now, whenever a property changes on a LevelViewModel instance, the OnLevelPropertyChanged method is called. This method checks, if the Elevation property was changed. If it was, the UpdateOverallElevation method is called, which recalculates all overall elevation properties. Of course you could optimize this to only recalculate the levels above the current one passed as sender.
For a more robust implementation, you should subscribe to the CollectionChanged event of the Levels collection, so can subscribe to and unsubscribe from the PropertyChanged events of level items whenever you add, remove or modify the collection in other ways than through the commands like restoring a persisted collection.
public class LevelsViewModel
{
private const string GroundName = "GROUND FLOOR";
private const string LevelName = "LEVEL";
public ObservableCollection<LevelViewModel> Levels { get; }
public LevelViewModel GroundFloor { get; }
public ICommand Add { get; }
public ICommand Remove { get; }
public LevelsViewModel()
{
Levels = new ObservableCollection<LevelViewModel>();
GroundFloor = new LevelViewModel(GroundName, 0, 0, 0);
Add = new DelegateCommand<string>(ExecuteAdd);
Remove = new DelegateCommand(ExecuteRemove);
GroundFloor.PropertyChanged += OnLevelPropertyChanged;
}
private void ExecuteAdd(string arg)
{
if (!double.TryParse(arg, out var value))
return;
var lastLevel = Levels.Any() ? Levels.Last() : GroundFloor;
var number = lastLevel.Number + 1;
var name = GetDefaultLevelName(number);
var overallHeight = lastLevel.OverallElevation + value;
var level = new LevelViewModel(name, number, value, overallHeight);
level.PropertyChanged += OnLevelPropertyChanged;
Levels.Add(level);
}
private void ExecuteRemove()
{
if (!Levels.Any())
return;
var lastLevel = Levels.Last();
lastLevel.PropertyChanged -= OnLevelPropertyChanged;
Levels.Remove(lastLevel);
}
private void OnLevelPropertyChanged(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.PropertyName != nameof(LevelViewModel.Elevation))
return;
UpdateOverallElevation();
}
private static string GetDefaultLevelName(int number)
{
return $"{LevelName} {number:D2}";
}
private void UpdateOverallElevation()
{
GroundFloor.OverallElevation = GroundFloor.Elevation;
var previousLevel = GroundFloor;
foreach (var level in Levels)
{
level.OverallElevation = previousLevel.OverallElevation + level.Elevation;
previousLevel = level;
}
}
}
The view for the levels tab item could look like below. You can use a ListBox with your LevelDefinition user control as item template to display the levels. Alternatively, you could use a DataGrid with editable columns for each property of the LevelViewModel, which would be more flexible for users.
<Grid>
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition/>
<RowDefinition Height="Auto"/>
<RowDefinition Height="Auto"/>
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<ListView ItemsSource="{Binding Levels}">
<ListBox.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type ListBoxItem}">
<Setter Property="HorizontalContentAlignment" Value="Stretch"/>
</Style>
</ListBox.ItemContainerStyle>
<ListBox.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<local:LevelDefinition/>
</DataTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemTemplate>
</ListView>
<DockPanel Grid.Row="1" Margin="5">
<Button DockPanel.Dock="Right" Content="-" MinWidth="50" Command="{Binding Remove}"/>
<Button DockPanel.Dock="Right" Content="+" MinWidth="50" Command="{Binding Add}" CommandParameter="{Binding Text, ElementName=NewLevelElevationTextBox}"/>
<TextBox x:Name="NewLevelElevationTextBox" MinWidth="100"/>
</DockPanel>
<local:LevelDefinition Grid.Row="2" DataContext="{Binding GroundFloor}"/>
</Grid>
This is a simplified example, there is no input validation, invalid values are ignored on adding.
I've managed to implement this using a multi-binding converter.
Assuming that you set up the multi-converter as a static resource somewhere, the TextBlock to display the value is:
<TextBlock>
<TextBlock.Text>
<MultiBinding Converter="{StaticResource ElevationMultiConverter}">
<MultiBinding.Bindings>
<Binding Path="" />
<Binding Path="DataContext.Levels" RelativeSource="{RelativeSource AncestorType={x:Type ItemsControl}}" />
</MultiBinding.Bindings>
</MultiBinding>
</TextBlock.Text>
</TextBlock>
The converter itself looks like this:
class ElevationMultiConverter : IMultiValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object[] values, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
var item = values[0] as Level;
var list = values[1] as IList<Level>;
var lowerLevels = list.Where(listItem => list.IndexOf(listItem) <= list.IndexOf(item));
var elevation = lowerLevels.Sum(listItem => listItem.Height);
return elevation.ToString();
}
public object[] ConvertBack(object value, Type[] targetTypes, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
In this example, it depends on the specific order of items in the list to determine whether a level is above or below another; you could use a property, or whatever else.
I didn't use a framework for this example so I needed to implement INotifyPropertyChanged everywhere myself. In the MainViewModel, this meant adding a listener to each Level element's PropertyChanged event to trigger the multibinding converter to have 'changed'. In total, my MainViewModel looked like this:
class MainViewModel :INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public ObservableCollection<Level> Levels { get; set; }
public MainViewModel()
{
Levels = new ObservableCollection<Level>();
Levels.CollectionChanged += Levels_CollectionChanged;
}
private void Levels_CollectionChanged(object sender, System.Collections.Specialized.NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
foreach(var i in e.NewItems)
{
(i as Level).PropertyChanged += MainViewModel_PropertyChanged;
}
}
private void MainViewModel_PropertyChanged(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
this.PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(nameof(Levels)));
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
}
How it works:
A new Level is added to the collection, and it's PropertyChanged event is listened to by the containing view model. When the height of a level changes, the PropertyChanged event is fired and is picked up by the MainViewModel. It in turn fires a PropertyChanged event for the Levels property. The MultiConverter is bound to the Levels property, and all changes for it trigger the converters to re-evaluate and update all of the levels combined height values.
Related
I'm trying to get the mouse position related to a wpf control (a Canvas in this case) using MVVM Framework with Prism Library.
I already got a solution but I'm not sure if it's a correct way to use the MVVM framework.
Main window:
<Grid Grid.Row="1">
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition />
<ColumnDefinition Width="250"/>
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<Border Grid.Column="0" BorderBrush="Gray" BorderThickness="1">
<Canvas HorizontalAlignment="Center" VerticalAlignment="Center"
Width="{Binding CanvasWidth}" Height="{Binding CanvasHeight}">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger EventName="MouseMove">
<prism:InvokeCommandAction Command="{Binding MouseMove}"/>
</i:EventTrigger>
<i:EventTrigger EventName="Loaded">
<prism:InvokeCommandAction Command="{Binding Loaded}"/>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
<Image Source="{Binding Image}" />
</Canvas>
</Border>
<TextBlock Grid.Column="1" Text="{Binding Text}"/>
<StackPanel Grid.Column="1">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding MouseX, StringFormat='X={0}'}" Grid.Column="1" />
<TextBlock Text="{Binding MouseY, StringFormat='Y={0}'}" Grid.Column="1" />
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
In this XAML code snippet the canvas has 2 Event triggers that I use for converting:
the "MouseMove" event to give the XY pointer position
and the "Loaded" event where the tricky part is. Here I pass the instance obj from Canvas to the controller through this EventTrigger, the in the controller I use this code:
Loaded and MouseMove commands definition:
public DelegateCommand<MouseEventArgs> MouseMove { get; private set; }
public DelegateCommand<RoutedEventArgs> Loaded { get; private set; }
Constructor:
public MainWindowViewModel()
{
MouseMove = new DelegateCommand<MouseEventArgs>(GetMousePosition);
Loaded = new DelegateCommand<RoutedEventArgs>(GetCanvas);
}
Properties definition:
private string _mouseX;
public string MouseX
{
get { return _mouseX; }
set { SetProperty(ref _mouseX, value); }
}
private string _mouseY;
public string MouseY
{
get { return _mouseY; }
set { SetProperty(ref _mouseY, value); }
}
private System.Windows.Controls.Canvas _canvas;
public System.Windows.Controls.Canvas Canvas
{
get { return _canvas; }
set { SetProperty(ref _canvas, value); }
}
Methods called by commands:
private void GetCanvas(RoutedEventArgs obj)
{
Canvas = (System.Windows.Controls.Canvas)obj.Source;
}
private void GetMousePosition(MouseEventArgs eventParam)
{
Point position = eventParam.GetPosition(Canvas);
MouseX = position.X.ToString();
MouseY = position.Y.ToString();
}
Is this way a correct usage? Even this working I feel like passing the Canvas obj to the controller I'm doing something like "code behind".
I'm using a converter to do the GetPosition. That gets passed the source and the event args, so you can get away without the LoadedCommand and you keep the MouseEventArgs out of your view model.
xaml:
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger EventName="MouseMove">
<i:InvokeCommandAction Command="{Binding MouseMoveCommand}" PassEventArgsToCommand="True" EventArgsConverter="{StaticResource GetPositionConverter}"/>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
view model:
public DelegateCommand<Point?> MouseMoveCommand { get; }
converter:
internal class GetPositionConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert( object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture )
{
var mouseEventArgs = (MouseEventArgs)value;
return mouseEventArgs.GetPosition( (IInputElement)mouseEventArgs.Source );
}
public object ConvertBack( object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture )
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
The converter should have at least minimal error handling, though, this is just an example :-)
I think you are violating MVVM.. because you are referencing UI-type (i.e. System.Windows.Controls.Canvas) in ViewModel.
I'd suggest an approach to keep the ViewModel clean and get whatever data needed from View..
First, Define an interface in ViewModel's namespace, everything ViewModel wants from View will be defined in this interface..
public interface IUiServices
{
(string mouseX, string mouseY) GetMouseCoordinates();
}
Next, Let your Window (or UserControl) that hosts the <Canvas/> implement this interface
public partial class TheWindow : IUiServices {
// ..
private string _mouseX;
private string _mouseY;
public (string mouseX, string mouseY) GetMouseCoordinates() => (_mouseX, _mouseY);
}
Now, Let the Canvas subscribe to MouseMove event
<Canvas MouseMove="Canvas_OnMouseMove"
And add the handler to set the mouse coords variables
private void MainWindow_OnMouseMove(object sender, MouseEventArgs e)
{
Point position = e.GetPosition(sender as Canvas);
_mouseX = position.X.ToString();
_mouseY = position.Y.ToString();
}
Finally, you can register IUiServices in Prism
protected override void RegisterTypes(IContainerRegistry containerRegistry)
{
// ...
containerRegistry.RegisterSingleton<IUiServices, TheView>();
// ...
}
And inject it in ViewModel's constructor
public TheViewModel(.. , IUiServices uiServices){
//..
}
Now, wherever you want to get the coordinates, just call uiServices.GetMouseCoordinates().
Note1: From now on, any service ViewModel wants from View, just define it in IUiServices interface, implement it in View and use it in ViewModel
Note2: you might not use want to pass the service to the ViewModel via Prism, then you could inject it via setter injection
private IUiServices UiServices {set; get;}
public SetUiService(IUiServices s){
UiServices = s;
}
And in TheView, you can do the injection (DataContext as TheViewModel)?.SetUiService(this);
Note3: you can remove all of these from your code: the DelegateCommands in your ViewModel and all the code snippets you've there + <i:Interaction.Triggers/> code-block in your .xaml.
I have been tasked with creating my first UWP App in C#.
The basic idea is to read in an XML file and create objects based on the data read in, then display the properties stored in the object to users in the IU.
Lets say a Person object that has a name, age, and height. I want to display the Person fields after I have read in the data but I can't get anything to show up in the UI after creating the Person object.
I have created a Person class that holds the name, age, height. I have another class that extends ObservableCollection<> and a ItemTemplate that looks for the observable class but currently nothing is showing up on the UI.
Has anyone been through a similar process or know of the correct documentation to read?
Thanks.
First of all in UWP you can choose between two types of binding:
{x:Bind }, is slightly faster at compile time, binds to your Framework Element code-behind class, but it is not as flexible as the other type of binding.
The default mode for this type of binding is OneTime, therefore you will only have your data actually propagated onto your UI, when you construct your object.
{Binding }, in this type of binding where you can only reference variables which exists inside the DataContext of a parent element. The default mode is OneWay.
With that in mind, first of all dealing with a ViewModel which is just a bunch of properties, is different from actually dealing with a Collection, since I don't think the Collection can actually detect alterations on the items itself, but rather on its structure.
Therefore during the Add/Remove process of items in your Collection, you have to actually subscribe/unsubscribe those items to the PropertyChanged EventHandler.
Nevertheless with the following code, i think you should be able to start visualizing updates onto your UI:
VIEWMODEL
public class PersonsObservable<T> : ObservableCollection<Person> where T : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private PersonsObservable<Person> _personslist;
public PersonsObservable<Person> personslist
{
get { return _personslist; }
set
{
_personslist = value;
_personslist.CollectionChanged += OnObservableCollectionChanged;
}
}
public void OnObservableCollectionChanged(object sender, NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
if(e.NewItems != null)
{
foreach (object item in e.NewItems)
((INotifyPropertyChanged)item).PropertyChanged += OnItemPropertyChanged;
}
if(e.OldItems != null)
{
foreach (object item in e.OldItems)
((INotifyPropertyChanged)item).PropertyChanged -= OnItemPropertyChanged;
}
}
public void OnItemPropertyChanged(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs args = new NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs(NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Replace, sender, sender, IndexOf((Person)sender));
OnCollectionChanged(args);
}
}
public class Person : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public Person()
{
_name = "Walter White";
_age = 40;
_height = 180;
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged = delegate { };
private string _name;
public string name
{
get
{
return _name;
}
set
{
_name = value;
this.OnPropertyChanged();
}
}
private int _age;
public int age
{
get
{
return _age;
}
set
{
_age = value;
this.OnPropertyChanged();
}
}
private int _height;
public int height
{
get
{
return _height;
}
set
{
_height = value;
this.OnPropertyChanged();
}
}
public void OnPropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] string propertyName = null)
{
this.PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
private void Button_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
// Add Items
PersonsList.Add(new Person());
}
}
XAML
<Grid HorizontalAlignment="Center" VerticalAlignment="Center">
<StackPanel Orientation="Vertical">
<TextBlock Text="DataBinding" Foreground="DarkBlue" FontSize="18" FontWeight="Bold"/>
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding Mode=TwoWay}">
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel Orientation="Vertical">
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<TextBlock Text="Name: "/>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding name, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
</StackPanel>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<TextBlock Text="Age: "/>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding age, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
</StackPanel>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<TextBlock Text="Height: "/>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding height, Mode=TwoWay}"/>
</StackPanel>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
<Button Content="Add Items" Click="Button_Click" Background="Blue" VerticalAlignment="Bottom"/>
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
*Test adding items *
private void Button_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
// Add Items
PersonsList.Add(new Person());
}
Expose your property and set it to the DataContext of your page (with x:Bind you wouldn't need to do this, but instead you would have to perform a cast for your code to actually compile).
public MainPage()
{
InitializeComponent();
PersonsList = new PersonsObservable<Person>();
this.DataContext = PersonsList;
PersonsList.Add(new Person());
PersonsList.Add(new Person());
}
PersonsObservable<Person> PersonsList { get; set; }
I haven't tested for the situation where one of the items is altered, but you can easily do that, by adding another button (and click event) and actually test if changing one of the items's properties update in your UI.
Anything else, feel free to ask, will be glad to help!
I need both operating by mouse clicking and operating by hotkeys in my WPF application. User's actions affects on both data and appearance of application controls.
For example, the following app will send data to tea machine. You can select the tea brand, type (hot or cold) and optional ingredients: milk, lemon and syrup.
Not good from the point of view of UI design, but just example:
If to click the dropdown menu or input Ctrl+B, the list of select options will appear.
If to click the "Hot" button on input Ctrl+T, button becomes blue and text becomes "Cold". If to click or input Ctrl+T again, button becomes orange and text becomes to "Hot" again.
If to click optional ingredient button or input respective shortcut, button's background and text becomes gray (it means "unselected"). Same action will return the respective button to active state.
If don't use MVVM and don't define shortcuts, the logic will be relatively simple:
Tea tea = new Tea(); // Assume that default settings avalible
private void ToggleTeaType(object sender, EventArgs e){
// Change Data
if(tea.getType().Equals("Hot")){
tea.setType("Cold");
}
else{
tea.setType("Hot");
}
// Change Button Appearence
ChangeTeaTypeButtonAppearence(sender, e);
}
private void ChangeTeaTypeButtonAppearence(object sender, EventArgs e){
Button clickedButton = sender as Button;
Style hotTeaButtonStyle = this.FindResource("TeaTypeButtonHot") as Style;
Style coldTeaButtonStyle = this.FindResource("TeaTypeButtonCold") as Style;
if (clickedButton.Tag.Equals("Hot")) {
clickedButton.Style = coldTeaButtonStyle; // includes Tag declaration
clickedButton.Content = "Cold";
}
else (clickedButton.Tag.Equals("Cold")) {
clickedButton.Style = hotTeaButtonStyle; // includes Tag declaration
clickedButton.Content = "Hot";
}
}
// similarly for ingredients toggles
XAML:
<Button Content="Hot"
Tag="Hot"
Click="ToggleTeaType"
Style="{StaticResource TeaTypeButtonHot}"/>
<Button Content="Milk"
Tag="True"
Click="ToggleMilk"
Style="{StaticResource IngredientButtonTrue}"/>
<Button Content="Lemon"
Tag="True"
Click="ToggleLemon"
Style="{StaticResource IngredientButtonTrue}"/>
<Button Content="Syrup"
Tag="True"
Click="ToggleSyrup"
Style="{StaticResource IngredientButtonTrue}"/>
I changed my similar WPF project to MVVM because thanks to commands it's simple to assign the shortcuts:
<Window.InputBindings>
<KeyBinding Gesture="Ctrl+T" Command="{Binding ToggleTeaType}" />
</Window.InputBindings>
However, now it's a problem how to set the control's appearance. The following code is invalid:
private RelayCommand toggleTeaType;
public RelayCommand ToggleTeaType {
// change data by MVVM methods...
// change appearence:
ChangeTeaTypeButtonAppearence(object sender, EventArgs e);
}
I need the Relay Commands because I can bind it to both buttons and shortcuts, but how I can access to View controls from RelayCommand?
You should keep the viewmodel clean of view specific behavior. The viewmodel should just provide an interface for all relevant settings, it could look similar to the following (BaseViewModel would contain some helper methods to implement INotifyPropertyChanged etc.):
public class TeaConfigurationViewModel : BaseViewModel
{
public TeaConfigurationViewModel()
{
_TeaNames = new string[]
{
"Lipton",
"Generic",
"Misc",
};
}
private IEnumerable<string> _TeaNames;
public IEnumerable<string> TeaNames
{
get { return _TeaNames; }
}
private string _SelectedTea;
public string SelectedTea
{
get { return _SelectedTea; }
set { SetProperty(ref _SelectedTea, value); }
}
private bool _IsHotTea;
public bool IsHotTea
{
get { return _IsHotTea; }
set { SetProperty(ref _IsHotTea, value); }
}
private bool _WithMilk;
public bool WithMilk
{
get { return _WithMilk; }
set { SetProperty(ref _WithMilk, value); }
}
private bool _WithLemon;
public bool WithLemon
{
get { return _WithLemon; }
set { SetProperty(ref _WithLemon, value); }
}
private bool _WithSyrup;
public bool WithSyrup
{
get { return _WithSyrup; }
set { SetProperty(ref _WithSyrup, value); }
}
}
As you see, there is a property for each setting, but the viewmodel doesn't care about how the property is assigned.
So lets build some UI. For the following example, generally suppose xmlns:local points to your project namespace.
I suggest utilizing a customized ToggleButton for your purpose:
public class MyToggleButton : ToggleButton
{
static MyToggleButton()
{
MyToggleButton.DefaultStyleKeyProperty.OverrideMetadata(typeof(MyToggleButton), new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(typeof(MyToggleButton)));
}
public Brush ToggledBackground
{
get { return (Brush)GetValue(ToggledBackgroundProperty); }
set { SetValue(ToggledBackgroundProperty, value); }
}
// Using a DependencyProperty as the backing store for ToggledBackground. This enables animation, styling, binding, etc...
public static readonly DependencyProperty ToggledBackgroundProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("ToggledBackground", typeof(Brush), typeof(MyToggleButton), new FrameworkPropertyMetadata());
}
And in Themes/Generic.xaml:
<Style TargetType="{x:Type local:MyToggleButton}" BasedOn="{StaticResource {x:Type ToggleButton}}">
<Setter Property="Template">
<Setter.Value>
<ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type local:MyToggleButton}">
<Border x:Name="border1" BorderBrush="Gray" BorderThickness="1" Background="{TemplateBinding Background}" Padding="5">
<ContentPresenter HorizontalAlignment="{TemplateBinding HorizontalContentAlignment}" VerticalAlignment="{TemplateBinding VerticalContentAlignment}"/>
</Border>
<ControlTemplate.Triggers>
<Trigger Property="IsChecked" Value="True">
<Setter TargetName="border1" Property="Background" Value="{Binding ToggledBackground,RelativeSource={RelativeSource TemplatedParent}}"/>
</Trigger>
</ControlTemplate.Triggers>
</ControlTemplate>
</Setter.Value>
</Setter>
</Style>
Now, build the actual window content using this toggle button. This is just a rough sketch of your desired UI, containing only the functional controls without labels and explanation:
<Grid x:Name="grid1">
<StackPanel>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<ComboBox
x:Name="cb1"
VerticalAlignment="Center"
IsEditable="True"
Margin="20"
MinWidth="200"
ItemsSource="{Binding TeaNames}"
SelectedItem="{Binding SelectedTea}">
</ComboBox>
<local:MyToggleButton
x:Name="hotToggle"
IsChecked="{Binding IsHotTea}"
VerticalAlignment="Center"
Margin="20" MinWidth="60"
Background="AliceBlue" ToggledBackground="Orange">
<local:MyToggleButton.Style>
<Style TargetType="{x:Type local:MyToggleButton}">
<Setter Property="Content" Value="Cold"/>
<Style.Triggers>
<Trigger Property="IsChecked" Value="True">
<Setter Property="Content" Value="Hot"/>
</Trigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
</local:MyToggleButton.Style>
</local:MyToggleButton>
</StackPanel>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<local:MyToggleButton
x:Name="milkToggle"
Content="Milk"
IsChecked="{Binding WithMilk}"
VerticalAlignment="Center"
Margin="20" MinWidth="60"
Background="WhiteSmoke" ToggledBackground="LightGreen"/>
<local:MyToggleButton
x:Name="lemonToggle"
Content="Lemon"
IsChecked="{Binding WithLemon}"
VerticalAlignment="Center"
Margin="20" MinWidth="60"
Background="WhiteSmoke" ToggledBackground="LightGreen"/>
<local:MyToggleButton
x:Name="syrupToggle"
Content="Syrup"
IsChecked="{Binding WithSyrup}"
VerticalAlignment="Center"
Margin="20" MinWidth="60"
Background="WhiteSmoke" ToggledBackground="LightGreen"/>
</StackPanel>
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
Notice the style trigger to change the button content between Hot and Cold.
Initialize the datacontext somewhere (eg. in the window constructor)
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
grid1.DataContext = new TeaConfigurationViewModel();
}
At this point, you have a fully functional UI, it will work with the default mouse and keyboard input methods, but it won't yet support your shortcut keys.
So lets add the keyboard shortcuts without destroying the already-working UI. One approach is, to create and use some custom commands:
public static class AutomationCommands
{
public static RoutedCommand OpenList = new RoutedCommand("OpenList", typeof(AutomationCommands), new InputGestureCollection()
{
new KeyGesture(Key.B, ModifierKeys.Control)
});
public static RoutedCommand ToggleHot = new RoutedCommand("ToggleHot", typeof(AutomationCommands), new InputGestureCollection()
{
new KeyGesture(Key.T, ModifierKeys.Control)
});
public static RoutedCommand ToggleMilk = new RoutedCommand("ToggleMilk", typeof(AutomationCommands), new InputGestureCollection()
{
new KeyGesture(Key.M, ModifierKeys.Control)
});
public static RoutedCommand ToggleLemon = new RoutedCommand("ToggleLemon", typeof(AutomationCommands), new InputGestureCollection()
{
new KeyGesture(Key.L, ModifierKeys.Control)
});
public static RoutedCommand ToggleSyrup = new RoutedCommand("ToggleSyrup", typeof(AutomationCommands), new InputGestureCollection()
{
new KeyGesture(Key.S, ModifierKeys.Control)
});
}
You can then bind those commands to appropriate actions in your main window:
<Window.CommandBindings>
<CommandBinding Command="local:AutomationCommands.OpenList" Executed="OpenList_Executed"/>
<CommandBinding Command="local:AutomationCommands.ToggleHot" Executed="ToggleHot_Executed"/>
<CommandBinding Command="local:AutomationCommands.ToggleMilk" Executed="ToggleMilk_Executed"/>
<CommandBinding Command="local:AutomationCommands.ToggleLemon" Executed="ToggleLemon_Executed"/>
<CommandBinding Command="local:AutomationCommands.ToggleSyrup" Executed="ToggleSyrup_Executed"/>
</Window.CommandBindings>
and implement the appropriate handler method for each shortcut in the window code behind:
private void OpenList_Executed(object sender, ExecutedRoutedEventArgs e)
{
FocusManager.SetFocusedElement(cb1, cb1);
cb1.IsDropDownOpen = true;
}
private void ToggleHot_Executed(object sender, ExecutedRoutedEventArgs e)
{
hotToggle.IsChecked = !hotToggle.IsChecked;
}
private void ToggleMilk_Executed(object sender, ExecutedRoutedEventArgs e)
{
milkToggle.IsChecked = !milkToggle.IsChecked;
}
private void ToggleLemon_Executed(object sender, ExecutedRoutedEventArgs e)
{
lemonToggle.IsChecked = !lemonToggle.IsChecked;
}
private void ToggleSyrup_Executed(object sender, ExecutedRoutedEventArgs e)
{
syrupToggle.IsChecked = !syrupToggle.IsChecked;
}
Again, remember this whole input binding thing is purely UI related, it is just an alternative way to change the displayed properties and the changes will be transferred to the viewmodel with the same binding as if the user clicks the button by mouse. There is no reason to carry such things into the viewmodel.
how I can access to View controls from RelayCommand?
You shouldn't. The whole point of MVVM (arguably) is to separate concerns. The 'state' that the ViewModel contains is rendered by the View (controls). The ViewModel/logic should never directly adjust the view - as this breaks the separation of concerns and closely couples the logic to the rendering.
What you need is for the view to render how it wants to display the state in the View Model.
Typically, this is done by bindings. As example: Rather than the ViewModel grabbing a text box reference and setting the string: myTextBox.SetText("some value"), we have the view bind to the property MyText in the view model.
It's the view's responsibility to decide how to show things on the screen.
That's all well and good, but how? I suggest, if you want to do this change using styles like you describe, I'd try using a converter that converts the using a binding to ViewModel state (Say, an enum property Hot or Cold):
<Button Content="Hot"
Tag="Hot"
Click="ToggleTeaType"
Style="{Binding TeaType, Converter={StaticResource TeaTypeButtonStyleConverter}}"/>
Note, we're using WPF's bindings. The only reference we've got tot he view model is through it's property TeaType.
Defined in your static resources, we have the converter:
<ResourceDictionary>
<Style x:Key="HotTeaStyle"/>
<Style x:Key="ColdTeaStyle"/>
<local:TeaTypeButtonStyleConverter
x:Key="TeaTypeButtonStyleConverter"
HotStateStyle="{StaticResource HotTeaStyle}"
ColdStateStyle="{StaticResource ColdTeaStyle}"/>
</ResourceDictionary>
And have the logic for converting from the TeaType enum to a Style in this:
public enum TeaType
{
Hot, Cold
}
class TeaTypeButtonStyleConverter : IValueConverter
{
public Style HotStateStyle { get; set; }
public Style ColdStateStyle { get; set; }
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
TeaType teaType = (TeaType)value;
if (teaType == TeaType.Hot)
{
return HotStateStyle;
}
else if (teaType == TeaType.Cold)
{
return ColdStateStyle;
}
return null;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
It could be made more generic and re-usable.
You should also take a look at toggle buttons, they deal with this kind of thing internally.
I have UserControl with ItemsControl binded to ObservableCollection. DataTemplate in this ItemsControl is a Grid containing TextBox and Button.
Here is some code (Updated):
<UserControl.Resources>
<entities:SeparatingCard x:Key="IdDataSource"/>
</UserControl.Resources>
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding Cards}">
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Grid>
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition/>
<ColumnDefinition/>
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition/>
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<TextBox Text="{Binding Id, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}" GotFocus="TextBox_GotFocus" Grid.Row="0" Grid.Column="0"/>
<Button DataContext="{Binding Source={StaticResource IdDataSource}}" Command="{Binding Accept}" Grid.Row="0" Grid.Column="1">Accept</Button>
</Grid>
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
In model file:
public ObservableCollection<SeparatingCard> Cards { get; set; }
Card class:
class SeparatingCard : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private string _id;
public string Id
{
get { return _id; }
set
{
_id = value;
OnPropertyChanged("Id");
}
}
public ActionCommand Accept { get; }
public SeparatingCard()
{
Accept = new ActionCommand(AcceptCommandExecute);
}
private void AcceptCommandExecute(object obj)
{
MessageBox.Show(Id);
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
protected virtual void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
Cards are added in runtime and I dynamically get a new textbox-button pair in my UserControl. Now in each pair I need to do the folowing things:
- Be able to check if the text in textbox is correct and disable/enable apropriate button.
- On button click get the text from apropriate textbox and process it.
I'd like all of this done via MVVM. But I only came to solution that directly have access to UI and implements only the second task:
private void Button_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
var text = (((sender as Button).Parent as Grid).Children
.Cast<UIElement>()
.First(x => Grid.GetRow(x) == 0 && Grid.GetColumn(x) == 0) as TextBox).Text;
MessageBox.Show(text);
}
Update
As was suggested I tried to move ICommand logic to SeparatingCard class. Now it's always return null and I can't check what object of SeparatingCard class my command refers to. Updates are in the code above.
Instead of using Button.Click, Use Button.Command, which you can bind to some command in SeparatingCard.
Please have a look in this tutorial:
http://www.codeproject.com/Tips/813345/Basic-MVVM-and-ICommand-Usage-Example
Then, SeparatingCard ViewModel will contain an ICommand object which you can bind to Button.Command.
So if the user clicks the button, the event will be directed to the corresponding SeparatingCard object's command.
I want to create XAML chat interface that will display messages differently depending on it's neighbours. Here's an example:
I think ListBox control is most suitable for this. I'm also thinking about different controls such as FlowDocumentReader but I've never used them. Also I need to mention that message's text should be selectable (across multiple messages) and I don't know how to achieve this with ListBox.
Update: The main point there is that if one side (viking in this case) send some messages in a row, the interface should concatenate those (use slim message header instead of full one). So, the look of message with header depends on whether previous message was sent by the same person.
If you were just interested in the formatting of the Headers (full or small) then a ListBox/ListView/ItemsControl with PreviousData in the RelativeSource binding is the way to go (as pointed out by anivas).
But since you added that you wanted to support for selection across multiple messages then this pretty much rules out ItemsControl and the classes that derives from it as far as I know. You'll have to use something like a FlowDocument instead.
Unfortunately FlowDocument doesn't have the ItemsSource property. There are examples of workarounds for this, like Create Flexible UIs With Flow Documents And Data Binding but this implementation pretty much makes my VS2010 crash (I didn't investigate the reason for this, might be an easy fix).
Here is how I would do it
First you design the Blocks of the FlowDocument in the designer and when you're satisfied you move them to a resource where you set x:Shared="False". This will enable you to create multiple instances of the resource instead of using the same one over and over. Then you use an ObservableCollection as the "source" for the FlowDocument and subscribe to the CollectionChanged event, and in the eventhandler you get a new instance of the resource, check if you want the full or small header, and then add the blocks to the FlowDocument. You could also add logic for Remove etc.
Example implementation
<!-- xmlns:Collections="clr-namespace:System.Collections;assembly=mscorlib" -->
<Window.Resources>
<Collections:ArrayList x:Key="blocksTemplate" x:Shared="False">
<!-- Full Header -->
<Paragraph Name="fullHeader" Margin="5" BorderBrush="LightGray" BorderThickness="1" TextAlignment="Right">
<Figure HorizontalAnchor="ColumnLeft" BaselineAlignment="Center" Padding="0" Margin="0">
<Paragraph>
<Run Text="{Binding Sender}"/>
</Paragraph>
</Figure>
<Run Text="{Binding TimeSent, StringFormat={}{0:HH:mm:ss}}"/>
</Paragraph>
<!-- Small Header -->
<Paragraph Name="smallHeader" Margin="5" TextAlignment="Right">
<Run Text="{Binding TimeSent, StringFormat={}{0:HH:mm:ss}}"/>
</Paragraph>
<!-- Message -->
<Paragraph Margin="5">
<Run Text="{Binding Message}"/>
</Paragraph>
</Collections:ArrayList>
</Window.Resources>
<Grid>
<FlowDocumentScrollViewer>
<FlowDocument Name="flowDocument"
FontSize="14" FontFamily="Georgia"/>
</FlowDocumentScrollViewer>
</Grid>
And the code behind could be along the following lines
public ObservableCollection<ChatMessage> ChatMessages
{
get;
set;
}
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
ChatMessages = new ObservableCollection<ChatMessage>();
ChatMessages.CollectionChanged += ChatMessages_CollectionChanged;
}
void ChatMessages_CollectionChanged(object sender, NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
ArrayList itemTemplate = flowDocument.TryFindResource("blocksTemplate") as ArrayList;
if (e.Action == NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Add)
{
foreach (ChatMessage chatMessage in e.NewItems)
{
foreach (Block block in itemTemplate)
{
bool addBlock = true;
int index = ChatMessages.IndexOf(chatMessage);
if (block.Name == "fullHeader" &&
(index > 0 && ChatMessages[index].Sender == ChatMessages[index - 1].Sender))
{
addBlock = false;
}
else if (block.Name == "smallHeader" &&
(index == 0 || ChatMessages[index].Sender != ChatMessages[index - 1].Sender))
{
addBlock = false;
}
if (addBlock == true)
{
block.DataContext = chatMessage;
flowDocument.Blocks.Add(block);
}
}
}
}
}
And in my sample, ChatMessage is just
public class ChatMessage
{
public string Sender
{
get;
set;
}
public string Message
{
get;
set;
}
public DateTime TimeSent
{
get;
set;
}
}
This will enable you to select text however you like in the messages
If you're using MVVM you can create an attached behavior instead of the code behind, I made a sample implementation of a similar scenario here: Binding a list in a FlowDocument to List<MyClass>?
Also, the MSDN page for FlowDocument is very helpful: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa970909.aspx
Assuming your ItemTemplate is a StackPanel of TextBlock header and TextBlock message you can use a MultiBinding Visibility Converter to hide the header as:
<TextBlock Text="{Binding UserName}">
<TextBlock.Visibility>
<MultiBinding Converter="{StaticResource headerVisibilityConverter}">
<Binding RelativeSource="{RelativeSource PreviousData}"/>
<Binding/>
</MultiBinding>
</TextBlock.Visibility>
</TextBlock>
And the IMultiValueConverter logic goes something like:
public object Convert(object[] values, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
var previousMessage = values[0] as MessageItem;
var currentMessage = values[1] as MessageItem;
if ((previousMessage != null) && (currentMessage != null))
{
return previousMessage.UserName.Equals(currentMessage.UserName) ? Visibility.Hidden : Visibility.Visible;
}
return Visibility.Visible;
}
Try to give a hint pseudocode like:
public abstract class Message {/*Implementation*/
public enum MessageTypeEnum {Client, Viking, None};
public abstract MessageTypeEnum MessageType {get;}
}
public class ClientMessage : Message {
/*Client message concrete implementation.*/
public override MessageTypeEnum MessageType
{
get {
return MessageTypeEnum.Client;
}
}
}
public class VikingMessage : Message
{
/ *Viking message concrete implementation*/
public override MessageTypeEnum MessageType
{
get {
return MessageTypeEnum.Viking;
}
}
}
After this in yor bindind code in XAML on binding control use XAML attribute Converter
Where you can assign a class reference which implements IValueConverter. Here are the links
Resource on web:
Converter
There you can converts the type between your UI/ModelView.
Hope this helps.
I don't think you can do this purely through XAML, you're going to need to have code written somewhere to determine the relationship between each message, i.e., is the the author of message n - 1 the same as n?
I wrote a very quick example that resulted in the desired output. My example and the resulting code snippets are in no way production level code, but it should at least point you in the right direction.
To start, I first created a very simple object to represent the messages:
public class ChatMessage
{
public String Username { get; set; }
public String Message { get; set; }
public DateTime TimeStamp { get; set; }
public Boolean IsConcatenated { get; set; }
}
Next I derived a collection from ObservableCollection to handle determining relationships between each message as they're added:
public class ChatMessageCollection : ObservableCollection<ChatMessage>
{
protected override void InsertItem(int index, ChatMessage item)
{
if (index > 0)
item.IsConcatenated = (this[index - 1].Username == item.Username);
base.InsertItem(index, item);
}
}
This collection can now be exposed by your ViewModel and bound to the ListBox in your view.
There are many ways to display templated items in XAML. Based on your example interface, the only aspect of each item changing is the header so I figured it made the most sent to have each ListBoxItem display a HeaderedContentControl that would show the correct header based on the IsConcatenated value:
<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding Path=Messages}" HorizontalContentAlignment="Stretch">
<ListBox.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type m:ChatMessage}">
<HeaderedContentControl Header="{Binding}">
<HeaderedContentControl.HeaderTemplateSelector>
<m:ChatHeaderTemplateSelector />
</HeaderedContentControl.HeaderTemplateSelector>
<Label Content="{Binding Path=Message}" />
</HeaderedContentControl>
</DataTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemTemplate>
</ListBox>
You'll notice that I am specifying a HeaderTemplateSelector which is responsible for choosing between one of two header templates:
public sealed class ChatHeaderTemplateSelector : DataTemplateSelector
{
public override DataTemplate SelectTemplate(object item, DependencyObject container)
{
var chatItem = item as ChatMessage;
if (chatItem.IsConcatenated)
return ((FrameworkElement)container).FindResource("CompactHeader") as DataTemplate;
return ((FrameworkElement)container).FindResource("FullHeader") as DataTemplate;
}
}
And finally, here are the two header templates which are defined as resources of the view:
<DataTemplate x:Key="FullHeader">
<Border
Background="Lavender"
BorderBrush="Purple"
BorderThickness="1"
CornerRadius="4"
Padding="2"
>
<DockPanel>
<TextBlock DockPanel.Dock="Left" Text="{Binding Path=Username}" />
<TextBlock DockPanel.Dock="Right" HorizontalAlignment="Right" Text="{Binding Path=TimeStamp, StringFormat='{}{0:HH:mm:ss}'}" />
</DockPanel>
</Border>
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate x:Key="CompactHeader">
<Border
Background="Lavender"
BorderBrush="Purple"
BorderThickness="1"
CornerRadius="4"
HorizontalAlignment="Right"
Padding="2"
>
<DockPanel>
<TextBlock DockPanel.Dock="Right" HorizontalAlignment="Right" Text="{Binding Path=TimeStamp, StringFormat='{}{0:HH:mm:ss}'}" />
</DockPanel>
</Border>
</DataTemplate>
Again, this example is not perfect and is probably just one of many that works, but at least it should point you in the right direction.