I am writing this to find out why the code below is resulting in failed setup for supersocket server.
var appServer = new AppServer();
if (!appServer.Setup(8080)){
MessageBox.Show("Failed!");
}
I have added rule in firewall that allows port 8080 since my firewall is enabled by company IT. Don't know why the setup fails. Is there an explanation?
In testing this locally in a console application using the following (requires NuGet packages SuperSocket and SuperSocket.Engine;
namespace SupersocketTest
{
using System;
using SuperSocket.SocketBase;
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var server = new AppServer();
bool success = server.Setup(8080);
Console.WriteLine($"Server setup: {success}");
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
}
The operation completes successfully.
Looking at the code online, the underlying connection is still Socket based (as the name of the package implies). As such, it's subject to all the rules around how sockets work normally in .NET.
Things that can cause a Socket fail to be set up are (but not limited to)
The socket is in use
The socket has been closed
The OS has run out of available sockets (not likely but technically possible)
Without more detail on the exception you're getting I can only guess but I suspect that the socket is in use as 8080 is a common alternative to 80 that another application could be using.
A. Description
I am using ZeroMQ monitor and I find that it works when logic disconnection but does not work when network broken down (unplug my cable).
For example:
I launch client app on an android pad, then launch a server app on my windows laptop. They are connected through a router with cables.
Everything will be OK with monitor if I close or open either client app or server app manually. Namely, the monitor on both sides can receive a 'Connect' or an 'Accept' and a 'Disconnect' event.
But If I unplug cable on the server side, while the client and server are connected and running, the monitors on both sides can not detect the 'Disconnect' event.
Is the monitor designed like this?
If so, are there any solutions to detect network broken down ( a cable unplug event ) except heartbeats?
If not, how to use the ZeroMQ's original monitor mechanism to solve this problem? Can a setTCPKeepAlive() interface be useful?
B. System environment
My scenario is as below.
Client
OS: Android, running on a pad, IDE: Android studio 2.3, lib:jeromq-0.4.3
// Java Code
String monitorAddr = "inproc://client.req";
ZContext ctx = new ZContext();
ZMQ.Socket clientSocket = ctx.createSocket(ZMQ.REQ);
clientSocket.monitor(monitorAddr,ZMQ.EVENT_ALL);
// Then start a montitor thread which is implemented by my own.
Server
OS: Windows 7 ( 64 bit ), running on my laptop, IDE: VS2013, lib: Clrzmq4
// C# Code
const string MonitorEndpoint = "inproc://server.rep";
var ctx = new ZContext();
var serverSocket = new ZSocket(ctx,ZSocketType.REP);
ZError error;
// Create serverSocket pair socket
if (!serverSocket.Monitor(MonitorEndpoint, ZMonitorEvents.AllEvents, out error))
{
if (error == ZError.ETERM)
return ; // Interrupted
throw new ZException(error);
}
// Create a monitor
ZMonitor _monitor = ZMonitor.Create(ctx, MonitorEndpoint);
_monitor.AllEvents += _monitor_AllEvents;
_monitor.Start();
AFAIK there is no built in heartbeat within ZeroMQ. I know there was some discussion on the topic within the ZMQ community some years ago, and that discussion may still be going on.
It is comparatively simple to incorporate your own heartbeat messaging in your application's use of ZeroMQ, especially if you use something like Google Protocol Buffers to encode different message types; the heartbeat is just another message.
Doing heartbeats in your application (rather than relying on some inbuilt mechanism) is ultimately more flexible; you can choose the heartbeat rate, you can choose what to do if the heartbeat fails, you can decide when heartbeating is important and not important, etc.
Consider heartbeats within a PUB/SUB pattern; it's a bit difficult for the ZMQ authors to decide on your behalf what connection / disconnection / connection-break events matter to you. And if they do build in a mechanism, but an application developer didn't want it, then it is a waste of bandwidth.
It's far easier for the ZMQ authors to leave that kind of application architectural issue to the application author (that's you!) to deal with.
With your specific example, an unplugged network cable simply looks (so far as any software can determine) like no traffic is flowing; it's the same as the application not sending anything. ZMQ doesn't send anything if the application hasn't sent anything.
If you look at the events that the socket monitor can report on, they're all the consequence of something flowing over the network connection, or something done to the socket by the application.
Trying to go lower than ZMQ protocol itself and access the TCP connection that specific ZeroMQ sockets use (while others do not) doesn't sound like a good idea; it would required to break encapsulation in multiple classes.
The answer #bazza gave in 2017 was entirely correct at the time.
However, newer versions of ZMQ (specifically ZMTP) include an heartbeat functionality.
Check ZMQ documentation for
socketOpt
Java functions
name
purpose
ZMQ_HEARTBEAT_IVL
get/setHeartbeatLvl()
heartbeat interval
milliseconds between ZMPT PINGs
ZMQ_HEARTBEAT_TIMEOUT
get/setHeartbeatTimeout()
local heartbeat timeout
how long the local socket waits between received packets until it considers the connection timed out
ZMQ_HEARTBEAT_TTL
get/setHeartbeatTtl()
remote heartbeat timeout
if and when remote side shall consider the connection timed out
ZMQ_HEARTBEAT_CONTEXT is still in draft state as of 2022. It is supposed to send an byte[] context with every ping.
Now, by design of ZMQ, quoting from chapter 2 of its documentation,
The network connection itself happens in the background, and ZeroMQ
will automatically reconnect if the network connection is broken
(e.g., if the peer disappears and then comes back).
Thus, answering your main question, I'd expect the monitor to give you ZMQ_EVENT_CONNECT_RETRIED / ZMQ_EVENT_CONNECTED events after the underlying connection was detected as disrupted.
So today I tried to create a SFtpconnection to a remote host through the SSHNet API. Tests in a quick and dirty console application worked quite fine but when referencing the the builded DLL in the project where the functionality should be added, the DLL was throwing exceptions.
Debugging the project, the exception turned out to be on the socket connect (or begin connect function):
A socket operation encountered a dead network.
As stated before, the connection in another project to exactly the same server with the same parameters worked just fine.
I checked Project/Solution configurations. Checked the server name and other parameters carefully and made a testcase that in the specific project always fails (no matter what server) but WORKS in (new) projects:
var ep = new IPEndPoint(IPAddress.Parse(IPAdres),Port);
var sock = new Socket(ep.AddressFamily, SocketType.Stream, ProtocolType.Tcp);
sock.SetSocketOption(SocketOptionLevel.Tcp, SocketOptionName.NoDelay, true);
// Connect socket with specified timeout
var connectResult = sock.BeginConnect(ep, null, null);
if (!connectResult.AsyncWaitHandle.WaitOne(180, false))
{
throw new Exception("Timeout");
}
sock.EndConnect(connectResult);
But this doesn't seem like a strange example.
Does anyone has experience with this kind of error in a project specific way? Is there anything I'm missing?
Thanks,
Maybe the library was using the wrong NIC?
I encountered this exception on a Windows CE device with .net CF 2.0. In my case I was creating a socket for the GPRS interface, but the device was connected via Ethernet.
I've installed memcached on Windows as a service, listening on the default port 11211. I know this works, because I can telnet to the server and carry out get / set commands without any problems.
I've then downloaded the Enyim Memcached client (Enyim.Caching.dll, version 2.7) and written a simple test program:
var mcc = new MemcachedClientConfiguration();
mcc.AddServer("127.0.0.1:11211");
mcc.SocketPool.ReceiveTimeout = new TimeSpan(0, 0, 10);
mcc.SocketPool.ConnectionTimeout = new TimeSpan(0, 0, 10);
mcc.SocketPool.DeadTimeout = new TimeSpan(0, 0, 20);
using (MemcachedClient client = new MemcachedClient(mcc))
{
client.Store(StoreMode.Set, "enyimtest", "test value");
Console.WriteLine(client.Get<string>("enyimtest"));
}
I know this connects to my server correctly, as calling the stats command in telnet shows an increase in the number of connections. However, it doesn't call get or set, as the cmd_get and cmd_set stats counters remain constant. The call to client.Get returns null.
The program does not error in any way. Does anyone know what could prevent the Enyim client from working in this situation?
EDIT:
Looks like this is caused by a timeout. Afer configuring log4net to capture the client's logging output, I found it contained the following (in addition to other stack trace items):
2010-12-17 14:26:37,579 [1] ERROR Enyim.Caching.Memcached.MemcachedNode [(null)] - System.IO.IOException: Failed to read from the socket '172.23.0.100:11211'. Error: TimedOut
2010-12-17 14:26:37,626 [1] WARN Enyim.Caching.Memcached.MemcachedNode.InternalPoolImpl [(null)] - Marking node 172.23.0.100:11211 as dead
I still don't understand why it is timing out though?
After an hour or so of playing around, I've found the answer. I used Wireshark to look at the network traffic to and from the server. I noticed that when using the Enyim client, the messages looked nothing like those when using telnet. In particular, I couldn't read the protocol commands going across the wire when using the Enyim client.
Therefore, I concluded that the Enyim client was using a different protocol.
A second protocol was added to the memcached server in version 1.4, which is the binary protocol. Prior to that, only the text protocol was supported. The latest Windows binary I can find for memcached is the one from Jellycan, and it is only version 1.2.6.
The Enyim client is configured to use the Binary protocol by default, which was just ignored by my server as it couldn't be understood.
I added the following line to my test program, and things started working immediately:
mcc.Protocol = MemcachedProtocol.Text;
I ran into the same issue above. I too struggled to find a newer version of memcached for Windows, but did find one eventually.
I've put links to the latest binaries along with other useful resources here.
I am working with a commercial application which is throwing a SocketException with the message,
An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host
This happens with a socket connection between client and server. The connection is alive and well, and heaps of data is being transferred, but it then becomes disconnected out of nowhere.
Has anybody seen this before? What could the causes be? I can kind of guess a few causes, but also is there any way to add more into this code to work out what the cause could be?
Any comments / ideas are welcome.
... The latest ...
I have some logging from some .NET tracing,
System.Net.Sockets Verbose: 0 : [8188] Socket#30180123::Send() DateTime=2010-04-07T20:49:48.6317500Z
System.Net.Sockets Error: 0 : [8188] Exception in the Socket#30180123::Send - An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host DateTime=2010-04-07T20:49:48.6317500Z
System.Net.Sockets Verbose: 0 : [8188] Exiting Socket#30180123::Send() -> 0#0
Based on other parts of the logging I have seen the fact that it says 0#0 means a packet of 0 bytes length is being sent. But what does that really mean?
One of two possibilities is occurring, and I am not sure which,
The connection is being closed, but data is then being written to the socket, thus creating the exception above. The 0#0 simply means that nothing was sent because the socket was already closed.
The connection is still open, and a packet of zero bytes is being sent (i.e. the code has a bug) and the 0#0 means that a packet of zero bytes is trying to be sent.
What do you reckon? It might be inconclusive I guess, but perhaps someone else has seen this kind of thing?
This generally means that the remote side closed the connection (usually by sending a TCP/IP RST packet). If you're working with a third-party application, the likely causes are:
You are sending malformed data to the application (which could include sending an HTTPS request to an HTTP server)
The network link between the client and server is going down for some reason
You have triggered a bug in the third-party application that caused it to crash
The third-party application has exhausted system resources
It's likely that the first case is what's happening.
You can fire up Wireshark to see exactly what is happening on the wire to narrow down the problem.
Without more specific information, it's unlikely that anyone here can really help you much.
Using TLS 1.2 solved this error.
You can force your application using TLS 1.2 with this (make sure to execute it before calling your service):
ServicePointManager.SecurityProtocol = SecurityProtocolType.Tls12
Another solution :
Enable strong cryptography in your local machine or server in order to use TLS1.2 because by default it is disabled so only TLS1.0 is used.
To enable strong cryptography , execute these commande in PowerShell with admin privileges :
Set-ItemProperty -Path 'HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\.NetFramework\v4.0.30319' -Name 'SchUseStrongCrypto' -Value '1' -Type DWord
Set-ItemProperty -Path 'HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\.NetFramework\v4.0.30319' -Name 'SchUseStrongCrypto' -Value '1' -Type DWord
You need to reboot your computer for these changes to take effect.
This is not a bug in your code. It is coming from .Net's Socket implementation. If you use the overloaded implementation of EndReceive as below you will not get this exception.
SocketError errorCode;
int nBytesRec = socket.EndReceive(ar, out errorCode);
if (errorCode != SocketError.Success)
{
nBytesRec = 0;
}
Had the same bug. Actually worked in case the traffic was sent using some proxy (fiddler in my case). Updated .NET framework from 4.5.2 to >=4.6 and now everything works fine. The actual request was:
new WebClient().DownloadData("URL");
The exception was:
SocketException: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the
remote host
Simple solution for this common annoying issue:
Just go to your ".context.cs" file (located under ".context.tt" which located under your "*.edmx" file).
Then, add this line to your constructor:
public DBEntities()
: base("name=DBEntities")
{
this.Configuration.ProxyCreationEnabled = false; // ADD THIS LINE!
}
I've got this exception because of circular reference in entity.In entity that look like
public class Catalog
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int ParentId { get; set; }
public Catalog Parent { get; set; }
public ICollection<Catalog> ChildCatalogs { get; set; }
}
I added [IgnoreDataMemberAttribute] to the Parent property. And that solved the problem.
If Running In A .Net 4.5.2 Service
For me the issue was compounded because the call was running in a .Net 4.5.2 service. I followed #willmaz suggestion but got a new error.
In running the service with logging turned on, I viewed the handshaking with the target site would initiate ok (and send the bearer token) but on the following step to process the Post call, it would seem to drop the auth token and the site would reply with Unauthorized.
Solution
It turned out that the service pool credentials did not have rights to change TLS (?) and when I put in my local admin account into the pool, it all worked.
I had the same issue and managed to resolve it eventually. In my case, the port that the client sends the request to did not have a SSL cert binding to it. So I fixed the issue by binding a SSL cert to the port on the server side. Once that was done, this exception went away.
For anyone getting this exception while reading data from the stream, this may help. I was getting this exception when reading the HttpResponseMessage in a loop like this:
using (var remoteStream = await response.Content.ReadAsStreamAsync())
using (var content = File.Create(DownloadPath))
{
var buffer = new byte[1024];
int read;
while ((read = await remoteStream.ReadAsync(buffer, 0, buffer.Length)) != 0)
{
await content.WriteAsync(buffer, 0, read);
await content.FlushAsync();
}
}
After some time I found out the culprit was the buffer size, which was too small and didn't play well with my weak Azure instance. What helped was to change the code to:
using (Stream remoteStream = await response.Content.ReadAsStreamAsync())
using (FileStream content = File.Create(DownloadPath))
{
await remoteStream.CopyToAsync(content);
}
CopyTo() method has a default buffer size of 81920. The bigger buffer sped up the process and the errors stopped immediately, most likely because the overall download speeds increased. But why would download speed matter in preventing this error?
It is possible that you get disconnected from the server because the download speeds drop below minimum threshold the server is configured to allow. For example, in case the application you are downloading the file from is hosted on IIS, it can be a problem with http.sys configuration:
"Http.sys is the http protocol stack that IIS uses to perform http communication with clients. It has a timer called MinBytesPerSecond that is responsible for killing a connection if its transfer rate drops below some kb/sec threshold. By default, that threshold is set to 240 kb/sec."
The issue is described in this old blogpost from TFS development team and concerns IIS specifically, but may point you in a right direction. It also mentions an old bug related to this http.sys attribute: link
In case you are using Azure app services and increasing the buffer size does not eliminate the problem, try to scale up your machine as well. You will be allocated more resources including connection bandwidth.
I got the same issue while using .NET Framework 4.5. However, when I update the .NET version to 4.7.2 connection issue was resolved. Maybe this is due to SecurityProtocol support issue.
For me, it was because the app server I was trying to send email from was not added to our company's SMTP server's allowed list.
I just had to put in SMTP access request for that app server.
This is how it was added by the infrastructure team (I don't know how to do these steps myself but this is what they said they did):
1. Log into active L.B.
2. Select: Local Traffic > iRules > Data Group List
3. Select the appropriate Data Group
4. Enter the app server's IP address
5. Select: Add
6. Select: Update
7. Sync config changes
Yet another possibility for this error to occur is if you tried to connect to a third-party server with invalid credentials too many times and a system like Fail2ban is blocking your IP address.
I was trying to connect to the MQTT broker using the GO client,
broker address was given as address + port, or tcp://address:port
Example: ❌
mqtt://test.mosquitto.org
which indicates that you wish to establish an unencrypted connection.
To request MQTT over TLS use one of ssl, tls, mqtts, mqtt+ssl or tcps.
Example: ✅
mqtts://test.mosquitto.org
In my case, enable the IIS server & then restart and check again.
We are using a SpringBoot service. Our restTemplate code looks like below:
#Bean
public RestTemplate restTemplate(final RestTemplateBuilder builder) {
return builder.requestFactory(() -> {
final ConnectionPool okHttpConnectionPool =
new ConnectionPool(50, 30, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
final OkHttpClient okHttpClient =
new OkHttpClient.Builder().connectionPool(okHttpConnectionPool)
// .connectTimeout(30, TimeUnit.SECONDS)
.retryOnConnectionFailure(false).build();
return new OkHttp3ClientHttpRequestFactory(okHttpClient);
}).build();
}
All our call were failing after the ReadTimeout set for the restTemplate. We increased the time, and our issue was resolved.
This error occurred in my application with the CIP-protocol whenever I didn't Send or received data in less than 10s.
This was caused by the use of the forward open method. You can avoid this by working with an other method, or to install an update rate of less the 10s that maintain your forward-open-connection.