I have on .NET 6 project using xamarin.android where the resource designer file generated with an error CS0131 : The left-hand side of an assignment must be a variable, property or indexer:
public static void UpdateIdValues()
{
global::MyGame.Resource.Color.alignment_marker_color = global::MyGame.Resource.Color.alignment_marker_color;
global::MyGame.Resource.Color.white_transparent = global::MyGame.Resource.Color.white_transparent;
global::MyGame.Resource.Dimension.alignment_marker_height = global::MyGame.Resource.Dimension.alignment_marker_height;
// ...
}
with values generated like so :
public partial class Color
{
// aapt resource value: 0x7F010000
public const int alignment_marker_color = 2130771968;
// aapt resource value: 0x7F010001
public const int white_transparent = 2130771969;
// ...
}
Is it an issue with the xamarin dependency ? If so, is it something i can solve through nuget ? dotnet workload ?
I had this issue myself, and after much trial and error, I found that the issue was caused by me having two assemblies, both containing Resources which had the same "Default Namespace" in their project properties.
After changing the namespace in one of them, deleting the bin and obj folders, running a Clean (overkill) I was able to successfully rebuild the project without error.
Related
I'm fairly rusty when it comes to C#. I've been poking my nose around internet trying to find a solution to my question without success.
I created a test project using MSTest. Some tests use files, that I added to my project test under the folder TestData, and they are copied when executing the test by using the attribute DeploymentItem.
Example: [DeploymentItem(#"TestData\test.txt")]
This copies test.txt at the execution folder and it works. However, when I want to use this file in the test, I then have to work on "test.txt" instead of #"TestData\test.txt". Thus, if I want to factorize my code, I have to have two variables:
const string testFileName = "test.txt";
const string testFilePath = #"TestData\test.txt";
and then use them as
[DeploymentItem(testFilePath)]
public void TestFunction()
{
[...]testFileName[...]
}
Ideally, I want instead to write:
[DeploymentItem(testFilePath)]
public void TestFunction()
{
[...]testFilePath[...]
}
This way I would only need one variable.
It would work if I use the second argument of DeploymentItem as such:
const string testFilesFolder = "TestData";
const string testFilePath = #"TestData\test.txt";
[DeploymentItem(testFilePath, testFilesFolder)]
public void TestFunction()
{
[...]testFilePath[...]
}
However, that forces me and everyone to think about passing the second argument every time we use DeploymentItem. But it has the merit of working.
Here are the different things I tried to do to address the issue:
Inheriting from DeploymentItem to simply add my own constructor: DeploymentItem is sealed so this is not possible.
Creating my own attribute, by copying the code of DeploymentItem. The file is not copied at all:
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class | AttributeTargets.Method, AllowMultiple = true)]
class DeployFileAttribute : Attribute
{
public DeployFileAttribute(string path)
{
Path = path;
OutputDirectory = System.IO.Path.GetDirectoryName(path);
}
public string Path { get; }
public string OutputDirectory { get; }
}
[DeployFile(testFilePath)] // testFilePath is not copied at all, even though the constructor is correctly executed.
Creating a method that would return the attribute. It does not seem like it is possible to use the result of a method as an attribute:
public static DeploymentItemAttribute DeployFile(string path)
{
return new DeploymentItemAttribute(path, System.IO.Path.GetDirectoryName(path));
} // No compilation error
[DeployFile(testFilePath)] // DeployFileAttribute type does not exist
Creating something like a C++ style using statement or C style macro, I can't seem to find a syntax that works
using DeployFile(string toto) = DeploymentItemAttribute(toto, System.IO.Path.GetDirectoryName(path)); // Syntax is wrong, could not find one that works
Any hindsight would be welcome!
From my point of view, there are only two possibilities:
You use DeploymentItem in the way it was created by Microsoft.
[DeploymentItem(testFilePath, testFilesFolder)] as you manshioned in your post
You can combine source path:
const string testFileName = "test.txt";
[DeploymentItem(#"TestData\" + testFileName)]
public void TestFunction()
{
[...]testFileName[...]
}
In this case, you'll have just one variable :)
You can write your own extension for MSTest and create an attribute you need. But this is not the easy way. As key words for this approach, you could google for TestExtensionExecution, ITestMethodInvoker and TestClassExtensionAttribute
On the other hand, this is very understandable, why DeploymentItem is implemented as it is. Do not forget, that the source folder can be an absolute path as well. So assume, that you have the following attribute [DeploymentItem(#"S:\Shared\TestFiles\AAA\BBB\test.txt")] What should be the destination folder? But even with relative paths: [DeploymentItem(#"..\..\..\TestFiles\AAA\BBB\test.txt")] - can say the name of the destination folder in this case?
I have a .NET assembly that is built by me but would like to be able rewrite the .DLL with some minor but arbitrary attribute change file at runtime. Specifically I would like to be able to change a property of an attribute of a class so that I can customize the binary depending on the situation.
To illustrate, I want to achieve the effect of editing the assembly being generated from the code
[SomeAttribute("Name")]
public class MyClass{
...
such that the new assembly is functionally the same as
[SomeAttribute("Custom Name")]
public class MyClass{
...
And this "Custom Name" could be anything (determined at runtime). Is this possible to do at runtime?
The reason why the actual .DLL needs to be modified is because it will get loaded up by a seperate process which cannot determine the runtime information (I do not control this process).
Experimentation so far has shown that it seems to work if the new "Custom Name" is the same length as the original, but not otherwise (even if you edit the preceding byte that specifies the length; presumably there are offsets stored in the file somewhere).
EDIT: Forgot to mention, solution needs to be under the .NET 2 framework as well.
Unclear what you really want to do (XY problem?)
Still, if you want to modify an assembly, you normally use Mono.Cecil that self-describes as: you can load existing managed assemblies, browse all the contained types, modify them on the fly and save back to the disk the modified assembly. .
Note that an attribute can contain extra data on top of the data that is passed as a parameter:
public class MyAttribute : Attribute
{
public MyAttribute(string str)
{
argument = str;
}
private string argument;
public string Argument { get; }
public string AssemblyName
{
get
{
return Assembly.GetEntryAssembly().FullName;
}
}
}
[MyAttribute("Hello")]
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var attr = typeof(Program).GetCustomAttribute<MyAttribute>();
Console.WriteLine(attr.Argument);
Console.WriteLine(attr.AssemblyName);
}
}
Using the extremely helpful suggestion from #xanatos I have made this solution:
Under .NET 2, you can install package Mono.Cecil 0.9.6.1.
The code then is as follows:
AssemblyDefinition assbDef = AssemblyDefinition.ReadAssembly("x.dll");
TypeDefinition type = assbDef.MainModule.GetType("NameSpace.MyClass").Resolve();
foreach (CustomAttribute attr in type.CustomAttributes)
{
TypeReference argTypeRef = null;
int? index = null;
for (int i = 0; i < attr.ConstructorArguments.Count; i++)
{
CustomAttributeArgument arg = attr.ConstructorArguments[i];
string stringValue = arg.Value as string;
if (stringValue == "Name")
{
argTypeRef = arg.Type;
index = i;
}
}
if (index != null)
{
attr.ConstructorArguments[(int)index] = new CustomAttributeArgument(argTypeRef, newName);
}
}
assbDef.Write("y.dll");
Which will search an assembly for any attribute arguments with value "Name" and replace their value with newName.
Rather than modifying the DLL, you can add attributes at run-time using the TypeDescriptor class; e.g.
TypeDescriptor.AddAttributes(typeof(MyClass), new SomeAttribute("Custom Name"));
The only caveat with this approach is that code which relies purely on reflection will not be able to read the added attribute(s) - you must use TypeDescriptor.GetAttributes(). However, most of the built-in .NET Framework methods that operate on attributes are aware of metadata added at run-time.
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.componentmodel.typedescriptor_methods(v=vs.110).aspx
We would like the use the bundling mechanism of System.Web.Optimization in combination with the Less transformer.
The problem is that the same application/server serves pages for different branded websites. So depending on the 'SiteContext' the same .less files are used but different values should be used by the .less variables. So we want the (re)use the same less files but with different variables depending on the context of the request.
I tried a couple of different theories:
In all 3 cases I setup different bundles depending on the SiteContext.
1 inject an #import directive with the themed variables by using a custom VirtualPathProvider that intercepts the variables.less file.
So I have:
the styling file eg: header.less (imports the variables file)
the variables file: variables.less
a themed variables file: variables-theme.less (injected in variables.less via the VirtualPathProvider)
This is not working because the BundleTransformer cache sees this as the same file and doesn't know about the SiteContext. The cache key is based on the Url of the IAsset and we cannot influence this behavior.
2 Replace the variables.less import by variables-themed.less with an custom transformer that runs before the Less transformer.
Again no luck, same caching issues.
And as a side effect, the extra transformer was not called in debug because the assets are not bundled but called individually by the LessAssetHandler. This could be solved by writing your own AssetHandler that calls all required transformers.
3 create themed Asset names that are resolved by a custom VirtualPathProvider
Eg. Add header-themeX.less to the bundle, this file doesn't exist but you resolve this file to header.less and use method 2 to set the correct variables file import. (replace the import of the variables.less to the themed version).
Once again no luck. I think this could solve the caching issue if it wasn't for the Bundle.Include(string virtualPath) that does a File.Exists(path) internally. It doesn't pass via the CustomVirtualPathProvider.
Am I looking to deep to solve this?
All ideas are welcome, I can imagine that this will become a problem to more and more people as the System.Web.Optimization library gets more popular...
Keep in mind that:
we have a lot of .less/css files
we will have 5 or so themes
we like to keep things working in visual studio (that is why header.less has a ref. to variables.less)
Thanks for any feedback.
Michael!
You use the Microsoft ASP.NET Web Optimization Framework and the Bundle Transformer in multi-tenant environment, so you need to replace some components of the System.Web.Optimization and create own versions of the debugging HTTP-handlers (see «Problem: LESS file imports are added to BundleResponse.Files collection» discussion). As far as I know, Murat Cakir solve all these problems in the SmartStore.NET project.
In the Bundle Transformer there are 2 ways to inject of LESS-variables:
Look a properties GlobalVariables and ModifyVariables of LESS-translator:
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Web.Optimization;
using BundleTransformer.Core.Builders;
using BundleTransformer.Core.Orderers;
using BundleTransformer.Core.Transformers;
using BundleTransformer.Core.Translators;
using BundleTransformer.Less.Translators;
public class BundleConfig
{
public static void RegisterBundles(BundleCollection bundles)
{
var nullBuilder = new NullBuilder();
var nullOrderer = new NullOrderer();
var lessTranslator = new LessTranslator
{
GlobalVariables = "my-variable='Hurrah!'",
ModifyVariables = "font-family-base='Comic Sans MS';body-bg=lime;font-size-h1=50px"
};
var cssTransformer = new CssTransformer(new List<ITranslator>{ lessTranslator });
var commonStylesBundle = new Bundle("~/Bundles/BootstrapStyles");
commonStylesBundle.Include(
"~/Content/less/bootstrap-3.1.1/bootstrap.less");
commonStylesBundle.Builder = nullBuilder;
commonStylesBundle.Transforms.Add(cssTransformer);
commonStylesBundle.Orderer = nullOrderer;
bundles.Add(commonStylesBundle);
}
}
Create a custom item transformation:
using System.Text;
using System.Web.Optimization;
public sealed class InjectContentItemTransform : IItemTransform
{
private readonly string _beforeContent;
private readonly string _afterContent;
public InjectContentItemTransform(string beforeContent, string afterContent)
{
_beforeContent = beforeContent ?? string.Empty;
_afterContent = afterContent ?? string.Empty;
}
public string Process(string includedVirtualPath, string input)
{
if (_beforeContent.Length == 0 && _afterContent.Length == 0)
{
return input;
}
var contentBuilder = new StringBuilder();
if (_beforeContent.Length > 0)
{
contentBuilder.AppendLine(_beforeContent);
}
contentBuilder.AppendLine(input);
if (_afterContent.Length > 0)
{
contentBuilder.AppendLine(_afterContent);
}
return contentBuilder.ToString();
}
}
And register this transformation as follows:
using System.Web.Optimization;
using BundleTransformer.Core.Orderers;
using BundleTransformer.Core.Bundles;
public class BundleConfig
{
public static void RegisterBundles(BundleCollection bundles)
{
var nullOrderer = new NullOrderer();
const string beforeLessCodeToInject = #"#my-variable: 'Hurrah!';";
const string afterLessCodeToInject = #"#font-family-base: 'Comic Sans MS';
#body-bg: lime;
#font-size-h1: 50px;";
var commonStylesBundle = new CustomStyleBundle("~/Bundles/BootstrapStyles");
commonStylesBundle.Include(
"~/Content/less/bootstrap-3.1.1/bootstrap.less",
new InjectContentItemTransform(beforeLessCodeToInject, afterLessCodeToInject));
commonStylesBundle.Orderer = nullOrderer;
bundles.Add(commonStylesBundle);
}
}
Both ways have disadvantage: the injection of LESS-variables does not work in debug mode.
I have my own custom tool for Visual Studio 2008 SP1. It consists of 5 assemblies: 3 assemblies with code that are used heavily in my other projects, 1 assembly-wrapper above VS2008 SDK and an assembly with the tool.
If I'd debug my tool from visual studio, using "Run external program" option with command line "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\Common7\IDE\devenv.exe" and arguments "/ranu /rootsuffix Exp" all works perfectly.
After that I'm trying to deploy it to my working VS copy, not to experimental hive, doing: gacutil /i Asm1.dll for all my assemblies and doing RegAsm Asm1.dll only for assembly with custom tool. Neither of utils prints any error, all work as planned, even registry keys appear. But my tool doesn't work (error occurred "Cannot find custom tool 'TransportGeneratorTool' on this system") even after PC restart. What did I do wrong?
Wrapper looks like that:
[ComVisible(true)]
public abstract class CustomToolBase : IVsSingleFileGenerator, IObjectWithSite
{
#region IVsSingleFileGenerator Members
int IVsSingleFileGenerator.DefaultExtension(out string pbstrDefaultExtension)
{
pbstrDefaultExtension = ".cs";
return 0;
}
int IVsSingleFileGenerator.Generate(string wszInputFilePath, string bstrInputFileContents, string wszDefaultNamespace, IntPtr[] rgbOutputFileContents, out uint pcbOutput, IVsGeneratorProgress pGenerateProgress)
{
GenerationEventArgs gea = new GenerationEventArgs(
bstrInputFileContents,
wszInputFilePath,
wszDefaultNamespace,
new ServiceProvider(Site as Microsoft.VisualStudio.OLE.Interop.IServiceProvider)
.GetService(typeof(ProjectItem)) as ProjectItem,
new GenerationProgressFacade(pGenerateProgress)
);
if (OnGenerateCode != null)
{
OnGenerateCode(this, gea);
}
byte[] bytes = gea.GetOutputCodeBytes();
int outputLength = bytes.Length;
rgbOutputFileContents[0] = Marshal.AllocCoTaskMem(outputLength);
Marshal.Copy(bytes, 0, rgbOutputFileContents[0], outputLength);
pcbOutput = (uint)outputLength;
return VSConstants.S_OK;
}
#endregion
#region IObjectWithSite Members
void IObjectWithSite.GetSite(ref Guid riid, out IntPtr ppvSite)
{
IntPtr pUnk = Marshal.GetIUnknownForObject(Site);
IntPtr intPointer = IntPtr.Zero;
Marshal.QueryInterface(pUnk, ref riid, out intPointer);
ppvSite = intPointer;
}
void IObjectWithSite.SetSite(object pUnkSite)
{
Site = pUnkSite;
}
#endregion
#region Public Members
public object Site { get; private set; }
public event EventHandler<GenerationEventArgs> OnGenerateCode;
[ComRegisterFunction]
public static void Register(Type type)
{
using (var parent = Registry.LocalMachine.OpenSubKey(#"Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\9.0", true))
foreach (CustomToolRegistrationAttribute ourData in type.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(CustomToolRegistrationAttribute), false))
ourData.Register(x => parent.CreateSubKey(x), (x, name, value) => x.SetValue(name, value));
}
[ComUnregisterFunction]
public static void Unregister(Type type)
{
using (var parent = Registry.LocalMachine.OpenSubKey(#"Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\9.0", true))
foreach (CustomToolRegistrationAttribute ourData in type.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(CustomToolRegistrationAttribute), false))
ourData.Unregister(x => parent.DeleteSubKey(x, false));
}
#endregion
}
My tool code:
[ComVisible(true)]
[Guid("55A6C192-D29F-4e22-84DA-DBAF314ED5C3")]
[CustomToolRegistration(ToolName, typeof(TransportGeneratorTool))]
[ProvideObject(typeof(TransportGeneratorTool))]
public class TransportGeneratorTool : CustomToolBase
{
private const string ToolName = "TransportGeneratorTool";
public TransportGeneratorTool()
{
OnGenerateCode += GenerateCode;
}
private static void GenerateCode(object s, GenerationEventArgs e)
{
try
{
var serializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof (Parser.System));
using (var reader = new StringReader(e.InputText))
using (var writer = new StringWriter(e.OutputCode))
{
Generator.System = (Parser.System) serializer.Deserialize(reader);
Generator.System.Namespace = e.Namespace;
Generator.GenerateSource(writer);
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
e.Progress.GenerateError(ex.ToString());
}
}
}
Resulting registry keys:
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\VisualStudio\9.0\Generators]
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\VisualStudio\9.0\Generators\{FAE04EC1-301F-11D3-BF4B-00C04F79EFBC}]
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\VisualStudio\9.0\Generators\{FAE04EC1-301F-11D3-BF4B-00C04F79EFBC}\TransportGeneratorTool]
#="TransportGeneratorTool"
"CLSID"="{55a6c192-d29f-4e22-84da-dbaf314ed5c3}"
"GeneratesDesignTimeSource"=dword:00000001
"GeneratesSharedDesignTimeSource"=dword:00000001
Here is the code of my custom attribute (it is in wrapper assembly):
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class, AllowMultiple = true, Inherited = true)]
public class CustomToolRegistrationAttribute : RegistrationAttribute
{
public CustomToolRegistrationAttribute(string name, Type customToolType)
{
Name = name;
CustomToolType = customToolType;
}
/// <summary>
/// The type that implements the custom tool. This starts
/// as MyCustomTool by default in the template.
/// </summary>
public Type CustomToolType { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
#region RegistrationAttribute abstract member implementations
public override void Register(RegistrationContext context)
{
Register(x => context.CreateKey(x), (x, key, value) => x.SetValue(key, value));
}
public void Register<T>(Func<string, T> keyCreator, Action<T, string, object> valueCreator)
{
var keyName = CreateKeyName(Name);
var key = keyCreator(keyName);
valueCreator(key, string.Empty, Name);
valueCreator(key, "CLSID", CustomToolType.GUID.ToString("B"));
valueCreator(key, "GeneratesDesignTimeSource", 1);
valueCreator(key, "GeneratesSharedDesignTimeSource", 1);
var disposable = key as IDisposable;
if (disposable != null)
disposable.Dispose();
}
private static string CreateKeyName(string name)
{
return string.Format(#"Generators\{0}\{1}", vsContextGuids.vsContextGuidVCSProject, name);
}
public override void Unregister(RegistrationContext context)
{
Unregister(context.RemoveKey);
}
public void Unregister(Action<string> keyRemover)
{
keyRemover(CreateKeyName(Name));
}
#endregion
}
My solution is to make a setup project. I get the registry settings from the pkgdef file by adding the following to the csproj file of the package:
<Target Name="GeneratePackageRegistryFiles">
<Exec Command=""$(VSSDK90Install)VisualStudioIntegration\Tools\Bin\RegPkg.exe" /root:Software\Microsoft\VisualStudio\9.0 /codebase "$(TargetPath)" /regfile:"$(OutDir)$(TargetName).reg"" />
</Target>
<PropertyGroup>
<BuildDependsOn>$(BuildDependsOn);GeneratePackageRegistryFiles;</BuildDependsOn>
</PropertyGroup>
When building look in the output directory you should find a .reg file which you can import in the setup project.
Obviously you can run the regpkg.exe from the command-line if modifying the project is not an option.
This is what I ended up with last time when I struggled to get my custom tool registered.
I hope this instruction is detailed enough and covers everything so you won't spend much time fighting it. The following MSDN article was used as a starting point. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-US/library/bb166527(v=vs.80).aspx Unfortunately you cannot use it alone. What you really need to do is:
Make sure the assembly is signed. Why? Because otherwise you won't be able to put it into GAC at step 6 below.
To sign your assembly follow these steps:
1.1. Go to the Properties screen of the project.
1.2. Once there go to the Signing tab.
1.3. Once there check the Sign the assembly checkbox.
Make sure you know the version number of your assembly. You will need this number to specify the ASSEMBLY_VERSION parameter later.
In order to get this number open the AssemblyInfo.cs file in the Properties folder of your project and look for the line starting with: [assembly: AssemblyVersion(
Make sure you know the GUID of the generator class. You will need it to specify the GENERATOR_GUID parameter later.
In order to get this GUID open the file with the generator class and look for the Guid class-attribute that decorates this class, something like: [Guid("17799E85-421B-4684-B59E-650E34ECC718")]
Build the project
Get the public token key of the assembly. In order to do that you will have to run the following command:
sn.exe -T ASSEMBLY_FILE
You will need this information later when for PUBLIC_TOKEN_KEY.
The sn.exe file can be found in C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v8.0A\bin\sn.exe
Pay attention to the version number of the framework (v8.0A) in the filepath above. It needs to be consistent with the version of the framework used to compile the project.
Put the assembly to the GAC using the following command:
gacutil.exe /i ASSEMBLY_FILE /f
Getting registered in GAC requires administrative permissions.
The gacutil.exe file can be found in C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v8.0A\bin\NETFX 4.0 Tools\gacutil.exe
Pay attention to the version number of the framework (v8.0A) in the filepath above. It needs to be consistent with the version of the framework used to compile the project.
Make the following changes to the .REG (see below) file. PLEASE NOTE: that both GENERATOR_GUID and PROJECT_TYPE_GUID need to be supplied WITH curly braces: {XXXXXXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXXXXXX}
7.1. Fix version number of Visual Studio is used (for example: 10.0 or 9.0): VS_VERSION
7.2. Fix the GUID of the generator: GENERATOR_GUID
7.3. Fix the namespace of the assembly: NAMESPACE_NAME
7.4. Fix the generator class name: GENERATOR_TYPE_NAME
7.5. In order to register the generator the Visual Studio needs to know to which project types this generator can be applied to. So you need to get GUID's of proper project types (C#, VB.NET, etc.).
To figure out the GUID's of the project types you need to open a visual studio project file (*.csproj) in a text editor and look for GUID's in the ProjectTypeGuids XML element.
For each of these GUIDs repeat the block of last 3 entries in the .REG file replacing the PROJECT_TYPE_GUID with the a GUID just found.
7.6. Fix the extension of the file associated with the custom tool: FILE_EXTENSTION
Run the .REG file. You may need to have administrative permissions for doing this.
.REG file:
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\VisualStudio\VS_VERSION\CLSID\GENERATOR_GUID]
#="COM+ class: NAMESPACE_NAME.GENERATOR_TYPE_NAME"
"InprocServer32"="C:\\WINDOWS\\system32\\mscoree.dll"
"ThreadingModel"="Both"
"Class"="NAMESPACE_NAME.GENERATOR_TYPE_NAME"
"Assembly"="NAMESPACE_NAME, Version=ASSEMBLY_VERSION, Culture=Neutral, PublicKeyToken=PUBLIC_TOKEN_KEY"
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\VisualStudio\VS_VERSION\Generators]
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\VisualStudio\VS_VERSION\Generators\PROJECT_TYPE_GUID]
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\VisualStudio\VS_VERSION\Generators\PROJECT_TYPE_GUID\\.FILE_EXTENSTION]
#="GENERATOR_TYPE_NAME"
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\VisualStudio\VS_VERSION\Generators\PROJECT_TYPE_GUID\GENERATOR_TYPE_NAME]
#="Code generator for whatever you like"
"CLSID"="GENERATOR_GUID"
"GeneratesDesignTimeSource"=dword:00000001
PS.
Sorry for not being able to make placehoders in the REG file distinct, unfortunately the text editor that StackOverflow uses cannot distinguish its markup elements from the content.
I'm getting some serious weirdness using FileVersionInfo.GetVersionInfo() and was hoping somebody might be able to help.
The basics of the issue is that I am iterating through all the files in a folder calling GetVersionInfo() on each. There are about 300 files. This works ok for all but 2 of the files. For these DLLs I am getting comepletely incorrect info back from GetVersionInfo().
In order to eliminate all other variables, I extracted this call into a simple test app and it still got the same problem. However, if I built the test app as a Windows Application (it was a Console Application initially) then the data came back correct.
Just to clarify, the incorrect data coming back when running as a Console App is not simply null info like you would get if the file didn't contain version data. It contained reasonable data, but just the wrong data. It's as if it's reading it from a different file. I've looked for a file that contains matching version data, but can't find one.
Why is this simple call functioning differently if built as a Console Application rather than a Windows Application?
If anyone can help with this I would be very grateful.
Rgds,
Andy
-- Code Added
using System;
using System.Diagnostics;
namespace test
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
string file = "C:\\ProblemFile.dll";
FileVersionInfo version = FileVersionInfo.GetVersionInfo(file);
string fileName = version.FileName;
string fileVersion = version.FileVersion;
Console.WriteLine(string.Format("{0} : {1}", fileName, fileVersion));
}
}
}
This behaviour seems weird indeed. Could it be that the Console application does not load the DLL from the same place as the WinForms application does? This would mean that GetVersionInfo uses some other API than just Win32 CreateFile (maybe going through some DLL resolver mechanism, side-by-side or whatever); remember that under the covers, version.dll will be executing your request, not the CLR itself.
Looking at FileVersionInfo through Reflector points in another direction yet:
public static unsafe FileVersionInfo GetVersionInfo(string fileName)
{
// ...
int fileVersionInfoSize = UnsafeNativeMethods.GetFileVersionInfoSize(fileName, out num);
FileVersionInfo info = new FileVersionInfo(fileName);
if (fileVersionInfoSize != 0)
{
byte[] buffer = new byte[fileVersionInfoSize];
fixed (byte* numRef = buffer)
{
IntPtr handle = new IntPtr((void*) numRef);
if (!UnsafeNativeMethods.GetFileVersionInfo(fileName, 0, fileVersionInfoSize, new HandleRef(null, handle)))
{
return info;
}
int varEntry = GetVarEntry(handle);
if (!info.GetVersionInfoForCodePage(handle, ConvertTo8DigitHex(varEntry)))
{
int[] numArray = new int[] { 0x40904b0, 0x40904e4, 0x4090000 };
foreach (int num4 in numArray)
{
if ((num4 != varEntry) && info.GetVersionInfoForCodePage(handle, ConvertTo8DigitHex(num4)))
{
return info;
}
}
}
}
}
return info;
}
As you can see there, some interesting dance is going on with code pages. What if the DLLs you inspected had several version information resources attached to them? Depending on the culture of the program calling into GetVersionInfo, I guess that the code page related calls could return other results?
Take the time to check the resources of the DLLs and make sure that there is only one language/code page for the version information. It might point you at the solution, I hope.
Sure the "files" you're seeing aren't . and .. ? If you iterate through all files, you'll always see entries for . (current dir) and .. (up dir). GetVersion Info might well return anything for these. You'd have to filter these entries out manually by name.
File and Assembly versions are 2 different things.
Are you sure you are not expecting the other?
Update: Tried this. Didn't work.
using System;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
namespace test
{
class Program
{
[DllImport("COMCTL32")]
private static extern int InitCommonControls(int nExitCode);
static void Main(string[] args)
{
InitCommonControls(0);
string file = "C:\\ProblemFile.dll";
FileVersionInfo version = FileVersionInfo.GetVersionInfo(file);
string fileName = version.FileName;
string fileVersion = version.FileVersion;
Console.WriteLine(string.Format("{0} : {1}", fileName, fileVersion));
}
}
}