I have a TabControl that I want to have 2 data bindings. One is to have a TabItem for each item in a list and another single TabItem that is a Summary and uses an ItemsControl to show a template of controls for each item in another list.
I can set a TabControl to either one of these two types of data binding but not both of them at the same time. How could I get a TabControl to do both?
Could I somehow add an extra TabItem to the TabControl that has ItemSource, Binding set? Then I could load the new extra TabItem with XAML.
Expose a Combined Collection
You can expose a collection in your view model that combines both the collection and the addtional item like below (if you do not modify the collection, you can also use any other enumerable type).
public class MyViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public MyViewModel()
{
var myTabItemCollection = // ...get the items collection.
var mySummaryTabItem = // ...get the summary item.
TabItems = new ObservableCollection<string>(myTabItemCollection)
{
mySummaryTabItem
};
}
public ObservableCollection<MyTabItemViewModel> TabItems { get; }
// ...other properties, methods, ...
}
Using a Composite Collection
There is a dedicated CompositeCollection type for combining one or multiple collections and single items in XAML. However, this type has severe shortcommings in terms of data-binding. It does neither derive from FrameworkElement, nor is it a Freezable, which makes it very difficult, cumbersome and error-prone to work with. I will present one solution with this type for the sake of completeness. Let's assume this view model:
public class MyViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public ObservableCollection<MyTabItemViewModel> TabItems { get; }
public MyTabItemViewModel Summary { get; }
// ...other properties, methods, ...
}
In theory this would be easy if CompositeCollection would be to data-bindable (this does not work):
<TabControl>
<TabControl.ItemsSource>
<CompositeCollection>
<CollectionContainer Collection="{Binding TabItems}" />
<TabItem DataContext="{Binding Summary}"
Header="{Binding}"
Content="{Binding}" />
</CompositeCollection>
</TabControl.ItemsSource>
</TabControl>
In order to make it work, your can apply various approaches like in these related questions:
How do you bind a CollectionContainer to a collection in a view model?
CompositeCollection + CollectionContainer: Bind CollectionContainer.Collection to property of ViewModel that is used as DataTemplates DataType
Binding to a single element inside a CompositeCollection
As an example, I will use a binding proxy type to enable binding inside CompositeCollection. It will bind to the DataContext of the TabControl and expose it with the Data property. Since the proxy is a resource, the CompositeCollection can refer to it as source for binding with StaticResource.
<TabControl x:Name="TabControl">
<TabControl.Resources>
<local:BindingProxy x:Key="TabControlBindingProxy" Data="{Binding}" />
</TabControl.Resources>
<TabControl.ItemsSource>
<CompositeCollection>
<CollectionContainer Collection="{Binding Data.TabItems, Source={StaticResource TabControlBindingProxy}}" />
<TabItem DataContext="{Binding Data.Summary, Source={StaticResource TabControlBindingProxy}}"
Header="{Binding}"
Content="{Binding}" />
</CompositeCollection>
</TabControl.ItemsSource>
</TabControl>
This will also work for multiple collections and single items, but be aware that this and the other approaches from the related questions - although they compile and run just fine - might crash the Visual Studio designer, which is unfortunate. Consequently, I recommend you to take the approach of exposing a combined collection, which is more reliable, easier to comprehend and simple.
Related
I do not have any code at the moment to share. Just a design question.
I have a class that defines a label, and an associated entry type, which I would like to bind to a ListBox. If the type is for example, "Postal Code", I need the ListBox to create the row as a TextBlock and a TextBox. For "Yes/no", I need it to know instead to create a TextBlock with a CheckBox beside it. There will likely be 7 or 8 of these different row types.
What is the best way to approach this?
Have a look at the ItemTemplateSelector Property. This property allows you to provide custom logic for choosing which template to use for each item in a collection.
First define your various templates in a resource dictionary...
<Application>
<Application.Resources>
<DataTemplate x:Key="TextBoxTemplate">
<!-- template here -->
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate x:Key="CheckBoxTemplate">
<!-- template here -->
</DataTemplate>
</Application.Resources>
</Application>
Then, create a custom DataTemplateSelector...
public class MyTemplateSelector : DataTemplateSelector
{
public override DataTemplate SelectTemplate(object item, DependencyObject container)
{
var myObj= item as MyObject;
if (myObj != null)
{
if (myObj.MyType is PostalCode)
{
return Application.Resources["TextBoxTemplate"] as DataTemplate;
}
if (myObj.MyType is YesNo)
{
return Application.Resources["CheckBoxTemplate"] as DataTemplate;
}
}
return null;
}
}
Then, its just a matter of using the ItemTemplateSelector property...
<Window>
<Window.Resources>
<local:MyTemplateSelector x:Key="tempSelector" />
</Window.Resources>
<ListBox ItemSource="{Binding items}" ItemTemplateSelector="{StaticResource tempSelector}" />
</Window>
You can use the DataTrigger class.
A DataTrigger allows you to set property values when the property value of the data object matches a specified Value.
Alternatively, you can use the DataTemplateSelector class.
Typically, you create a DataTemplateSelector when you have more than one DataTemplate for the same type of objects and you want to supply your own logic to choose a DataTemplate to apply based on the properties of each data object.
The best way to approach this would be to have a collection property containing all of the items that you want to see in your ListBox, bind that collection to a control that displays lists of items, and use different data templates to change the visuals used for each type of item.
For example, you might have a postal code type:
public class PostalCodeEntry
{
public string Value { get; set; } // Implement using standard INotifyPropertyChanged pattern
}
And a "Boolean" type:
public class BooleanEntry
{
public bool Value { get; set; } // Implement using standard INotifyPropertyChanged pattern
}
You said you wanted a label for each entry type, so a base class would be a good idea:
public abstract class EntryBase
{
public string Label { get; set; } // Implement using standard INotifyPropertyChanged pattern
}
Then BooleanEntry and PostalCodeEntry would derive from EntryBase.
That's the Models sorted. You just need a collection of these so that you can bind to them from the UI. Add an appropriate collection property to your Window or ViewModel:
public ObservableCollection<EntryBase> Entries { get; private set; }
In your UI (the View, implemented in XAML), use an instance of a control that knows how to bind to a list of items and visualize them. In WPF this would be an ItemsControl or a control that derives from it such as ListBox or ListView:
<ItemsControl ItemsSource="{Binding Entries}" />
You can see how we bind the ItemsSource property to our code-behind property named Entries. The ItemsControl (and its descendants) knows how to convert those items into a visual representation. By default, your custom object (EntryBase in our example) will be converted into a string and displayed as a text block. However, by using data templates you can control how the conversion from object to visual happens.
If you add a couple of data templates to the resources section like so:
<Window ... xmlns:my="clr-namespace:---your namespace here---">
<Window.Resources>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type my:PostalCodeEntry}">
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Label}" />
<TextBox Text="{Binding Value}" />
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type my:BooleanEntry}">
<CheckBox Content="{Binding Label}" IsChecked="{Binding Value}" />
</DataTemplate>
</Window.Resources>
Then add the <ItemsControl ... element after that, then you should see a TextBlock/TextBox combo for PostalCodeEntry types and a CheckBox for BooleanEntry types.
Hopefully if you can get this working it will give you an idea how you could extend it to cope with other model types and their matching data templates.
So I'm developing a Windows Phone 8 app with the Caliburn.Micro framework. I'm trying to create a grid where I, at runtime add/remove elements such as TextBlock's at runtime. I've tried a few things to bind my code to the x:Name but nothing has worked so far.
So one of the things i tried was having a placeholder grid in my xaml aka View:
<Grid x:Name="ContentPanel" Margin="0,97,0,0" Grid.RowSpan="2">
</Grid>
And then i my ViewModel i use the following to bind my ContentPanel Grid:
private Grid contentPanel;
public Grid ContentPanel
{
get
{
return contentPanel;
}
set
{
contentPanel = value;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => ContentPanel);
}
}
I then created a TextBlock to add to the grid:
TextBlock txt1 = new TextBlock();
txt1.Text = "2005 Products Shipped";
txt1.FontSize = 20;
txt1.FontWeight = FontWeights.Bold;
Grid.SetRow(txt1, 1);
And finally i added the TextBlock to my Grid:
ContentPanel.Children.Add(txt1);
When i run this code ContentPanel turn out to be equals null, why is that? Shouldn't Caliburn auto bind ContentPanel x:Name="ContentPanel" with the property ContentPanel?
I would appreciate your help in this matter.
My core problem, that i need solved is this:
I got a login page in my app where i show some pictures and text loaded from a server. As you can see below this is done with Image and a TextBlock When that server is offline or the wi-fi simply aren't enabled i want to replace this picture+text with a static image. Aka i want to remove the TextBlock from the StackPanel.
The part where i load and show the stuff form my server works great and looks like this in my xaml:
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" Background="White" DataContext="{Binding FeedItemsAnnounce,Mode=TwoWay}" >
<Image delay:LowProfileImageLoader.UriSource="{Binding ImagePath,Mode=TwoWay}" Margin="5" Width="170" Height="138">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger
EventName="Tap">
<cm:ActionMessage
MethodName="LoadAnnouncement">
<cm:Parameter Value="{Binding Link}"></cm:Parameter>
</cm:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</Image>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Title}" TextWrapping="Wrap" Width="160" Foreground="Black" FontSize="24" VerticalAlignment="Center" Margin="25,0,0,0"></TextBlock>
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger
EventName="Tap">
<cm:ActionMessage
MethodName="LoadAnnouncement">
<cm:Parameter Value="{Binding Link}"></cm:Parameter>
</cm:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
So when the server is offline/wifi disabled i want to replace that with. so that the TextBlock is no longer there:
<Image delay:LowProfileImageLoader.UriSource="{Binding ImagePath,Mode=TwoWay}" DataContext="{Binding FeedItemsAdvertisement,Mode=TwoWay}" Margin="0,20,0,39" Width="380" Height="128">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger
EventName="Tap">
<cm:ActionMessage
MethodName="LoadAdvertisement" >
<cm:Parameter Value="{Binding Link}"></cm:Parameter>
</cm:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
Is this even possible? If not what would the best semi-solution be?
EDIT 1: I've managed to setup the flow following the instructions from the accepted answer. But my BooleanToVisibilityConverter is not called, though my NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => IsConnectionAvailable); is getting called.
My Property:
private bool _isConnectionAvailable;
public bool IsConnectionAvailable
{
get { return _isConnectionAvailable; }
set
{
if (_isConnectionAvailable != value)
{
_isConnectionAvailable = value;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => IsConnectionAvailable);
}
}
}
How i change the bool: This code is called in my constructor for my ViewModel(just as a test to see if it was working):
IsConnectionAvailable = false;
TextBlock (without trigger code cause its the same as previous):
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Title}" Visibility="{Binding IsConnectionAvailable, Converter={StaticResource BoolToVisibility}}" TextWrapping="Wrap" Width="160" Foreground="Black" FontSize="24" VerticalAlignment="Center" Margin="25,0,0,0"></TextBlock>
It's like the Binding IsConnectionAvailable isn't working because i can change the name IsConnectionAvailable in my Xaml to anything and my NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => IsConnectionAvailable); will still be called.
Any ideas?
I can't even do a normal bind Visibility="{Binding Path=IsVisibil,Mode=TwoWay} to a public Visibility IsVisibil property. I've done this in other classes, but even this won't work??
EDIT 2: The problem that course the binding not to work, seems to lie somewhere in this code:
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" Background="White" DataContext="{Binding FeedItemsAnnounce,Mode=TwoWay}" >
<Image delay:LowProfileImageLoader.UriSource="{Binding ImagePath,Mode=TwoWay}" Margin="5" Width="170" Height="138">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger
EventName="Tap">
<cm:ActionMessage
MethodName="LoadAnnouncement">
<cm:Parameter Value="{Binding Link}"></cm:Parameter>
</cm:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</Image>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Title}" Visibility="{Binding Path=IsVisibil,Mode=TwoWay}" TextWrapping="Wrap" Width="160" Foreground="Black" FontSize="24" VerticalAlignment="Center" Margin="25,0,0,0"></TextBlock>
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger
EventName="Tap">
<cm:ActionMessage
MethodName="LoadAnnouncement">
<cm:Parameter Value="{Binding Link}"></cm:Parameter>
</cm:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</StackPanel>
Solution to EDIT 1 and 2: I created an x:Name"Root" at the top of my xaml structure. Then changed the binding to:
ElementName=Root, Path=DataContext.IsVisibil
This is needed because the binding to visibility that I'm trying to set is inside another DataContxt.
This isn't the correct way to use CM, there are a number of areas where you are confusing the model and viewmodel and the binding functionality in CM.
What you are doing currently
You are attempting to have the CM framework look for a property called ContentPanel on your ViewModel and automatically figure out what properties on Grid to bind it to...
This won't work because of a few reasons:
I don't think there is a convention for Grid in CM - it's not really bindable in an obvious way (it's a layout container)
Grid is not a data enabled control - it doesn't know how to consume a collection and display dynamic rows out the box (it's a layout container)
What you are doing doesn't really make any sense (you have an instance of a grid in your UserControl and you have also instantiated a grid in your ViewModel - these are two separate instances of a control - you can't 'bind' them together - that's not how it all works)
CM and Bindings
When you using element name bindings e.g. x:Name with CM, it attempts to find a property on the ViewModel which matches the element name. At this point, depending on the conventions setup for the source control in question, CM will attempt to automagically wire up all the bits and pieces.
There are default conventions contained in ConventionManager which determine which properties to bind when you use element name bindings - e.g. for TextBlock, the Text property on the TextBlock is bound to the target property on the ViewModel.
http://caliburnmicro.codeplex.com/SourceControl/latest#src/Caliburn.Micro.Platform/ConventionManager.cs - look at the class constructor on ConventionManager to see the out of the box conventions - there isn't one for Grid
Once a target property is found, CM will bind it up.
(As an aside: it's worth noting that if the control type is a ContentControl CM will do some composition magic so you can have viewmodels that contain other viewmodels and have a composition all bound up at runtime - great for screens which have multiple sub-windows etc)
The problem you have is that there is no convention setup for Grid out of the box - this is most likely because a Grid in SL/WPF is primarily used for layout, and is not really a 'data container' or data aware in any way (apart from the few dependency properties you can bind to) - i.e. I don't think it's possible to bind to a grid and get a dynamic number of columns/rows without some customisation to the control, hence the omission of any conventions
(think about it - if you are binding a grid to a collection, what should the grid do... add rows or columns? It can't really be supported in a sensible way)
Now bringing it back to SL/WPF for a sec:
Usually if you want a variable list of items you will need to bind to the ItemsSource property of a control which inherits from ItemsControl (or ItemsControl itself).
Many controls do this: if they need to display a dynamic number of items they will usually inherit from ItemsControl.
How does this tie in with CM?
Caliburn Micro knows how to bind up ItemsControl out of the box. This means you can have a property on your ViewModel containing a collection of items and after binding you get a dynamic view of these at runtime
For example - a CM bound ItemsControl might look like this:
<ItemsControl x:Name="TextItems">
<!-- host the items generated by this ItemsControl in a grid -->
<ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<Grid/>
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<!-- render each bound item using a TextBlock-->
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding SomeTextualProperty}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
Now you just need a collection of objects to bind this to - each item in the collection becomes a new item in the control with its DataContext pointing to the bound item. I've made the assumption that you would want each item to be a ViewModel which contained the property SomeTextualProperty - I've defined that here...
// Provides a viewmodel for a textual item
public class TextItemViewModel
{
public string SomeTextualProperty { get; set;}
}
The VM that should contain the list of items would need to have a collection to bind against.
(Note: Since you are adding items to it at runtime you need to tell the UI when the collection changes - ObservableCollection gives you this for free as it implements collection changed notification events)
// This is the viewmodel that contains the list of text items
public class ScreenViewModel
{
public ObservableCollection<TextItemViewModel> TextItems { get; set; }
}
What else I would consider the incorrect approach
Your ViewModels shouldn't know about your View implementation i.e. they shouldn't reference any type of controls unless absolutely necessary (I can't think of a time when I had to put a control in a VM). ViewModels should model the view - but they shouldn't really need to know any specifics about what that view contains - this way they are more easily testable and they are easily reused
If you follow the above approach, you can get away with providing an application which re-uses the set of viewmodels, but provides different views for each. You can try this by replacing ItemsControl with another type of control in the view (as long as it's data aware such as a datagrid) and the VM will still work - the VM is view agnostic.
Your use of Grid in your VM is not ideal because Grid is a visual control, it is not data. Remember that the visuals are your View and the ViewModel should just contain data and events which notify the view of things happening
If I was doing this - the code would look more like the code I posted above.
To sum up
Model the information you wanted to show in a ViewModel (TextItemViewModel)
Add a collection of these objects to the main ViewModel (ScreenViewModel) using a change aware collection such as ObservableCollection
Add/remove items from the collection using the standard add/remove
Bind the ItemsControl in the view using x:Name bindings to the collection on your ScreenViewModel
Adding/removing items in the VM will fire property changed notifications. ItemsControl will watch for these events and update itself accordingly
Addendum
You could get away with just using an ObservableCollection<string> instead of a TextBlockViewModel but it's not clear if you want to add more properties to the items you are binding to the grid (such as IsHeading property for headings which you could then make bold/italic in the view)
If you want to just use strings just modify the DataTemplate to bind directly to the DataContext rather than a property on the DataContext
<ItemsControl x:Name="TextItems">
<!-- host the items generated by this ItemsControl in a grid -->
<ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<Grid/>
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemsPanel>
<!-- render each bound item using a TextBlock-->
<ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
**<TextBlock Text="{Binding}"/> <!-- Bind direct -->**
</DataTemplate>
</ItemsControl.ItemTemplate>
</ItemsControl>
Edit:
Ok in your case it's quite simple - your ViewModel should simply model the state of the server:
public class LoginPageViewModel
{
public bool IsConnectionAvailable { get; set; } // or whatever your variable should be called
}
Then bind the visibility of the textblock to this using a converter:
<TextBlock Visibility="{Binding IsConnectionAvailable, Converter={StaticResource BooleanToVisibilityConverter}}">
You will need to declare the static resource for the converter somewhere (in the control itself or your main resources dictionary for example)
It looks like there is a converter already defined in System.Windows.Controls somewhere, but in case you can't find it the implementation is pretty simple (you could probably do this a bit better to guard against invalid input but for brevity I've kept it tiny):
public class BooleanToVisibilityConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
return (bool) value ? Visibility.Visible : Visibility.Collapsed;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter,CultureInfo culture)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
You may also want to change the state from available/unavailable during the views lifecycle, so in that case you probably want to use the property changed events built in to PropertyChangedBase (which Screen also inherits) to let the view know when the property changes
private bool _isConnectionAvailable;
public bool IsConnectionAvailable
{
get { return _isConnectionAvailable; }
set
{
if (_isConnectionAvailable != value)
{
_isConnectionAvailable = value;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => IsConnectionAvailable);
}
}
}
Addendum 2
I prefer the terse CM syntax instead of being explicit when binding action messages - so your XAML would change from:
<Image delay:LowProfileImageLoader.UriSource="{Binding ImagePath,Mode=TwoWay}" DataContext="{Binding FeedItemsAdvertisement,Mode=TwoWay}" Margin="0,20,0,39" Width="380" Height="128">
<i:Interaction.Triggers>
<i:EventTrigger
EventName="Tap">
<cm:ActionMessage
MethodName="LoadAdvertisement" >
<cm:Parameter Value="{Binding Link}"></cm:Parameter>
</cm:ActionMessage>
</i:EventTrigger>
</i:Interaction.Triggers>
</Image>
To
<Image delay:LowProfileImageLoader.UriSource="{Binding ImagePath,Mode=TwoWay}" DataContext="{Binding FeedItemsAdvertisement,Mode=TwoWay}" Margin="0,20,0,39" Width="380" Height="128" cal:Message.Attach="[Tap] = [LoadAdvertisement($dataContext.Link)]"></Image>
(actually that might not be right with the $dataContext.Link part ... but then again it might be... see here: http://caliburnmicro.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=All%20About%20Actions&referringTitle=Documentation)
I'm new to WPF and using MVVM. I have a view in which I want to display different content according to what a user selects on a menu. One of those things is another user control Temp which has a view model (TempVM) so I am doing this:
<ContentControl Content="{Binding Path=TempVM}"/>
and TempVM (of type TempViewModel)is null until the user clicks a button. Its data template is this
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type vm:TempViewModel}">
<view:Temp />
</DataTemplate>
That's fine, but the other thing I want to do is show a listbox when a user clicks a different menu item. So I am trying to do
<ContentControl Content="{Binding Path=Missions}"/>
(Missions is an observable collection of MissionData) and trying to template it like this:
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type ObservableCollection(MissionData)}">
<StackPanel>
<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding}" SelectedItem="{Binding Path=MissionData, Mode=TwoWay}" DisplayMemberPath="MissionName" SelectedValuePath="MissionId" />
<Button Content="Go"/>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
But the compiler doesn't like the type reference. If I try doing it by giving the template a key and specifying that key in the ContentControl it works but obviously I see the ListBox and button when there's no Missions. Obviously I could make a user control and viewmodel and follow the same pattern as I did for the TempVM but it seems over the top. Am I going the right way about this and what do I need to do?
From what i see is that you try to use a Collection as a dataobject which is in my opinion bad practice. Having a DataTemplate for a collection is also problematic, like you already have witnessed. I would advice you to use a ViewModel for your missions collection.
class MissionsSelectionViewModel
{
public ObservableCollection<Mission> Misssions;
public MissionData SelectedMission;
public ICommand MissionSelected;
}
and modify your datatemplate to
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type MissionsSelectionViewModel}">
<StackPanel>
<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding Missions}" SelectedItem="{Binding Path=MissionData, Mode=TwoWay}" DisplayMemberPath="MissionName" SelectedValuePath="MissionId" />
<Button Content="Go" Command="{Binding MissionSelected}/>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
If I were to follow your pattern of implicit templates, I would derive a custom non-generic collection MissionDataCollection from ObservableCollection<MissionData> and use it to keep MissionData items. Then I would simply reference that collection in DataType. This solution gives other advantages like events aggregation over the collection that are useful.
However, it seems to me that the best solution is the following.
Add a IsMissionsListVisible property to your VM.
Bind the Visibility property of the ContentControl showing the list to the IsMissionsListVisible property.
Use a keyed DataTemplate resource.
Implement the logic that determines if IsMissionsListVisible. Supposedly it should be true when there is at least one mission in the selected item. But the logic may be more complex.
I would do it this way. In fact, I do it this way usually, and it gives several benefits. The most important is that I can explicitly control the logic of content visibility in various situations (e.g. async content refresh).
In my wpf application the main view has 5 tabs with 5 different usercontrols , since the user controls are not related to each other, I have created 5 different view models (apart from the main viewmodel).
I thought of having a List or dictionary to have the list of usercontrols and its viewmodels,
Now, I would like to bind the tabitems with the list of usercontrols and assign the datacontexts, but since the list or dictionary can be changed, I dont find a way to bind the usercontrols to the tabitems.
For example, If I have a single tab which will be associated with a usercontrol I can assign
tab1View tview=new tab1View();
tview.DataContext= new tab1ViewModel();
tab1.Content=tview;
But how can I do the same from a list which has the reference of the view and viewmodels of the usercontrols?
Please teach me a best way to achieve this.
**Answer: **
I got the answer for what I need.
First, Generic type collection of the view models should be created
C# - Multiple generic types in one list
public abstract class Metadata
{
}
public class Metadata<DataType> : MetaData where DataType : class
{
private DataType mDataType;
}
List<Metadata> metadataObjects;
metadataObjects.Add(new Metadata<tab1ViewModel>());
metadataObjects.Add(new Metadata<tab2ViewModel>());
Then create a DataTemplate selector if multiple views are to be be referenced with same viewmodel or just apply the DataTemplate
There are a few ways to handle this, though I'd look at using frameworks to help you with MVVM. I myself promote Prism.
View Injection
View Discovery
DataTemplates - Sample
With DataTemplates you're defining in XAML (or in code, but XAML is more likely) which view to "automagically" apply to a ContentControl based upon the view-model (DataContext).
Somewhere in the XAML resources:
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type ViewModel:GeneralSettingsViewModel}">
<View:GeneralSettingsView/>
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate DataType="{x:Type ViewModel:AdvancedSettingsViewModel}">
<View:AdvancedSettingsView/>
</DataTemplate>
Somewhere in the XAML file that has the resources applied to it:
<TabControl ItemsSource="{Binding MyViewModelCollection}" />
Note: This only works if you have one view-model per DataTemplate in the scoped resource.
DataTemplateSelector
If you have a view-model that can be applied to multiple views and you determine those views through additional logic, you would want to use a DataTemplateSelector. Here is an example:
Somewhere in the XAML resources:
<!-- Possible collision because the DataType is of the same type -->
<DataTemplate x:Key="GeneralSettingsTemplate"
DataType="{x:Type ViewModel:SettingsViewModel}">
<View:GeneralSettingsView/>
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate x:Key="AdvancedSettingsTemplate"
DataType="{x:Type ViewModel:SettingsViewModel}">
<View:AdvancedSettingsView/>
</DataTemplate>
<local:SettingsDataTemplateSelector x:Key="SettingsTemplateSelector"
GeneralSettingsTemplate="{StaticResource GeneralSettingsTemplate}"
AdvancedSettingsTemplate="{StaticResource AdvancedSettingsTemplate}" />
Somewhere in the XAML file that has the resources applied to it:
<TabControl ItemsSource="{Binding MyViewModelCollection}"
ItemTemplateSelector="{StaticResource SettingsTemplateSelector}" />
SettingsTemplateSelector.cs:
public class SettingsDataTemplateSelector : DataTemplateSelector
{
public DataTemplate GeneralSettingsTemplate { get; set; }
public DataTemplate AdvancedSettingsTemplate { get; set; }
public override DataTemplate SelectTemplate(Object item,
DependencyObject container)
{
var vm = item as SettingsViewModel;
if (vm == null) return base.SelectTemplate(item, container);
if (vm.IsAdvanced)
{
return AdvancedSettingsTemplate;
}
return GeneralSettingsTemplate;
}
}
MSDN: Prism Navigation - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg430861(v=PandP.40).aspx
This covers Prism Regions as well as other parts of navigation.
MSND: View Discovery vs View Injection - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff921075(v=pandp.20).aspx
This section covers the differences of View Discovery and View Injection and when to use each.
Create a collection of your viewmodels that you bind to the ItemsSource of the tab control. Then create a DataTemplateSelector to select a view for each viewmodel.
I am just learning XAML and programming for Windows Phone 7.
Im trying to create an itemtemplate for a WP7 Pivot Control. I was able to make a template which contains a listbox. Is it possible to access this listbox in the code-behind so I can fill it based on a collection of a custom class? Basically how it works is that I have a pivot control and each item in that control is a category. For each category thatis added, there is a list of items that belong to that category. I need to be able to populate the list on each pivot item with items of that category.
I searched for ideas on how to accomplish this, and I get a lot of examples on databinding, but Im not too familiar on how databinding works in XAML.
Would databinding be the way to go or can I somehow get a reference to the listbox and add the items myself?
Any help would be greatly appriciated!
Thank you
I've some considerations on subject:
1) If you fill Categories list via binding, then you don't have entry point where binding is guaranteed comleted (because binding executes in deferred fashion).
2) Working with ItemTemplate's content is more tricky and unreliable, than DataTemplate approach, and you should use it just in exclusive situations. LogicalTreeHelper and VisualTreeHelper classes will help you.
3) But I would recommend you to build your view based on DataTemplates as it is common practice in WPF. Do you really think that this code is pretty complicated?
<Window x:Class="WpfApplication1.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="MainWindow">
<Window.Resources>
<DataTemplate x:Key="InnerItemDataTemplate">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Name}"/>
</DataTemplate>
<DataTemplate x:Key="CategoryDataTemplate">
<StackPanel>
<ListView ItemsSource="{Binding InnerItems}"
ItemTemplate="{StaticResource InnerItemDataTemplate}"/>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</Window.Resources>
<Grid>
<ListView ItemsSource="{Binding Categories}"
ItemTemplate="{StaticResource CategoryDataTemplate}"/>
</Grid>
public class Category
{
public IEnumerable<InnerItem> InnerList
{
get{/*...*/}
}
}
class InnerItem
{
public string Name
{
get{/*...*/}
}
}
public class SampleModel
{
public IEnumerable<Category> Categories
{
get {/*...*/}
}
}
IF you create a new "Windows Phone Pivot Application" the default code shows an example of this but reuses the same items in the listbox in multiple pivotitems.
Here's an overview of what that sample code is doing and how you might go about changing it.
In the constructor of MainPage, the DataContext is set to an object (App.ViewModel).
This Loaded event of MainPage ensures that App.ViewModel is populated.
App.ViewModel is an instance of MainViewModel.
MainViewModel contains an ObservableCollection called "Items". It is this that is bound to an idividual ListBox in a PivotItem:
<controls:PivotItem Header="first">
<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding Items}">
...
</ListBox>
</controls:PivotItem>
Within the ListBox, you can refer to the contents of the "Items" collection.
If you wanted to adjust this to have different collections for each ListBox/PivotItem you could just adjust this to have multiple collections in the MainViewModel.
HTH.