How to solve the DLL cannot be found issue - c#

In my C# Wpf project, I need some funtion from C++. So I make my own C++ DLL project named LibC. And the Wpf app can run normally in my computer. But on the tester's computer, the log says:
Unable to load DLL 'LibC.dll': The specified module could not be found. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8007007E)
And I checked that the DLL file LibC.dll is there.
By checking this post: Unable to load DLL (Module could not be found HRESULT: 0x8007007E)
Anthony Hayward's answer inspires me. So I run below dumpbin command and find that my dll rely on those 4 Window's dll. And on the tester's computer, two are missing: vcruntime140d.dll and ucrtbased.dll. While on my computer, all the four dlls can be found. So I copied the missing two dlls to the tester's computer, put them together with my LibC.dll, then the app works well now.
My question is how to solve this kind of problem in a better way?
As I said, I copy the missing dll files manually to the tester's computer.
Another options is to put the two dlls into my project and release them together with my project files, including the exe file and LibC.dll.
Is it possible to statically link the two missing dll into my LibC.dll? Or any other advise?
"c:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Professional\vc\Tools\MSVC\14.29.30133\bin\Hostx64\x64\dumpbin.exe" /DEPENDENTS libc.dll
Microsoft (R) COFF/PE Dumper Version 14.29.30143.0
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Dump of file libc.dll
File Type: DLL
Image has the following dependencies:
KERNEL32.dll
USER32.dll
VCRUNTIME140D.dll
ucrtbased.dll
Summary
1000 .00cfg
1000 .data
2000 .idata
1000 .msvcjmc
3000 .pdata
4000 .rdata
1000 .reloc
1000 .rsrc
A000 .text
10000 .textbss

Your users will need to install the visual c++ runtime. The typical way to do this would be with an installer that does this silently. As far as I know they cannot be compiled into your program, and that the license prohibit distribution of lose dlls outside the redistribution package.
Note that you may need to update this package if you update the Visual studio version used to compile your dll.
Also note that you need to deploy the release build of your application, since the debug version of the dlls is only distributed as part of visual studio.
At last, that pure .Net code does not have these kinds of problems, so if you have c++ code it might be better to just rewrite it in c#. If you want to access some third party dll it might be better to use P/Invoke directly to that dll.

Related

Unable to load DLL file (0x8007007E) [duplicate]

I have a dll library with unmanaged C++ API code I need to use in my .NET 4.0 application. But every method I try to load my dll I get an error:
Unable to load DLL 'MyOwn.dll': The specified module could not be found. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8007007E)
I have read and tried several solutions I have found on the internet. Nothing works..
I have tried using following methods:
[DllImport("MyOwn.dll", CallingConvention = CallingConvention.Cdecl)]
[return: MarshalAs((UnmanagedType.I4))]
public static extern Int32 MyProIni(string DBname, string DBuser_pass,
string WorkDirectory, ref StringBuilder ErrorMessage);
When I tried following this article and when I run this example (from the downloaded code) it runs without a problem (the dll used is in the bin/debug folder)
I have copied my dll (along with all the files the it depends on into my bin folder).
I also tried this approach but got the same error:
[DllImportAttribute(MyOwnLibDllPath, EntryPoint="TMproIni")]
[return: MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.I4)]
public static extern int MyproIni(string DBname, string DBuser_pass,
string WorkDirectory, ref StringBuilder ErrorMessage);
Any suggestions?
From what I remember on Windows the search order for a dll is:
Current Directory
System folder, C:\windows\system32 or c:\windows\SysWOW64 (for 32-bit process on 64-bit box).
Reading from the Path environment variable
In addition I'd check the dependencies of the DLL, the dependency walker provided with Visual Studio can help you out here, it can also be downloaded for free: http://www.dependencywalker.com
You can use the dumpbin tool to find out the required DLL dependencies:
dumpbin /DEPENDENTS my.dll
This will tell you which DLLs your DLL needs to load. Particularly look out for MSVCR*.dll. I have seen your error code occur when the correct Visual C++ Redistributable is not installed.
You can get the "Visual C++ Redistributable Packages for Visual Studio 2013" from the Microsoft website. It installs c:\windows\system32\MSVCR120.dll
In the file name, 120 = 12.0 = Visual Studio 2013.
Be careful that you have the right Visual Studio version (10.0 = VS 10, 11 = VS 2012, 12.0 = VS 2013...) right architecture (x64 or x86) for your DLL's target platform, and also you need to be careful around debug builds. The debug build of a DLL depends on MSVCR120d.dll which is a debug version of the library, which is installed with Visual Studio but not by the Redistributable Package.
The DLL has to be in the bin folder.
In Visual Studio, I add the dll to my project NOT in References, but "Add existing file". Then set the "Copy to Output Directory" Property for the dll to "Copy if newer".
This is a 'kludge' but you could at least use it to sanity-test:
Try hard-coding the path to the DLL in your code
[DllImport(#"C:\\mycompany\\MyDLL.dll")]
Having said that; in my case running dumpbin /DEPENDENTS as suggested by #anthony-hayward, and copying over 32-bit versions of the DLLs listed there into my working directory solved this problem for me.
The message is just a bit misleading, becuase it isn't "my" dll that can't be loaded - it's the dependencies
Try to enter the full-path of the dll.
If it doesn't work, try to copy the dll into the system32 folder.
"Unable to load DLL 'xxx.dll': The specified module could not be found. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8007007E)" means the file CAN be found BUT it's not able to load it. Try to copy the DLL file to the root folder of your application, some DLL libraries need to be available in the root folder of the application in order for it to work. Or check if there are any other depending DLL files required by it.
"Cannot find DLL 'xxx.dll': ..." means the file CANNOT be found. Try to check the path. For example, [DllImport(#"\Libraries\Folder\xxx.dll")]
Ensure that all dependencies of your own dll are present near the dll, or in System32.
Turn on the fusion logging, see this question for lots of advice on how to do that. Debugging mixed-mode apps loading problems can be a right royal pain. The fusion logging can be a big help.
Make sure you set the Build Platform Target to x86 or x64 so that it is compatible with your DLL - which might be compiled for a 32 bit platform.
There is one very funny thing (and has a technical relevance) which might waste your hours so thought of sharing it here -
I created a console application project ConsoleApplication1 and a class library project ClassLibrary1.
All the code which was making the p/invoke was present in ClassLibrary1.dll. So before debugging the application from visual studio I simply copied the C++ unmanaged assembly (myUnmanagedFunctions.dll) into the \bin\debug\ directory of ClassLibrary1 project so that it can be loaded at run-time by the CLR.
I kept getting the
Unable to load DLL
error for hours. Later on I realized that all such unmanaged assemblies which are to be loaded need to be copied into the \bin\debug directory of the start-up project ConsoleApplication1 which is usually a win form, console or web application.
So please be cautious the Current Directory in the accepted answer actually means Current Directory of main executable from where you application process is starting. Looks like an obvious thing but might not be so at times.
Lesson Learnt - Always place the unamanaged dlls in the same directory as the start-up executable to ensure that it can be found.
I had the same problem when I deployed my application to test PC. The problem was development PC had msvcp110d.dll and msvcr110d.dll but not the test PC.
I added "Visual Studio C++ 11.0 DebugCRT (x86)" merge module in InstalledSheild and it worked. Hope this will be helpful for someone else.
In my case one unmanaged dll was depending on another which was missing. In that case the error will point to the existing dll instead of the missing one which can be really confusing.
That is exactly what had happen in my case. Hope this helps someone else.
If the DLL and the .NET projects are in the same solution and you want to compile and run both every time, you can right click the properties of the .NET project, Build events, then add something like the following to Post-build event command line:
copy $(SolutionDir)Debug\MyOwn.dll .
It's basically a DOS line, and you can tweak based on where your DLL is being built to.
I think your unmanaged library needs a manifest.
Here is how to add it to your binary. and here is why.
In summary, several Redistributable library versions can be installed in your box but only one of them should satisfy your App, and it might not be the default, so you need to tell the system the version your library needs, that's why the manifest.
Setup: 32-bit Windows 7
Context: Installed a PCI-GPIB driver that I was unable to communicate through due to the aforementioned issue.
Short Answer: Reinstall the driver.
Long Answer:
I also used Dependency Walker, which identified several missing dependency modules. Immediately, I thought that it must have been a botched driver installation. I didn't want to check and restore each missing file.
The fact that I was unable to find the uninstaller under Programs and Features of the Control Panel is another indicator of bad installation. I had to manually delete a couple of *.dll in \system32 and registry keys to allow for driver re-installation.
Issue fixed.
The unexpected part was that not all dependency modules were resolved. Nevertheless, the *.dll of interest can now be referenced.
I have come across the same problem, In my case I had two 32 bit pcs.
One with .NET4.5 installed and other one was fresh PC.
my 32-bit cpp dll(Release mode build) was working fine with .NET installed PC but Not with fresh PC where I got the below error
Unable to load DLL 'PrinterSettings.dll': The specified module could not be
found. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8007007E)
finally,
I just built my project in Debug mode configuration and this time my
cpp dll was working fine.
Also faced the same problem when using unmanaged c/c++ dll file in c# environment.
1.Checked the compatibility of dll with 32bit or 64bit CPU.
2.Checked the correct paths of DLL .bin folder, system32/sysWOW64 , or given path.
3.Checked if PDB(Programme Database) files are missing.This video gives you ans best
undestand about pdb files.
When running 32-bit C/C++ binary code in 64bit system, could arise this because of platform incompatibility. You can change it from Build>Configuration manager.
I faced the same problem when import C++ Dll in .Net Framework +4, I unchecked Project->Properties->Build->Prefer 32-bit and it solved for me.
It has nothing to do with dependencies if you checked all dependencies and you know you got them all, it has nothing to do with the file being in the wrong directory either or incorrect ARGUMENTS passed to dll, the DLL Fails to load using LoadLibrary itself.. you could check the address returned from LoadLibrary is always 0x0000000 (not loaded).
I couldn't figure this error out either it worked fine on Windows 7, but on Windows 10 it doesn't work. I fixed the problem though it had nothing to do with missing dependencies or Runtime redistributable packs.
The problem was I had to pack the DLL with upx and it started working again.
Something with the file being unpacked and compiled on old Windows XP operating system created a bad PE Header or Bad file format or something, but packing it with UPX did the trick works fine now and the DLL got 3x smaller haha.
I got this error for one C++ project in our solution, and only on our buildmaster's machine. The rest of us could build it with no problem.
In our case it was because that particular project had <WindowsTargetPlatformVersion> in the .vcxproj file set to "10.0" vs. "10.0.18362.0" as in all our other C++ projects.
Not specifying the entire SDK version number seems to have allowed MSBuild to choose the newest(?) SDK and associated build tools.
Our buildmaster likely had the remnants of a newer SDK on his machine, and MSBuild was trying to use it (and thus RC.exe was not found).
In any case, bringing up the project's property page and changing Configuration Properties > General > Windows SDK Version to "10.0.18362.0" (or whichever specific version of the SDK you have installed) for all of the project's configurations/platforms did the trick.

vs2017 linking realsense camera

I'm trying to use a Intel RealSense camera in a c# project.
While the example code seams to run just fine.
My own project in a different folder raises an exception.
Unable to load DLL
"realsense2:The specified module could not be found. (Exception from HRESULT:0x8007007E)."
I've now placed the realsense2.dll in lib folder and in debug folder.
I think its a unmanaged dll and the other "Intel.RealSense.dll" seams a .net interface dll . I placed both in lib and in debug folders I tried referencing the Intel.realsense.dll (.net api wrapper) in both locations (debug folder and in lib folder), but to no success.
From Intel forums I noted that sometimes the error gets raised when the CPU model isn't correct, but I kept those the same as the sample.
This must be some visual studio error (since the Intel example works).
But I miss where it goes wrong.
Step 1. Build the provided C++/C# samples using the instructions located in the main repo under /wrappers/csharp/readme.md
Generate the VS solution using cmake (run from librealsense root dir):
mkdir build
cd build
cmake .. -DBUILD_CSHARP_BINDINGS=ON -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON
The file realsense2.sln should be created in build folder, open the file with Visual Studio, C# examples and library will be available in the solution under Wrappers/csharp.
Both the native library and the .NET wrapper are built by default as part of the examples dependencies.
Step 2. Take a look at the working samples for reference. The default librealsense build on Windows is Debug/Win32 (For this config, built samples will be available at your_librealsense_dir/build/Debug)
In your C# project you need to have Intel.RealSense.dll added as a reference and copy realsense2.dll in your build directory ex: your_project_home/bin/x86/Debug
Note: Looking below, I think it's likely you have all these DLLs. Possibly you have a path issue. Check your EXE is running from the same folder the DLLs are in.
Here are the dependencies of realsense2.dll (x86) output by DUMPBIN:
These Windows ones:
KERNEL32.dll
USER32.dll
ole32.dll
OLEAUT32.dll
ADVAPI32.dll
SHLWAPI.dll
CFGMGR32.dll
SETUPAPI.dll
MF.dll
MFPlat.DLL
MFReadWrite.dll
WINUSB.DLL
And this VS 2017 one:
VCOMP140.DLL
Dependency Walker will tell you which ones you do or don't have.

External DLL write in C and use in C# [duplicate]

I have a dll library with unmanaged C++ API code I need to use in my .NET 4.0 application. But every method I try to load my dll I get an error:
Unable to load DLL 'MyOwn.dll': The specified module could not be found. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8007007E)
I have read and tried several solutions I have found on the internet. Nothing works..
I have tried using following methods:
[DllImport("MyOwn.dll", CallingConvention = CallingConvention.Cdecl)]
[return: MarshalAs((UnmanagedType.I4))]
public static extern Int32 MyProIni(string DBname, string DBuser_pass,
string WorkDirectory, ref StringBuilder ErrorMessage);
When I tried following this article and when I run this example (from the downloaded code) it runs without a problem (the dll used is in the bin/debug folder)
I have copied my dll (along with all the files the it depends on into my bin folder).
I also tried this approach but got the same error:
[DllImportAttribute(MyOwnLibDllPath, EntryPoint="TMproIni")]
[return: MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.I4)]
public static extern int MyproIni(string DBname, string DBuser_pass,
string WorkDirectory, ref StringBuilder ErrorMessage);
Any suggestions?
From what I remember on Windows the search order for a dll is:
Current Directory
System folder, C:\windows\system32 or c:\windows\SysWOW64 (for 32-bit process on 64-bit box).
Reading from the Path environment variable
In addition I'd check the dependencies of the DLL, the dependency walker provided with Visual Studio can help you out here, it can also be downloaded for free: http://www.dependencywalker.com
You can use the dumpbin tool to find out the required DLL dependencies:
dumpbin /DEPENDENTS my.dll
This will tell you which DLLs your DLL needs to load. Particularly look out for MSVCR*.dll. I have seen your error code occur when the correct Visual C++ Redistributable is not installed.
You can get the "Visual C++ Redistributable Packages for Visual Studio 2013" from the Microsoft website. It installs c:\windows\system32\MSVCR120.dll
In the file name, 120 = 12.0 = Visual Studio 2013.
Be careful that you have the right Visual Studio version (10.0 = VS 10, 11 = VS 2012, 12.0 = VS 2013...) right architecture (x64 or x86) for your DLL's target platform, and also you need to be careful around debug builds. The debug build of a DLL depends on MSVCR120d.dll which is a debug version of the library, which is installed with Visual Studio but not by the Redistributable Package.
The DLL has to be in the bin folder.
In Visual Studio, I add the dll to my project NOT in References, but "Add existing file". Then set the "Copy to Output Directory" Property for the dll to "Copy if newer".
This is a 'kludge' but you could at least use it to sanity-test:
Try hard-coding the path to the DLL in your code
[DllImport(#"C:\\mycompany\\MyDLL.dll")]
Having said that; in my case running dumpbin /DEPENDENTS as suggested by #anthony-hayward, and copying over 32-bit versions of the DLLs listed there into my working directory solved this problem for me.
The message is just a bit misleading, becuase it isn't "my" dll that can't be loaded - it's the dependencies
Try to enter the full-path of the dll.
If it doesn't work, try to copy the dll into the system32 folder.
"Unable to load DLL 'xxx.dll': The specified module could not be found. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8007007E)" means the file CAN be found BUT it's not able to load it. Try to copy the DLL file to the root folder of your application, some DLL libraries need to be available in the root folder of the application in order for it to work. Or check if there are any other depending DLL files required by it.
"Cannot find DLL 'xxx.dll': ..." means the file CANNOT be found. Try to check the path. For example, [DllImport(#"\Libraries\Folder\xxx.dll")]
Ensure that all dependencies of your own dll are present near the dll, or in System32.
Turn on the fusion logging, see this question for lots of advice on how to do that. Debugging mixed-mode apps loading problems can be a right royal pain. The fusion logging can be a big help.
Make sure you set the Build Platform Target to x86 or x64 so that it is compatible with your DLL - which might be compiled for a 32 bit platform.
There is one very funny thing (and has a technical relevance) which might waste your hours so thought of sharing it here -
I created a console application project ConsoleApplication1 and a class library project ClassLibrary1.
All the code which was making the p/invoke was present in ClassLibrary1.dll. So before debugging the application from visual studio I simply copied the C++ unmanaged assembly (myUnmanagedFunctions.dll) into the \bin\debug\ directory of ClassLibrary1 project so that it can be loaded at run-time by the CLR.
I kept getting the
Unable to load DLL
error for hours. Later on I realized that all such unmanaged assemblies which are to be loaded need to be copied into the \bin\debug directory of the start-up project ConsoleApplication1 which is usually a win form, console or web application.
So please be cautious the Current Directory in the accepted answer actually means Current Directory of main executable from where you application process is starting. Looks like an obvious thing but might not be so at times.
Lesson Learnt - Always place the unamanaged dlls in the same directory as the start-up executable to ensure that it can be found.
I had the same problem when I deployed my application to test PC. The problem was development PC had msvcp110d.dll and msvcr110d.dll but not the test PC.
I added "Visual Studio C++ 11.0 DebugCRT (x86)" merge module in InstalledSheild and it worked. Hope this will be helpful for someone else.
In my case one unmanaged dll was depending on another which was missing. In that case the error will point to the existing dll instead of the missing one which can be really confusing.
That is exactly what had happen in my case. Hope this helps someone else.
If the DLL and the .NET projects are in the same solution and you want to compile and run both every time, you can right click the properties of the .NET project, Build events, then add something like the following to Post-build event command line:
copy $(SolutionDir)Debug\MyOwn.dll .
It's basically a DOS line, and you can tweak based on where your DLL is being built to.
I think your unmanaged library needs a manifest.
Here is how to add it to your binary. and here is why.
In summary, several Redistributable library versions can be installed in your box but only one of them should satisfy your App, and it might not be the default, so you need to tell the system the version your library needs, that's why the manifest.
Setup: 32-bit Windows 7
Context: Installed a PCI-GPIB driver that I was unable to communicate through due to the aforementioned issue.
Short Answer: Reinstall the driver.
Long Answer:
I also used Dependency Walker, which identified several missing dependency modules. Immediately, I thought that it must have been a botched driver installation. I didn't want to check and restore each missing file.
The fact that I was unable to find the uninstaller under Programs and Features of the Control Panel is another indicator of bad installation. I had to manually delete a couple of *.dll in \system32 and registry keys to allow for driver re-installation.
Issue fixed.
The unexpected part was that not all dependency modules were resolved. Nevertheless, the *.dll of interest can now be referenced.
I have come across the same problem, In my case I had two 32 bit pcs.
One with .NET4.5 installed and other one was fresh PC.
my 32-bit cpp dll(Release mode build) was working fine with .NET installed PC but Not with fresh PC where I got the below error
Unable to load DLL 'PrinterSettings.dll': The specified module could not be
found. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8007007E)
finally,
I just built my project in Debug mode configuration and this time my
cpp dll was working fine.
Also faced the same problem when using unmanaged c/c++ dll file in c# environment.
1.Checked the compatibility of dll with 32bit or 64bit CPU.
2.Checked the correct paths of DLL .bin folder, system32/sysWOW64 , or given path.
3.Checked if PDB(Programme Database) files are missing.This video gives you ans best
undestand about pdb files.
When running 32-bit C/C++ binary code in 64bit system, could arise this because of platform incompatibility. You can change it from Build>Configuration manager.
I faced the same problem when import C++ Dll in .Net Framework +4, I unchecked Project->Properties->Build->Prefer 32-bit and it solved for me.
It has nothing to do with dependencies if you checked all dependencies and you know you got them all, it has nothing to do with the file being in the wrong directory either or incorrect ARGUMENTS passed to dll, the DLL Fails to load using LoadLibrary itself.. you could check the address returned from LoadLibrary is always 0x0000000 (not loaded).
I couldn't figure this error out either it worked fine on Windows 7, but on Windows 10 it doesn't work. I fixed the problem though it had nothing to do with missing dependencies or Runtime redistributable packs.
The problem was I had to pack the DLL with upx and it started working again.
Something with the file being unpacked and compiled on old Windows XP operating system created a bad PE Header or Bad file format or something, but packing it with UPX did the trick works fine now and the DLL got 3x smaller haha.
I got this error for one C++ project in our solution, and only on our buildmaster's machine. The rest of us could build it with no problem.
In our case it was because that particular project had <WindowsTargetPlatformVersion> in the .vcxproj file set to "10.0" vs. "10.0.18362.0" as in all our other C++ projects.
Not specifying the entire SDK version number seems to have allowed MSBuild to choose the newest(?) SDK and associated build tools.
Our buildmaster likely had the remnants of a newer SDK on his machine, and MSBuild was trying to use it (and thus RC.exe was not found).
In any case, bringing up the project's property page and changing Configuration Properties > General > Windows SDK Version to "10.0.18362.0" (or whichever specific version of the SDK you have installed) for all of the project's configurations/platforms did the trick.

A reference to .dll could not be added. Please make sure that the file is accessible, and that it is a valid assembly or COM component

Ok now i will try to explain my problem as much as possible. I want to use popular compression algorithm 7zip at my c# project
There is already NuGet package for 7zip
Now when i install 7zip page https://www.nuget.org/packages/SevenZipSharp/0.64.0 it installs fine however it gives error when i try to run
An unhandled exception of type 'SevenZip.SevenZipLibraryException' occurred in SevenZipSharp.dll
Additional information: Can not load 7-zip library or internal COM error! Message: failed to load library
So i decide to add dll file manually and i get this error below
---------------------------
Microsoft Visual Studio
---------------------------
A reference to 'D:\51_doktora tez projesi\program_crawler\doktora_tez_projesi_crawler_program\ExternalDLLs\7z_9_38_2015_01_03.dll' could not be added. Please make sure that the file is accessible, and that it is a valid assembly or COM component.
---------------------------
OK
---------------------------
Ok but i found a solution and it works that way
First install nuget package
And before start calling functions set path
SevenZip.SevenZipExtractor.SetLibraryPath("SevenZipSharp.dll");
SevenZip.SevenZipCompressor.SetLibraryPath("SevenZipSharp.dll");
Ok second question which is also interesting
I wanted to use latest version of 7zip DLL file. So downloaded it from official website : https://sourceforge.net/projects/sevenzip/files/7-Zip/9.38/
Downloaded MSI installed and got 64bit dll file. However when i try to reference this file, it fails with error message above: Please make sure that the file is accessible, and that it is a valid assembly or COM component.
However the trick works again
I install NuGet 7zip package. Then before calling functions i set these 2 lines of code and it uses latest version of DLL file
SevenZip.SevenZipExtractor.SetLibraryPath("ExternalDLLs/7z_9_38_2015_01_03.dll");
SevenZip.SevenZipCompressor.SetLibraryPath("ExternalDLLs/7z_9_38_2015_01_03.dll");
So i am looking for answers why all these happens? Why i can not directly add as a reference the DLL file however the trick works?
windows 8.1 64bit, Visual Studio 2013 update 3 WPF application
Part of your problem most likely stems from the fact that SevenZipSharp is merely a wrapper for the 7z.dll, which to the best of my knowledge is a c++ dll. The project page, for SevenZipSharp, also mentions that any compatible dll can be used and needs to be specified:
SevenZipSharp requires a 7-zip native library to function. You can specify the path to a 7-zip dll (7z.dll, 7za.dll, etc.) in LibraryManager.cs at compile time, your app.config or via SetLibraryPath() method at runtime. + "7z.dll" is the default path. For 64-bit systems, you must use the 64-bit versions of those libraries.
7-zip ships with 7z.dll, which is used for all archive operations (usually it is "Program Files\7-Zip\7z.dll"). 7za.dll is a light version of 7z.dll, it supports only 7zip archives. You may even build your own library with formats you want from 7-zip sources. SevenZipSharp will work with them all.

C# application seems to search both MSVCP90d and side-by-side

I build a collection of C++ libraries with the command-line and wrap them with managed C++ for C# support.
It worked fine with VS2010, but in VS2008 it results in a "the specified module could not be found 0x8007007E" error.
After some investigation with dependency walker and process monitor, it looked like the application loads the side-by-side assemblies msvcp90d, msvcr90d and msvcm90d, but then searches for the same DLLs in the directories at the PATH. When I tried to add these libraries, to system32 folder or the application folder, it crashed due to R6034 error: "An application has made an attempt to load the C runtime library without using a manifest" (the vc10 dlls are indeed at the system32 folder).
Though I didn't use the manifest tool, I see that the compiler generates manifest file. However, copying them to the DLLs directory didn't help. Is there another way I should use the manifest tool?
I'd like to hear you suggestions for solutions and directions to research.
Some additional relevant information:
So far I used generated solutions and projects and the error didn't occur.
I haven't tried yet to reinstall\repair VS2008.
The managed libraries use the System.Core of v3.5 at the Program Files\Reference Assemblies folder.

Categories