Unity freezes at IndexOutOfRangeException, even though I continue - c#

I have this "Game" class that gets instantiated at Start and sets up the field for Minesweeper and in this process I count the adjacent Mines for each field.
using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using UnityEngine;
public class Game
{
public int Width;
public int Height;
public int NumOfMines;
public Field[,] Board;
public Game(int width = 8, int height = 8, int numOfMines = 10)
{
this.Width = width;
this.Height = height;
this.NumOfMines = numOfMines;
Board = new Field[height, width];
InitializeBoard();
}
public void InitializeBoard()
{
for (int row = 0; row < Height; row++)
{
for (int column = 0; column < Width; column++)
{
Board[row, column] = new Field();
}
}
// Board.Initialize();
// foreach (var field in Board)
// {
// field.IsMine = false;
// }
var rnd = new System.Random();
for (int i = 0; i < NumOfMines; i++)
{
int mineRow = 0;
int mineColumn = 0;
do
{
mineRow = rnd.Next(Height);
mineColumn = rnd.Next(Width);
} while (Board[mineRow, mineColumn].IsMine);
Board[mineRow, mineColumn].IsMine = true;
Board[mineRow, mineColumn].NumOfAdjacentMines = null;
}
for (int row = 0; row < Height; row++)
{
for (int column = 0; column < Width; column++)
{
if (!Board[column, row].IsMine)
Board[row, column].NumOfAdjacentMines = CountAdjacentMines(new Vector2Int(column, row));
}
}
}
private int CountAdjacentMines(Vector2Int pos)
{
Debug.Log(pos);
int counter = 0;
for (int y = pos.y - 1; y <= pos.y + 1; y++)
{
for (int x = pos.x - 1; y <= pos.x + 1; x++)
{
try
{
Debug.Log($"Checking {x + ":" + y} for a mine");
if (Board[x, y].IsMine)
{
counter++;
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Debug.LogError(ex + ", Pos: " + x + ":" + y);
continue;
}
}
}
return counter;
}
}
Why does Unity freeze without any notes? If I throw the exception, unity reacts normally.
(I have to write this so StackOverflow let's me post this...)

Look at the inner for loop iterating the x variable. Look closely. What is the actual condition that will end/conclude this inner for loop? Look very closely.
Basic answer to your question: Your program freezes, because the inner for loop iterating the x variable is an infinite loop that will never end. It's not Unity that freezes, it's your code getting stuck in this infinite loop. Like a hamster running in his wheel, forever...
(Re)throwing the exception will force this loop to exit, hence no freeze (because, simplified speaking, throwing the exception will abort execution of the CountAdjacentMines method).

Related

Unable to detect if two rectangles are colliding C#

I am working on a procedural room generator in c#, I would like the rooms not to overlap and I am having a hard time getting that to work. After #Idle_Mind's comments, I have a new problem. The Image produced by the program has many overlapping rooms. Bellow is the class that should handle the intersection checking and the placement of the rooms onto the tilemap
public int XSize, YSize;
private Cell[ , ] cells;
private List<Room> rooms;
public Tilemap(int xSize, int ySize)
{
XSize = xSize;
YSize = ySize;
rooms = new List<Room>();
cells = new Cell[XSize, YSize];
for (int y = 0; y < YSize; y++)
{
for (int x = 0; x < XSize; x++)
{
cells[x, y].type = CellType.Empty;
}
}
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
GenerateRandomRoomSafe(10);
}
}
private Room GetRoomBounds()
{
Utils.Int2 min = new Utils.Int2(0, 0);
Utils.Int2 max = new Utils.Int2(XSize,YSize);
Utils.Int2 q1 = Utils.GetRandomCoords(min, max);
max.X = XSize - 1 - q1.X;
max.Y = YSize - 1 - q1.Y;
Utils.Int2 siz = Utils.GetRandomCoords(min, max);
Room check = new Room(q1.X, q1.Y, siz.X, siz.Y);
return check;
}
public void GenerateRandomRoomSafe(int maxTries)
{
Room check = new Room(0, 0, 0, 0);
bool isValid = false;
int tries = 0;
if (rooms.Count == 0)
{
isValid = true;
check = GetRoomBounds();
tries = 1;
}
else
{
while (!isValid && tries < maxTries)
{
check = GetRoomBounds();
for (int i = 0; i < rooms.Count; i++)
{
if (!rooms[i].Walls.IntersectsWith(check.Walls))
{
isValid = true;
break;
}
}
tries++;
}
}
if (isValid)
{
Console.WriteLine(check + " was placed after " + tries + " tries");
PlaceRoomUnsafe(check);
}
}
public void PlaceRoomUnsafe(Room r)
{
for (int y = r.Walls.Y; y <= r.Walls.Y + r.Walls.Height; y++)
{
cells[r.Walls.X, y].type = CellType.Wall;
}
for (int y = r.Walls.Y; y <= r.Walls.Y + r.Walls.Height; y++)
{
cells[r.Walls.X + r.Walls.Width, y].type = CellType.Wall;
}
for (int x = r.Walls.X; x <= r.Walls.X + r.Walls.Width; x++)
{
cells[x, r.Walls.Y].type = CellType.Wall;
}
for (int x = r.Walls.X; x <= r.Walls.X + r.Walls.Width; x++)
{
cells[x, r.Walls.Y + r.Walls.Height].type = CellType.Wall;
}
for (int y = r.Floor.Y; y < r.Floor.Y + r.Floor.Height; y++)
{
for (int x = r.Floor.X; x < r.Floor.X + r.Floor.Width; x++)
{
cells[x, y].type = CellType.Floor;
}
}
rooms.Add(r);
}
public void GenerateRandomRoomUnsafe()
{
Room r = GetRoomBounds();
PlaceRoomUnsafe(r);
}
public int GetCellPixel(int x, int y)
{
return (int) cells[x, y].type;
}
public class Room
{
public Rectangle Walls;
public Rectangle Floor;
public Room(int q1X, int q1Y, int xSize, int ySize)
{
Walls.X = q1X;
Walls.Y = q1Y;
Walls.Width = xSize;
Walls.Height = ySize;
Floor.X = q1X + 1;
Floor.Y = q1Y + 1;
Floor.Width = xSize - 1;
Floor.Height = ySize - 1;
}
public override string ToString()
{
return "[Walls: " + Walls + "\n Floor: " + Floor + "]";
}
}
}
Image below for reference
Your logic in GenerateRandomRoomSafe() is backwards.
In this code block:
while (!isValid && tries < maxTries)
{
check = GetRoomBounds();
for (int i = 0; i < rooms.Count; i++)
{
if (!rooms[i].Walls.IntersectsWith(check.Walls))
{
isValid = true;
break;
}
}
tries++;
}
What you're saying is, "If it doesn't intersect with at least one room, then it must be valid".
Just because it doesn't intersect with the current room, doesn't mean it won't intersect with a different one!
It should look more like: (note the comments)
while (!isValid && tries < maxTries)
{
isValid = true; // assume it's good until proven otherwise
check = GetRoomBounds();
for (int i = 0; i < rooms.Count; i++)
{
if (rooms[i].Walls.IntersectsWith(check.Walls)) // if it DOES intersect...
{
isValid = false; // .. then set valid to false.
break;
}
}
tries++;
}
So we start by assuming it is valid, then when we encounter a room that DOES intersect, we set valid to false and stop the for loop so another random room can be tried (assuming we haven't exceeded the number of tries).
Some of the maps it produced:

Changing the 2D array value Tetris Style

I have a 2d boolean array that checks if the row of the columns are all true. right now I want to check that if a row is filled with all true. I want that row to go all false. and then I take the value above me. and shove it down. just like tetris. this is my pseudo code i made. can someone give me a hint and explanation about how to do it? and btw. if i filled the SECOND column with true. I'm afraid that the first column will also shift down regardless of his lowest column value.
[SerializeField]private int columns;
[SerializeField]private int rows;
private bool[,] grid;
private bool isRowTrue = true;
private int gridColumnCount = 0;
private int gridRowCount = 0;
private int combo = 0;
// Start is called before the first frame update
void Start()
{
grid = new bool[columns, rows];
for (int y = 0; y < grid.GetLength(1); y++)
{
for (int x = 0; x < grid.GetLength(0); x++)
{
grid[y, x] = false;
}
}
}
// Update is called once per frame
void Update()
{
CheckArrays();
}
private void CheckArrays()
{
for (int y = 0; y < grid.GetLength(1); y++)
{
for (int x = 0; x < grid.GetLength(0); x++)
{
if (grid[y, x] == false)
{
isRowTrue = false;
break;
}
}
if (isRowTrue == true)
{
Debug.Log(y + "TH Row Are All True");
for (int x = 0; x < grid.GetLength(0); x++)
{
grid[y, x] = false;
Debug.Log(grid[y, x]);
}
for (int yc = 0; yc < grid.GetLength(1); yc++)
{
for (int xc = 0; xc < grid.GetLength(0); xc++)
{
grid[yc, xc] = grid[yc - 1, xc - 1];
}
}
}
else
{
isRowTrue = true;
}
}
}
If you don't have a specific requirement to build this as a 2d array, this may be easier to reason about in a more object oriented way. For example, create a Row class that will hold an array of bool and have a method IsFull() which returns true if the entire array is true. Then you can hold a ArrayList of Row in your code above. Then, you can iterate over the rows and simply delete the row from the list whenever row.IsFull()==true, this should give you the effect that you are looking for.

The knights tour for 8x8 infinite recurssion

here will be my code for famous Knights Tour for 8x8 deck. So, the main idea of my code is: we will choose from Turns our destination, check it with isPossible and then go recursevly to it, marked this cell to '1'. So, check every cell, and if we will be in 64's cell - return true.
But my code goes to infinite recurssion, and I can't debug it, any recommendation will be greatly appreciated.
class Class1
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
int x = 0;
int y = 0;
Console.WriteLine("Enter X and press enter");
x = Int32.Parse(Console.ReadLine());
Console.WriteLine("Enter Y and press enter");
y = Int32.Parse(Console.ReadLine());
TurnVariation Turns = new TurnVariation();
EmptyBoard Board = new EmptyBoard();
if (TryPut.Put(Board, x, y, Turns, 1, false))
{
Console.WriteLine("МОЖНА!!!!");
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("NET!!");
}
}
}
public class TryPut : EmptyBoard
{
public static bool Put(EmptyBoard Board, int x, int y, TurnVariation Turns, int count, bool flag)
{
int tempX = 0;
int tempY = 0;
if (count >= 64)
{
Console.WriteLine("yeab");
return true;
}
for (int i = 0; i <= 7; i++)
{
tempX = x + Turns.Turns[i,0];
tempY = y + Turns.Turns[i,1];
//Console.WriteLine(count);
if (IsPossible(Board, tempX, tempY))
{
Board.Array[tempX, tempY] = 1;
flag = Put(Board, tempX, tempY, Turns, count+1, flag);
if (flag)
{
break;
}
Board.Array[tempX, tempY] = 0;
}
}
if (flag)
return true;
else
return false;
}
public static bool IsPossible(EmptyBoard Board, int x, int y)
{
if ((x < 0) || (x > 7) || (y < 0) || (y > 7))
return false;
if (Board.Array[x, y] == 1)
return false;
return true;
}
}
public class TurnVariation
{
public int[,] Turns = new int[8, 2];
public TurnVariation()
{
Turns[0, 0] = -2; Turns[0, 1] = 1;
Turns[1,0] = -2; Turns[1,1] = -1;
Turns[2,0] = -1; Turns[2,1] = 2;
Turns[3,0] = 1; Turns[3,1] = 2;
Turns[4,0] = 2; Turns[4,1] = 1;
Turns[5,0] = 2; Turns[5,1] = -1;
Turns[6,0] = 1; Turns[6,1] = -2;
Turns[7,0] = -1; Turns[7,1] = -2;
}
}
public class EmptyBoard
{
public const int N = 8;
public int[,] Array = new int[N, N];
public EmptyBoard()
{
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
for (int j = 0; j < N; j++)
Array[i, j] = 0;
}
}
I think your problem is that your testing for count<64, but you never assign to count. You just pass (by value!) 'Count + 1' to the put method. You are probably thinking that this will bewritten back to the count variable. But that is not the case...
Do note that debugging is the first skill you need to learn!

Rotating matrices

Objectives
Imagine that, we have matrix like
a11 a12 a13
a21 a22 a23
a31 a32 a33
What I want to do is, from textbox value rotate this matrix so that, for example if I write 2 and press rotate, program must keep both diagonal values of matrix (in this case a11, a22, a33, a13, a31) and rotate 2 times clockwise other values. So result must be like
a11 a32 a13
a23 a22 a21
a31 a12 a33
It must work for all N x N size matrices, and as you see every 4 rotation takes matrix into default state.
What I've done
So idea is like that, I have 2 forms. First takes size of matrix (1 value, for example if it's 5, it generates 5x5 matrix). When I press OK it generates second forms textbox matrix like that
Form 1 code
private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
int matrixSize;
matrixSize = int.Parse(textBox1.Text);
Form2 form2 = new Form2(matrixSize);
form2.Width = matrixSize * 50 + 100;
form2.Height = matrixSize *60 + 200;
form2.Show();
//this.Hide();
}
Form 2 code generates textbox matrix from given value and puts random values into this fields
public Form2(int matrSize)
{
int counter = 0;
InitializeComponent();
TextBox[] MatrixNodes = new TextBox[matrSize*matrSize];
Random r = new Random();
for (int i = 1; i <= matrSize; i++)
{
for (int j = 1; j <= matrSize; j++)
{
var tb = new TextBox();
int num = r.Next(1, 1000);
MatrixNodes[counter] = tb;
tb.Name = string.Format("Node_{0}{1}", i, j);
Debug.Write(string.Format("Node_{0}{1}", i, j));
tb.Text = num.ToString();
tb.Location = new Point(j * 50, i * 50);
tb.Width = 30;
tb.Visible = true;
this.splitContainer1.Panel2.Controls.Add(tb);
counter++;
}
}
}
Form 2 has 1 textbox for controlling rotation (others are generated on the fly, programmatically). What I want to do is, when I enter rotation count and press Enter on this textbox, I want to rotate textbox matrix as I explained above. Can't figure out how to do it.
Copy both diagonals to separate arrays, then rotate your matrix and replace diagonals. Below code shows each step:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
int matrixSize = 3;
string[,] matrix = new string[matrixSize,matrixSize];
//create square matrix
for (int x = 0; x < matrixSize; x++)
{
for (int y = 0; y < matrixSize; y++)
{
matrix[x, y] = "a" + (x + 1).ToString() + (y + 1).ToString();
}
}
Console.WriteLine(Environment.NewLine + "Base square matrix");
for (int x = 0; x < matrixSize; x++)
{
for (int y = 0; y < matrixSize; y++)
{
Console.Write(matrix[x, y] + " ");
}
Console.Write(Environment.NewLine);
}
Console.ReadKey();
//copy diagonals
string[] leftDiagonal = new string[matrixSize];
string[] rightDiagonal = new string[matrixSize];
for (int x = 0; x < matrixSize; x++)
{
leftDiagonal[x] = matrix[x, x];
rightDiagonal[x] = matrix[matrixSize - 1 - x, x];
}
Console.WriteLine(Environment.NewLine + "Diagonals");
for (int x = 0; x < matrixSize; ++x)
{
Console.Write(leftDiagonal[x] + " " + rightDiagonal[x] + Environment.NewLine);
}
Console.ReadKey();
//rotate matrix
string[,] rotatedMatrix = new string[matrixSize, matrixSize];
for (int x = 0; x < matrixSize; x++)
{
for (int y = 0; y < matrixSize; y++)
{
rotatedMatrix[x, y] = matrix[matrixSize - y - 1, x];
}
}
Console.WriteLine(Environment.NewLine + "Rotated");
for (int x = 0; x < matrixSize; x++)
{
for (int y = 0; y < matrixSize; y++)
{
Console.Write(rotatedMatrix[x, y] + " ");
}
Console.Write(Environment.NewLine);
}
Console.ReadKey();
//rotate matrix again
string[,] rotatedMatrixAgain = new string[matrixSize, matrixSize];
for (int x = 0; x < matrixSize; x++)
{
for (int y = 0; y < matrixSize; y++)
{
rotatedMatrixAgain[x, y] = rotatedMatrix[matrixSize - y - 1, x];
}
}
Console.WriteLine(Environment.NewLine + "Rotated again");
for (int x = 0; x < matrixSize; x++)
{
for (int y = 0; y < matrixSize; y++)
{
Console.Write(rotatedMatrixAgain[x, y] + " ");
}
Console.Write(Environment.NewLine);
}
Console.ReadKey();
//replace diagonals
for (int x = 0; x < matrixSize; x++)
{
rotatedMatrixAgain[x, x] = leftDiagonal[x];
rotatedMatrixAgain[matrixSize - 1 - x, x] = rightDiagonal[x];
}
Console.WriteLine(Environment.NewLine + "Completed" + Environment.NewLine);
for (int x = 0; x < matrixSize; x++)
{
for (int y = 0; y < matrixSize; y++)
{
Console.Write(rotatedMatrixAgain[x, y] + " ");
}
Console.Write(Environment.NewLine);
}
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
I don't know C#, so I can only give a suggestion in pseudocode:
Input: An N by N matrix in
Output: The input matrix rotated as described in the OP out
for i = 1 to N
for j = 1 to N
if N - j != i and i != j // Do not change values on either diagonal
out[j][N-i] = in[i][j]
else
out[i][j] = in[i][j]
Disclaimer: This algorithm is untested. I suggest you use a debugger to check that it works as you want.
This seems like quite an unorthodox UI presentation, but you're not too far off in terms of being able to achieve your functionality. Instead of a linear array, a rectangular array will make your job much easier. The actual rotation could be implemented with a for loop repeating a single rotation (which would be implemented as in the case 1 code), but I've decided to combine them into the four possible cases. This actually allows you to enter a negative number for number of rotations. Which reminds me, you really should do more error checking. At least protect against int.Parse throwing an exception both places it's used (with a try catch block or by switching to int.TryParse) and make sure it returns a meaningful number (greater than 0, possibly set a reasonable maximum other than int.MaxValue) for matrixSize in button1_Click.
namespace RotatingMatrices
{
public class Form2 : Form
{
// note these class fields
private TextBox[,] matrixNodes;
private int matrixSize;
public Form2(int matrSize)
{
InitializeComponent();
// note these inits
matrixSize = matrSize;
matrixNodes = new TextBox[matrixSize, matrixSize];
Random r = new Random();
// note the new loop limits
for (int i = 0; i < matrixSize; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < matrixSize; j++)
{
var tb = new TextBox();
int num = r.Next(1, 1000);
// note the change in indexing
matrixNodes[i,j] = tb;
tb.Name = string.Format("Node_{0}_{1}", i, j);
Debug.Write(string.Format("Node_{0}_{1}", i, j));
tb.Text = num.ToString();
tb.Location = new Point(j * 50, i * 50);
tb.Width = 30;
tb.Visible = true;
this.splitContainer1.Panel2.Controls.Add(tb);
}
}
}
private void buttonRotate_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
string[,] matrix = new string[matrixSize, matrixSize];
int rotations = (4 + int.Parse(textBoxRotations.Text)) % 4; // note the addition of and mod by 4
switch(rotations)
{
case 1: // rotate clockwise
for (int i = 0; i < matrixSize; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < matrixSize; j++)
{
matrix[j, matrixSize - i - 1] = matrixNodes[i, j].Text;
}
}
break;
case 2: // rotate 180 degrees
for (int i = 0; i < matrixSize; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < matrixSize; j++)
{
matrix[i, j] = matrixNodes[matrixSize - i - 1, matrixSize - j - 1].Text;
}
}
break;
case 3: // rotate counter-clockwise
for (int i = 0; i < matrixSize; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < matrixSize; j++)
{
matrix[i, j] = matrixNodes[j, matrixSize - i - 1].Text;
}
}
break;
default: // do nothing
return;
}
// restore diagonals
for(int i = 0; i < matrixSize; i++)
{
matrix[i, i] = matrixNodes[i, i].Text;
matrix[i, matrixSize - i - 1] = matrixNodes[i, matrixSize - i - 1].Text;
}
// write strings back to text boxes
for (int i = 0; i < matrixSize; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < matrixSize; j++)
{
matrixNodes[i, j].Text = matrix[i, j];
}
}
}
}
}
I decided to tackle the issue using a listView instead of a text box, which makes the logic easier for me. Using this method, I was able to think of the matrix as successive boxes. I start on the outside and move in toward the middle, changing the size of my box each time.
Also, rather than using two forms, I use one. At the top I have a textbox where the user enters the size they want the array to be, and a button labeled "Fill" (button2). And at the bottom I have a textbox where the user enters the degree of rotation. When they click "Rotate," it kicks off a process of adding values to linked lists, combining and shifting the list, and then writing back out to the matrix. I'm sure I made it more convoluted than it has to be, but it was a great learning exercise.
After looking over jerry's code above, I think I'm going to look into rectangular arrays. :)
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.ComponentModel;
using System.Data;
using System.Drawing;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Windows.Forms;
namespace Recycle
{
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public int size;
public LinkedList<string> topRight = new LinkedList<string>();
public LinkedList<string> bottomLeft = new LinkedList<string>();
public LinkedList<string> myMatrix = new LinkedList<string>();
public LinkedList<string> shiftMatrix = new LinkedList<string>();
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void button2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
listView1.Clear();
size = int.Parse(textBox2.Text);
int c = 0;
int q = 0;
int w = 0;
string[] content = new string[size];
Random rnd = new Random();
for (c = 0; c < size; c++)
{
listView1.Columns.Add("", 25);
}
for (q = 0; q < size; q++)
{
for (w = 0; w < size; w++)
{
content[w] = rnd.Next(9,100).ToString();
}
ListViewItem lvi = new ListViewItem(content);
listView1.Items.Add(lvi);
}
}
public bool iseven(int size)
{
if (size % 2 == 0)
{
return true;
}
else
{
return false;
}
}
public void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (listView1.Items.Count < 3)
{
MessageBox.Show("Matrix cannot be rotated.");
return;
}
bool even = false;
int shift = int.Parse(textBox1.Text); //amount to shift by
int box = listView1.Items.Count - 1; //size of box
int half = Convert.ToInt32(listView1.Items.Count / 2);
int corner = 0; //inside corner of box
if (shift > listView1.Items.Count)
{
shift = shift % ((listView1.Items.Count - 2) * 4);
}
do
{
eachPass(shift, box, corner);
++corner;
--box;
} while (box >= half + 1);
}
public void eachPass(int shift, int box, int corner)
{
int x;
int i;
//Read each non-diagonal value into one of two lists
for (x = corner + 1; x < box; x++)
{
topRight.AddLast(listView1.Items[corner].SubItems[x].Text);
}
x = box;
for (i = corner + 1; i < box; i++)
{
topRight.AddLast(listView1.Items[i].SubItems[x].Text);
}
for (x = box - 1; x > corner; x--)
{
bottomLeft.AddLast(listView1.Items[box].SubItems[x].Text);
}
x = corner;
for (i = box - 1; i > corner; i--)
{
bottomLeft.AddLast(listView1.Items[i].SubItems[x].Text);
}
string myTest = "";
//join the two lists, so they can be shifted
foreach (string tR in topRight)
{
myMatrix.AddLast(tR);
}
foreach (string bL in bottomLeft)
{
myMatrix.AddLast(bL);
}
int sh;
//shift the list using another list
for (sh = shift; sh < myMatrix.Count; sh++)
{
shiftMatrix.AddLast(myMatrix.ElementAt(sh));
}
for (sh = 0; sh < shift; sh++)
{
shiftMatrix.AddLast(myMatrix.ElementAt(sh));
}
//we need the sizes of the current lists
int trCnt = topRight.Count;
int blCnt = bottomLeft.Count;
//clear them for reuse
topRight.Clear();
bottomLeft.Clear();
int s;
//put the shifted values back
for (s = 0; s < trCnt; s++)
{
topRight.AddLast(shiftMatrix.ElementAt(s));
}
for (s = blCnt; s < shiftMatrix.Count; s++)
{
bottomLeft.AddLast(shiftMatrix.ElementAt(s));
}
int tRn = 0;
int bLn = 0;
//write each non-diagonal value from one of two lists
for (x = corner + 1; x < box; x++)
{
listView1.Items[corner].SubItems[x].Text = topRight.ElementAt(tRn);
++tRn;
}
x = box;
for (i = corner + 1; i < box; i++)
{
listView1.Items[i].SubItems[x].Text = topRight.ElementAt(tRn);
++tRn;
}
for (x = box - 1; x > corner; x--)
{
listView1.Items[box].SubItems[x].Text = bottomLeft.ElementAt(bLn);
++bLn;
}
x = corner;
for (i = box - 1; i > corner; i--)
{
listView1.Items[i].SubItems[x].Text = bottomLeft.ElementAt(bLn);
++bLn;
}
myMatrix.Clear();
shiftMatrix.Clear();
topRight.Clear();
bottomLeft.Clear();
}
}
}

Brute force Algorithm for creation of Sudoku Board

What I am developing is that initially the entire sudoku board is empty.
One of the random cells(out of 81) is filled with a random value(1-9).
Now I want to fill all the remaining cells using brute force approach.
From what I came to know after googling is that we should start with the first cell and fill it with 1(if it's valid), then fill the second cell with 2(if it's valid, we will begin checking with a number greater than the last filled cell, which in this case is 1, once we reach 9, we reset it with 1).
The thing is that it's not working properly!
Can anyone link me to the exact algorithm.
Here's an implementation of the backtracking approach:
import java.util.Random;
public class Sudoku {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Random rand = new Random();
int r = rand.nextInt(9);
int c = rand.nextInt(9);
int value = rand.nextInt(9) + 1;
Board board = new Board();
board.set(r, c, value);
System.out.println(board);
solve(board, 0);
System.out.println(board);
}
private static boolean solve(Board board, int at) {
if (at == 9*9)
return true;
int r = at / 9;
int c = at % 9;
if (board.isSet(r, c))
return solve(board, at + 1);
for (int value = 1; value <= 9; value++) {
if (board.canSet(r, c, value)) {
board.set(r, c, value);
if (solve(board, at + 1))
return true;
board.unSet(r, c);
}
}
return false;
}
static class Board {
private int[][] board = new int[9][9];
private boolean[][] rs = new boolean[9][10];
private boolean[][] cs = new boolean[9][10];
private boolean[][][] bs = new boolean[3][3][10];
public Board() {}
public boolean canSet(int r, int c, int value) {
return !isSet(r, c) && !rs[r][value] && !cs[c][value] && !bs[r/3][c/3][value];
}
public boolean isSet(int r, int c) {
return board[r][c] != 0;
}
public void set(int r, int c, int value) {
if (!canSet(r, c, value))
throw new IllegalArgumentException();
board[r][c] = value;
rs[r][value] = cs[c][value] = bs[r/3][c/3][value] = true;
}
public void unSet(int r, int c) {
if (isSet(r, c)) {
int value = board[r][c];
board[r][c] = 0;
rs[r][value] = cs[c][value] = bs[r/3][c/3][value] = false;
}
}
public String toString() {
StringBuilder ret = new StringBuilder();
for (int r = 0; r < 9; r++) {
for (int c = 0; c < 9; c++)
ret.append(board[r][c]);
ret.append("\n");
}
return ret.toString();
}
}
}
I used a method without backtracing, although the while loop might be it. To quote an algorithm book I've read "Nothing in recursion can't be duplicated using iteration".
I've been using my eyes to inspect this, and since I can't wrap my head around the recursive method, even though recursion is relatively understood:
This method, I kinda wrote with some guidance, had a bug in the grid checker, when I found it, it seems to be working now. I'm positing it 'cause it's hard to find complete-and-working code. IOS SDK.
#define WIDTH 9
#define HEIGHT 9
#interface ViewController ()
//- (BOOL) numberConflicts:(int)testNum;
- (BOOL) number:(int)n conflictsWithRow:(int)r;
- (BOOL) number:(int)n conflictsWithColumn:(int)c;
- (BOOL) number:(int)n conflictsWithSquareInPointX:(int)x andPointY:(int)y;
- (BOOL) number:(int)n conflictsAtGridPointX:(int)xPoint andPointY:(int)yPoint;
- (int) incrementSudokuValue:(int)v;
#end
static int sudoku[WIDTH][HEIGHT];
#implementation ViewController
- (void)viewDidLoad
{
[super viewDidLoad];
/// Initialize it
for (int x = 0; x < WIDTH; x++)
{
for (int y = 0; y < HEIGHT; y++)
{
sudoku[x][y] = 0;
}
}
///
int tries = 0;
for (int j = 0; j < HEIGHT; j++)
{
for (int i = 0; i < WIDTH; i++)
{
int num = arc4random()%9 + 1;
while ([self number:num conflictsAtGridPointX:i andPointY:j])
{
num = [self incrementSudokuValue:num];
tries++;
if (tries > 10) { //restart the column
tries = 0;
for(int count = 0; count < WIDTH; count++)
{
sudoku[count][j] = 0;
}
i = 0;
}
}
if(sudoku[i][j] == 0)
sudoku[i][j] = num;
tries = 0;
for (int y = 0; y < HEIGHT; y++)
{
for (int x = 0; x < WIDTH; x++)
{
printf("%i ", sudoku[x][y]);
}
printf("\n");
}
printf("\n");
}
}
for (int x = 0; x < WIDTH; x++)
{
for (int y = 0; y < HEIGHT; y++)
{
printf("%i ", sudoku[y][x]);
}
printf("\n"); //newline
}
// Do any additional setup after loading the view, typically from a nib.
}
- (void)didReceiveMemoryWarning
{
[super didReceiveMemoryWarning];
// Dispose of any resources that can be recreated.
}
- (BOOL) number:(int)n conflictsWithRow:(int)r;
{
for (int y = 0; y < HEIGHT; y++) {
if (sudoku[y][r] == n) {
return YES;
}
}
return NO;
}
- (BOOL) number:(int)n conflictsWithColumn:(int)c;
{
for (int x = 0; x < WIDTH; x++) {
if (sudoku[c][x] == n) {
return YES;
}
}
return NO;
}
- (BOOL) number:(int)n conflictsAtGridPointX:(int)xPoint andPointY:(int)yPoint;
{
if ([self number:n conflictsWithRow:yPoint])
{
return YES;
}
if ([self number:n conflictsWithColumn:xPoint])
{
return YES;
}
if ([self number:n conflictsWithSquareInPointX:xPoint andPointY:yPoint]) {
return YES;
}
return NO;
}
- (BOOL) number:(int)n conflictsWithSquareInPointX:(int)x andPointY:(int)y;
{
int leftX = x - (x % 3); //used to use int division
// leftX *= 3;
int topY = y - (y % 3);
// topY *= 3;
int rightX = leftX + 2;
int bottomY = topY + 2;
for(int subY = topY; subY <= bottomY; subY++) //bug was here, used < instead of less N equal to...
{
for ( int subX = leftX; subX <= rightX; subX++)
{
if (sudoku[subX][subY] == n) {
return YES;
}
}
}
NSLog(#"Testing grid at %i, %i", x/3, y/3);
NSLog(#"LeftX: %i TopY: %i", leftX, topY);
return NO;
}
- (int) incrementSudokuValue:(int)v;
{
if (v < 9) {
v++;
return v;
}
return 1;
}
Note: The header file is empty, paste this into iOS single View application if you desire.
Caution: might loop infinitely( and above does sometimes, but is very fast), may want another more global "tries" variable, and restart the algorithm as a safety, or give it a seed/do both
edit: the below should be safe from infinite loops, if the source grid is solvable (or nonexistant)
#define WIDTH 9
#define HEIGHT 9
#interface ViewController ()
//- (BOOL) numberConflicts:(int)testNum;
- (BOOL) number:(int)n conflictsWithRow:(int)r;
- (BOOL) number:(int)n conflictsWithColumn:(int)c;
- (BOOL) number:(int)n conflictsWithSquareInPointX:(int)x andPointY:(int)y;
- (BOOL) number:(int)n conflictsAtGridPointX:(int)xPoint andPointY:(int)yPoint;
- (int) incrementSudokuValue:(int)v;
#end
static int sudoku[WIDTH][HEIGHT];
#implementation ViewController
- (BOOL) fillGridWithNext:(int)next;
{
for (int y = 0; y < HEIGHT; y++)
{
for (int x = 0; x < WIDTH; x++)
{
if (sudoku[x][y] != 0)
{
if (x == 8 && y == 8) {
return YES;
}
continue;
}
for (int count = 0; count < (HEIGHT-1); count++)
{
if ([self number:next conflictsAtGridPointX:x andPointY:y])
{
next = [self incrementSudokuValue:next];
}
else
{
sudoku[x][y] = next;
if( [self fillGridWithNext:arc4random()%9+1])
{
return YES;
}
}
}
sudoku[x][y] = 0;
return NO;
}
}
return NO;
}
- (void)viewDidLoad
{
[super viewDidLoad];
/// Initialize it
for (int x = 0; x < WIDTH; x++)
{
for (int y = 0; y < HEIGHT; y++)
{
sudoku[x][y] = 0;
}
}
sudoku[0][0]=9;
int next;
next = (arc4random()%9)+1;
if( [self fillGridWithNext:next]) //seeded
{
NSLog(#"Solved");
}
else
{
NSLog(#"No solution");
}
for (int x = 0; x < WIDTH; x++)
{
for (int y = 0; y < HEIGHT; y++)
{
printf("%i ", sudoku[y][x]);
}
printf("\n"); //newline
}
// Do any additional setup after loading the view, typically from a nib.
}
- (void)didReceiveMemoryWarning
{
[super didReceiveMemoryWarning];
// Dispose of any resources that can be recreated.
}
- (BOOL) number:(int)n conflictsWithRow:(int)r;
{
for (int y = 0; y < HEIGHT; y++) {
if (sudoku[y][r] == n) {
return YES;
}
}
return NO;
}
- (BOOL) number:(int)n conflictsWithColumn:(int)c;
{
for (int x = 0; x < WIDTH; x++) {
if (sudoku[c][x] == n) {
return YES;
}
}
return NO;
}
- (BOOL) number:(int)n conflictsAtGridPointX:(int)xPoint andPointY:(int)yPoint;
{
if ([self number:n conflictsWithRow:yPoint])
{
return YES;
}
if ([self number:n conflictsWithColumn:xPoint])
{
return YES;
}
if ([self number:n conflictsWithSquareInPointX:xPoint andPointY:yPoint]) {
return YES;
}
return NO;
}
- (BOOL) number:(int)n conflictsWithSquareInPointX:(int)x andPointY:(int)y;
{
int leftX = x - (x % 3); //used to use int division
// leftX *= 3;
int topY = y - (y % 3);
// topY *= 3;
int rightX = leftX + 2;
int bottomY = topY + 2;
for(int subY = topY; subY <= bottomY; subY++) //bug was here, used < instead of less N equal to...
{
for ( int subX = leftX; subX <= rightX; subX++)
{
if (sudoku[subX][subY] == n) {
return YES;
}
}
}
NSLog(#"Testing grid at %i, %i", x/3, y/3);
NSLog(#"LeftX: %i TopY: %i", leftX, topY);
return NO;
}
- (int) incrementSudokuValue:(int)v;
{
if (v < 9) {
v++;
return v;
}
return 1;
}
#end
Summary: The first version is flawed but (mostly) gets the job done. It generates every row at random, if the row is invalid, it wipes and starts over. This will wipe out source grids, and can go forever, but works most of the time.
The lower code uses recursion. I don't think it backtracks properly, but it has solved empty and semi-seeded grids on my tests. I think I need to save a "state" grid to backtrack with, but I'm not doing this. I'm posting both since they both answer "Brute force"... on my own, I should study recursion, I can't explain why the lower one works, I personally could use help with doing it.
Note: The first one finishes in a blink or so when it does finish... if speed means more than reliability to your application (somewhat counter-intuitive in this case, with the infinite looping, heh).
This simple random walk algorithm should work too (but is inefficient- use at your own risk!!!):
EDIT: - added fix for unresolvable solutions.
For each empty cell in grid
array = Get_Legal_Numbers_for_cell(row,col);
If (array is empty) {
Clear_All_cells()
} else {
number = Random_number_from(array);
Put_Number_in_Cell(number);
}
EDIT 2
If someone are interested here are described methods for solving sudoku with random-based search.

Categories