How to manage SqlConnection in C# for high frequency transaction? - c#

I have an application that connect to a SQL Server database with high frequency. Inside this service, there are many scheduled tasks that run every second, and each time I'm executing some query.
I don't understand which solution is better in this condition.
Opening a single SqlConnection and keeping it open while application is running and execute all query with that connection
Each time I want to execute query, opening a new connection and after query execution, close the connection (does this solution suitable for so many scheduled task that runs every 1 second?)
I tried second solution, but is there any better choice?
How do ORMs like EF manage connections?
As you see i have many service. I cant change interval and the interval is important for me. but the code makes so many calls and im following a better way manage connection over database. Also I'm making connection with Using Statement.
Is there any better solution?

you should use SQL Connection Pool feature for that.
It automatically manages in the background if a connection needs to be open or can be reused.
Documentation: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/framework/data/adonet/sql-server-connection-pooling?source=recommendations
Example copied from that page
using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(
"Integrated Security=SSPI;Initial Catalog=Northwind"))
{
connection.Open();
// Pool A is created.
}
using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(
"Integrated Security=SSPI;Initial Catalog=pubs"))
{
connection.Open();
// Pool B is created because the connection strings differ.
}
using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(
"Integrated Security=SSPI;Initial Catalog=Northwind"))
{
connection.Open();
// The connection string matches pool A.
}
By using the "using" statement, application checks if a connection in this pool can be reused before opening a new connection. So the overhead of opening and closing the connections disappears.
But after your last edit you seem to have other problems in your current architecture. Like the other poster recommends you can try to use the "with (nolock)" parameter in your sql statements. It creates dirty reads, but maybe that's ok for your application.
Alternatively if all your services use the same select statement maybe a stored procedure or a caching mechanism could help.

I assume that you are already opening/closing your SQL connections in either a "using" statement or explicitly in your code ( try/catch/finally ). If so you are already making use of connection pooling as it is enabled in ADO.Net by default ("By default, connection pooling is enabled in ADO.NET").
Therefore I don't think that your problem is so much a connection/resource problem as it is a database concurrency issue. I assume it to be either 1 of 2 issues :
Your code is making so many calls to the SQL server that it is exhausting all the available connections and nobody else can get one
Your code is locking tables in SQL that is causing other code/applications to timeout
If it is case 1, try and redesign your code to be "less chatty" to the database. Instead of making several inserts/updates per second, perhaps buffer the changes and make a single insert/update every 3-5 seconds in batch mode ( obvs if possible ). Or maybe your SQL statements are taking longer than 1 second to execute and you are calling them every second causing in a backlog scenario?
If it is case 2, try and redesign the SQL tables in such a way that the "reading" applications are not influenced by the "writing" application. Normally this involves a service that periodically writes aggregated data to a read-only table for viewing or at very least adding a "WITH(NOLOCK)" hint to the select clauses to allow dirty reads ( i.e. it wont lock the table to read, but may result in slightly out of date dataset i.e. eventual consistency )
Good luck

Related

Is overutilisation of Sql Connections in C# a problem?

Throughout the program which I am currently working on, I realized that whenever I need to access to SQL Server, I just type a queryString and execute my query using SqlCommand and SqlConnection in C#. At a certain point during the program, I even opened a connection and ran a query in a "for loop".
Is it unhealthy for the program to constantly open-close connections?
***I am not very familiar with the terminology, therefore you might be having some problems understanding what I am talking about:
Is doing this very frequently may cause any problem?:
string queryString = "Some SQL Query";
public void(){
SqlConnection con = new Connection(conString);
SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(queryString,con);
cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("#SomeParam",someValue);
con.Open();
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
con.Close();
}
I use this template almost every class I create,(usually to get,update,insert data from/into a datatable).
Well, is it harmful?
The short answer is yes - it is inefficient to constantly open and close connections. Opening an actual connection is a very expensive process and managing a connection for the lifetime of its need (which usually is the lifetime of the application or process using it) is fraught with errors.
That is why connection pooling was introduced a long time ago. There is a layer beneath your application that will manage the physical opening/closing of connections in a more efficient way. This also helps prevent the chances that an open connection is lost and continues to stay open (which causes lots of problems). By default pooling is enabled so you don't need to do anything to use it.
With pooling - you write code to open a connection and use it for the duration of a particular section of code and then close it. If the connection pool has an open but unused connection, it will reuse it rather than open a new one. When you close the connection, that simply returns the connection to the pool and makes it available to the next open attempt. You should also get familiar with the c# using statement.

SQL timeout on last connection

I have a weird issue. I have a C# application that makes multiple connections to SQL (7 in total). Everything had been working fine for a while and then all of the sudden, SQL times out on the last connection. That connection is pretty simple
public static void APP()
{
using (SqlConnection conn7 = new SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["Connect"].ConnectionString))
{
conn7.Open();
SqlCommand cmd7 = new SqlCommand("sp_proc", conn7);
cmd7.CommandType = System.Data.CommandType.StoredProcedure;
cmd7.ExecuteNonQuery();
conn7.Close();
}
}
My connection string looks like this.
add name="Connect" connectionString="Data Source=Server; Initial Catalog=DB; User ID=User; Password=password" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient"
I am doing a using on each one and I am closing each connection at the end of each class. Has anyone seen anything like this happen? Do I have too many connections?
I run each class in order from Main.
If it is timing out, there are 3 likely scenarios:
sp_proc is simply taking too long to run; you'll need to address the code
there is some kind of locking that is making it impossible to complete (perhaps an open transaction on a competing SPID that has touched the same data and taken conflicting locks)
there is some unrelated server load happening at the same time that is making it run too slow (this is unlikely to be the issue if it happens reliably)
I would recommend adding
cmd7.CommandTimeout = 6000
the time out is measured in seconds so put a time out that is acceptable for the users of the application,
I'd recommend this for all your SQL connections too just as a standard this way you should always have sufficient time to get the data.
one thing you might want to do is run a trace \ sql profile on the database that youre running against and also check for locking of some kind.
If this is timing out, I would think that there is a process that is being suspended or a lock of some kind somewhere

SqlConnection vs Sql Session. Do their lifetimes coincide?

I want to apply some sql-session level settings for certain processes in my c# app.
For instance, I want to set DEADLOCK_PRIORITY for some background processes to LOW.
The questions are:
If I open a new sql connection, does that start a new sql-session?
Will the sql-session live until the connection is closed? If I apply my settings right after the SqlConnection is opened, will they be valid for all queries executed in context of that same SqlConnection?
What about connection pooling? Is this possible that my SET DEADLOCK_PRIORITY LOW setting will be reused by other processes in my system (which I don't want to) because the SqlConnection is not actually closed ( asp.net connection pooling decides to reuse it).
Thank you!
ADO.NET executes sp_reset_connection when you take a SqlConnection from the pool (after having closed it so that it gets returned to the pool). According to What does "exec sp_reset_connection" mean in Sql Server Profiler? all SET options are being reset. That would include DEADLOCK_PRIORITY.
I would still suggest that you write a tiny test program to confirm this. ADO.NET session pooling is not perfect, for example it does not reset the ISOLATION LEVEL and does not rollback transactions when closing.

"open/close" SqlConnection or keep open?

I have my business-logic implemented in simple static classes with static methods. Each of these methods opens/closes SQL connection when called:
public static void DoSomething()
{
using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection("..."))
{
connection.Open();
// ...
connection.Close();
}
}
But I think passing the connection object around and avoiding opening and closing a connection saves performance. I made some tests long time ago with OleDbConnection class (not sure about SqlConnection), and it definitely helped to work like this (as far as I remember):
//pass around the connection object into the method
public static void DoSomething(SqlConnection connection)
{
bool openConn = (connection.State == ConnectionState.Open);
if (!openConn)
{
connection.Open();
}
// ....
if (openConn)
{
connection.Close();
}
}
So the question is - should I choose the method (a) or method (b) ? I read in another stackoverflow question that connection pooling saved performance for me, I don't have to bother at all...
PS. It's an ASP.NET app - connections exist only during a web-request. Not a win-app or service.
Stick to option a.
The connection pooling is your friend.
Use Method (a), every time. When you start scaling your application, the logic that deals with the state will become a real pain if you do not.
Connection pooling does what it says on the tin. Just think of what happens when the application scales, and how hard would it be to manually manage the connection open/close state. The connection pool does a fine job of automatically handling this. If you're worried about performance think about some sort of memory cache mechanism so that nothing gets blocked.
Always close connections as soon as you are done with them, so they underlying database connection can go back into the pool and be available for other callers. Connection pooling is pretty well optimised, so there's no noticeable penalty for doing so. The advice is basically the same as for transactions - keep them short and close when you're done.
It gets more complicated if you're running into MSDTC issues by using a single transaction around code that uses multiple connections, in which case you actually do have to share the connection object and only close it once the transaction is done with.
However you're doing things by hand here, so you might want to investigate tools that manage connections for you, like DataSets, Linq to SQL, Entity Framework or NHibernate.
Disclaimer: I know this is old, but I found an easy way to demonstrate this fact, so I'm putting in my two cents worth.
If you're having trouble believing that the pooling is really going to be faster, then give this a try:
Add the following somewhere:
using System.Diagnostics;
public static class TestExtensions
{
public static void TimedOpen(this SqlConnection conn)
{
Stopwatch sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
conn.Open();
Console.WriteLine(sw.Elapsed);
}
}
Now replace all calls to Open() with TimedOpen() and run your program. Now, for each distinct connection string you have, the console (output) window will have a single long running open, and a bunch of very fast opens.
If you want to label them you can add new StackTrace(true).GetFrame(1) + to the call to WriteLine.
There are distinctions between physical and logical connections. DbConnection is a kind of logical connection and it uses underlying physical connection to Oracle. Closing/opening DbConnection doesn't affect your performance, but makes your code clean and stable - connection leaks are impossible in this case.
Also you should remember about cases when there are limitations for parallel connections on db server - taking that into account it is necessary to make your connections very short.
Connection pool frees you from connection state checking - just open, use and immediately close them.
Normally you should keep one connect for each transaction(no parallel computes)
e.g when user execute charge action, your application need find user's balance first and update it, they should use same connection.
Even if ado.net has its connection pool, dispatching connection cost is very low, but reuse connection is more better choice.
Why not keep only one connection in application
Because the connection is blocking when you execute some query or command,
so that means your application is only doing one db operation at sametime,
how poor performance it is.
One more issue is that your application will always have a connection even though your user is just open it but no operations.If there are many user open your application, db server will cost all of its connection source in soon while your users have not did anything.

Working With ODP.NET Asynchronously

Hay,
My system needs to execute several major SQL`s (on Oracle DB) using the same connection (asynchronous).
What`s the best practice for this issue?
1. open single connection and execute every SQL statement on different thread (does it thread safe?)
2. create new connection and “open + close” it for every SQL statement
Thanks,
Hec
We've been calling Oracle SQL statements on multiple threads, and this is probably best, if your DB can handle the load and won't be the bottleneck anyway. HOWEVER, I think you need to create the connection on the thread that will be issuing the SQL command. You can (and probably should) also use connection pooling so your connections will be reused, rather than being re-established (and Oracle seems to be fine with re-using these from one thread to another).

Categories