I'm working on a module for a CMS. This module is distributed as a class library DLL.
I have several utility libraries I'd like to use in this module. Is there anyway I can link these libraries statically so I won't have to distribute several DLL's (thereby distributing my utility libraries separately)?
I would like to have only one DLL.
You can merge your many DLLs with ILMERGE:
http://research.microsoft.com/~mbarnett/ILMerge.aspx
Haven't tried it myself. Hope it helps.
Download here:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=22914587-B4AD-4EAE-87CF-B14AE6A939B0&displaylang=en
Brief Description (from download-page)
ILMerge is a utility for merging multiple .NET assemblies into a single .NET assembly. It works on executables and DLLs alike and comes with several options for controlling the processing and format of the output. See the accompanying documentation for details.
If you don't want to use ILMerge, see this page:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/microsoft_press/archive/2010/02/03/jeffrey-richter-excerpt-2-from-clr-via-c-third-edition.aspx
editor's note: Jeffrey Richter advices to put your dlls into exe file as resources (For each DLL file you add, display its properties and change its “Build Action” to “Embedded Resource.”). Then a custom class loader is needed to make the executable work (At runtime, the CLR won’t be able to find the dependent DLL assemblies, which is a problem. To fix this, when your application initializes, register a callback method with the AppDomain’s ResolveAssembly event).
Be sure to change the resourceName string to point to your actual resources. (e.g. change AssemblyLoadingAndReflection to your project name.)
The short answer for this is no!
You can not link in a dll during compilation.
I don't know if there is some subtle way to do this, but you would probably have to distribute the dlls along with your cms.
The best way to do this is to make some kind of re-distributable.
Related
Using C# .NET with COM interop in VS2012, I'm developing a common library for use in several other programs. To keep the integration simple, I would like to keep the entire library down to one DLL. One of the features of this library is localization. It has string tables with messages in multiple languages, each language having it's own ResX file.
Presently, a MyLibrary.resources.dll is being created for each language and placed in its own subdirectory, like this:
Release\MyLibrary.dll
Release\ja\MyLibrary.resources.dll
Release\fr\MyLibrary.resources.dll
What I want to see is just this:
Release\MyLibrary.dll
Here are my current ResX settings.
I have tried using ResXFileCodeGenerator and GlobalResourceProxyGenerator for the "Custom Tool" generators. I also tried a few options for "Build Action" including Compile, but so far only Embedded Resource works. Other than that I'm not sure what else to try or if I'm on the right track. There aren't really that many settings to work with.
I am aware that there are a variety of tools that may work to do this after building the DLL, but I'm looking for a compile-time solution. Third party tools are challenging from a maintenance standpoint -- I will not be the only one updating this library.
There are two main ways of embedding libraries into a single DLL or executable. The first uses ILMerge, combines all assemblies as if it was a single assembly; the second is dynamically loading dependencies from embedded resource(s) at runtime (offers a bit more flexibility, but has its own set of pros and cons). The sample project is intended to be portable (the only dependency is Powershell -- all required libraries are included in the project).
It's important to know the difference between the two techniques. I've written articles outlining both approaches with a sample project on github for both approaches.
Articles:
Assembly Loading: Combine Assemblies & Executables Using ilMerge
AND
Assembly Loading: Dynamic Assembly Loading & Compression
Sample Project:
Application Demonstrating Both ILMerge and Runtime Loading of Embedded Assemblies
If you have any questions regarding either approach, don't hesitate to get in touch. I'll gladly refine the posts based on your feedback.
I have a c++/CLI library that is in turn calling a c# library. That is fine, it is linking implicitly and all is good with the world. But for various reasons the libraries are not getting quite the prefect treatment by our automated build process, and the libraries are not finding each other unless we move the libraries to locations that we would rather not have them in, and would rather not fold into our build process.
It is suggested to me that we/I could write a post-build event that uses XCOPY. but lets say we don't want to do that.
Another suggestion is to explicitly load the dll. Windows says that to link explicitly "Applications must make a function call to explicitly load the DLL at run time." The problem is that Microsoft's example is not enough for my small mind to understand how to proceed with this idea. Worse, the only example I could find is out of date. Perhaps I am not using the right search terms but I am having difficulty finding more about it with google.
How do we explicitly Link a c++/Cli Library to a C# .dll?
----edit
OK, How do we explicitly Link a C++/CLI code, which exports a library using __declspec(), to a C# .dll.
There is no such thing as a "C++/CLI library", only assemblies are supported. There is no explicit or implicit linking, binding always happens at runtime. Assemblies are found at runtime by the CLR, the rules it uses to locate them are described in detail in the MSDN library.
Copying all dependencies into the same directory as the EXE is the sane way to go about it while you are developing the code. Well supported by build system, the C# and C++ rules are however different. C++ projects build to the solution's Debug directory, C# projects build to the EXE project's bin\Debug directory. So yes, altering a C++ project's Output Directory setting or copying files with a post build event is usually required to get everything together.
Is there a way to keep any DLLs needed for my Visual C# program (such as SQLite) inside the actual EXE so it doesn't require the files to be present?
If not, can anyone show me how to make a wrapper for my program (independent of .NET, so maybe C++?) to copy/load required files to the working directory before starting the program itself.
What I intend to end up with is a single EXE file that can be deployed anywhere and set itself up like a transformer. All it requires is the following criteria:
SQLite is present
OpenHardwareMonitorLib is present
.NET 2.0 is installed (if not, offer install with redistributable package)
Microsoft provide a tool for merging DLLs. It's called ILMerge.
It doesn't always work, I believe certain things can cause problems. But it's definitely the easier option!
If the problem is redistribute only one file, you can create a "installer" exe, that unpack all your dependencies (from executable content).
If you don't want to leave all dlls in your production environment, you can merge all IL code in the main executable. you can use ILMerge (but it's not the only product that can do this)
You can merge the dependencies into the main executable. After your build completes you run an additional tool that combines the IL code into a single assembly.
ILMerge can do this but is a bit cumbersome to use.
Some (proprietary) tools can do this as well. I know of at least one obfuscator (DeepSea) that can do this. DeepSea also allows you to specify what you want to include and what types you want to expose from the resulting assembly.
Full disclosure: I know the guys that build DeepSea Obfuscator.
I guess you could embed the target assemblies as resources and then unpack them in some custom assembly resolution code?
Edit: there's an example of this here: Embedding assemblies inside another assembly
I have an application that makes use of/consumes services from a number of external .net libraries, which in turn calls certain executables. Would it be possible to integrate these into one huge executable and load them from my application to the disk as required? Resources come to mind but not sure how that is done.
Thanks,
You have several options to do that:
use ILMerge (free)
For howto see here and here
OR
use some tool like SmartAssembly (commercial)
it can embed and merge among other things (no need to change your source code)
OR
code that yourself in less than 10 lines (free but minimal source code change)
mark all needed dependencies as "embedded resource" - this way they are included in the EXE file... you need to setup an AssemblyResolve handler which at runtime reads from Resources and returns the needed DLLs to the .NET runtime...
You can use ILMerge to merge all your assemblies into a single executable file.
You can find a complete example at CodeProject.
We have a dll file; let's say X.DLL.
We are now writing another DLL, let's say "A.DLL" that uses some (very few) of the functions of X.DLL. We have no access to source code of X.DLL. Also, we don't want to give our clients X.DLL along with A.DLL.
Instead, we want to encapsulate X.DLL within A.DLL, so that distributing A.DLL will suffice.
Is it something possible?
Your help is appreciated.
Novice Coder
ILMerge
ILMerge is a utility for merging
multiple .NET assemblies into a single
.NET assembly. It works on executables
and DLLs alike and comes with several
options for controlling the processing
and format of the output. See the
accompanying documentation for
details.
You tagged your question with c#.
If these are managed assembly DLL's, which they will be if the code is c#, then you can do exactly what you want with ILMerge.
copy source code from x.dll to a.dll with required functions.
or split x.dll to two dll's
It is impossible to encapsulate one dll into another.
A way out may be if you can obtain a lib from the X.DLL vendors, and statically link to it with your code.
A hack out may be carrying the X.DLL as a resource inside you dll, then unpack and load in in the runtime.