I'm setting up a WCF service. The service has to use transport security over https and I need to use some kind of authentication to prevent unwanted usage.
Digging in to WCF theory has disapointed me so far.
What I have found out so far is that I can use UserName authentication with transport security. But then I will need a certificate to secure the message.
And this makes it difficult to consume with most .NET languages.
I am surprised that I cannot find any good information on how to authenticate a user with wcf without message security?
What I would like is that the client passes username and password in some way to my service.
And for the record. The service will be using transport security.
To break it down:
How can I implement authentication without limiting interoperability?
Is WCF services so cumbersome that I either have to use a completely open service. And use IP filtering or VPN to restrict access?
UPDATE:
Since I am planing to use https with a SSL sertificate, will security mode "TransportWithMessageCredential" be the solution for me?
The only way to get REAL security IS to use digital certificates.
See my own question on this topic for details.
TransportWithMessageCredential (AKA mixed-mode security) is indeed what you are looking for.
Related
We are working on a payment processing application and want to make sure we are doing CRL/OCSP checks when establishing secure connections (we will be initiating a TLS 1.1 session with a server). I would think that .NET would do this for us, but I'm not able to find any information in this regard.
Does .NET do this auto-magically?
Are there any settings to control how it works?
Please provide links to documentation that I cannot seem to find.
If it does not do this for us. Is there a 'best-practice' method for performing the checks, such as the X509Certificate2.Verify Method?
Thank you!
yes, by default WCF client do check server certificate to determine if it is valid for requested usage and is not revoked.
yes, you can control certificate validation behavior. These threads discuss the subject:
One: WCF, REST, SSL, Client, custom certificate validation
Two: Custom WCF client certificate over ssl validation
The best link I know of is this: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa702579.aspx
According to that link, when using HTTPS, WCF checks the chain trust but does not check for revocation. For Message based security and for TLS over TCP, WCF does both checks according to the the client endpoint configuration.
My scenario is that I have to expose some API over WCF to third party clients. I wanna use the most secure option. Ideal solution would be making a windows account for each client in my server active directory and letting them access the service with Transport & Message security and Client credentials username. So I could ask the client to provide username and password and use windows group policy to role base authorization.
Since this is an internet facing WCF service, I'm not sure I could use windows accounts??? Should I be using database solution to manage usernames, pwd and roles?
Should be able to consume from .NET clients as well as Java clients. Third party clients could be anything that can consume soap.
What's the best security option to this scenario? VPN is not an option as this totally should go over internet. Your help is very much appreciated.
It sounds like what you need is some kind of a token based authentication setup. Microsoft seems to publish the best material in the game for this kind of thing. You can find their articles here and pick the scenario of security that most closely matches your needs:
Microsoft WCF Security
you can use ASP.net membership with form authentication for your service.
using windows authentication for internet facing service is not a good idea.
for more information:
How to: Enable the WCF Authentication Service
Windows Communication Foundation Authentication Service Overview
Securing WCF with Forms Authentication
I've got two MVC sites that use the same STS for authentication. I need to create a WCF service as part of one of the sites that allows the other site to retrieve data.
These sites could be on different machines accessible over the internet (although currently they're on the same machine) and the WCF service should only be able to be accessed from the client site. The authentication token used to log into the client site should be passed through to the WCF service.
I've been looking at the different WS-Security options available (Transport, Message etc) and it's not quite sinking in 100%, and I feel like I'd end up implementing something that seemed secure but wasn't actually secure due to a lack of understanding. Any help much appreciated.
Edit:
My first attempt was with transport layer security and setting the WCF service virtual directory with require SSL in IIS. However that left me with an error of:
"The remote certificate is invalid according to the validation procedure."
And I had no way of ensuring that a specific client was connecting to the service, only that a client had a certificate from a trusted CA. At least as far as I know. I'm probably missing something vital here.
The authentication token used to log into the client site should be
passed through to the WCF service.
In this case you should be requesting an "ActAs" token from the STS:
The WCF service should be configured as a Relying Party of the STS.
The MVC site should call back to the STS and request an ActAs token specific to the WCF service.
The MVC site uses the ActAs token to call the service.
The motivation for the complexity: Delegation, or traversing multilayer architectures
Since you mentioned WS standards:
Requesting Delegation (ActAs) Tokens using WSTrustChannel (as opposed to Configuration Madness)
Not knowing your STS its hard to say more, but Googling "ActAs token" will probably give you what you need.
I need to call a .NET SOAP webservice in a secure way. It must be secure in such a way that others can't call the WebService methods, and also it should not be possible for "the middle man" to understand the content of the messages.
The caller will also be a .NET webapplication installed on another IIS.
I can design the webservice methods as I want, so no restrictions there.
I have been researching HTTPS/SSL with certificates, but I don't know if it actually solves my problems in a good way? For example, it would be anoying if the certificates has an expiration date, although it's not a showstopper in any way.
So how would I go about this in a good way..?
Thanks for any help.
As #BrokenGlass said, SSL only encrypts the traffic between points. It doesn't handle securing individual functions from usage without authorization. Here is a good article on just such a topic using SOAP headers:
How to: Perform Custom Authentication Using SOAP Headers
This can be mixed with any form of authentication except Windows Integrated. To use Windows authentication, you'll need to have a separate library which accesses the Active Directory through the DirectoryServices namespace.
Assuming you control the infrastructure then keeping the server that is providing the web services behind a firewall so it's accessible only from the web servers and implementing IPSec should provide the necessary security.
From the software point of view, this article contains all you need to know about protecting the service interactions.
HTTPS/SSL works fine. Just make sure to renew your certificate in time to avoid warnings and messages for your client.
I need to call a .NET SOAP webservice in
a secure way. It must be secure in
such a way that others can't call the
WebService methods, and also it should
not be possible for "the middle man"
to understand the content of the
messages.
HTTPS/SSL only solves the "middle man" part of what you want to achieve. You would still need proper authentication in place on your web service. You could do this i.e by using the built in Forms authentication and providing a Login method that returns your authentication ticket.
This the situation: I have one webservice without SSL, which provides two pages for the other web application. When the user submits these pages, an XML file with private information is sent to the webservice.
How can I provide the necessary privacy protection on the XML file? Is the one certificate good enough to give the appropriate security?
I'm not sure about this one, and am in the preparation phase of a project... So need to know the involved work on this part...
As an alternative to SSL you could encrypt the file yourself using any of the algorithms available in using System.Security.Cryptography but then you have to work out a mechanism to exchange your key(s).
However by far the easiest way will be to have both web services using SSL endpoints. That will take care of all your confidentiality, integrity and identity considerations in one fell swoop.
Certificates are tied to the hostname of the server (or, with wildcard certificates, all the hosts in a domain). So if the two services are on the same host, then both can use the same certificate.
If they are not on the same host there will be no transport security on the non-SSL service unless this is added separately. WCF has support for message (or part of message) encryption.
The simplest solution is certainly to use TLS, ex-SSL (widely supported in every programming language).
There is no need to buy a certificate (and it brings no extra security, it is mostly there to make PHBs feel better): either create self-signed certificates or set up your own CA.