I'm getting this weird issue when using Durable Azure functions to submit messages to azure service bus.
My code is a simple Fan-Out implementation
REST trigger get the number of messages to be submitted and hands that an orchestrator.
Orchestrator stores the calls activity which will create and submit the message to Service bus.
The issue is when I send the REST parameter asking to add 3000 messages, more than 3000 get added.
Worse, it's not the same number either - 3104, 3100, 3286 anything...
See code below:
[FunctionName("Function1_HttpStart")]
//public static async Task<HttpResponseMessage> HttpStart(
public static async Task<IActionResult> HttpStart(
[HttpTrigger(AuthorizationLevel.Anonymous, "get", "post")] HttpRequest req,
[DurableClient] IDurableOrchestrationClient starter,
ILogger log)
{
String type = req.Query["type"];
if(!long.TryParse(req.Query["count"], out var count))
{
return new ObjectResult($"Parse failed for parameter 'count' ({req.Query["count"]}) to Int.") { StatusCode = 400};
}
var restInputs = new RestInputs()
{ Type = type, Count = count };
// Function input comes from the request content.
string instanceId = await starter.StartNewAsync
("EmailQueueSubmitter_OrchestratorSingleton"
, restInputs);
log.LogInformation($"Started orchestration with ID = '{instanceId}'.");
return starter.CreateCheckStatusResponse(req, instanceId);
}
[FunctionName("EmailQueueSubmitter_OrchestratorSingleton")]
public static async Task<List<string>> EmailQueueSubmitter_OrchestratorSingleton(
[OrchestrationTrigger] IDurableOrchestrationContext context, ILogger log)
{
var outputs = new List<string>();
try
{
var restInputs = context.GetInput<RestInputs>();
var parallelTasks = new List<Task>();
long runBatchLen;
long i_batch, i_iter, batchCount = 0;
for (i_batch = 0; i_batch < restInputs.Count; i_batch++)
{
parallelTasks.Add(context.CallActivityAsync("EmailQueueSubmitter_ActivitySendMessageBatchSingleton", i_batch.ToString()));
log.LogWarning($"Message {i_batch} Added");
}
log.LogWarning($"Awaiting {parallelTasks.Count} tasks");
await Task.WhenAll(parallelTasks);
var doneTaskCount = parallelTasks.Where(t => t.IsCompleted).ToList().Count;
var successTaskCount = parallelTasks.Where(t => t.IsCompletedSuccessfully).ToList().Count;
var faultedTaskCount = parallelTasks.Where(t => t.IsFaulted).ToList().Count;
var exceptionTaskCount = parallelTasks.Where(t => t.Exception != null).ToList().Count;
log.LogWarning($"Done:{doneTaskCount}, Success: {successTaskCount}, Fault:{faultedTaskCount}, Exception:{exceptionTaskCount}");
log.LogWarning($"Achieved completion.");
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
log.LogError(ex.Message);
throw new InvalidOperationException(ex.Message);
}
return outputs;
}
[FunctionName("EmailQueueSubmitter_ActivitySendMessageBatchSingleton")]
public static async Task EmailQueueSubmitter_ActivitySendMessageBatchSingleton([ActivityTrigger] IDurableActivityContext activityContext, ILogger log)
{
log.LogWarning($"Starting Activity.");
var payload = activityContext.GetInput<String>();
await ServiceBus_Sender.SendMessageBatch(payload);
log.LogWarning($"Finished Activity.");
}
public static ServiceBusMessage CreateMessage(String Payload)
{
try
{
var sbMsg = new ServiceBusMessage(Payload)
{
MessageId = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
ContentType = "text/plain"
};
//sbMsg.ApplicationProperties.Add("RequestType", "Publish");
return sbMsg;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException(ex.Message, ex);
}
}
Thanks #Camilo Terevinto for the information, I am converting this to an answer so that may help other community members:
As suggested in the comments, to run a duplicate check you could generate a Guid and send it together with the data, and then check that the Guid wasn't handled already before. Hopefully this resolved your issue.
OP Edit: Duplicates check was enabled by changing the service bus queue to be session enabled and have de-duplication turned on. The submitted messages' MessageId was set to be unique in each session. This is the only way I can think of to deal with the at-least-once guarantees...
Related
I am creating a microservice where one app is sending selected filters to other app using azure service bus queue.
I am able to send and receive the message however unable to use received message in my SQL Query.
The API is getting hit by one application (frontend).
.../api/User
Our controller
public class UserController : ControllerBase
{
public IEnumerable<dynamic> Get()
{
return userRepository.GetAll();
}
}
GetAll method
public IEnumerable<dynamic> GetAll()
{
ReceiveMsg().GetAwaiter().GetResult(); // We have called receiveMsg from here
startdate = content1[0];
enddate = content1[1];
using (IDbConnection dbConnection = connection)
{
var result = connection.Query("select * from [User] where DateofBirth between '" + startdate + "' and'" + enddate + "'");
return result;
}
}
Receive Message method`
public static async Task ReceiveMsg()
{
//
string sbConnectionString = <connection string for Service Bus namespace>;
string sbQueueName = <Queue name>;
try
{
queueClient = new QueueClient(sbConnectionString, sbQueueName);
var messageHandlerOptions = new MessageHandlerOptions(ExceptionReceivedHandler)
{
MaxConcurrentCalls = 1,
AutoComplete = false
};
queueClient.RegisterMessageHandler(ReceiveMessagesAsync, messageHandlerOptions);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Console.WriteLine(ex.Message);
}
finally
{
Console.ReadKey();
await queueClient.CloseAsync();
}
}
public static async Task ReceiveMessagesAsync(Message message, CancellationToken token)
{
Debug.WriteLine($"Received message: {Encoding.UTF8.GetString(message.Body)}");
var receivedmsg = Encoding.UTF8.GetString(message.Body);
ServiceBusMessage DeserializeMsg = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<ServiceBusMessage>(receivedmsg);
content1 = DeserializeMsg.Content;
await queueClient.CompleteAsync(message.SystemProperties.LockToken);
}
static Task ExceptionReceivedHandler(ExceptionReceivedEventArgs exceptionReceivedEventArgs)
{
Console.WriteLine(exceptionReceivedEventArgs.Exception);
return Task.CompletedTask;
}`
You're mixing two paradigms here - a message pump and receive messages on demand. With a message pump, when using .ReceiveMessageHandler() you're requesting the Service Bus SDK to run a continuous loop, aka "message pump", to receive messages as they arrive. That doesn't align with an explicit message retrieval when making a request to the Web API (via controller). You need to redesign your application and retrieve the message(s) upon demand rather than running a message pump.
I have on ASP.Net C# web API with an endpoint for the import. Javascript client sends a list of items to this API and API process this list in another thread (long task) and immediately returns unique id (GUID) of process. Now I need the cancel the background task from the CLIENT. Is possible to somehow send the cancelation token from the client? I have tried to add CancellationToken as a parameter to my controller async action but I don't know how to pass it from the client. For simplification, we can use as the client the Postman app.
Sample server-side
[HttpPost]
[UserContextActionFilter]
[RequestBodyType(typeof(List<List<Item>>))]
[Route("api/bulk/ImportAsync")]
public async Task<IHttpActionResult> ImportAsync()
{
var body = await RequestHelper.GetRequestBody(this);
var queue = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<List<List<Item>>>(body);
var resultWrapper = new AsynckResultWrapper(queue.Count);
HostingEnvironment.QueueBackgroundWorkItem(async ct =>
{
foreach (var item in queue)
{
var result = await ProcessItemList(item, false);
resultWrapper.AddResultItem(result);
}
});
return Ok(new
{
ProcessId = resultWrapper.ProcessId.ToString()
});
}
private async Task<ItemResult> ProcessItemList(<List<Item>>itemList, bool runInOneTransaction = false)
{
try
{
var result = await PerformBulkOperation(true, itemList);
return new ResultWrapper(result);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
// process exception
return new ResultWrapper(ex);
}
}
On a high level what you could do is store the process id along with a cancellation token source when you queue the work. Then you can expose a new endpoint that accepts a process id, gets the cancellation token source from the store and cancels the associated token:
[HttpPost]
[UserContextActionFilter]
[RequestBodyType(typeof(List<List<Item>>))]
[Route("api/bulk/ImportAsync")]
public async Task<IHttpActionResult> ImportAsync()
{
var body = await RequestHelper.GetRequestBody(this);
var queue = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<List<List<Item>>>(body);
var resultWrapper = new AsynckResultWrapper(queue.Count);
HostingEnvironment.QueueBackgroundWorkItem(async ct =>
{
var lts = CancellationTokenSource.CreateLinkedTokenSource(ct);
var ct = lts.Token;
TokenStore.Store(resultWrapper.ProcessId, lts);
foreach (var item in queue)
{
var result = await ProcessItemList(item, ct, false);
resultWrapper.AddResultItem(result);
}
TokenStore.Remove(processId) // remove the cancellation token source from storage when doen, because there is nothing to cancel
});
return Ok(new
{
ProcessId = resultWrapper.ProcessId.ToString()
});
}
private async Task<ItemResult> ProcessItemList(<List<Item>>itemList, CancellationToken token, bool runInOneTransaction = false)
{
try
{
var result = await PerformBulkOperation(true, itemList, token);
return new ResultWrapper(result);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
// process exception
return new ResultWrapper(ex);
}
}
[Route("api/bulk/CancelImportAsync")]
public async Task<IHttpActionResult> CancelImportAsync(Guid processId)
{
var tokenSource = TokenStore.Get(processId);
tokenSource.Cancel();
TokenStore.Remove(processId) // remove the cancellation token source from storage when cancelled
}
In the above example I modified the ProcessItemList to accept a cancellation token and pass it to PerformBulkOperation, assuming that method has support for cancellation tokens. If not, you can manually call ThrowIfCancellationRequested(); on the cancellation token at certain points in the code to stop when cancellation is requested.
I've added a new endpoint that allows you to cancel a pending operation.
Disclaimer
There are for sure some things you need to think about, especially when it is a public api. You can extend the store to accepts some kind of security token and when cancellation is requested you check whether it matches with the security token that queued the work. My answer is focused on the basics of the question
Also, I left the implementation of the store to your own imagination ;-)
I have an http trigger that calls a support function to perform a SQL update on some JSON. I made a mistake in the support function and used command.ExecuteNonQueryAsync() by accident. This code ran just fine locally in VS Studio, 100% of the time. But, when I published to Azure the function would work once. The only way to make it work again was start/stop the function. I performed a memory dump and saw there was one thread running. The HTTP request always returned 200, even though it only changed the data once.
Now my question. The Azure HTTP function does not wait for the threads to finish before exiting? I am just trying to understand better Azure threading.
Thanks
public static class SetNotificationConfig
{
[FunctionName("SetNotificationConfig")]
public static async Task<IActionResult> Run(
[HttpTrigger(AuthorizationLevel.Anonymous, "get", "post", Route = null)] HttpRequest req,
ILogger log)
{
try
{
string requestBody = await new StreamReader(req.Body).ReadToEndAsync();
dynamic data = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<dynamic>(requestBody);
var tem = data["NotificationConfig"];
string notificationConfig = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(tem);
SchedulerSupport.SetNotificationConfigJSON(1, notificationConfig);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
return new BadRequestObjectResult("Error updating notification configuration: " + ex.Message);
}
return new OkResult();
}
}
public static void SetNotificationConfigJSON(int storeId, string notificationConfig)
{
if (notificationConfig.Length > 0)
{
using SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(SchedulerSupport.ConnectionStr());
connection.Open();
var queryString = "Update SchedulerConfig Set ConfigInfo = JSON_MODIFY(ConfigInfo, '$.NotificationConfig', JSON_QUERY(#notificationConfig)) Where StoreId = #StoreId";
using SqlCommand command = new SqlCommand(queryString, connection);
try
{
command.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("#StoreId", System.Data.SqlDbType.Int));
command.Parameters["#StoreId"].Value = storeId;
command.Parameters.AddWithValue("#NotificationConfig", notificationConfig);
command.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
catch
{
throw;
}
}
}
I have an azure function app that I call from a slack slash command.
Sometimes the function takes a little while to return the data requested, so I made that function return a "Calculating..." message to slack immediately, and run the actual processing on a Task.Run (the request contains a webhook that I post back to when I finally get the data) :
Task.Run(() => opsData.GenerateQuoteCheckMessage(incomingData, context.FunctionAppDirectory, log));
This works mostly fine, except every now and then when people are calling the function from slack, it will return the data twice. So it will show one "Calculating..." message and then 2 results returned from the above function.
BTW, Azure functions start with :
public static async Task
Thanks!
UPDATE : here is the code for the function:
[FunctionName("QuoteCheck")]
public static async Task<HttpResponseMessage> Run([HttpTrigger(AuthorizationLevel.Anonymous)]HttpRequestMessage req, TraceWriter log, ExecutionContext context)
{
var opsHelper = new OpsHelper();
string bodyContent = await req.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
var parsedBody = HttpUtility.ParseQueryString(bodyContent);
var commandName = parsedBody["command"];
var incomingBrandId = parsedBody["text"];
int.TryParse(incomingBrandId, out var brandId);
var responseUrl = parsedBody["response_url"];
var incomingData = new IncomingSlackRequestModel
{
UserName = parsedBody["user_name"],
ChannelName = parsedBody["channel_name"],
CommandName = commandName,
ResponseUri = new Uri(responseUrl),
BrandId = brandId
};
var opsData = OpsDataFactory.GetOpsData(context.FunctionAppDirectory, environment);
Task.Run(() => opsData.GenerateQuoteCheckMessage(incomingData, context.FunctionAppDirectory, log));
// Generate a "Calculating" response message based on the correct parameters being passed
var calculatingMessage = opsHelper.GenerateCalculatingMessage(incomingData);
// Return calculating message
return req.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK, calculatingMessage, JsonMediaTypeFormatter.DefaultMediaType);
}
}
And then the GenerateQuoteCheckMessage calculates some data and eventually posts back to slack (Using Rest Sharp) :
var client = new RestClient(responseUri);
var request = new RestRequest(Method.POST);
request.AddParameter("application/json; charset=utf-8", JsonConvert.SerializeObject(outgoingMessage), ParameterType.RequestBody);
client.Execute(request);
Using Kzrystof's suggestion, I added a service bus call in the function that posts to a queue, and added another function that reads off that queue and processes the request, responding to the webhook that slack gives me :
public void DeferProcessingToServiceBus(IncomingSlackRequestModel incomingSlackRequestModel)
{
var serializedModel = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(incomingSlackRequestModel);
var sbConnectionString = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings.Get("SERVICE_BUS_CONNECTION_STRING");
var sbQueueName = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings.Get("OpsNotificationsQueueName");
var client = QueueClient.CreateFromConnectionString(sbConnectionString, sbQueueName);
var brokeredMessage = new BrokeredMessage(serializedModel);
client.Send(brokeredMessage);
}
Using VS 2017 Community. Azure.
I have Azure setup, I have a blank webapp created just for test purpose.
My actual site is an Angular2 MVC5 site, currently run locally.
The following is the code that should... Contact azure providing secret key(the site is registered in azure Active directory).
From this i get a token i then can use to contact azure api and get list of sites.
WARNING: code is all Sausage code/prototype.
Controller
public ActionResult Index()
{
try
{
MainAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Console.WriteLine(e.GetBaseException().Message);
}
return View();
}
static async System.Threading.Tasks.Task MainAsync()
{
string tenantId = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["AzureTenantId"];
string clientId = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["AzureClientId"];
string clientSecret = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["AzureClientSecret"];
string token = await AuthenticationHelpers.AcquireTokenBySPN(tenantId, clientId, clientSecret).ConfigureAwait(false);
using (var client = new HttpClient())
{
client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Add("Authorization", "Bearer " + token);
client.BaseAddress = new Uri("https://management.azure.com/");
await MakeARMRequests(client);
}
}
static async System.Threading.Tasks.Task MakeARMRequests(HttpClient client)
{
const string ResourceGroup = "ProtoTSresGrp1";
// Create the resource group
// List the Web Apps and their host names
using (var response = await client.GetAsync(
$"/subscriptions/{Subscription}/resourceGroups/{ResourceGroup}/providers/Microsoft.Web/sites?api-version=2015-08-01"))
{
response.EnsureSuccessStatusCode();
var json = await response.Content.ReadAsAsync<dynamic>().ConfigureAwait(false);
foreach (var app in json.value)
{
Console.WriteLine(app.name);
foreach (var hostname in app.properties.enabledHostNames)
{
Console.WriteLine(" " + hostname);
}
}
}
}
Controller class uses a static helper class that gets the token from Azure...
public static class AuthenticationHelpers
{
const string ARMResource = "https://management.core.windows.net/";
const string TokenEndpoint = "https://login.windows.net/{0}/oauth2/token";
const string SPNPayload = "resource={0}&client_id={1}&grant_type=client_credentials&client_secret={2}";
public static async Task<string> AcquireTokenBySPN(string tenantId, string clientId, string clientSecret)
{
var payload = String.Format(SPNPayload,
WebUtility.UrlEncode(ARMResource),
WebUtility.UrlEncode(clientId),
WebUtility.UrlEncode(clientSecret));
var body = await HttpPost(tenantId, payload).ConfigureAwait(false);
return body.access_token;
}
static async Task<dynamic> HttpPost(string tenantId, string payload)
{
using (var client = new HttpClient())
{
var address = String.Format(TokenEndpoint, tenantId);
var content = new StringContent(payload, Encoding.UTF8, "application/x-www-form-urlencoded");
using (var response = await client.PostAsync(address, content).ConfigureAwait(false))
{
if (!response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
{
Console.WriteLine("Status: {0}", response.StatusCode);
Console.WriteLine("Content: {0}", await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync());
}
response.EnsureSuccessStatusCode();
return await response.Content.ReadAsAsync<dynamic>().ConfigureAwait(false);
}
}
}
}
ISSUE:
Ok so the issue I was faced with was Async Deadlocks in my code. So i looked at this stack post stack post here
I fixed the issues by putting in .ConfigureAwait(false) on most of the await declarations.
Code runs and gets all the way back to the controller with a token etc and runs through the MakeARMRequests(HttpClient client) method, however the json only returns 1 result "{[]}" when i debug and as such ignores the loops.
My question is, is my code the culprit here? or would this point to a configuration setting in azure?
Not sure if this is the issue you are facing now BUT you never wait for a result from your async action in the first method Index in your code. MainAsync().ConfigureAwait(false); will immediately return and continue to the next block while the task MainAsync() will start in the background. The catch handler also does nothing because you dont wait f or a result.
Option 1 (recommended)
public async Task<ActionResult> Index()
{
try
{
await MainAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Console.WriteLine(e.GetBaseException().Message);
}
return View();
}
Option 2 if you can't use async/await for some reason
public ActionResult Index()
{
try
{
MainAsync().GetAwaiter().GetResult();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Console.WriteLine(e.GetBaseException().Message);
}
return View();
}
The Code looks OK and runs fine, Anyone who could help verify would be good, but one can assume this is OK.
The issue for this was configuration in azure, When you register an app you must set a certain number of Access controls via the subscription.
In this case I set some more specific things for the web api , for now set the app as owner and made reference to service management api.
Probably don't need half the "IAM" added in the subscription to the registered app, I simply went through adding the relevant ones and debugging each time until finally i got the results expected.