We Keep Coding

How to use Min() and Max() in Linq SQL queries [duplicate]

I plan on using this in a subquery but can't figure out the correct syntax to translate the following query into LINQ:
select ChapterID, min(MeetingDate)
from ChapterMeeting
group by ChapterID

var query = myDataContext.ChapterMeeting
.GroupBy(cm => cm.ChapterID)
.Select(g => new {
g.Key,
MinMeetingDate = g.Min(cm => cm.MeetingDate)
});

Well, Amy beat me to it, but in case you wanted to see it with the "comprehension" syntax:
var q = (
from cm in context.ChapterMeeting
group cm by cm.ChapterID into cmg
select new {
ChapterID = cmg.Key,
FirstMeetingDate = cmg.Min(cm => cm.MeetingDate)});

How to write linq query for this sql statement

How would you write a linq query with the following SQL statement. I've tried several methods referenced on stackoverflow but they either don't work with the EF version I'm using (EF core 3.5.1) or the DBMS (SQL Server).
select a.ProductID, a.DateTimeStamp, a.LastPrice
from Products a
where a.DateTimeStamp = (select max(DateTimeStamp) from Products where a.ProductID = ProductID)
For reference, a couple that I've tried (both get run-time errors).
var results = _context.Products
.GroupBy(s => s.ProductID)
.Select(s => s.OrderByDescending(x => x.DateTimeStamp).FirstOrDefault());
var results = _context.Products
.GroupBy(x => new { x.ProductID, x.DateTimeStamp })
.SelectMany(y => y.OrderByDescending(z => z.DateTimeStamp).Take(1))
Thanks!

I understand you would like to have a list of the latest prices of each products?
First of all I prefer to use group by option even over 1st query
select a.ProductID, a.DateTimeStamp, a.LastPrice
from Products a
where a.DateTimeStamp IN (select max(DateTimeStamp) from Products group by ProductID)
Later Linq:
var maxDateTimeStamps = _context.Products
.GroupBy(s => s.ProductID)
.Select(s => s.Max(x => x.DateTimeStamp)).ToArray();
var results = _context.Products.Where(s=>maxDateTimeStamps.Contains(s.DateTimeStamp));
-- all assuming that max datetime stamps are unique

I've managed to do it with the following which replicates the correlated sub query in the original post (other than using TOP and order by instead of the Max aggregate), though I feel like there must be a more elegant way to do this.
var results = from x
in _context.Products
where x.DateTimeStamp == (from y
in _context.Products
where y.ProductID == x.ProductID
orderby y.DateTimeStamp descending
select y.DateTimeStamp
).FirstOrDefault()
select x;

I prefer to break up these queries into IQueryable parts, do you can debug each "step".
Something like this:
IQueryable<ProductOrmEntity> pocoPerParentMaxUpdateDates =
entityDbContext.Products
//.Where(itm => itm.x == 1)/*if you need where */
.GroupBy(i => i.ProductID)
.Select(g => new ProductOrmEntity
{
ProductID = g.Key,
DateTimeStamp = g.Max(row => row.DateTimeStamp)
});
//// next line for debugging..do not leave in for production code
var temppocoPerParentMaxUpdateDates = pocoPerParentMaxUpdateDates.ToListAsync(CancellationToken.None);
IQueryable<ProductOrmEntity> filteredChildren =
from itm
in entityDbContext.Products
join pocoMaxUpdateDatePerParent in pocoPerParentMaxUpdateDates
on new { a = itm.DateTimeStamp, b = itm.ProductID }
equals
new { a = pocoMaxUpdateDatePerParent.DateTimeStamp, b = pocoMaxUpdateDatePerParent.ProductID }
// where
;
IEnumerable<ProductOrmEntity> hereIsWhatIWantItems = filteredChildren.ToListAsync(CancellationToken.None);
That last step, I am putting in an anonymous object. You can put the data in a "new ProductOrmEntity() { ProductID = pocoMaxUpdateDatePerParent.ProductID }...or you can get the FULL ProductOrmEntity object. Your original code, I don't know if getting all columns of the Product object is what you want, or only some of the columns of the object.

How to combine a query of the LINQ and a list? [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Linq version of SQL "IN" statement
(6 answers)
Closed 4 years ago.
[Sorry if it is a duplicate]
I couldn't find properly solution, so I decided to ask a question.
I have an object companies which returns list of elements.
I would like to write a query which will select these all CompanyId which we have in our list. I don't want to select only one record by using FirstOrDefault().
Example:
var companiesSummary = _context.Company
.Where(c => c.CompanyId == companies.Select(cs => cs.ID))
.Include(country => country.Country)
How can I cope with it? Do you have any ideas?

Select the ids of the companies from your in-memory list and then pass that into the query in the where method:
var ids = companies.Select(cs => cs.ID).ToList();
var companiesSummary =
_context.Company
.Where(c => ids.contains(c.ID))
.Include(country => country.Country)

Assuming your companies contains a list of objects with an ID property you want to compare to Company.CompanyId, your query should look like
int[] ids = companies.Select(cs => cs.ID).ToArray();
var companiesSummary = _context.Company
.Where(c => ids.Contains(c.CompanyId))
.Include(company => company.Country);

var matchingCompanies = companies.Where(c => companyIds.Contains(c.Id))
Make companyIds a HashSet<T> for an efficient Contains.

how to use linq to return a value from 4 tables

I am reasonably new to Linq and it seems quite easy to iuse but I am having an issue when trying to extract a value from a table that is linked/constrained by 3 other tables.
I have this in my SQL DB:
I am using Asp.Net 4 and Entity Framework 6.
I have as a parameter the 'DatabaseName'.
I ultimately want to get the SubscriptionRef that is assigned to this name.
I could do this step-by-step (ie using multiple linqs) but I thought it would look 'clean' using just 1 linq statment.
I have got as far as this:
var names = o.RegisteredNames.Where(d => d.DatabaseName == DBName).Where(d => d.ClientNames.Where(f => f.ClientId == f.Client.ClientId).FirstOrDefault();
But I get the error:
Cannot implicitly convert type 'Services.ClientName' to 'bool'

You have a Problem here:
d => d.ClientNames.Where(f => f.ClientId == f.Client.ClientId)
f => ... returns a single ClientName or null, which causes your error, because there should be a boolean.
If you want this first value or null, you should replace
.Where(d => d.ClientNames ...
//with
.Select(d => d.ClientNames ...

Try this:
o.RegisteredNames.First(d => d.DatabaseName == DBName).ClientNames.Select(x=>x.Client.Subscription.SubscriptionRef)
It should give you list go SubscriptionRef.

You can try with one LINQ query like...
var names = o.RegisteredNames.Where(d => d.DatabaseName == DBName ).FirstOrDefault();

You might wanna try sql style:
var client = from c in db.Clients
join cn in db.ClientNames on c.ClientId equals cn.ClientId
join rn in db.RegisteredNames on cn.RegisteredNamesId equals rn.RegisteredNameId
where rn.DatabaseName == "YourDBName"
select c;
But it also depends on how your objects were built.

Try using join:
var names = (
from names in o.RegisteredNames.Where(d => d.DatabaseName == DBName)
join cnames in o.ClientNames on names.RegisteredNamesId equals cnames.RegisteredNamesId
select cnames.ClientId
).FirstOrDefault();
Add as many joins as you want.

Try this
It works in List,
var option1= o.RegisteredNames
.Where(g => g.DbName == "YourDbName")
.Where(h => h.ClientNames.Any(f => f == 5))
.FirstOrDefault();
var option2= o.RegisteredNames
.FirstOrDefault(h => h.DbName == "Name" && h.ClientNames.Any(j => j == 1));

Convert SQL query with multiple GroupBy columns to LINQ

SELECT
[TimeStampDate]
,[User]
,count(*) as [Usage]
FROM [EFDP_Dev].[Admin].[AuditLog]
WHERE [target] = '995fc819-954a-49af-b056-387e11a8875d'
GROUP BY [Target], [User] ,[TimeStampDate]
ORDER BY [Target]
My database table has the columns User, TimeStampDate, and Target (which is a GUID).
I want to retrieve all items for each date for each user and display count of entries.
The above SQL query works. How can I convert it into LINQ to SQL? Am using EF 6.1 and my entity class in C# has all the above columns.
Create Filter basically returns an IQueryable of the entire AuditLogSet :
using (var filter = auditLogRepository.CreateFilter())
{
var query = filter.All
.Where(it => it.Target == '995fc819-954a-49af-b056-387e11a8875d')
.GroupBy(i => i.Target, i => i.User, i => i.TimeStamp);
audits = query.ToList();
}
Am not being allowed to group by on 3 columns in LINQ and I am also not sure how to select like the above SQL query with count. Fairly new to LINQ.

You need to specify the group by columns in an anonymous type like this:-
var query = filter.All
.Where(it => it.Target == '995fc819-954a-49af-b056-387e11a8875d')
.GroupBy(x => new { x.User, x.TimeStampDate })
.Select(x => new
{
TimeStampDate= x.Key.TimeStampDate,
User = x.Key.User,
Usage = x.Count()
}).ToList();

Many people find query syntax simpler and easier to read (this might not be the case, I don't know), here's the query syntax version anyway.
var res=(from it in filter.All
where it.Target=="995fc819-954a-49af-b056-387e11a8875d"
group it by new {it.Target, it.User, it.TimeStampDate} into g
orderby g.Key.Target
select new
{
TimeStampDate= g.Key.TimeStampDate,
User=g.Key.User,
Usage=g.Count()
});
EDIT: By the way you don't need to group by Target neither OrderBy, since is already filtered, I'm leaving the exact translation of the query though.

To use GroupBy you need to create an anonymous object like this:
filter.All
.Where(it => it.Target == '995fc819-954a-49af-b056-387e11a8875d')
.GroupBy(i => new { i.Target, i.User, i.TimeStamp });

It is unnecessary to group by target in your original SQL.
filter.All.Where( d => d.Target == "995fc819-954a-49af-b056-387e11a8875d")
.GroupBy(d => new {d.User ,d.TimeStampDate} )
.Select(d => new {
User = d.Key.User,
TimeStampDate = d.Key.TimeStampDate,
Usage = d.Count()
} );