Can someone explain me why need to use implementation of INotifyPropertyChanged when using binding in wpf?
I can bind properties without implementation of this interface?
For example i have code
public class StudentData : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
#region INotifyPropertyChanged Members
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
#endregion
void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
if (PropertyChanged != null)
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
string _firstName = null;
public string StudentFirstName
{
get
{
return _firstName;
}
set
{
_firstName = value;
OnPropertyChanged("StudentFirstName");
}
}
}
And binding in .xaml
<TextBox Text="{Binding Path=StudentFirstName, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}"
Grid.Row="1"
Grid.Column="2"
VerticalAlignment="Center" />
this code from .xaml.cs
StudentData _studentData = new StudentData { StudentFirstName = "John", StudentGradePointAverage = 3.5};
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.DataContext = _studentData;
}
why we need to use INotifyPropertyChanged in this case?
It is not my code.
You need INotifyPropertyChanged if you want a wpf form to be automatically updated when a property changes through code. Also some controllers might want to know if edits have been made in order to enable/disable a save-button, for instance. You also might be displaying the same property on different views; in this case INotifyPropertyChanged helps to immediately update the other view when you edit a property.
If you think that your form behaves well without INotifyPropertyChanged, then you can drop it.
Note that binding works even without INotifyPropertyChanged. See: Why does the binding update without implementing INotifyPropertyChanged?
I would implement the properties like this. In some rare cases it can help to avoid endless circular updates. And it is more efficient by the way.
private string _firstName;
public string StudentFirstName
{
get { return _firstName; }
set
{
if (value != _firstName) {
_firstName = value;
OnPropertyChanged("StudentFirstName");
}
}
}
Starting with C#6.0 (VS 2015), you can implement OnPropertyChanged like this:
private void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
When you bind to a property of StudentData such as the StudentFirstName then the binding class tests to see if the StudentData instance provides the INotifyPropertyChanged interface. If so then it will hook into the PropertyChanged event. When the event fires and it fires because of the StudentFirstName property then it knows it needs to recover the source value again because it has changed. This is how the binding is able to monitor changes in the source and reflect them in the user interface.
If you do not provide the INotifyPropertyChanged interface then the binding has no idea when the source value changes. In which case the user interface will not update when the property is changed. You will only see the initial value that was defined when the binding was first used.
It does need to be implemented in order for binding to work but that doesn't mean you always have to do it yourself. There are other options like Castle Dynamic Proxy (which wraps your classes in a proxy and injects INPC into all virtual properties) and Fody (which adds it to the IL in a post-processing step). It's also possible to implement yourself while at the same time reducing code bloat, as demonstrated in my answer to this question.
Related
Can someone explain me why need to use implementation of INotifyPropertyChanged when using binding in wpf?
I can bind properties without implementation of this interface?
For example i have code
public class StudentData : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
#region INotifyPropertyChanged Members
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
#endregion
void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
if (PropertyChanged != null)
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
string _firstName = null;
public string StudentFirstName
{
get
{
return _firstName;
}
set
{
_firstName = value;
OnPropertyChanged("StudentFirstName");
}
}
}
And binding in .xaml
<TextBox Text="{Binding Path=StudentFirstName, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}"
Grid.Row="1"
Grid.Column="2"
VerticalAlignment="Center" />
this code from .xaml.cs
StudentData _studentData = new StudentData { StudentFirstName = "John", StudentGradePointAverage = 3.5};
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.DataContext = _studentData;
}
why we need to use INotifyPropertyChanged in this case?
It is not my code.
You need INotifyPropertyChanged if you want a wpf form to be automatically updated when a property changes through code. Also some controllers might want to know if edits have been made in order to enable/disable a save-button, for instance. You also might be displaying the same property on different views; in this case INotifyPropertyChanged helps to immediately update the other view when you edit a property.
If you think that your form behaves well without INotifyPropertyChanged, then you can drop it.
Note that binding works even without INotifyPropertyChanged. See: Why does the binding update without implementing INotifyPropertyChanged?
I would implement the properties like this. In some rare cases it can help to avoid endless circular updates. And it is more efficient by the way.
private string _firstName;
public string StudentFirstName
{
get { return _firstName; }
set
{
if (value != _firstName) {
_firstName = value;
OnPropertyChanged("StudentFirstName");
}
}
}
Starting with C#6.0 (VS 2015), you can implement OnPropertyChanged like this:
private void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
When you bind to a property of StudentData such as the StudentFirstName then the binding class tests to see if the StudentData instance provides the INotifyPropertyChanged interface. If so then it will hook into the PropertyChanged event. When the event fires and it fires because of the StudentFirstName property then it knows it needs to recover the source value again because it has changed. This is how the binding is able to monitor changes in the source and reflect them in the user interface.
If you do not provide the INotifyPropertyChanged interface then the binding has no idea when the source value changes. In which case the user interface will not update when the property is changed. You will only see the initial value that was defined when the binding was first used.
It does need to be implemented in order for binding to work but that doesn't mean you always have to do it yourself. There are other options like Castle Dynamic Proxy (which wraps your classes in a proxy and injects INPC into all virtual properties) and Fody (which adds it to the IL in a post-processing step). It's also possible to implement yourself while at the same time reducing code bloat, as demonstrated in my answer to this question.
My label only seems to get the data from the property it is bound to once. I have the Property raising the Property Changed event in the setter, but when the value of the property gets changed, it raises the event properly (I know this because of the break point I set), but the text in the Label on the window doesn't change. I should maybe also note that the window with the label isn't the main window, but a new one that pops up.
ViewModel:
public class PurchaseVerificationViewModel : ViewModelBase
{
private WindowService.WindowService windowService = new WindowService.WindowService();
private string _verificationQuestion = "Question"; //default so i can check if it changed in the window
public string VerificationQuestion
{
get { return _verificationQuestion; }
set
{
if (_verificationQuestion != value)
{
_verificationQuestion = value;
OnPropertyChanged(nameof(VerificationQuestion));
}
}
}
}
Window:
<Window>
<Window.DataContext>
<viewmodels:PurchaseVerificationViewModel/>
</Window.DataContext>
<Grid>
<Label Content="{Binding VerificationQuestion, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}"/>
</Grid>
</Window>
ViewModelBase:
public class ViewModelBase : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
public void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
There's no problem with your implementation of the INotifyPropertyChanged, since you are correctly invoking the notification that your property has been modified.
So if the problem is not with the one who's raising the notification, might it rather be with what is actively listening to it?
And the problem is that you're defining the DataContext of your Window to the class itself, rather than to the instance which you are utilizing and modifying in the code-behind of your application.
What is actually happening under the hoods, due to the way you defined your DataContext in xaml, is that a new PurchaseVerificationViewModel class is being constructed (is the not the one who are modifying on your logic) and therefore your VerificationQuestion will return it's default value (or rather the private backing field default value, "Question").
In reality the problem is that you have induced your listener to listen to the wrong thing.
Since you want the content of the Label (target) to be update based on a source change, what you have to do, is to set as the DataContextof the Window the specific instance which you are modifying on the logic of your application, and make sure you define it as a property!
public PurchaseVerificationViewModel myViewModel {get;set;}
For instance after InitializeComponent(), on your page constructor, you could initialize the property and set it as the DataContext, like this:
myViewModel = new PurchaseVerificationViewModel();
this.DataContext = myViewModel;
I've got similar situation to this, but in Touch. Trying to deal with that via INotifyPropertyChanged though.
My code is the following:
set.Bind(txtSearch).For(x => x.Text).To(x => x.SearchText);
where txtSearch is my custom wrapper of UISearchBar. So, I can not inherit from MvxNotifyPropertyChanged as I already inherit from UIView (the wrapper is view).
Text property is:
public string Text { get
{
return _search.Text;
} set
{
_search.Text = value;
RaisePropertyChanged(() => Text);
}
}
and I fire it on the SearchBar text changing (which works).
I've also added the following:
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
protected IMvxMainThreadDispatcher Dispatcher
{
get { return MvxMainThreadDispatcher.Instance; }
}
protected void InvokeOnMainThread(Action action)
{
if (Dispatcher != null)
Dispatcher.RequestMainThreadAction(action);
}
protected void RaisePropertyChanged<T>(Expression<Func<T>> property)
{
var name = this.GetPropertyNameFromExpression(property);
RaisePropertyChanged(name);
}
protected void RaisePropertyChanged(string whichProperty)
{
var changedArgs = new PropertyChangedEventArgs(whichProperty);
RaisePropertyChanged(changedArgs);
}
protected void RaisePropertyChanged(PropertyChangedEventArgs changedArgs)
{
// check for subscription before going multithreaded
if (PropertyChanged == null)
return;
InvokeOnMainThread(
() =>
{
var handler = PropertyChanged;
if (handler != null)
handler(this, changedArgs);
});
}
But when everything gets to RaisePropertyChanged, then I see that PropertyChanged is empty (so, seems no code is subscribed for my object). Which, of course, makes no notifications further.
I have similar situation but with some object inherited directly from MvxNotifyPropertyChanged, which seems working fine. Does that mean, that MvvmCross only can deal with such objects but not ones which generally use INotifyPropertyChanged?
Thank you!
INotifyPropertyChanged is used on the ViewModel side for property changes.
On the View side, MvvmCross uses DependencyProperty bindings on Windows, and C# methods, properties and events on the Xamarin platforms.
INotifyPropertyChanged isn't provided by default on the View side - since no off-the-shelf View objects support INotifyPropertyChanged, then there was no point in trying to bind to it within any of the MvvmCross View platforms.
However, the binding system is extensible - so if anyone wants to write INotifyPropertyChanged based views and wants to include a custom INotifyPropertyChanged binding for the View side, then they can do that following the steps similar to In MvvmCross how do I do custom bind properties and following examples linked from https://speakerdeck.com/cirrious/custom-bindings-in-mvvmcross
If they want to write an INotifyPropertyChanged-based system for the View side, then I'm sure this could be achieved using a custom binding approach - but it's not something I've personally done. I would expect such a custom binding to work both for INotifyPropertyChanged and for MvxNotifyPropertyChanged too (since MvxNotifyPropertyChanged implements INotifyPropertyChanged) - but I guess it would be up to the author to decide on the mechanics of that.
I am a beginner to use MVVM in WPF and found that it seem impossible to change the value of a textbox or a label. Here is an example.
In Xaml:
The original value of Name is "Peter".
But after I press a button which invoke a command in the ViewModel and change the value of Name to be
"John". So, suppose the value of the text box will be changed to John as well. However, it doesn't change.
I have found a lot of example in the net and found that none of them implemented this kind of functions. What I have learnt from them is to use Command and ItemsSource of ListView.
The value of ListView will change when I use button to raise command to change the ItemsSource of the view. Its value will change automatically when the Binding to ItemsSource changed.
However, I cannot make the value of TextBox or Label change even the value of the bindings to them are changed already.
Actually, I am really quite young in MVVM. I think I still have so much that I don't know.
Could you give me an example of how exactly I should do to make change to textbox after a button click? By the way, I am not quite sure how to make command for button. It seem to involve so much codes that I found in the sample from the net. Is there any simplier way?
Thank you very much.
Your ViewModel needs to implement INotifyPropertyChanged .
Documentation see here
public class Bar : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
private string foo;
public string Foo
{
get { return this.foo; }
set
{
if(value==this.foo)
return;
this.foo = value;
this.OnPropertyChanged("Foo");
}
}
private void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
if(this.PropertyChanged!=null)
this.PropertyChanged(this,new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
Your view model should implement INotifyPropertyChanged so that WPF knows that you've altered a value of a property.
Here is an example from
// This is a simple customer class that
// implements the IPropertyChange interface.
public class DemoCustomer : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
// These fields hold the values for the public properties.
private string customerNameValue = String.Empty;
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
private void NotifyPropertyChanged(String info)
{
var listeners = PropertyChanged;
if (listeners != null)
{
PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(info));
}
}
public string CustomerName
{
get
{
return this.customerNameValue;
}
set
{
if (value != this.customerNameValue)
{
this.customerNameValue = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged("CustomerName");
}
}
}
}
I have been trying to create a fairly simple application in WPF following the MVVM development pattern but I have been going crazy over how difficult it seems to be to do simple things. I have already created this app in Forms and had it successfully running, but my boss requested I rewrite the interface in WPF as a demo of the technology. I decided to try to follow as many best practices as I can in order to make the app and code as educational as possible. My current dilemma is using a listbox to run some code every time the selection changes. I'm ready to just use the code-behind with an event to call the method on the view-model. To me this seems to still be essentially MVVM since no logic is executing. Thanks for any help/insight.
You can do that simply binding selecteditem property of listbox... on selection change a setter in the view model will be called and you can do what ever you want...
Here is a sample which will help you
XAML
<Grid Canvas.Left="0" Canvas.Bottom="0" Height="300" Width="300" Background="Bisque">
<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding Employes}" SelectedItem="{Binding SelectedEmploye}"/>
</Grid>
View Model
public class ViewModel : ViewModelBase
{
private List<Employee> _employes;
public List<Employee> Employes
{
get { return _employes; }
set { _employees = value; OnPropertyChanged("Employes"); }
}
private Employee _selectedEmploye;
public Employee SelectedEmploye
{
get { return _selectedEmploye; }
set
{
_selectedEmployee = value;
OnPropertyChanged("SelectedEmploye");
}
}
}
View model base
public class ViewModelBase : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
protected virtual void OnPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
if (this.PropertyChanged != null)
{
this.PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
}
Employee Class
public class Employee : ViewModelBase
{
private string _name;
public string Name
{
get { return _name; }
set { _name = value; }
}
}
In your ViewModel you can create a Property "SelectedItem". Bind then the SelectedItem-property if your ListBox to your property.
If it's a POCO clr-property (INotifyPropertyChanged), then you can trigger your code from the properties setter.
IF it's a DependencyProperty, you have to add a PropertyChangedCallback and trigger your code from there.
Don't be afraid to use code-behind. No code-behind is a guideline to avoid too much logic being placed in the view, not a hard and fast rule. In this case (as others have suggested) you can bind the SelectedItem property to some property on your viewmodel. With non-data-related events, my recommendation would be to handle the event as normal and delegate execution logic to the viewmodel.
In my opinion, design patterns should always be taken as rule of thumb and used with some judgement as it's quite easy to apply them too strictly in areas where they don't belong, which usually makes things worse.
Checkout the EventToCommand behavior in Galasoft MVVM Light
Here's the SO post
you can bind to ListBox.SelectedItem to get the selected item in your vm.